Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28
While mod after you last commit works great on Windows 32/64 Rpi arm It has one issue on Aarch64 (yet I don't know if it is related to your last commit or not): jullien@gcc113:~/tinycc$ uname -a Linux gcc113 3.13.0-92-generic #139-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 20:45:34 UTC 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux Test: 95_bitfields... --- 95_bitfields.expect 2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700 +++ 95_bitfields.output 2017-09-24 10:50:43.236414994 -0700 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ TEST 6 bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030002001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 12 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ TEST 6 - PACKED bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030002001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 10 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ TEST 6 - WITH ALIGN bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030002001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 12 @@ -145,5 +145,5 @@ TEST 6 - PACKED - WITH ALIGN bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030002001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 10 make[2]: *** [95_bitfields.test] Error 1 Test: 95_bitfields_ms... --- 95_bitfields_ms.expect 2017-09-24 10:50:04.240209938 -0700 +++ 95_bitfields_ms.output 2017-09-24 10:50:43.246414020 -0700 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030200100FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 20 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED bits in use : 70FF bits as set : 302001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 14 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - WITH ALIGN bits in use : 007000FF bits as set : 0030200100FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 4 20 @@ -145,5 +145,5 @@ TEST 6 - MS-BITFIELDS - PACKED - WITH ALIGN bits in use : 70FF bits as set : 302001FD0004 -values : 01 02 03 04 fffd +values : 01 02 03 04 fd align/size : 1 14 make[2]: *** [95_bitfields_ms.test] Error 1 -Original Message- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Christian Jullien Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:40 To: 'grischka'; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28 Very nice indeed. I offer you my time to test every attempts on: Windows x86/x64 Linux x86/x64 RPi arm Aarch64 -Original Message- From: grischka [mailto:gris...@gmx.de] Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:10 To: Christian JULLIEN; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28 Hi, I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for multicharacter constants: http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d4 1be3 So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing, as ___ 0.9.27 ___. What do people think? -- gr Christian JULLIEN wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months > later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. > > I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but > also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. > > I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO, > > - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release > 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation > > - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous > changes) > > - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, > more?), I will test all of them > > - Make 0.9.28 > > > Sounds reasonable to you? > > > -- > -- > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28
Very nice indeed. I offer you my time to test every attempts on: Windows x86/x64 Linux x86/x64 RPi arm Aarch64 -Original Message- From: grischka [mailto:gris...@gmx.de] Sent: dimanche 24 septembre 2017 19:10 To: Christian JULLIEN; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28 Hi, I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for multicharacter constants: http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d4 1be3 So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing, as ___ 0.9.27 ___. What do people think? -- gr Christian JULLIEN wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months > later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. > > I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but > also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. > > I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO, > > - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release > 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation > > - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous > changes) > > - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, > more?), I will test all of them > > - Make 0.9.28 > > > Sounds reasonable to you? > > > -- > -- > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28
Hi, I just pushed a patch for more complete 'long' support (which was started by Matthias Gatto for _Generic), as well as with eome improvements for multicharacter constants: http://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/commitdiff/1443039416dd02750765efde1af35e31c8d41be3 So, now, basically, I'd agree to, including the offer to undertake the necessary steps, to release this, say after some weeks of for finel testing, as ___ 0.9.27 ___. What do people think? -- gr Christian JULLIEN wrote: Hi all, Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but also see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 IMHO, - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes) - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), I will test all of them - Make 0.9.28 Sounds reasonable to you? ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28
Yes please! On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:37 AM, David Mertens wrote: > +1 > > David > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Christian JULLIEN wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months >> later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. >> >> I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but also >> see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. >> >> I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 >> >> >> IMHO, >> >> - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release >> 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation >> >> - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes) >> >> - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), I >> will test all of them >> >> - Make 0.9.28 >> >> >> Sounds reasonable to you? >> >> >> ___ >> Tinycc-devel mailing list >> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >> > > > > -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > -- -Austin GPG: 14FB D7EA A041 937B ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] plans to 0.9.28
+1 David On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Christian JULLIEN wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Last December, we where close to release 0.9.28 but more than 6 months > later, I see no plans for an imminent 0.9.28 release. > > I'm fortunate to know how to build tcc on the many machines I use but also > see many users trying to use a very old 0.9.27 version. > > I think it's time to release 0.9.28 and start new dev. on 0.9.29 > > > IMHO, > > - we should decide what we really want to implement before we release > 0.9.28 and propose an ETA for implementation > > - enter a bug fix, validation cycle (no new feature or gratuitous changes) > > - check all ports (Windows 32/64, Linux x86, x64, arm, Aarch64, more?), I > will test all of them > > - Make 0.9.28 > > > Sounds reasonable to you? > > ___ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
