Re:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Since 4.0.2 is already released, shouldn't this be tagged 4.0.3b2 ? Reply Separator Subject:[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release Author: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 1/16/2002 3:10 PM Hi, I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot The release process will be the following: - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote) - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in) - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update the binaries in the main Tomcat tree - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp - Build and upload the RPMs Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the JK developers :) Thanks, Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. This email message has been swept by a virus software product for the presence of computer viruses. * -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: [...] ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot -bip -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [X] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot The release process will be the following: - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote) Why not doing it now? - I have only fixed things in j-t-c - I will port back the _change_ in TC to j-t-c. - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in) - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update the binaries in the main Tomcat tree - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp - Build and upload the RPMs Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the JK developers :) Thanks, Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Remy Maucherat wrote: I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff. PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
+1 - Original Message - From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff. PS: Since I'll have to works on RPM, could you send us early annoucement of source tarball availability to make me sure that everything works fine to avoid the problem I got with TC 4.0.1 with incorrect gif and empty htmls -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 if the load balancing code gets in. -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will not work in 4.0.2 ). I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to make sure it gets in before the release ) Done. There are dependencies of the new Java JK components for Tomcat 4 with some Tomcat 3 components which are not yet in tomcat-util, like util.net and the PoolTcpConnector. It's fine to use them, but they should be in j-t-c/util. The build process shouldn't reference the utils which are from the TC 3 tree anymore. In the meantime, I removed the new stuff from the build to avoid possible problems. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: ballot [X] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: ballot [X] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot The release process will be the following: - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote) - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in) - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update the binaries in the main Tomcat tree - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp - Build and upload the RPMs Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the JK developers :) Thanks, Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andy Armstrong, Tagish -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
ballot [X] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
Is there a plan to build native webapp for Apache 2.0 as well as 1.3? ballot [ ] +1 Make the release [X ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: /ballot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
[X] +1 Make the release [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help [ ] -0 Bad idea [ ] -1 No, because: Amy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
+1 if the load balancing code gets in. -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will not work in 4.0.2 ). Costin The release process will be the following: - Tag j-t-c/webapp with tomcat_402_b2 - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote) - Tag j-t-c/jk with tomcat_402_b2 (it's fine to also tag it with something else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in) - Tag j-t-c/util with tomcat_402_b2 - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update the binaries in the main Tomcat tree - Tag the Tomcat tree with tomcat_402_b2 - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp - Build and upload the RPMs Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the JK developers :) Thanks, Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
+1 if the load balancing code gets in. -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will not work in 4.0.2 ). I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 if the load balancing code gets in. -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will not work in 4.0.2 ). I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ? Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to make sure it gets in before the release ) Thanks, Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]