Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Tom W8JI
 This MRFE6VP61K25H solid state device is catching on fast in amateur radio 
 circles. HF Amps next.

 http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf


Here is the tough time with this, because I'm sure most people take device 
manufacturer's data at surface value. All of this stuff, to this point of 
time, is mostly vaporware.

Here are the worries:

1.) While manufacturer's make wild claims about device VSWR tolerance, those 
specs are really just creative marketing fantasy. A 2:1 SWR would instantly 
blow the device up if peak voltage breakdown is exceeded, or over a short 
period of time if heat limits in the junction are exceeded. If you do not 
see SWR fault protection, and there are no current limits, you can bet 
devices will fail with some conditions of mismatch.

Their popular U-tube video is at pulsed service with a power limited supply. 
I can do the same thing with MRF150's, and actually designed a medical 
device that ran 1000 watts of peak output power on two MRF150's, without SWR 
protection, on 27.120 MHz. The reason it lived is the power supply would 
barely supply 100 watts average power, and it was pulsed duty cycle with 
very low Q filters and matching.

2.) No SSB IMD spec's.

3.) All public data appears to be matched narrow-band class-C pulsed 
service.

4.) Getting heat out of a small surface transfer area at high power and high 
duty cycles is a major problem.

There was a good marketing presentation by the device manufacturer, but 
nothing indicates it is anything special for HF or linear service, or going 
to catch on fast.

73 Tom 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Bruce
Hi Tom,

The new Harris Flexiva 10 KW FM band (not pulse)  stereo transmitter is not 
having a heat problem with air cooling, in a reasonably small package . It 
has individual modules that can be hot switched. Will have more info when we 
install it next few weeks. It's going up on a mountain with no automobile/ 
truck road, so transporting takes time.

 I only meant that it was catching on fast in general. A French design is 
also making a 2 meter amp.

A pair of the devices, with an built in ALC, to keep the output below the 
non linear portion could could be one approach to a 1.5 KW Amp..

The Harris Salesman, Engineer, Ham, said there was already  a W2  using a 
pair, but had a small water cooled system.

73
Bruce







 This MRFE6VP61K25H solid state device is catching on fast in amateur 
 radio
 circles. HF Amps next.

 http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf


 Here is the tough time with this, because I'm sure most people take device
 manufacturer's data at surface value. All of this stuff, to this point of
 time, is mostly vaporware.

 Here are the worries:

 1.) While manufacturer's make wild claims about device VSWR tolerance, 
 those
 specs are really just creative marketing fantasy. A 2:1 SWR would 
 instantly
 blow the device up if peak voltage breakdown is exceeded, or over a short
 period of time if heat limits in the junction are exceeded. If you do not
 see SWR fault protection, and there are no current limits, you can bet
 devices will fail with some conditions of mismatch.

 Their popular U-tube video is at pulsed service with a power limited 
 supply.
 I can do the same thing with MRF150's, and actually designed a medical
 device that ran 1000 watts of peak output power on two MRF150's, without 
 SWR
 protection, on 27.120 MHz. The reason it lived is the power supply would
 barely supply 100 watts average power, and it was pulsed duty cycle with
 very low Q filters and matching.

 2.) No SSB IMD spec's.

 3.) All public data appears to be matched narrow-band class-C pulsed
 service.

 4.) Getting heat out of a small surface transfer area at high power and 
 high
 duty cycles is a major problem.

 There was a good marketing presentation by the device manufacturer, but
 nothing indicates it is anything special for HF or linear service, or 
 going
 to catch on fast.

 73 Tom

 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Harris 10 KW FM transmitter

2012-07-07 Thread Bruce
Info:

Product # HARFAX10KCD

Product description:  Harris FAX10CD transmitter

73
Bruce-K1FZ
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

On 7/7/2012 1:18 PM, Bruce wrote:
 Hi Tom,

 The new Harris Flexiva 10 KW FM band (not pulse)  stereo transmitter is not
 having a heat problem with air cooling, in a reasonably small package . It

The problem with starting with a saturated amplifier and then
backing off the power for linearity is that the dissipation actually
goes UP when you reduce the output power.  The maximum dissipation
occurs at something like 1/3 of maximum power.  Therefore, this FM
transmitter is not really proof that a linear amplifier is practical.

I have done a lot of work with Dick Brounley's laser drivers.  He
gets up to 750 watts (continuous duty) out of a pair of MRF150's
at 81.36 MHz, just below the FM band.  Dick's design is great for
its intended application, but doesn't translate to a ham amplifier.
Furthermore, it is water cooled.  The biggest problem Dick has
thermally is cooling the ferrites in the output transformers.
He actually has to heat sink them with copper sleeves.

RF lasers are lucky to have 10% efficiency in terms of converting
RF to light.  Therfore, they are all water cooled and this makes water
cooling for Dick's amplifiers basically free.

Rick N6RK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Fw: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Bruce
Hi Rick,

Did you notice the 2 meter amplifier that the device is biased for SSB 
operation ?

 http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf

 73
Bruce-K1FZ
 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Tom W8JI
Hi Bruce,

 The new Harris Flexiva 10 KW FM band (not pulse)  stereo transmitter is 
 not
 having a heat problem with air cooling, in a reasonably small package . It
 has individual modules that can be hot switched.

I'm sure Harris did a great job. The modules can be swapped while the TX is 
on, even power supply modules, which is a nice feature. But hot or live 
swapping does not mean the modules are hot switched, as in allowed to have 
no load while amplifying. Generally a module is designed to remove power 
first when pulled, and apply power last when plugged in, which is nothing at 
all like some ham transmitting with an arcing tuner, or without a feedline.

You will also note Harris protects the modules, which is what everyone 
should do. VSWR ratings in data sheet are really useless marketing hype, 
because near full power in longer duty cycle modes, as little as a 2:1 VSWR 
can blow a device out.

My point is about Ham gear use where people are thinking they do not need to 
watch SWR or other parameters. There is little worry in a commercial 
transmitter that runs the device at 600 watts or less per device with 
adequate protection for SWR and thermal issues, and most likely current 
limiting.

We should not translate what Harris did into something with no thermal 
protection, no SWR protection, and twice the power on the device!!

 The Harris Salesman, Engineer, Ham, said there was already  a W2  using a
 pair, but had a small water cooled system.

I played with a thick copper heatsink and air cooling, but concluded it was 
too expensive, and it would be a manufacturing PITA to get the surface 
machining flat enough in production. With 1000 watts of heat in such a small 
footprint, the surface almost has to be polished flat. The copper spreader 
would have cost about $30-40, plus the aluminum heatsink would need to be 
reasonably flat all across the surface. I'm not even sure that would work 
without liquid cooling.

It makes sense hearing the W2 used liquid cooling.

At current costs for cooling and the devices, it is better to use more lower 
power devices and spread the heat around. Especially when the devices are 
just as reliable, have a history of good SSB IM performance, and cost less 
per watt.

My guess is the marketing blitz and creative specs are why we find a few 
amateur soon to be released products without any final specifications. 
They probably believed a single 1200 watt device would be linear at 1200 
watts, and would actually handle high SWR without protection. Anyone who has 
actually worked with high power RF semiconductors knows the VSWR specs are 
meaningless marketing drivel.

Like I said, I ran a pair of MRF150's in pulsed service, in deep class C, 
and they were safe and reliable at a kilowatt without any SWR protection, 
other than power supply limiting. Because they worked in pulse service deep 
class C in a low-Q system at 1000 watts without worry  doesn't mean 2x 
MRF150's would work on CW at that power, or be reliable at 200 watts CW 
without SWR and thermal protection.

Apples and oranges.

When the device price comes down a bit, or if they make a smaller device 
that allows spreading the heat around, you'll probably see the Freescale 
device in Ham gear.

73 Tom 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Fw: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
As the manual explains, the amplifier has two
modes, linear and non linear.  Linear is only
for low duty cycles.  It is also worth noting
that a tuned amplifier will in general have
better drain efficiency than a broadband one.

Rick N6RK

On 7/7/2012 6:08 PM, Bruce wrote:
 Hi Rick,

 Did you notice the 2 meter amplifier that the device is biased for SSB
 operation ?

   http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf

   73
 Bruce-K1FZ

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Bruce
Page 6 states, when the amplifier is in the Single Sideband mode, SSB or CW, 
the amplifier is in the linear mode and delivers 1200+ peak to the antenna.

Tuned or unturned,  if  the toroids or tuned circuits  are running hot, then 
too much RF is not going to the antenna, a re-think of  circuit components, 
and design is a good idea.

Am signing off  the thread for now. Thanks to everyone for the input.

73
Bruce-K1FZ



 As the manual explains, the amplifier has two
 modes, linear and non linear.  Linear is only
 for low duty cycles.  It is also worth noting
 that a tuned amplifier will in general have
 better drain efficiency than a broadband one.

 Rick N6RK

 On 7/7/2012 6:08 PM, Bruce wrote:
 Hi Rick,

 Did you notice the 2 meter amplifier that the device is biased for SSB
 operation ?

   http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf

   73
 Bruce-K1FZ
 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Fw: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Tom W8JI
 Yes, the broadcast 50 ohm load has a very low VSWR.

 Harris claims that with the 75 %  RF efficiency, and only  25 %  heat
 generation, it lets them to use air cooling.
 Individual new power supply for each module.

Right. My point is people seem to be reading the data sheet for the device, 
which is a very confusing data sheet.

The data sheet, if read carefully,  is for class-C pulsed duty with (I 
think) 20% duty and 100uS pulse width. There is a small bit on pure class C 
that might be carrier, because it says CW. There are no linear mode specs 
anywhere. Even the CW rating is at 75% efficiency, which means pretty deep 
into class C and perfectly matched.

We cannot use class-C for  HF PA's on CW or SSB. On CW it would have 
terrible clicks. It would also require being perfectly matched (to maintain 
that high efficiency). On SSB, it would have terrible splatter.

We'd have about 50-60% efficiency maximum for what we need to do, and that 
is almost three times the heat for a given power. For 1250 watts output, 
Hams would probably have about 2350 watts input and 1100 watts of heat.

Compare that to their special class-C test fixture, where for 1675 watts 
input they get 1250 watts output with 425 watts of heat.

The linear Ham amp is over 2-1/2 times the heat compared to class C. This is 
why, for amateur duty where it has to be linear, heat is a major issue with 
a single compact device.

Also, and it is important to get this point across... SWR claims for 
high power devices in data sheets are just pure fiction, except in very 
special cases that have nothing to do with real amplifiers we use.

73 Tom 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Peter Voelpel
 
BEKO in Germany uses them in their 2m amps for about two years.

Last year I was operator at a contest station with 3x HLV-2000 into three
antenna groups.
They worked perfectly at 2KW out for the 24 hours. 

The HLV-1000 uses one of those transistors and is upgradeable with a second,
the HLV-2000 uses two and the HLV-4000 uses four MRFE6VP61K25H.

http://www.beko-elektronik.de/index.php?do=03,01,01,02,05lang=en

Wideband and HF seems to be more difficult.

73
Peter, DJ7WW
 

-Original Message-
From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Bruce
Sent: Samstag, 7. Juli 2012 20:47
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: New Linear amp

This MRFE6VP61K25H solid state device is catching on fast in amateur radio
circles. HF Amps next.  

http://www.m2inc.com/pdf_manuals/2M-1K2.pdf

73
Bruce-K1FZ
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

On 7/7/2012 11:28 PM, Chortek, Robert L wrote:
  Uh, I thought the legal limit was 1.5 KW

Only in the US.  Limits vary by country with some as high as 5KW
others as low as 400W.

73,

... Joe, W4TV



On 7/7/2012 11:28 PM, Chortek, Robert L wrote:
 Uh, I thought the legal limit was 1.5 KW

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 7, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Peter Voelpel df...@t-online.de wrote:


 BEKO in Germany uses them in their 2m amps for about two years.

 Last year I was operator at a contest station with 3x HLV-2000 into three
 antenna groups.
 They worked perfectly at 2KW out

 73
 Peter, DJ7WW



 ___
 UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: New Linear amp

2012-07-07 Thread Bill Cromwell
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 23:45 -0400, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
 On 7/7/2012 11:28 PM, Chortek, Robert L wrote:
   Uh, I thought the legal limit was 1.5 KW
 
 Only in the US.  Limits vary by country with some as high as 5KW
 others as low as 400W.
 
 73,
 
 ... Joe, W4TV

And by band. This is a top band list but other bands have already been
introduced into the discussion.

73,

Bill  KU8H

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK