Re: [tor-relays] new Tor exit
Holy Cow! The new Toe exit I just crabbed about just took off. My apologies everyone! (23:39 PDT) Arisbe On 3/14/2018 11:03 PM, Arisbe wrote: Hello all, I rolled out a new Tor exit [0] this morning West Coast U.S. time. It's special to me because I've negotiated the trust of a host company in Albania. I was the first Tor relay in that country and now I'm the first exit relay there. This trust took me a year to establish. I run a number of relays-both exit and non-exit. I run a dozen bridges for people that need the ISP connectivity. I host classes in Southwest Washington State to teach ordinary people how to be safe while they're on the internet. I teach high-school pupils how to set up and operate Tor relays. Here is my problem: The aforementioned relay has been on for nearly 24-hours and not a single user has frequented my doorsteps. I have had seven of the nine authorities parked in this node for most of the time but no inbound connections (except for those referenced and two hackers) and no outbound or exit connections. There is nothing technically wrong with the installation so what gives. I this an issue of administrative paperwork? While I am very supportive of Tor, I am not with unlimited patience. I have a job, wife and kids and money pit house to maintain. Thanks for giving me a bit of advice to make this guy blossom. If I don't understand, I apologize to all. Arisbe [0] 516D1B9E22484202322828D8CAC30325030017E2 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] new Tor exit
Hi Arisbe, Thanks for running relays! If you're running multiple relays (as you've suggested) it's important to run then under the same family, see https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#MultipleRelays. In regards to new relay usage, see https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-new-relay On 03/14/2018 11:03 PM, Arisbe wrote: Hello all, I rolled out a new Tor exit [0] this morning West Coast U.S. time. It's special to me because I've negotiated the trust of a host company in Albania. I was the first Tor relay in that country and now I'm the first exit relay there. This trust took me a year to establish. I run a number of relays-both exit and non-exit. I run a dozen bridges for people that need the ISP connectivity. I host classes in Southwest Washington State to teach ordinary people how to be safe while they're on the internet. I teach high-school pupils how to set up and operate Tor relays. Here is my problem: The aforementioned relay has been on for nearly 24-hours and not a single user has frequented my doorsteps. I have had seven of the nine authorities parked in this node for most of the time but no inbound connections (except for those referenced and two hackers) and no outbound or exit connections. There is nothing technically wrong with the installation so what gives. I this an issue of administrative paperwork? While I am very supportive of Tor, I am not with unlimited patience. I have a job, wife and kids and money pit house to maintain. Thanks for giving me a bit of advice to make this guy blossom. If I don't understand, I apologize to all. Arisbe [0] 516D1B9E22484202322828D8CAC30325030017E2 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- Jordan https://yui.cat/ ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] new Tor exit
2018-03-15 7:03 GMT+01:00 Arisbe : > > Here is my problem: The aforementioned relay has been on for nearly > 24-hours and not a single user has frequented my doorsteps. https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-new-relay ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] new Tor exit
Hello all, I rolled out a new Tor exit [0] this morning West Coast U.S. time. It's special to me because I've negotiated the trust of a host company in Albania. I was the first Tor relay in that country and now I'm the first exit relay there. This trust took me a year to establish. I run a number of relays-both exit and non-exit. I run a dozen bridges for people that need the ISP connectivity. I host classes in Southwest Washington State to teach ordinary people how to be safe while they're on the internet. I teach high-school pupils how to set up and operate Tor relays. Here is my problem: The aforementioned relay has been on for nearly 24-hours and not a single user has frequented my doorsteps. I have had seven of the nine authorities parked in this node for most of the time but no inbound connections (except for those referenced and two hackers) and no outbound or exit connections. There is nothing technically wrong with the installation so what gives. I this an issue of administrative paperwork? While I am very supportive of Tor, I am not with unlimited patience. I have a job, wife and kids and money pit house to maintain. Thanks for giving me a bit of advice to make this guy blossom. If I don't understand, I apologize to all. Arisbe [0] 516D1B9E22484202322828D8CAC30325030017E2 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat
Thanks teor > I would recommend using a caching resolver, it puts much less load on the > remote resolvers you are using. Went down this path - its working. Paul 609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Hidden service error in log
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Gary wrote: > 4l53ozkhv*** Whether tor or you *''d it, 45 bits is insufficient to prevent association in posts, and being v2, can be discovered in full, further, onions can be deanon'd to IP address in time by motivated adversaries. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor program
> I2P, Gnunet, IPFS, GPG, blockchain, > lots of other networks have relavant > philosophy material. Many of which could make up list of new software packages such places could install as part of such program. Just as they might have libreoffice on windows, or even some easy / volunteer admin, $free software, *nix machines for public use. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor program
media.torproject.org youtube library freedom project I2P, Gnunet, IPFS, GPG, blockchain, lots of other networks have relavant philosophy material. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] middle relay connexions dropped in half
On 14.03.2018 03:56, teor wrote: On 13 Mar 2018, at 20:51, mytormail wrote: I just doesn't feel right if donated capacity isn't used. Oh, but your relay's spare capacity *is* used. Just not the way you think. Hi teor, Thanks for your reassuring words. :) I just wait a few weeks and see what happens. DoS mitigation will have it's impact I guess. One of my relays has a lot circuits rejected compared to my other relays: "DoS mitigation since startup: 79258 circuits rejected, 14 marked addresses. 701 connections closed. 1287 single hop clients refused." Six hours after the upgrade it rejected 56722 circuits already.. So it seems to have a big impact indeed. Regards, Edwin. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Tor program
Hello People, Does anyone have a graphic or verbal discussion about the Tor network that they would share? I want to give a talk at the public library about the uses, advantage and how-to's of Tor. I want to get my facts correct before I commit to this task. Thanks ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Hidden service error in log
Hello. I made a "hello world" hidden service and I had to following message in the logs about exceeding launch limit. I have not seen this before. I had one onion for a while and added a second one recently - not sure if that matters as it is only complaining about the first one. I am not sure what / why it is exceeding launch limit, I would be grateful if someone could explain it to me. Thanks. Mar 14 12:43:24.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 100%: Done Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Hidden service 4l53ozkhv*** exceeded launch limit with 10 intro points in the last 202 seconds. Intro circuit launches are limited to 10 per 300 seconds. Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Service configured in "/var/lib/tor/hidden_service/": Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 0 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 1 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 2 at [scrubbed]: circuit is doing handshakes Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 3 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Service configured in "/var/lib/tor/hidden2/": Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 0 at [scrubbed]: circuit is doing handshakes Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 1 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 2 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Intro point 3 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open Mar 14 12:44:25.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Best tor version
> On 14 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Jonathan Marquardt wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:40:30AM +, Даннил Николаев wrote: >> What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3? > > Always the latest stable version, which is currently 0.3.2.10. Be sure to > follow this guide for how to set up a relay: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide Or, if you want a long-term stable version, use 0.2.9. Long-term stable is for distributions and people who don't want to upgrade major Tor versions every 6-12 months. T ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Best tor version
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:40:30AM +, Даннил Николаев wrote: > What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3? Always the latest stable version, which is currently 0.3.2.10. Be sure to follow this guide for how to set up a relay: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide -- OpenPGP Key: 47BC7DE83D462E8BED18AA861224DBD299A4F5F3 https://www.parckwart.de/pgp_key signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Best tor version
What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
