[tor-relays] Hivelocity is not longer serving my needs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've had my exit relay running on a spare Hivelocity server that I had for 17 days now. Even after a reduced exit policy I continued to receive abuse reports. They have now asked that I stop running a tor relay on the server. I'm looking for a decent provider that can suit my needs of running a fast exit node. Does anyone have any recommendations? Thanks, Tim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVUM1qCRC8Tq5FO2jmKgAA9aAP/3rWozZ63GiGG28/UsWT Ap4ygekHqXvKPzpbUJz7mwxgk0AzCydgaLKaYHvl4jgEgXuwAXSCfSyZS27E jOd72A6Qk36dtsVSgzBbFFyiT3f30mAZIBc+KCyhZ6fEQ5Rb5v0mJWz1nlyA BfvYjTF6eZgLaLcyPt8RPJoITyV6df+RUbaUAstoqql+cZn7Wnoj9P6rbM3h aSPFD2llWQorGxgRX7vJzuytJqZEIvhLoI/eakClyTKrNi2AosCn2rzKwB4C oTv4wmlbbZnhSXvT8jdqBXzQl1va2XPaSErXTfkREzQ6Pg+LEG1lr+AGTFAE JRMx5MN79YQtX86XnxZsCHxqLD8mqz1Kw2/lr6rNWWcxZH+tmXfKqpmCr6/b 9Jjttd2qUQctOQZEYYoMSsIx1s269km1X6WB4tvYrx8NuBaqsFUuoEndeEpD AvF2mlL5mhUjGxE4q9UERGm7KTVLf1MfqPNdpWjpepxy2eATjaOyo+tnswIZ vM1h7x/Ky2KQG9240k1U6vfiqaRV82FNRvIhbrKgCtiZ3+CrqLNx4UXwcMVt tqGqC86xX5ip4W+iyuVOOApV86V6U047ovPmiRV9XRv+44v8UFgGZA58Zobg sCsFluaLICo857y4WPsiHjXwA5IHy9hI1kVAyJB2Qo9yIApGGlL9RhVhFDBI B4Nm =L3ny -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] T-shirts and Confirming Relay Control
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 AVee, Would it not be possible for me to specify the ExitNode in my torrc and then do the wget to prove my "ownership"? I haven't tried to specify a single node before so I'm not sure if it'd work. Thanks, Tim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVSKElCRC8Tq5FO2jmKgAA4hMP/3nPoz/ygyRrtpzWxYQT S6+EN5A3DlPHX/fWgSHVdtaZKatb/OBfH4db6anvf1T1t7yhA8u1YxTKSLxA TOB0Bk3n5BC6H0dCBusAMLcGBb/r/navz5ficu2N8/mP7Yvee2zMuTMPmWML awWw1pgh90cHQbMYvs0k5/DsByxzdfRPzkSL5i1jrKNyiEaDNZTDMo0dm2cf dkyiW/Qr1HueO8qkVTzzeGthCVN+saUmhfWIKnQfs1nMG64Hrh+8S7oMEmoK efHJT6bAPn0fWr9STiqV19xKmAPuYAOSSHMOdRiI8CAS/bfPMZQvOjHwmKBm Tp0AqKrVequEQDiKeuQOinEksdMVMPi8C1ifCL70GM4T5QOyK2CzbSuWmi8e fr2D/mN5fSKVcITgud29FxQKYjP8rmxYcCBBTF9m4/W/XdN9eXrOjHko0HEK 4dGMmzdf6/Wx9+kgS3n9pcOabSd742FUwb2ZqIRXsxpcg0S8mJc3vU5OVTsC VurtbRQVycIbfOvDtqogbUpPGLe3D/Z0nkqjHuoP746SKFnNeB6rVu9b4Zdh HDclgMy9L2q2nuOS1KvOfDgoEYa0A/tfRDG4qahaovrn/ayonAvwtnUgtgkK HMdyh83msC72l3apxAMqCh6sZfijuxjIOTUQBicbHemrLyf1KVrK7RJ/6U4h phH0 =ZXd3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- On 5 May 2015 at 17:58, AVee wrote: > On 2015-05-03 19:44, Matthew Finkel wrote: > >> Hi Ops, >> > [...] > >> For this case, we need an authentication mechanism which >> proves control of the relay but is something relay operators won't mind >> running. >> >> My currently plan is to ask relay operators to sign the fingerprint file >> which tor creates. The major disadvantage of this method is that it must >> be run as root (or a user with access to tor's data directory). >> > > If you are willing to lower the bar for 'proof' a bit I'd ask them to > fetch a confirmation url send to them from the connection their node runs > on. Spoofing an IP address for a TCP connection isn't trivial and seems > rather a lot of effort for just a t-shirt. So it at least proofs access to > the connection the node is running on. That could be a simple unprivileged > wget one-liner. > > It leaves room for some abuse, but does raise the bar quite a bit. > > If you do want to use the tor key couldn't you use it as a key for ssl > client authentication? That would allow for further automation and you > could be build into tor in the future. > > AVee > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Determining geographical locations for a new exit relay would help most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Great to see Seth! I'm looking around Perth area at the moment for cheaper bandwidth but can't seem to find anything near that kind of price. A bit of a shame but it's the reality given Australia's poor internet. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVR04BCRC8Tq5FO2jmKgAARUsQAKe18KzwCqfsduZ17rY8 qtQXTgSivViTanFwHlpyP1QQBqZrkWJyDMrOUgYfMf9JaJH9jJIpvzbfL4pu osxmJuj9kPpWlqDw00TjBPVc4OvH/PB/XNcdkbMVDdw6aBv87ryBuDA4DFU2 A3YbTxdUIbXu6mRW610MJH1gGHo5/5AtHBce+2DNKfoTVG849J0RUi5AxZ7a WJsN35DT2QUYBk9UIQ46aS29UDD//vwtELI4CDaKWZ5OmRv8oZr3QERP+mJX THs3C+yuqZws/6ensFdCbU1sc+2J/sL+OGetK5UNJZAIyVdlc81daaJS6WlR TRD1GzvwufwtsgqkuSG44ncutZAJkeZntR9Xmrqc+bH+zJqGRhASAn0SiL01 PJXnyzpyYoxu5ozJWP3gR58v8+kuSy0Tm9okuAs/MjEpk3ZsGWUSEG3n/KvH 0KpnnQEk8VwElzwHADVwzCRt1iKUnf965s80i3q5vpbc3jGETWNILF6zesMe I/k/0wkr1DA0gBFPGBbh3ZisMsF6w0CAPT0RaoJ1TlPjDGJMVdLz0v3k05MJ xXCqgUmQQvuMyk9aztdaiekENykkNHXb9sKjeMElWro3Ir19rJmSQ+LkI71e cfoVhLeg6ZLjihFPE0R/RIm6r5D25gxFEJaWV1rNVnLSxehQVoeDugn8tYku YkSw =h27Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- On 4 May 2015 at 12:35, Seth wrote: > On Sat, 02 May 2015 00:52:07 -0700, Geo Rift < > tim.cochrane.lap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would love to see some more nodes in Australia. I'm located in Perth >> and the speed of the network it horrible. >> > > Tim, just deployed an exit node to Sydney location, feel free to test it > out: > > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E1059D8C41FC48B823C6F09348EA89C4D4C9D4 > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relays Network Survey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I gave it a shot, one thing I noticed. I haven't participated in any conferences when I tried to leave the question blank it spat back asking me to fill one in. Tim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVROscCRC8Tq5FO2jmKgAAZqgP+gKQaRCr8OS+vNJl9Nor unDGhwG520PAEwsWm8IcTBX75+RV1XUhJtm6DeYD2G2mF9med8iMB/+uCrv7 qS7eyD0b9wQMU2lm0RK2TutFKuzG3iGeUv3rcv91J/dGbWKbxnyFG6vbdQH5 eHWugqODz3ZhXlzNalmI4TA6AdCOaM0OY/ysVrJ98J4c78FsZ6AyuF1hrWrA 29hRQBERd3rsEavRMgUqmo5tIHMf7v6I2ew3LCGrpe1GgpkZU8ZTLHgChVmV wvP7lECnpKMcR4/KQJufDAKI/q655ebh5j+pCOU6ec0az3uWi0s4QUoV8hRI zQv8mfP2tdCL+tX+o4axl6Kl3t6ZfGC5TCN1EI9v704c7Rosucqk+FQ0QSOd D29FoZtLz9CJrHiUlq7IKN/TKtgYFPG39d0WXozN8ytvNIF7IGhNBu7x69W9 lFvD9RC/vZfUM6nr06BWBAYSl3gVPBiyEnQqlEP2TD6JGFPmsCv1dzqNCfDU zrtGD0Rsp/j+bdQcaDwK4iHspM+dBrxQ1abZZ1ROxJ2IEwNyaLNlKU+ZyyGF W1aaEpiitYiyuIPwwhLHLPGQX6VfR8fM0QcJtzQlxARawVJdc/dX+uJAOgx5 yJDmTYpNvIPlHP3yOv3x2MTLn6pGt+NkzWtyWIOcY/IFnORyPag+vbVL048H KMyy =oEq9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Determining geographical locations for a new exit relay would help most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I would love to see some more nodes in Australia. I'm located in Perth and the speed of the network it horrible. Not usable for day to day internet which is unfortunate, hopefully it will pick up soon. I might look into setting up a node here as my only running one is located out of Australia -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVRIIACRC8Tq5FO2jmKgAABu4P/jW0c/LCiFdt4NPUsrZx geq8ZdMoHtMaIMVvm0xDiV0kkBrIWp/4QGfTp0zCgeuugdaixqoKkUPkF60k w6yiPNZZzj5TwxPSdnIlCyQp8l/jv2fagBEp7n3OO2qgfKol7BbsaGKhCagO 5rGoAdT8b/N6t3oX5pPzajkHqmFjv9ojK4qMyJsTiAZv2G9KsJ5HtpmquuJg w3evZqhodmKGH3xy+4zvCW6iIF6gBwx7zdtofHwxi4e1sifSnerMEU4j6Oau s+lw5PNm3uKfZA3j0gNXeI/OahQl1KVTyAMob9ZW7XR+Yr7AUAbOOAC005Ca z6RgmOOqK8gKcQzNjpOm8xYzYRiqoPrqr+yV85d6lBQ2yABzZjHXXe96/tYW Hp1TPEDu+wACv7JWAMcbC9wJd/vfkRBJNPWIVEsKSDw+HZ3dRBT6exym25q6 r4iQ1XjUznIi6W5sC4h6uvhDtwFr4P2AIvYp0fhIq5dPvaFzyX57oAlkPnJv /vhs8lrChrT3hIf1KFwYQ39E7Pu7gG0hXqLDYyKUztoKaKDb4/nvQKYUXVrq hLQBqxO0qX1aUOKbpxHKMrcIT66/EywXrV1iun2yOmarHxvFDrj8z6zRrEiA 7bapu03fXbiM3IsXUKAXyALVwref/LP/m0NX96+XNi8iG+j3moSAk9rfZ3LF 5V3s =UDT3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- On 2 May 2015 at 05:00, Seth wrote: > On Fri, 01 May 2015 10:01:45 -0700, nusenu wrote: > >> It might be oversimplified but using compass with group by country >> ordered by consensus weight (or in your case exit probability) shows >> you where most of tor network capacity is currently located. The goal >> is to setup relays in new or rarely used locations. >> >> So by using compass your list would look like this, ordered from >> better to less good: >> >> * (AU) Sydney, Australia (0.01% CW) >> * (Asia) Tokyo, Japan (0.8% CW) >> * UK (4.6% CW) >> * US (10.1%) >> * NL (12.4% CW) >> * France (21.6%) >> * DE (25.7% CW) >> Note: the is a current snapshot and numbers change but AU or JP is >> better then DE (from a capacity divers. point of view) - this will >> also be the case in a week or a month. >> >> You might also want to consider the exit probability and use that in >> addition or instead of CW. >> >> I don't know if VULTR has multiple ASes but if they do you might also >> want to have a look at the group by AS results (if they allow you to >> choose). >> > > Thanks for the breakdown, that helps. The only hitch with the Sydney and > Toyko locations is that instead of 1000GB/mo of bandwidth, you only get > 200GB/mo. > > Would it be better (all things considered) to go with the UK location at > 1000GB/mo vs Tokyo or Sydney at 200GB/mo? > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
