[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate
I had the update of the bug description on my todo list - it's done now. ** Description changed: === SRU information === + [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is http://pad.lv/2033422 [Impact] Openssl using an engine dumps core upon certificate creation; other operations are probably affected too. Overall, engines are likely mostly unusable. [Test plan] - An engine is needed to test the fix and I don't think we have many in the archive. This complicates reproducing the issue. I have been relying on user reports which have been very detailled and helpful. - The issue has also been reported independently and with another engine (devcrypto). - The issue is fixed in openssl 3.0.8 which landed in lunar. + - An openssl engine is req. to test the fix. + - A z13 / LinuxONE LPAR or z/VM guest is needed, with attached APQN. + - Check with 'lszcrypt -V' the availability (online) of the hw crypto resources. + - Install the needed package that allows to exploit the hw crypto resources: + sudo apt-get install libica-utils libica? openssl-ibmca + - And copy a working sample openssf.cnf file: + sudo cp /usr/share/doc/openssl-ibmca/examples/openssl.cnf.sample /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf + - Verify if the 'openssl engine' lists an ibmca engine, in addition to the dynamic engine: + (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support + (ibmca) Ibmca hardware engine support <=== + - try to create a new certificate, using this cmd-line: + openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' + - The above command must not lead to a 'Segmentation fault (core dumped)', + rather than create a proper certificate file. + Also watch /var/log/syslog / journalctl for more details. + - The issue is fixed in openssl 3.0.8 which landed in lunar. [Where problems could occur] I don't pretend to understand the lifecycle of providers in openssl3 but the patch is simple and has been widely tested by now, including on ubuntu. Thus, I see little chance an unexpected problem would occur with it. [Patches] The patches come directly from upstream and apply cleanly. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18578 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy- sru-0001-Release-the-drbg-in-the-global-default-context- befor.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 === Original description === openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' ---Problem Description--- OpenSSL with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate. # openssl engine (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support (ibmca) Ibmca hardware engine support # openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' Segmentation fault (core dumped) # journalctl Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User process fault: interruption code 003b ilc:2 in libc.so.6[3ffae08+1ca000] Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Failing address: TEID: 0800 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Fault in primary space mode while using user ASCE. Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: AS:9c2941c7 R3:0024 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 2344 Comm: openssl Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.0-73-generic #80-Ubuntu Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (z/VM 7.3.0) Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User PSW : 070500018000 03ffae11c708 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:1 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User GPRS: 0007 03ffae11c6f0 02aa3289f9d0 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:02aa1825980f 02aa3289f9d0 02aa328a4300 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae870720 03ffae657128 02aa03ff Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae24dd10 03ffae657120 03ffae437c22 03ffec2fe000 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User Code: 03ffae11c6fc: b90400b2 lgr%r11,%r2 03ffae11c700: 4700bc0,0 #03ffae11c704: b24f00a0ear%r10,%a0 >03ffae11c708: 58102018l%r1,24(%r2) 03ffae11c70c: ebaa002dsllg%r10,%r10,32 03ffae11c712: b24f00a1ear%r10,%a1
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038901] Re: Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~10% smaller than full installation
** Tags added: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038901 Title: Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~10% smaller than full installation Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu default/minimal installation should be made smaller in future. It's a little too close to the full install size right now. As of mantic 2023-10-10, the default/minimal install ends up 8.4 GB whereas the full install is 9.4 GB. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSmQLXuDO0E-tKnWcgjL3Ua2bWDeUg4ICZIfuMrrZndBrYjbVLKAWlKuiZLZ9EOrj4N1WV37DRg8GyW/pubchart?oid=2040836911=interactive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2038901/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038901] Re: Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~11% smaller than full installation
In noble daily images there's now only 10% difference between a full install and minimal. ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~11% smaller than full installation + Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~10% smaller than full installation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038901 Title: Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~10% smaller than full installation Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu default/minimal installation should be made smaller in future. It's a little too close to the full install size right now. As of mantic 2023-10-10, the default/minimal install ends up 8.4 GB whereas the full install is 9.4 GB. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSmQLXuDO0E-tKnWcgjL3Ua2bWDeUg4ICZIfuMrrZndBrYjbVLKAWlKuiZLZ9EOrj4N1WV37DRg8GyW/pubchart?oid=2040836911=interactive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2038901/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044664] [NEW] HDMI plugin after boot, but display can't work
Public bug reported: [Summary] HDMI plugin but display can't work after boot under HDMI only display [Reproduce] 1. Set display configuration as single HDMI only 2. Boot into the system without plugging HDMI cable 3. Ensure system is booted (check it by debug console), then plug HDMI cable 4. Check the image on HDMI monitor [Expected result] Ubuntu desktop should be shown on HDMI monitor [Actual result] Ubuntu desktop was not shown on HDMI monitor [Fail Rate] 100% [Additional information] Platform: Mediatek Genio1200 EVK Ubuntu Version: 22.04.2 LTS Image: baoshan-classic-desktop-2204-x01-20231005-133.tar.xz ** Affects: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044664 Title: HDMI plugin after boot, but display can't work Status in webbrowser-app package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: [Summary] HDMI plugin but display can't work after boot under HDMI only display [Reproduce] 1. Set display configuration as single HDMI only 2. Boot into the system without plugging HDMI cable 3. Ensure system is booted (check it by debug console), then plug HDMI cable 4. Check the image on HDMI monitor [Expected result] Ubuntu desktop should be shown on HDMI monitor [Actual result] Ubuntu desktop was not shown on HDMI monitor [Fail Rate] 100% [Additional information] Platform: Mediatek Genio1200 EVK Ubuntu Version: 22.04.2 LTS Image: baoshan-classic-desktop-2204-x01-20231005-133.tar.xz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/2044664/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044540] Re: Screen bugs on any GUI apps
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2043057 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043057 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 2043057, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Opinion ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2043057 Graphical issues on WSL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044540 Title: Screen bugs on any GUI apps Status in Ubuntu: Opinion Bug description: 13th Gen Intel integrated graphics. Screen bugson anything using a GUI. Can come and go if the window is moved around or when clicking. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: xorg (not installed) Uname: Linux 5.15.133.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Sat Nov 25 00:36:45 2023 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=C.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2044540/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1994165] Re: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result
I think the concerns Andreas raises regarding debian/patches/lp1994165/0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch are valid. Yes, there are cases where the return value of SMIME_crlf_copy() is currently ignored and this results in other API calls returning success when they should not. However, it appears no one is reporting bugs about this behavior. This means either the code is never called in a way that triggers this wrong behavior; or, it is called, hits the wrong behavior, and the current wrong behavior is being handled up the stack[1]. From an SRU perspective, if no one is reporting bugs about the current behavior, it is better to leave it alone - I would not expect a change in *how* the failure of SMIME_crlf_copy() is handled to result in "good" behavior by the caller - the function still failed and isn't supposed to - so there's basically no upside here within the SRU guidelines, only possible downside. I'm therefore rejecting this upload; please reupload without debian/patches/lp1994165/0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch. [1] Note that "handled up the stack" could mean "user knows that the behavior is broken in this way and just copes with it rather than filing a bug report in Ubuntu"; or "user encounters this error, is puzzled by it, but doesn't file a bug (maybe they don't know how)". I am not asserting that the current error handling is *good*; only that it is *stable*, and therefore if no one is reporting a bug, it's best not to change the current behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994165 Title: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in openssl source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in openssl source package in Kinetic: Won't Fix Status in openssl source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: === SRU information === [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is http://pad.lv/2033422 [Impact] S/MIME signature can fail silently The commit by upstream propagates the return code of some functions rather than ignore it. [Test plan] This issue is not very simple to reproduce because "openssl cms" cannot be used to do so. This has to be done with the openssl API instead. At least the bug reportere here and the one on openssl's bug tracker have confirmed the patch solves the issue. Additionally, the bug reporter here has tested the PPA that contains the patche and validated it. Finally, I read through the patch attentively. [Where problems could occur] At this point it is unlikely an error would appear. The openssl bug tracker mentions nothing related to this patch which landed more than a year ago. The patch is simple and doesn't change the code logic. [Patches] The patches come directly from upstream and apply cleanly. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy-sru-0001-REGRESSION-CMS_final-do-not-ignore-CMS_dataFinal-res.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy-sru-0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 === Original description === https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876 The CMS_dataFinal result is important as signature may fail, however, it is ignored while returning success from CMS_final. Please add this fix to The openssl 3.0.2 "Jammy Jellyfish (supported)" Thanks Upstream commit: ``` commit 67c0460b89cc1b0644a1a59af78284dfd8d720af Author: Alon Bar-Lev Date: Tue Jul 26 15:17:06 2022 +0300 Handle SMIME_crlf_copy return code Currently the SMIME_crlf_copy result is ignored in all usages. It does return failure when memory allocation fails. This patch handles the SMIME_crlf_copy return code in all occurrences. Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz Reviewed-by: Paul Dale Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876) ``` To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1994165/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1994165] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of openssl to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Please reupload without debian/patches/lp1994165/0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994165 Title: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in openssl source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in openssl source package in Kinetic: Won't Fix Status in openssl source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: === SRU information === [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is http://pad.lv/2033422 [Impact] S/MIME signature can fail silently The commit by upstream propagates the return code of some functions rather than ignore it. [Test plan] This issue is not very simple to reproduce because "openssl cms" cannot be used to do so. This has to be done with the openssl API instead. At least the bug reportere here and the one on openssl's bug tracker have confirmed the patch solves the issue. Additionally, the bug reporter here has tested the PPA that contains the patche and validated it. Finally, I read through the patch attentively. [Where problems could occur] At this point it is unlikely an error would appear. The openssl bug tracker mentions nothing related to this patch which landed more than a year ago. The patch is simple and doesn't change the code logic. [Patches] The patches come directly from upstream and apply cleanly. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy-sru-0001-REGRESSION-CMS_final-do-not-ignore-CMS_dataFinal-res.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy-sru-0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 === Original description === https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876 The CMS_dataFinal result is important as signature may fail, however, it is ignored while returning success from CMS_final. Please add this fix to The openssl 3.0.2 "Jammy Jellyfish (supported)" Thanks Upstream commit: ``` commit 67c0460b89cc1b0644a1a59af78284dfd8d720af Author: Alon Bar-Lev Date: Tue Jul 26 15:17:06 2022 +0300 Handle SMIME_crlf_copy return code Currently the SMIME_crlf_copy result is ignored in all usages. It does return failure when memory allocation fails. This patch handles the SMIME_crlf_copy return code in all occurrences. Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz Reviewed-by: Paul Dale Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18876) ``` To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1994165/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate
> Excuse me for chiming in so late, but we can test (and even recreate) > the situation by ourselves on our system (and we have systems with > attached crypto hw to it). Someone please update the bug description accordingly with a complete description of the SRU test case. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023545 Title: [UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems: In Progress Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in openssl source package in Jammy: Incomplete Status in openssl source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: === SRU information === [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is http://pad.lv/2033422 [Impact] Openssl using an engine dumps core upon certificate creation; other operations are probably affected too. Overall, engines are likely mostly unusable. [Test plan] An engine is needed to test the fix and I don't think we have many in the archive. This complicates reproducing the issue. I have been relying on user reports which have been very detailled and helpful. The issue has also been reported independently and with another engine (devcrypto). The issue is fixed in openssl 3.0.8 which landed in lunar. [Where problems could occur] I don't pretend to understand the lifecycle of providers in openssl3 but the patch is simple and has been widely tested by now, including on ubuntu. Thus, I see little chance an unexpected problem would occur with it. [Patches] The patches come directly from upstream and apply cleanly. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18578 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy- sru-0001-Release-the-drbg-in-the-global-default-context- befor.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 === Original description === openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' ---Problem Description--- OpenSSL with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate. # openssl engine (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support (ibmca) Ibmca hardware engine support # openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' Segmentation fault (core dumped) # journalctl Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User process fault: interruption code 003b ilc:2 in libc.so.6[3ffae08+1ca000] Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Failing address: TEID: 0800 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Fault in primary space mode while using user ASCE. Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: AS:9c2941c7 R3:0024 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 2344 Comm: openssl Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.0-73-generic #80-Ubuntu Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (z/VM 7.3.0) Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User PSW : 070500018000 03ffae11c708 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:1 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User GPRS: 0007 03ffae11c6f0 02aa3289f9d0 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:02aa1825980f 02aa3289f9d0 02aa328a4300 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae870720 03ffae657128 02aa03ff Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae24dd10 03ffae657120 03ffae437c22 03ffec2fe000 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User Code: 03ffae11c6fc: b90400b2 lgr%r11,%r2 03ffae11c700: 4700bc0,0 #03ffae11c704: b24f00a0ear%r10,%a0 >03ffae11c708: 58102018l%r1,24(%r2) 03ffae11c70c: ebaa002dsllg%r10,%r10,32 03ffae11c712: b24f00a1ear%r10,%a1 03ffae11c716: 5910a0d0c%r1,208(%r10) 03ffae11c71a: a7840033brc8,03ffae11c780 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Last Breaking-Event-Address: Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: [<03ffae33242c>] 0x3ffae33242c
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of openssl to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Please reupload without debian/patches/lp1994165/0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023545 Title: [UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems: In Progress Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in openssl source package in Jammy: Incomplete Status in openssl source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: === SRU information === [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is http://pad.lv/2033422 [Impact] Openssl using an engine dumps core upon certificate creation; other operations are probably affected too. Overall, engines are likely mostly unusable. [Test plan] An engine is needed to test the fix and I don't think we have many in the archive. This complicates reproducing the issue. I have been relying on user reports which have been very detailled and helpful. The issue has also been reported independently and with another engine (devcrypto). The issue is fixed in openssl 3.0.8 which landed in lunar. [Where problems could occur] I don't pretend to understand the lifecycle of providers in openssl3 but the patch is simple and has been widely tested by now, including on ubuntu. Thus, I see little chance an unexpected problem would occur with it. [Patches] The patches come directly from upstream and apply cleanly. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18578 * https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/tree/debian/patches/jammy- sru-0001-Release-the-drbg-in-the-global-default-context- befor.patch?h=jammy-sru=04ef023920ab08fba214817523fba897527dfff0 === Original description === openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' ---Problem Description--- OpenSSL with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate. # openssl engine (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support (ibmca) Ibmca hardware engine support # openssl req -new -newkey rsa:2048 -x509 -sha256 -nodes -out __cert.pem -keyout __key.pem --subj '/CN=US' Segmentation fault (core dumped) # journalctl Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User process fault: interruption code 003b ilc:2 in libc.so.6[3ffae08+1ca000] Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Failing address: TEID: 0800 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Fault in primary space mode while using user ASCE. Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: AS:9c2941c7 R3:0024 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 2344 Comm: openssl Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.0-73-generic #80-Ubuntu Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (z/VM 7.3.0) Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User PSW : 070500018000 03ffae11c708 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:1 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User GPRS: 0007 03ffae11c6f0 02aa3289f9d0 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:02aa1825980f 02aa3289f9d0 02aa328a4300 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae870720 03ffae657128 02aa03ff Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel:03ffae24dd10 03ffae657120 03ffae437c22 03ffec2fe000 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: User Code: 03ffae11c6fc: b90400b2 lgr%r11,%r2 03ffae11c700: 4700bc0,0 #03ffae11c704: b24f00a0ear%r10,%a0 >03ffae11c708: 58102018l%r1,24(%r2) 03ffae11c70c: ebaa002dsllg%r10,%r10,32 03ffae11c712: b24f00a1ear%r10,%a1 03ffae11c716: 5910a0d0c%r1,208(%r10) 03ffae11c71a: a7840033brc8,03ffae11c780 Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: Last Breaking-Event-Address: Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM kernel: [<03ffae33242c>] 0x3ffae33242c Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM systemd[1]: Started Process Core Dump (PID 2345/UID 0). Jun 07 13:06:08 SYSTEM systemd-coredump[2350]: Process 2344 (openssl) of
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2033422] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of openssl to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Please reupload without debian/patches/lp1994165/0002-Handle-SMIME_crlf_copy-return-code.patch". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033422 Title: openssl: backport to jammy "clear method store / query cache confusion" Status in openssl package in Ubuntu: New Status in openssl source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in openssl source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: === SRU information === [ATTENTION] This SRU contains THREE changes which are listed in the section below. [Meta] This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU. This ( #2033422 ) is the "central" bug with the global information and debdiff. This SRU addresses three issues with Jammy's openssl version: - http://pad.lv/1994165: ignored SMIME signature errors - http://pad.lv/2023545: imbca engine dumps core - http://pad.lv/2033422: very high CPU usage for concurrent TLS connections (this one) The SRU information has been added to the three bug reports and I am attaching the debdiff here only for all three. All the patches have been included in subsequent openssl 3.0.x releases which in turn have been included in subsequent Ubuntu releases. There has been no report of issues when updating to these Ubuntu releases. I have rebuilt the openssl versions and used abi-compliance-checker to compare the ABIs of the libraries in jammy and the one for the SRU. Both matched completely (FYI, mantic's matched completely too). I have also pushed the code to git (without any attempt to make it git-ubuntu friendly). https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+ref/jammy- sru I asked Brian Murray about phasing speed and he concurs a slow roll-out is probably better for openssl. There is a small uncertainty because a security update could come before the phasing is over, effectively fast-forwarding the SRU. Still, unless there is already a current pre-advisory, this is probably better than a 10% phasing which is over after only a couple days anyway. NB: at the moment openssl doesn't phase slowly so this needs to be implemented. [Impact] Severely degraded performance for concurrent operations compared to openssl 1.1. The performance is so degraded that some workloads fail due to timeouts or insufficient resources (noone magically has 5 times more machines). As a consequence, a number of people use openssl 1.1 instead and do not get security updates. [Test plan] Rafael Lopez has shared a simple benchmarks in http://pad.lv/2009544 with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2009544/+attachment/5690224/+files/main.py . To test, follow these steps: - run "time python3 main.py" # using the aforementioned main.py script - apt install -t jammy-proposed libssl3 - run "time python3 main.py" - compare the runtimes for the two main.py runs You can run this on x86_64, Raspberry Pi 4 or any machine, and get a very large speed-up in all cases. The improvements are not architecture-dependant. Using this changeset, I get the following numbers for ten runs on my laptop: 3.0.2: real 2m5.567s user 4m3.948s sys 2m0.233s this SRU: real 0m23.966s user 2m35.687s sys 0m1.920s As can be easily seen, the speed-up is massive: system time is divided by 60 and overall wall clock time is roughly five times lower. In http://pad.lv/2009544 , Rafael also shared his performance numbers and they are relatable to these. He used slightly different versions (upstreams rather than patched with cherry-picks) but at least one of the version used does not include other performance change. He also used different hardware and this performance issue seems to depend on the number of CPUs available but also obtained a performance several times better. Results on a given machine vary also very little across runs (less than 2% variation on runs of size 10). They are also very similar on a Raspberry Pi 4 (8GB). The benchmark uses https://www.google.com/humans.txt which takes around 130ms to download on my machine but I modified the script to download something only 20ms away. Results are so close to the ones using humans.txt that they are within the error margin. This is consistent with the high-concurrency in the benchmark which both saturates CPU, and "hides" latencies that are relatively low. Finally, there are positive reports on github. Unfortunately they are not always completely targeted at these patches only and therefore I will not link directly to them but they have also been encouraging. [Where problems could occur] The change is spread over several patches which touch the
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040273] Autopkgtest regression report (software-properties/0.99.22.9)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted software-properties (0.99.22.9) for jammy have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: software-properties/0.99.22.9 (amd64, armhf) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#software-properties [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040273 Title: [SRU] Enable support for Caracal Cloud Archive Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in software-properties source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Status in software-properties source package in Noble: Fix Released Bug description: Please add support for: cloud-archive:caracal cloud-archive:caracal-proposed This will also need to be SRU'd back to jammy. [Impact] End users have to manually enable the caracal cloud archive pockets. [Test case] sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:caracal sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:caracal-proposed [Regression potential] Limited - just a data item addition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2040273/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029173] Re: fatal error: cannot open file '/usr/lib/clc/gfx1031-amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d.bc': No such file or directory
The error is unchanged with Kubuntu 23.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029173 Title: fatal error: cannot open file '/usr/lib/clc/gfx1031-amdgcn-mesa- mesa3d.bc': No such file or directory Status in mesa package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Programs using OpenCL report the following bug: fatal error: cannot open file '/usr/lib/clc/gfx1031-amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d.bc': No such file or directory This bug is encountered when trying to run github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp build with CLBlast or just using clinfo. The hardware is an AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT lsb_release -rd: No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 23.04 Release:23.04 apt-cache policy mesa-opencl-icd #although I am not sure that this is the offending package mesa-opencl-icd: Installed: 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 Candidate: 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 Version table: *** 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 500 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lunar-updates/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 23.0.2-1ubuntu1 500 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lunar/universe amd64 Packages pc@pc-MS-7C02:~/ML/llama.cpp$ clinfo output: Number of platforms 2 Platform Name Clover Platform Vendor Mesa Platform VersionOpenCL 1.1 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 Platform ProfileFULL_PROFILE Platform Extensions cl_khr_icd Platform Extensions function suffix MESA Platform Name rusticl Platform Vendor Mesa/X.org Platform VersionOpenCL 3.0 Platform ProfileFULL_PROFILE Platform Extensions cl_khr_icd Platform Extensions with Versioncl_khr_icd 0x40 (1.0.0) Platform Numeric Version0xc0 (3.0.0) Platform Extensions function suffix MESA Platform Host timer resolution 0ns Platform Name Clover Number of devices 1 Device Name AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (navi22, LLVM 15.0.7, DRM 3.49, 6.2.0-26-generic) Device Vendor AMD Device Vendor ID0x1002 Device Version OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 Device Numeric Version 0x401000 (1.1.0) Driver Version 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 Device OpenCL C Version OpenCL C 1.1 Device OpenCL C Numeric Version 0x401000 (1.1.0) Device Type GPU Device Profile FULL_PROFILE Device AvailableYes Compiler Available Yes Max compute units 40 Max clock frequency 2855MHz Max work item dimensions3 Max work item sizes 256x256x256 Max work group size 256 === CL_PROGRAM_BUILD_LOG === fatal error: cannot open file '/usr/lib/clc/gfx1031-amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d.bc': No such file or directory Preferred work group size multiple (kernel) Preferred / native vector sizes char16 / 16 short8 / 8 int 4 / 4 long 2 / 2 half 0 / 0(n/a) float4 / 4 double 2 / 2 (cl_khr_fp64) Half-precision Floating-point support (n/a) Single-precision Floating-point support (core) Denormals No Infinity and NANs Yes Round to nearest Yes Round to zero No Round to infinity No IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add No Support is emulated in software No Correctly-rounded divide and sqrt
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack
The directx-headers part of this is easy because it's just a build- dependency of mesa, but mesa itself is a big delta to a library that affects all users of the graphics stack: unlike the kernel, which has both GA and HWE versions where the user can opt out of the rolling kernel updates on the LTS, there is only one mesa package, so the impact of any regressions is higher. I see that the current bug description is in line with the previous update, LP: #2019212; and of course, with respect to hardware enablement, this is an SRU we're going to want to take; but I think it would be best if there were a more explicit test case than just "Install the new mesa on various hw". Do we expect this new mesa to be tested on all certified hardware before it's released to -updates? Is there a feedback mechanism for us to *know* if Certification finds regressions on some of the certified platforms? Is any effort made to check for regressions on non-certified hardware? ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604 Title: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in mesa package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Status in mesa source package in Jammy: Incomplete Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy: Invalid Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy: Invalid Bug description: [Impact] The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4 directx-headers - build-dep of the new Mesa mesa - new major release (23.2.x) - new HW support, Meteor Lake.. [Test case] Install the new mesa on various hw, see that everything still works like before or better. [Where things could go wrong] This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade
This is indeed still broken. Running on Raspberry Pi 4 ubuntu-server image. # dpkg -l systemd Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description +++-==-==--= ii systemd249.11-0ubuntu3.11 arm64system and service manager # netplan get network: version: 2 ethernets: eth0: optional: true dhcp4: true # networkctl list IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP 1 loloopback carrier unmanaged 2 eth0 etherroutableconfigured 3 wlan0 wlan off unmanaged 3 links listed. # SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online --timeout=10 Found link 3 Found link 2 Found link 1 wlan0: link is not managed by networkd (yet?). lo: link is ignored eth0: link is ignored Timeout occurred while waiting for network connectivity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036358 Title: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in systemd source package in Jammy: Fix Released Status in systemd source package in Lunar: Fix Released Bug description: [NOTE] If you are running a desktop system and you see this issue, you should run: $ systemctl disable --now systemd-networkd.service This will disable systemd-networkd and associated units, including systemd-networkd-wait-online.service. NetworkManager and systemd- networkd should not be running at the same time. On desktop, NetworkManager is the default network stack. [Impact] When all interfaces are "not required for online", e.g. when they are marked "optional: true" in netplan, systemd-networkd-wait-online will timeout. Or, in other words, systemd-networkd-wait-online will timeout even though all interfaces are ignored, hence none of them will ever be marked as "ready." Depending on what units depend on network- online.target, this can delay boot by 120 seconds (the default timeout for systemd-networkd-wait-online). [Test Plan] 1. Create a new LXD container. These instructions assume jammy is the release, but the same can be done for lunar. $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jammy $ lxc exec jammy bash 2. Once in the container, modify the default /etc/netplan/10-lxc.yaml so that eth0 is configured with "optional: true": $ vi /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml # Use whatever editor you like $ cat /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml network: version: 2 ethernets: eth0: dhcp4: true dhcp-identifier: mac optional: true 3. Re-generate and apply the netplan configuration. $ netplan generate $ netplan apply 4. Manually run systemd-networkd-wait-online, and observe that all links are ignored, and the command times out: $ SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online --timeout=10 Found link lo(1) Found link eth0(19) lo: link is ignored eth0: link is ignored Timeout occurred while waiting for network connectivity. [Where problems could occur] This patch partially re-instates a patch remove in bug 1982218. However, instead of exiting if all links are unmanaged, we exit if all links are ignored in manager_configured(). If the patch was wrong, we may re-introduce bug 1982218, so as part of this SRU verification, that bug should be tested too. Any other regressions would also be related to systemd-networkd-wait-online behavior. [Original Description] On Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system using network-manager and upgrading to systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.10, wait-online now times out which prevents logins (GDM, ssh, console) until it does time out. This seems to be introduced by the change for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218/comments/21 also mentioned the problem on Lunar. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2036358/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted directx-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx- headers/1.610.2-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: directx-headers (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604 Title: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in mesa package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Status in mesa source package in Jammy: New Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy: Invalid Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy: Invalid Bug description: [Impact] The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4 directx-headers - build-dep of the new Mesa mesa - new major release (23.2.x) - new HW support, Meteor Lake.. [Test case] Install the new mesa on various hw, see that everything still works like before or better. [Where things could go wrong] This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040273] Re: [SRU] Enable support for Caracal Cloud Archive
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected, Accepted software-properties into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software- properties/0.99.22.9 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040273 Title: [SRU] Enable support for Caracal Cloud Archive Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in software-properties source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Status in software-properties source package in Noble: Fix Released Bug description: Please add support for: cloud-archive:caracal cloud-archive:caracal-proposed This will also need to be SRU'd back to jammy. [Impact] End users have to manually enable the caracal cloud archive pockets. [Test case] sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:caracal sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:caracal-proposed [Regression potential] Limited - just a data item addition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2040273/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044654] Re: No debugging symbols found in libgdk-3.so.0
Also affects libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044654 Title: No debugging symbols found in libgdk-3.so.0 Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Attach gdb to a running yelp process! (gdb) share libgdk Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0... (No debugging symbols found in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: libgtk-3-0 3.24.33-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 13:11:15 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gtk+3.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/2044654/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044654] [NEW] No debugging symbols found in libgdk-3.so.0
Public bug reported: Attach gdb to a running yelp process! (gdb) share libgdk Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0... (No debugging symbols found in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: libgtk-3-0 3.24.33-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 13:11:15 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gtk+3.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044654 Title: No debugging symbols found in libgdk-3.so.0 Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Attach gdb to a running yelp process! (gdb) share libgdk Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0... (No debugging symbols found in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: libgtk-3-0 3.24.33-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 13:11:15 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gtk+3.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/2044654/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044642] [NEW] debuginfod urls should be documented
Public bug reported: Since we do not enable debuginfod by default, it should be documented how to configure it, preferably in the file README.Debian. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gdb 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 11:31:54 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdb UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gdb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044642 Title: debuginfod urls should be documented Status in gdb package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Since we do not enable debuginfod by default, it should be documented how to configure it, preferably in the file README.Debian. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gdb 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 11:31:54 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdb UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/2044642/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044641] [NEW] Package gdb-doc is in group Development
Public bug reported: The package gdb-doc is in group Development. It should be in group Documentation instead. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gdb-doc (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 11:17:45 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdb UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gdb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044641 Title: Package gdb-doc is in group Development Status in gdb package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The package gdb-doc is in group Development. It should be in group Documentation instead. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gdb-doc (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-1016.16~22.04.1-azure 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-1016-azure x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Nov 26 11:17:45 2023 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdb UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/2044641/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004552] Re: Sound doesn't work on ASUS X670E-E motherboard.
Fixed as of Ubuntu 23.10 (due to updated alsa-ucm-conf package). ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004552 Title: Sound doesn't work on ASUS X670E-E motherboard. Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: None of the outputs work for my digital optical output on my ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI motherboard since updating the ALC4080/ALC4082 firmware. The issue is resolved in the upstream package of alsa-ucm-conf (https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf). When I applied the newer configs sound started working again. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-29.30-generic 5.19.17 Uname: Linux 5.19.0-29-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Feb 2 06:08:15 2023 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-08 (24 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Release amd64 (20221020) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/04/2022 dmi.bios.release: 8.5 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0805 dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string dmi.chassis.version: Default string dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0805:bd11/04/2022:br8.5:svnASUS:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXX670E-EGAMINGWIFI:rvrRev1.xx:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuSKU: dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.sku: SKU dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/2004552/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
