Re: [U-Boot] how does board_init_f() -> board_init_r?

[Peter Chen]

Oh I see. Thanks.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Stephen Warren 
wrote:

> On 02/16/2016 09:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> +Stephen who will know more
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13 February 2016 at 18:52, quantumlight 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to modify the bootloader code for NVIDIA's jetson board.
>>>
>>> So I am looking at crt0.S. It seems that two builds happen, one with
>>> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and one without. So you end up with two file, u-boot.bin
>>> and spl/u-boot-spl.bin.
>>>
>>
>> SPL is built with ARMv4t
>> U-Boot proper is built with ARMv7
>>
>> That's why SPL is used on Tegra. The SPL does not actually load
>> U-Boot. In fact both are bundle together and loaded at the same time.
>> SPL simply jumps to U-Boot when needed.
>>
>
> There's some more background on this topic at:
>
> ftp://download.nvidia.com/tegra-public-appnotes/index.html
>
> In particular, see the "Tegra Boot Flow" link/document.
>
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] how does board_init_f() -> board_init_r?

[Stephen Warren]

On 02/16/2016 09:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:

+Stephen who will know more

Hi,

On 13 February 2016 at 18:52, quantumlight  wrote:

I am trying to modify the bootloader code for NVIDIA's jetson board.

So I am looking at crt0.S. It seems that two builds happen, one with
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and one without. So you end up with two file, u-boot.bin
and spl/u-boot-spl.bin.


SPL is built with ARMv4t
U-Boot proper is built with ARMv7

That's why SPL is used on Tegra. The SPL does not actually load
U-Boot. In fact both are bundle together and loaded at the same time.
SPL simply jumps to U-Boot when needed.


There's some more background on this topic at:

ftp://download.nvidia.com/tegra-public-appnotes/index.html

In particular, see the "Tegra Boot Flow" link/document.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] how does board_init_f() -> board_init_r?

[Simon Glass]

+Stephen who will know more

Hi,

On 13 February 2016 at 18:52, quantumlight  wrote:
> I am trying to modify the bootloader code for NVIDIA's jetson board.
>
> So I am looking at crt0.S. It seems that two builds happen, one with
> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and one without. So you end up with two file, u-boot.bin
> and spl/u-boot-spl.bin.

SPL is built with ARMv4t
U-Boot proper is built with ARMv7

That's why SPL is used on Tegra. The SPL does not actually load
U-Boot. In fact both are bundle together and loaded at the same time.
SPL simply jumps to U-Boot when needed.

>
> However, I am unable to find the code path that calls board_init_r() after
> board_init_f() finishes, although there are several candidates:
>
> 1) crt0.S - if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD was not defined, then it would fall straight
> through to board_init_r() - HOWEVER, for u-boot.bin, isn't CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> defined in autoconf.h? Or is this some clever magic between how u-boot.bin
> and spl/u-boot-spl.bin are stitched together?

For U-Boot, CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined. That define means you are
building SPL.

The clever magic is mostly 'cat'. SPL is padded a little and then
U-Boot is added on the end.

> 2) _weak board_init_f in arch/arm/lib/spl.c - HOWEVER, shouldn't this be
> overloaded by board_init_f in common/board_f.c?

The latter is only used in U-Boot proper. SPL has its own board_init_f().

> 3) board_init_f_r in common/board_f.c - HOWEVER, nothing calls
> board_init_f_r().

No, that is not used on ARM.

>
> Can someone illuminate me on how this happens?
>

See the README under Board Initialisation Flow. In brief, the link
between board_init_f() and board_init_r() is generally the crt0.S that
you found. The catch is that some boards don't implement
board_init_f() in SPL, and so use the weak one, which in fact calls
board_init_r() directly.

See also arch/arm/mach-tegra/board.c which I think contains the code
to jump to SPL.

Regards,
Simon
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] how does board_init_f() -> board_init_r?

[quantumlight]

I am trying to modify the bootloader code for NVIDIA's jetson board.

So I am looking at crt0.S. It seems that two builds happen, one with
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and one without. So you end up with two file, u-boot.bin
and spl/u-boot-spl.bin.

However, I am unable to find the code path that calls board_init_r() after
board_init_f() finishes, although there are several candidates:

1) crt0.S - if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD was not defined, then it would fall straight
through to board_init_r() - HOWEVER, for u-boot.bin, isn't CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
defined in autoconf.h? Or is this some clever magic between how u-boot.bin
and spl/u-boot-spl.bin are stitched together?
2) _weak board_init_f in arch/arm/lib/spl.c - HOWEVER, shouldn't this be
overloaded by board_init_f in common/board_f.c?
3) board_init_f_r in common/board_f.c - HOWEVER, nothing calls
board_init_f_r().

Can someone illuminate me on how this happens?



--
View this message in context: 
http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/how-does-board-init-f-board-init-r-tp245816.html
Sent from the U-Boot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot