Re: [ubuntu-art] New Wave Brainstorm
Could you give a link to this version? It would be easier to test the difference with the actual gtk theme (unless this is a mockup) On 23 January 2010 09:30, Anton Kerezov wrote: > Here you can see the image and tell me what do you think. Could this > replace the default New Wave or should it be a separate theme? > > http://wp.me/pAQvt-28 > > > Anton Kerezov > http://ankere.wordpress.com/ > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
[ubuntu-art] New Wave Brainstorm
Here you can see the image and tell me what do you think. Could this replace the default New Wave or should it be a separate theme? http://wp.me/pAQvt-28 Anton Kerezov http://ankere.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Theme Creator Mockup
В 08:28 + на 23.01.2010 (сб), Andrew написа: > Is there any idea when this might be completed/started? Looks like a > genuinely useful tool It might start soon (but not earlier that a month) and will finish when it is bug free and working. That depends on how things would work and if there are no bugs that stop the development. I really got some feedback and a lot of people would love to see this working but it won't be easy to implement. These days I'll speak with some people that develop the gtk theme rendering (manage all the engines an the way they work) and see if things are going to change radically in gnome 3.0 or no, so on that depends too if I'm even starting this. Anton Kerezov http://ankere.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] Theme Creator Mockup
On 21/01/10 10:40, Anton Kerezov wrote: > В 09:51 +0100 на 21.01.2010 (чт), Thorsten Wilms написа: >> Maybe people are not quite sure what this is about? >> Maybe the pixmap engine doesn't have many fans? > > I don't understand why people think pixmaps are bad. With the power of > today's computers you even don't see the difference between code based > and image based theme plus the fact that the detail and quality is at > least two times more for the little more you "pay". > >> >> You could try to raise some interest outside Ubuntu. > > I'll definitely ask some more about this. > >> >> If it's worth it? >> Is it possible the result would help you personally enough to make good >> for the effort invested? Could it lead to an influx of decent themes? >> Perhaps. I would likely try it out if it existed, but I would not write >> such a tool. I'm much too disappointed of GTK theming and every >> additional detail I learned about GTK made me like it less. > > But as you say I might wait and see what Gnome 3.0 will deliver on the > theming side. I thought that later this could be integrated with the css > theme engine by simply having two (or more in the future) buttons: > "Export pixbuf based theme" and "Export CSS based theme". > > > > Anton Kerezov > http://ankere.wordpress.com/ > > Is there any idea when this might be completed/started? Looks like a genuinely useful tool -- Andrew -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art