[Bug 318047] [NEW] Please backport rdiff-backup 1.2.2-1
Public bug reported: Rationale: rdiff-backup in all recent Ubuntu releases comes from the 1.1 development branch (Intrepid ships 1.1.16-2). Jaunty now has the packages from the stable 1.2 branch which build fine with prevu at least on Intrepid i386. ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport rdiff-backup 1.2.2-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 318047] Re: Please backport rdiff-backup 1.2.2-1
** Attachment added: "rdiff-backup 1.2.2-1 for Intrepid i386 backported with prevu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21276049/rdiff-backup_1.2.2-1%7E8.10prevu1_i386.deb -- Please backport rdiff-backup 1.2.2-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 315815] Re: Please backport vagalume 0.7-1
The attached .deb was created with prevu and works ok. ** Attachment added: "vagalume 0.7-1 backported to Inrepid with prevu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21084169/vagalume_0.7-1%7E8.10prevu1_i386.deb -- Please backport vagalume 0.7-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 315815] [NEW] Please backport vagalume 0.7-1
Public bug reported: Please backport the vagalume 0.7-1 package from Jaunty. The changelog for Vagalume 0.7 follows – the most useful changes are the support for the lastfm:// URL handler and the support for multimedia keys. 0.7 (01 Sep 2008) * Bookmarks support * Support for the Moblin platform * D-BUS support for the desktop version (including vagalumectl) * vagalumectl: renamed 'tag' to 'globaltag' and 'personal radio' to 'library'. * Added manpage for vagalumectl * Detect if Vagalume is already running when trying to run it * Tag correctly albums by various artists (bug #2741) * Allow removing all tags from a song (bug #2655) * Automatically renew expired sessions (bug #2554) * Added lastfm:// URL handler for the desktop * Fixed problem when tagging tracks with special chars in their names. * New Latvian and French translations (see TRANSLATORS for details) * Merged es and es_MX translations * Support for the multimedia keys in some keyboards * Configuration file moved to ~/.vagalume and converted to XML * Use threads when changing radio stations to avoid UI freezes ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport vagalume 0.7-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 275573] Re: Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports
FWIW, the bzr’s PPA for Hardy was just updated to carry a working bzr, bzrtools, bzr-svn trifecta. Thanks a ton to Jelmer for uploading it there! -- Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 275573] Re: Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports
Jelmer Vernooij: > There *is* a verison of bzr-svn that works with bzr 1.8 - bzr-svn > 0.4.13 works with bzr 1.8 and Debian experimental has a version of > bzr-svn that also silences the compatibility warning. Ah, perfect. Can this version be uploaded to the Bazaar PPA at https://launchpad.net/~bzr/+archive please? That would be most helpful. -- Shot -- Did you know that helicopters are souls of fallen tanks? -- Goof -- Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 275573] Re: Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports
(When backporting, note that the current Bazaar – 1.8 – has not yet a compatible bzr-svn release; the last working triple is Bazaar 1.7, Subversion 1.5 and bzr-svn 0.4.13.) -- Please consider rebuiling the package for hardy-backports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 54640] Re: Gaim 2.0 beta 3
FWIW, to rebuild this on my Dapper box, I had to unversion the libgnutls-dev Build-Dep. -- Gaim 2.0 beta 3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54640 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: firefox 1.5
Hello. ulrich steffens: > i'm not that much of a 'break my ubuntu' guy, so maybe > I'll just stick with a vmware-ubuntu and experiment a bit. You can always fetch the official Mozilla binary and install that in /opt, /home/ulrich/bin or whereever you please. IMHO it's much saner than using Firefox through VMware. :o) > fortunately there was a german computermagazine which had > a 1 year license for vmware featured on one of the attached cds. Care to share which magazine and which issue...? :o) Cheers, -- Shot -- A 'lame' server is a server that is SUPPOSED to be authoritative, but, when asked, says: 'Me? I know nothing, I'm from Madrid!' -- Ralf Hildebrandt == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: firefox 1.5
Hello. ulrich steffens: > since firefox 1.5 was released earlier this > week, will there be a backport for firefox? Most probably - no. There are too many components depending on Firefox. For example, I've rebuilt Dapper's 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-1ubuntu3 for my Breezy install and Firefox works as a browser, but the System | Help is broken (most probably Yelp needs a rebuild against the new firefox-dev). Cheers, -- Shot -- We're back to the times when men were men and wrote their own device drivers. -- Linus Torvalds == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
Hello. Marc Wiriadisastra: > Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. > However installation. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb > Selecting previously deselected package trac. > (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: > trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: > Package python-clearsilver is not installed. dpkg won't by itself download the missing dependencies. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy python-clearsilver python-clearsilver: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 Version table: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com breezy/universe Packages python-clearsilver is in Breezy's universe and in version higher than required by Trac, so when you fulfill Trac's dependencies it should be fully installable. Cheers, -- Shot -- With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. -- Steven Weinberg == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
request: quodlibet 0.15-1
Hello. Please backport the source package quodlibet 0.15-1. Both quodlibet_0.15-1_all.deb and quodlibet-ext_0.15-1_i386.deb installed properly on my Breezy system (no rebuilding needed). Reasoning: 0.14 and 0.15 introduced quite a lot, including 'many bug fixes' and 'many optimizations, especially during startup': http://sacredchao.net/quodlibet/milestone?id=EF%2FQL+0.14 http://sacredchao.net/quodlibet/milestone?id=EF%2FQL+0.15 Cheers, -- Shot -- Despite the tons of examples and docs, mod_rewrite is voodoo. Damned cool voodoo, but still voodoo. -- Brian Moore == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. Reinhard Tartler: > On 11/13/05, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does this tool require mirroring of the whole >> archive(s) or just the Packages and Sources files? > please look in /usr/share/doc/madison-lite/* Er, right. Silly me. Thanks. :o) Based on the examples, I created a much simpler script that works for my much smaller needs (attached, if anyone else finds it useful). Is there a way to ask wget to not download the *.gz files if they have the same size and timestamp locally as on the server? The wget manpage suggests -N should be enough, but it doesn't work for me; the files are created with proper timestamps (2005-11-11 21:44 for experimental's main sources, for example), but are re-downloaded each time. Cheers, -- Shot -- If I have pinged farther than others, it is because I routed upon the T3s of giants.-- Greg Andrews == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === #!/bin/sh -e mirror='/home/shot/ubuntu/madison-lite/mirror' madison_conf='/home/shot/.madison-lite/config' deb_dists='unstable experimental' deb_parts='main contrib non-free' ub_dists='breezy breezy-security breezy-updates breezy-backports dapper dapper-security dapper-updates' ub_parts='main restricted universe multiverse' wget='wget -N -O' cd $mirror echo mirror $mirror > $madison_conf for dist in $deb_dists; do for part in $deb_parts; do mkdir -p $dist/$part/binary-i386 mkdir -p $dist/$part/source $wget $dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/$dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz $wget $dist/$part/source/Sources.gz http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/$dist/$part/source/Sources.gz done echo suite $dist $dist >> $madison_conf done for dist in $ub_dists; do for part in $ub_parts; do mkdir -p $dist/$part/binary-i386 mkdir -p $dist/$part/source $wget $dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz $wget $dist/$part/source/Sources.gz http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$dist/$part/source/Sources.gz done echo suite $dist $dist >> $madison_conf done signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. Reinhard Tartler: > May I suggest/introduce the package 'madison-lite' to you? Wow, your example look really useful! Thanks a lot for sharing. > Here is an example output the way I configured it: Could you share the configuration? Does this tool require mirroring of the whole archive(s) or just the Packages and Sources files? (Excuse my asking, I usually don't have problems with parsing manpages, but the madison-lite's one doesn't make it clear whether I should mirror the archive(s) independently, whether the Packages/Sources suffice, etc.) Cheers, -- Shot -- First time I've gotten a programming job that required a drug test. I was worried they were going to say 'you don't have enough LSD in your system to do Unix programming.' -- Paul Tomblin, asr == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. John Dong: >> Is there a mailing list or a feed with the new breezy-backports >> arrivals? I have your 'mc is approved for backporting' email; it >> would be great, though, if there were something akin to dapper-updates >> or its RSS feed of when the packages actually appear in the archive. > Well, mail filtering for CC's to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > should give you the same results as dapper-updates. Right, but the emails are about approvals (like your Friday email about mc), not arrivals - or am I missing something, and there will be a separate email when mc makes it to the breezy-backports archive? The 'approved' emails are very useful; I keep the Friday email in my mail folder and check `apt-cache policy mc` from time to time, but the best solution would be to have an email list (or, better yet, a feed) on actual breezy-backports *arrivals*. // Sorry if I'm asking for a lot; I respect your work very much and // thank a lot for the time you put in it; I would simply like the // outcome to be as useful for everybody as it can be. :o) Cheers, -- Shot -- The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions.-- Robert Lynd == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. John Dong: >>> dosage 1.5.5-1.0~0shot1 (from Debian sid, lessened build-deps) > Not in Dapper. Right, probably isn't autosynced because of the python-dev (<< 2.4) build-dep. I dropped that build-dep and rebuilt it successfully on Breezy; I also notified the Debian maintainer, so if he drops the build-dep upstream, dosage will make the next sync. If not, I'll ask the Dapper team to do a 1.5.5-1ubuntu1 version and then ask for a backport here. > gtodo 0.14+cvs20050820-1 (Dapper's .deb) > Success > phppgadmin 3.5.6-1 (Dapper's .deb; Breezy's has stupid dependencies) > Approved, pending build test > wesnoth 1.0.1-1 (Dapper's .deb) > Approved, pending build test Thanks for the above! :o) > xmoto 0.1.8-2~0shot1 (required a rebuild against Breezy's gcc) > 0.1.7 in Dapper, nothing in Breezy and below. Do you want 0.1.7 instead? No, thanks. My private package works ok for me, and 0.1.8-2 will probably make it to Dapper on next sync; I'll ask then. Is there a mailing list or a feed with the new breezy-backports arrivals? I have your 'mc is approved for backporting' email; it would be great, though, if there were something akin to dapper-updates or its RSS feed of when the packages actually appear in the archive. Cheers, -- Shot -- CAPS LOCK IS LIKE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. John Dong: > Unison from Dapper approved for backporting to Breezy. Great! How long does it take between when a package is approved and when it actually makes it into backports? > NOTE: this does break archive format compatibility with the previous > 2.10release, though for Unison users the price is well worth it. > In addition, other popular distributions are already using the new > archive format, so this brings Ubuntu up to speed. That's true, I had to downgrade Unison on my Debian sid machine to be able to synchronise files between and my Breezy boxen. Also, the 2.10.2 that's in Breezy can't diff properly. Can backport requests go to this list, or are forums the only approved interface (I can't bring myself to use forums on a regular basis...)? FWIW, here is a list of packages from Dapper and Debian I use: dosage 1.5.5-1.0~0shot1 (from Debian sid, lessened build-deps) gtodo 0.14+cvs20050820-1 (Dapper's .deb) mc 4.6.1-1ubuntu2(Dapper's .deb) phppgadmin 3.5.6-1 (Dapper's .deb; Breezy's has stupid dependencies) wesnoth 1.0.1-1 (Dapper's .deb) xmoto 0.1.8-2~0shot1 (required a rebuild against Breezy's gcc) Cheers, -- Shot -- All progress is based upon a universal innate desire on the part of every organism to live beyond its income.-- Samuel Butler == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
