[Bug 1941615] Re: fonts-fantasque-sans font displays numeric codes

2021-08-25 Thread Erik Zoltan
Actually, the font typeface itself looks OK in the "Fonts" application,
but it appears there are multiple copies of each version (e.g. multiple
copies of Fantasque Sans Mono, Regular). I'm attaching another
screenshot, because it looks pretty surprising.

** Attachment added: "Screen shot of the font in "Fonts" application"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-fantasque-sans/+bug/1941615/+attachment/5520538/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-08-25%2011-41-30.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941615

Title:
  fonts-fantasque-sans font displays numeric codes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-fantasque-sans/+bug/1941615/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941615] [NEW] fonts-fantasque-sans font displays numeric codes

2021-08-25 Thread Erik Zoltan
Public bug reported:

As shown in the attached screenshot, the fantasque sans mono font
displays hex codes in boxes rather than actual characters. In the photo,
I'm using gedit. The first line of text says "The quick brown fox jumps
over the lazy dog".

To produce this bug, I installed the font from the package repository
and tried to use the font on my system. In addition to gedit, the
problem occurs in Gnome Tweaks or anywhere else I try to look at the
font. I have a dual boot KDE and GNOME Kubuntu system, but I'm running
in GNOME only.

I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, but got the same issue. The issue
affects all the fonts in the package, but none of the other fonts on my
system.

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
Release:20.04

$ apt-cache policy fonts-fantasque-sans
fonts-fantasque-sans:
  Installed: 1.7.2~alpha.3~dfsg-2
  Candidate: 1.7.2~alpha.3~dfsg-2
  Version table:
 *** 1.7.2~alpha.3~dfsg-2 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: fonts-fantasque-sans (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "screen shot of what the problem looks like."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941615/+attachment/5520537/+files/Screenshot_20210825_112614.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941615

Title:
  fonts-fantasque-sans font displays numeric codes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-fantasque-sans/+bug/1941615/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1511157] Re: Unity command returns python error

2015-11-25 Thread Erik Zoltan
I had problems with my system and reinstalled from a 15.10 CD to fix the
problems. Now I can log into Ubuntu but Unity doesn't have a side menu
or a top menu bar. Windows don't have window title bars and can't be
resized.  When I try to run unity command from the terminal, I get the
following output.

~ $ unity --version
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/unity", line 21, in 
import glib
ImportError: No module named glib
~ $ 

I assume this is related to the lack of a side bar and top menu bar.

Thanks,
Erik

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511157

Title:
  Unity command returns python error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1511157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1511157] Re: Unity command returns python error

2015-11-25 Thread Erik Zoltan
Update: I resolved my problems with the side panel and top menu bar, but
I'm still getting the error message with the unity command. So I guess
they're possibly not related.

Thanks,
Erik

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511157

Title:
  Unity command returns python error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1511157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1475941] Re: Kernel panic - not syncing

2015-08-07 Thread Erik Zoltan
I am attaching a screen shot of my problem because it looks so similar
and I haven't had any luck in solving it. I can still boot with the
Linux 3.19.0-21-generic kernel from the Grub menu. However the more
recent versions (22 through 25) are not booting. I am not sure how to
tell for certain but it looks more and more like the same kind of
problem.

** Attachment added: "IMG_20150807_145055965_HDR.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1475941/+attachment/4441216/+files/IMG_20150807_145055965_HDR.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475941

Title:
  Kernel panic - not syncing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1475941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1475941] Re: Kernel panic - not syncing (clean 15.10 install)

2015-07-22 Thread Erik Zoltan
Correction: on further review my problem seems to be slightly different,
and I will log it separately.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475941

Title:
  Kernel panic - not syncing (clean 15.10 install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1475941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1475941] Re: Kernel panic - not syncing (clean 15.10 install)

2015-07-20 Thread Erik Zoltan
I have a 64-bit System76 computer and this problem also affects me.  My
kernel is 3.19.0-22-generic. I am using factory-installed Ubuntu 15.04,
but I've been running updates regularly.

I can still boot my original 3.19.0-21-generic kernel just fine, and do
my work on that kernel without any problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475941

Title:
  Kernel panic - not syncing (clean 15.10 install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1475941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1445745] Re: Not able to write a review (Unable to show 'none')

2015-06-25 Thread Erik Zoltan
I have tested this and ***IT WORKS. I can click on the link and
create a review.

Note to other testers. I used the instructions at the following link to
enable the vivid-proposed updates.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed

It's important to use vivid-proposed instead of trusty-proposed shown in
the above instructions.

$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install software-center/vivid-proposed

I then ran Software Center and it gave me the ability to create a
review. I created one, and was able to see it in Software Center.

Problem solved. This is a 64 bit Vivid system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445745

Title:
  Not able to write a review (Unable to show 'none')

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1445745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1462211] [NEW] submit_review_gtk3.py throws an exception

2015-06-04 Thread Erik Zoltan
Public bug reported:

I have a fresh Vivid 15.04 install on a System76 desktop computer. I
turn on recommendations in Ubuntu Software Center and I expect to be
able to write a review or rate a package I have installed. When I click
the "write your own review" link, nothing happens. I am attempting to
review the cream vim macros package, but I experience the same behavior
if I try to  review a different package.

Running software-center from the terminal, I see the following error
message in the terminal window at the time that I click the "Write your
own review" link.

(software-center:7441): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to show 'none': Operation not 
supported
2015-06-05 02:07:00,033 - softwarecenter.backend.spawn_helper - WARNING - exit 
code 1 from helper for '['/usr/share/software-center/submit_review_gtk3.py', 
'--pkgname', 'cream', '--iconname', '', '--parent-xid', '', '--version', 
'0.43-3', '--origin', 'ubuntu', '--datadir', '/usr/share/software-center/']'
2015-06-05 02:07:00,033 - softwarecenter.backend.spawn_helper - WARNING - got 
error from helper: 'Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/software-center/submit_review_gtk3.py", line 117, in 
version=options.version)
  File 
"/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/review_gui_helper.py", line 
595, in __init__
BaseApp.__init__(self, datadir, "submit_review.ui")
  File 
"/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/review_gui_helper.py", line 
382, in __init__
self, os.path.join(datadir, "ui/gtk3", uifile), "software-center")
  File 
"/usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/SimpleGtkbuilderApp.py", 
line 32, in __init__
self.builder.add_from_file(path)
GLib.Error: gtk-builder-error-quark: Invalid property: GtkGrid.n_rows on line 
409 (11)
'
/usr/bin/software-center:184: Warning: Source ID 2975 was not found when 
attempting to remove it
  Gtk.main()

I am using Ubuntu 15.04. 
The installed version of software-center is 13.10-0ubuntu6
Happy to provide additional information if it will help.

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1462211

Title:
  submit_review_gtk3.py throws an exception

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1462211/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 838577] Re: GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX

2011-10-30 Thread Erik Zoltan
I found a small workaround.  I went into the universal access menu and
selected "Large text".  It improved the appearance of the gnome menu,
and the improvement persisted even after I turned off large text.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838577

Title:
  GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/838577/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 838577] Re: GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX

2011-10-30 Thread Erik Zoltan
I'm attaching a screenshot taken with a digital camera since it's hard
to get a picture of this one.  This shows the problems I'm having on a
fresh install with gnome shell and all packages up to date out of the
default repositories.  One is the font problems in the gnome shell menu,
and the other is the diagonal effect on dialogs and pulldown menus.  It
certainly makes for an interesting computing experience ;).

** Attachment added: "Screenshot illustrating two display issues"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/838577/+attachment/2579021/+files/screenshot.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838577

Title:
  GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/838577/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 558872] Re: empathy accounts fail to connect after manually unlocking keyring

2010-11-29 Thread Erik Zoltan
I have been struggling with this bug in Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick (64 bit).

I tried the following and it solved the problem.  I went into System /
Preferences / Passwords and Encryption Keys.  I expanded the "Passwords:
login" key and I clicked on the keys that were causing problems (in my
case, anything related to Facebook and Identi.ca) that I couldn't
connect to with Empathy.  I pressed "Delete" on each one, to delete it.

When I rebooted, I had to go back into Empathy and tell it the passwords
that it should use to connect to those accounts for which I had removed
the password from the Passwords and Encryption Keys dialog.

Rebooting again, it now prompts me for my keyring password just one
time.  When I specify it correctly, it connects to my accounts in
Empathy and sets my status to "Available".

I hope this simple procedure works of others too.  If so, then the
developers should be able to use this information to narrow down exactly
what's going wrong.

Thanks,
Erik

-- 
empathy accounts fail to connect after manually unlocking keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558872
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362401] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.41 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-04-21 Thread Erik Zoltan
Hi Leann,

My older computer was lagging in Ubuntu Studio so I had to switch to
Xubuntu Jaunty yesterday.  I haven't had any problems but can't check
the Linux image because I wiped my drive clean as part of the process.

Sorry and thanks for your follow-up!  I have no problem if you want to
close this.

Erik

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.41 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362401
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362401] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.41 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-04-16 Thread Erik Zoltan

** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544595/dmesg.log

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544596/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544598/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544599/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544601/HalComputerInfo.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544602/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544603/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544604/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544606/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25544608/ProcModules.txt

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.41 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362401
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362401] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.41 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2009-04-16 Thread Erik Zoltan
Public bug reported:

I have a Jaunty Ubuntu Studio install on an older desktop.  Received a
notification that there were many updates to install.  During the update
my screen saver kicked in, and then there was an error message that the
screen saver errored out.  Much later during the process (not sure
whether it was related) I received this linux image installation error.


e...@ubustud-erik:~$ uname -a
Linux ubustud-erik 2.6.28-11-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 8 04:38:53 UTC 2009 
i686 GNU/Linux

e...@ubustud-erik:~$ cat /proc/version_signature
Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.41-generic

e...@ubustud-erik:~$ dmesg
[0.00] BIOS EBDA/lowmem at: 0009fc00/0009fc00
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 
4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 8 04:38:53 UTC 2009 
(Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.41-generic)
[0.00] KERNEL supported cpus:
[0.00]   Intel GenuineIntel
[0.00]   AMD AuthenticAMD
[0.00]   NSC Geode by NSC
[0.00]   Cyrix CyrixInstead
[0.00]   Centaur CentaurHauls
[0.00]   Transmeta GenuineTMx86
[0.00]   Transmeta TransmetaCPU
[0.00]   UMC UMC UMC UMC
[0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[0.00]  BIOS-e820:  - 0009fc00 (usable)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 0010 - 1fff (usable)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 1fff - 1fff8000 (ACPI data)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: 1fff8000 - 2000 (ACPI NVS)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: fec0 - fed0 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: fee0 - fef0 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: ffee - fff0 (reserved)
[0.00]  BIOS-e820: fffc - 0001 (reserved)
[0.00] DMI 2.3 present.
[0.00] AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working it around.
[0.00] last_pfn = 0x1fff0 max_arch_pfn = 0x10
[0.00] Scanning 0 areas for low memory corruption
[0.00] modified physical RAM map:
[0.00]  modified:  - 0001 (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: 0001 - 0009fc00 (usable)
[0.00]  modified: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: 000f - 0010 (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: 0010 - 1fff (usable)
[0.00]  modified: 1fff - 1fff8000 (ACPI data)
[0.00]  modified: 1fff8000 - 2000 (ACPI NVS)
[0.00]  modified: fec0 - fed0 (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: fee0 - fef0 (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: ffee - fff0 (reserved)
[0.00]  modified: fffc - 0001 (reserved)
[0.00] kernel direct mapping tables up to 1fff @ 1-16000
[0.00] RAMDISK: 1f88f000 - 1ffdfb28
[0.00] ACPI: RSDP 000F9F10, 0014 (r0 AMI   )
[0.00] ACPI: RSDT 1FFF, 002C (r1 AMIINT SiS645XX   10 MSFT  
10B)
[0.00] ACPI: FACP 1FFF0030, 0081 (r1 AMIINT SiS645XX   11 MSFT  
10B)
[0.00] ACPI: DSDT 1FFF0120, 3692 (r1SiS  645 1000 MSFT  
10D)
[0.00] ACPI: FACS 1FFF8000, 0040
[0.00] ACPI: APIC 1FFF00C0, 0058 (r1 AMIINT SiS645XX 1000 MSFT  
10B)
[0.00] ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0
[0.00] 0MB HIGHMEM available.
[0.00] 511MB LOWMEM available.
[0.00]   mapped low ram: 0 - 1fff
[0.00]   low ram:  - 1fff
[0.00]   bootmap 00012000 - 00016000
[0.00] (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [00 - 001fff]
[0.00]   #0 [00 - 001000]   BIOS data page ==> [00 
- 001000]
[0.00]   #1 [001000 - 002000]EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [001000 
- 002000]
[0.00]   #2 [006000 - 007000]   TRAMPOLINE ==> [006000 
- 007000]
[0.00]   #3 [10 - 87c52c]TEXT DATA BSS ==> [10 
- 87c52c]
[0.00]   #4 [001f88f000 - 001ffdfb28]  RAMDISK ==> [001f88f000 
- 001ffdfb28]
[0.00]   #5 [87d000 - 881000]INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [87d000 
- 881000]
[0.00]   #6 [09fc00 - 10]BIOS reserved ==> [09fc00 
- 10]
[0.00]   #7 [01 - 012000]  PGTABLE ==> [01 
- 012000]
[0.00]   #8 [012000 - 016000]  BOOTMAP ==> [012000 
- 016000]
[0.00] Zone PFN ranges:
[0.00]   DMA  0x0010 -> 0x1000
[0.00]   Normal   0x1000 -> 0x0001ff

[Bug 301910] Re: package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

2008-11-24 Thread Erik Zoltan
Changing the status to "Invalid" since it was easy to resolve.

** Changed in: libsndfile (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very 
bad inconsistent state - you should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 301910] Re: package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

2008-11-24 Thread Erik Zoltan
I was able to resolve this with the following step:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install libsndfile1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libsndfile1
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/191kB of archives.
After this operation, 459kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package libsndfile1.
(Reading database ... 111986 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libsndfile1 (from .../libsndfile1_1.0.17-4_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up libsndfile1 (1.0.17-4) ...

Processing triggers for libc6 ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

-- 
package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very 
bad inconsistent state - you should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 301910] Re: package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

2008-11-24 Thread Erik Zoltan

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19919928/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very 
bad inconsistent state - you should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 301910] [NEW] package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

2008-11-24 Thread Erik Zoltan
Public bug reported:

I was trying to do something unrelated in Kubuntu and got this error. I
had earlier exited out of Adept Installer a little early, but it had
reported everything was OK when I went back in and it tried to recover.

Can't install anything else due to this problem, and can't remove this
package.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get remove libsndfile1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libsndfile1
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
dpkg: error processing libsndfile1 (--remove):
 Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
 reinstall it before attempting a removal.
Errors were encountered while processing:
 libsndfile1
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Dependencies:
 
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: libsndfile1 1.0.17-4
SourcePackage: libsndfile
Title: package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a 
very bad inconsistent state - you should
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic x86_64

** Affects: libsndfile (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
package libsndfile1 1.0.17-4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very 
bad inconsistent state - you should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 258899] Re: Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working

2008-11-17 Thread Erik Zoltan
Yes it now works for me as well.  I've gotten this to work on multiple
systems now, both 32 and 64 bit.

Thanks,
Erik Z.

-- 
Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 258899] Re: Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working

2008-08-18 Thread Erik Zoltan
The problem also seems to affect hulu.com.  (Thought I'd add this
information just in case it provides any useful clues.)

-- 
Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 258899] Re: Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working

2008-08-18 Thread Erik Zoltan
I am having the same problem.  It affects videos on the Daily Show and
South Park web sites which have the same hosting company, it appears.
They both have the same kind of "watch full episode" interface.  I can
reproduce this 100% in Konqueror, Firefox and Opera.  I am able to use
Flash and videos on numerous other sites.

I have Hardy 8.04 Kubuntu, with KDE 4.1.  
Flash packages:
 - flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu2)
 - libswfdec-06.90 (0.6.4-2)
 - swfdec-gnome (2.22.2-1)
 - swfdec-mozilla (0.6.0-2ubuntu1)

Java:
 - sun-java6-jre (6-06-ubuntu1)
 - sun-java6-bin (6-06-ubuntu1)

Firefox Extensions
 - DOM Inspector 2.0.0
 - GooglePreview 3.11

-- 
Flash videos on sites such as The Daily Show stopped working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs