[Bug 1661310] [NEW] Same serial number for two different certs
Public bug reported: Hello, I have a problem with last version of xca installed from repo in yakkety (1.3.2-1 amd64). Sometimes we have some different certificates with same serial number. This is how to reproduce : *database.xdb (already initialised with a CA cert) is located in a file share (debian) *Computer A do a "mount -t cifs //server/share /mnt *Computer B do the same mount *Computer A (yakkety with xca 1.3.2-1) launch xca and open /mnt/database.xdb *Computer B (yakkety with xca 1.3.2-1) launch xca and open /mnt/database.xdb So the same database is opened from two computer at same time. *Computer A create a new cert (signed by CA) *Computer B create a new cert (signed by CA) *Computer A close database.xdb *Computer B close database.xdb When computer A or B reopen database.xdb serial number is the same for certs created by computer A and computer B. I have joined a screenshot to show this. So my question is : Is there a problem with concurrent access with the database ? If yes , is it possible to create a "lock" in the database in order to prevent this issue (maybe as vim warns when opening an already opened file) ? Thank you. ** Affects: xca (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "serial_number.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661310/+attachment/4812134/+files/serial_number.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661310 Title: Same serial number for two different certs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/1661310/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1582759] Re: Unexpected low write rate with Lexar JumpDrive P20 64GB flash drives
I have exactly the same problem with Lexar JumpDrive P20 128GB. The max write speed is near 45MB/sec and is expected to be near 270MB/sec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582759 Title: Unexpected low write rate with Lexar JumpDrive P20 64GB flash drives To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1582759/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1047688] Re: Boot fails on udev if USB devices are present
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 978891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 978891 ubuntu 12.04 doesn't boot when usb device plugged in (except usb mouse) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047688 Title: Boot fails on udev if USB devices are present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1047688/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1021316] Re: sticky edges should be inactive in the monitor where the launcher is not active and an window is not beeing draged
Seems like something is changed related to this bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1120223 but I'm not sure how it behaves when draging an window to the edge. otherwise I think it should be closed this bug as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021316 Title: sticky edges should be inactive in the monitor where the launcher is not active and an window is not beeing draged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1021316/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1071101] Re: nearly every other boot I get Low Graphics Mode message.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1070150 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 I am having the same issue with a system with dual vga nvidia optimus and intel (I don't use nvidia proprietary drivers or any thing). I would be happy if intel starts always correctly. I tryed to compare log files of xorg and they start differentiating with line setversion 1.4 failed In the good log file (the one that system starts normally) the order of loading moduls is: [ 6.071] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 6.071] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 6.071] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 6.071] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 6.071] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 7 [ 6.071] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout in the other one the secuence is: [ 7.362] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 7.362] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 7.362] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 7.362] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 7.362] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 7.362] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 7.362] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 7.362] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout as you can see, it seems like the drivers are recing which one has to start first and if intel starts first it works other wise fails. if you need both full log files or any thing I can do to help please let me know. another problem I have (not sure if related) is that when starting with a second monitor connected the system hangs with a black screen. this happens after selecting to boot on ubuntu (I have dual boot sytem). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071101 Title: nearly every other boot I get Low Graphics Mode message. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1071101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070150] Re: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics
I am having the same issue with a system with dual vga nvidia optimus and intel (I don't use nvidia proprietary drivers or any thing). I would be happy if intel starts always correctly. I tryed to compare log files of xorg and they start differentiating with line setversion 1.4 failed In the good log file (the one that system starts normally) the order of loading moduls is: [ 6.071] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 6.071] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 6.071] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 6.071] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 6.071] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 6.071] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 7 [ 6.071] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout in the other one the secuence is: [ 7.362] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 7.362] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 7.362] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 7.362] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 7.362] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 7.362] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 5 [ 7.362] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 6 [ 7.362] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout as you can see, it seems like the drivers are recing which one has to start first and if intel starts first it works other wise fails. if you need both full log files or any thing I can do to help please let me know. another problem I have (not sure if related) is that when starting with a second monitor connected the system hangs with a black screen. this happens after selecting to boot on ubuntu (I have dual boot sytem). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070150 Title: Intermittent low graphics mode with Intel HD graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1070150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478245] Re: Numlock keys + navigation keys not working
can someone please include the patch in the .deb This bug seems to be corrected long time ago (https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina/issues/45) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478245 Title: Numlock keys + navigation keys not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/478245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1021316] Re: sticky edges should be inactive in the monitor where the launcher is not active and an window is not beeing draged
@Bilali It is true that is a specification change. But how can it be considered? Should this be reported as a brainstorm instad of a bug or how should it be done? @John 1. I did not thing of that helping on scrollbar targeting but now that you say that I see that it might help but does this make a very big diference? 2. I know about the switch to turn it off but in my case I have it on. (I like to half-screen maximase the window) 3. I am sorry but I have no idea how it workes internally, all I know is that in most of the times that I move the mouse from one monitor to the other I don't want it to be cached and that times are easy distincuised from others I'm not draging a window -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021316 Title: sticky edges should be inactive in the monitor where the launcher is not active and an window is not beeing draged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1021316/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940124] Re: Remmina numlock bug -regression
This is happening to mee too. The caps lock is not transmitted to the rdp session too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940124 Title: Remmina numlock bug -regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/940124/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969911] Re: new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts
With the update of ff to 12 looks like the problem is fixed as it does not apear any more. I Will test it 1 or 2 more days and if it does not apear any more I will close/ask to close it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969911 Title: new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/969911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969911] [NEW] new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts
Public bug reported: as you might see from the screenshot attached with the bug report when I start the firefox the new tab button is complitly in the right corner and not just after the last tab as it should be. When I open enough tabs to complitly fill the tab space and than start clossing them back than the new tab button stays just after the last tab as it should be. I think this is a bug in the Ubuntu Firefix Modification becouse when I disable that add-on than I don't have the problem any more. The problem was first pressent on Ubuntu 11.10 (comming with one of the updates), last night I updated to 12.04 and still O have the same problem. I have installed Ubuntu Firefix Modification 2.0.1 Let me know if you need more info. ** Affects: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969911 Title: new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/969911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969911] Re: new tab is not in the right position when firefix starts
** Attachment added: firefox just started showing the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969911/+attachment/2974050/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-03-31%2011%3A44%3A07.png ** Summary changed: - new tab is not in the right position when firefix starts + new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts ** Description changed: - as you might see from the screen shot attached with the bug report when - I start the firefox the new tab button is complitly in the right corner + as you might see from the screenshot attached with the bug report when I + start the firefox the new tab button is complitly in the right corner and not just after the last tab as it should be. - When I open enough tabs to fill the screen and than start clossing them - back than the new tab button stays just after the last tab as it should - be. + When I open enough tabs to complitly fill the tab space and than start + clossing them back than the new tab button stays just after the last tab + as it should be. I think this is a bug in the Ubuntu Firefix Modification becouse when I disable that add-on than I don't have the problem any more. - The problem was first pressent on Ubuntu 11.10 and last night I updated - to 12.04 and still has the same problem. + The problem was first pressent on Ubuntu 11.10 (comming with one of the + updates), last night I updated to 12.04 and still O have the same + problem. - Let me know if I can provide more info. + I have installed Ubuntu Firefix Modification 2.0.1 + + Let me know if you need more info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969911 Title: new tab button is not in the right position when firefix starts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/969911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812949] [NEW] horizontal resize (make it smaller) does not work
Public bug reported: Running Ubuntu 11.10 oneiric updated to the latest version on date 19/07/2011. installed update manager version: 1:0.152.4 runnng on Virtual Box 4.1 beta3 when trying to resize (make it smaller) the update manager horizontally it resizes only till to where the controllers on the window start. If I maximize and restore it again the horizontal size does not restore to where was before maximizing but stays almost as big as maximized. to resize it bigger works properly as it works to resize it vertically. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: manager resize update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812949 Title: horizontal resize (make it smaller) does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/812949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778969] [NEW] scrollbar not visible in a list if list elemet is whider then scrollbar itself
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: overlay-scrollbar In Computer Janitor the scrollbar has the same color as the selected element (element to be removed) of the list. If the scrollbar is smaller than the selected element and on top of it than it is not visible. I believe this will be the same in other cases as well. this makes it very confusing and hard to find the scrollbar. ** Affects: overlay-scrollbar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778969 Title: scrollbar not visible in a list if list elemet is whider then scrollbar itself -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778969] Re: scrollbar not visible in a list if list elemet is whider then scrollbar itself
** Attachment added: as you may imagine, in the side of the selected libdata element which is selected is hiden the scrollbar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778969/+attachment/2118070/+files/Screenshot-1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778969 Title: scrollbar not visible in a list if list elemet is whider then scrollbar itself -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693777] Re: Minimizing a fullscreen window leaves nothing focused
when dragging an window from maximized it loses the focus. I believe the window should continue keeping the focus. Is this caused by the same bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693777 Title: Minimizing a fullscreen window leaves nothing focused -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728690] Re: When Unity launcher is visible restore a maximized window loses its focus
if the launcher is kept hidden by another window then dragging the maximized window to restore it doesn't loses the focus. that can be the same as bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/729929 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728690 Title: When Unity launcher is visible restore a maximized window loses its focus -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693777] Re: Minimizing a fullscreen window leaves nothing focused
For my preview comment: Just recognized that if the luncher is kept hidden by another window then dragging the maximized window it doesn't loses the focus. What looks to me more like the bug I tried to explain is the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/729929 which actually has a reference to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/728690 which explains my bug :) I will go and drop a comment to this bug entry as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693777 Title: Minimizing a fullscreen window leaves nothing focused -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651318] [NEW] The space between characters is not uniform when the font is used in the terminal
Public bug reported: In the terminal the font is bad rendered. the space between characters is not uniform. the preferences of the terminal in my machine are the default ones and I'm using maverick latest build attached you can find a screenshot. ** Affects: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- The space between characters is not uniform when the font is used in the terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651318] Re: Space betwin characters is nut uniform when used in terminal
** Attachment added: Screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651318/+attachment/1654150/+files/screenshot.jpeg ** Summary changed: - Space betwin characters is nut uniform when used in terminal + The space between characters is not uniform when the font is used in the terminal -- The space between characters is not uniform when the font is used in the terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522768] [NEW] i cant upgrade!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager So i try to upgrade but i get this crash Could not install '/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.10.1-0ubuntu16_i386.deb' The upgrade will continue but the '/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.10.1-0ubuntu16_i386.deb' package may not be in a working state. Please consider submitting a bug report about it sudo dpkg -i libc6_2.10.1-0ubuntu_i386.deb Errors were encountered while processing gedit: relocation error: /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: symbol __abort_msg, version GLIB C_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Errors were encountered while processing deconf tzdata sudo dpkg -i libc6_2.10.1-0ubuntu16_i386.deb Lulzim Errors were encountered while proccessing: libc62.10.1-0ubuntu_i386.deb The upgrade will continue but the 'libc6' package may not be in a working state. Please consider submitting a bug report about it. but it tells me even this package libc6 is already installed and configured Ubuntu 9.04 \n \l Also i cannot use the livecd for my networking in ubuntu 9.10 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.111.7 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- i cant upgrade! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522768] Re: i cant upgrade!
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39275091/Dependencies.txt -- i cant upgrade! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312491] Re: Out-of-disk-space is not reported to the user when installing/updating packages fails
** Description changed: when volume becomes full, no programs can be removed because updates and previous attempted installs try to reassert themselves, then the package handler closes itself. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Dependencies: - libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1ubuntu11 - gcc-4.3-base 4.3.2-1ubuntu11 - findutils 4.4.0-2ubuntu3 - libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu7 + libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1ubuntu11 + gcc-4.3-base 4.3.2-1ubuntu11 + findutils 4.4.0-2ubuntu3 + libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu7 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/perl/5.10.0/IO.pm' NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: perl-base 5.10.0-11.1ubuntu2 SourcePackage: perl Title: package perl-base 5.10.0-11.1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: failed in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/perl/5.10.0/IO.pm' Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic i686 -- Out-of-disk-space is not reported to the user when installing/updating packages fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257639] Re: E: The package cache file is corrupted E: _cache-open() failed, please report.
I have the same problem. It happens when I run Update manager in the following scenario: I run update manager then I click check after repositories are downloaded the error is shown After the error the list of updates is refreshed and it looks to me like every thing works fine after. If there are no updates the error doesn't show. BTW I'm using ubuntu 9.04 Beta, it happens on Alpha 6 and most probably 5 as well. All the Best Lulzim -- E: The package cache file is corrupted E: _cache-open() failed, please report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335200] [NEW] Volume notivication empty on volume change or mute
Public bug reported: I'm using ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 5. on a Compaq presario V5033EA (AMD Turion 64) When I change the volume the message notifier is empty, (the volume changes). The same happens when I mute. I don't know if the bug was there on alpha 4. find attached a screen shot All The Bast Lulzim ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Volume notivication empty on volume change or mute https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335200] Re: Volume notivication empty on volume change or mute
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23160439/Screenshot.png -- Volume notivication empty on volume change or mute https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
