[Bug 1413380] Re: [needs-packaging] cryptote needs packaging
I have fixed all the problems mentioned, the package passes the lintian test and is uploaded at: https://launchpad.net/~kcleung-users/+archive/ubuntu/cryptote Please have a look -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413380 Title: [needs-packaging] cryptote needs packaging To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1413380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1413380] Re: [needs-packaging] cryptote needs packaging
Hi Didier, - debian/copyright doesn't follow DEP5 (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/), please use this as a template. fixed - the version makes people think that this package is available in debian, which is not the case. Please reference it as 0.5.390-0ubuntuX (where -0 means this version wasn't in debian and ubuntuX == ubuntu+number as you did previously. However, when I looked at the changeling, it has this order: cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu3) vivid; urgency=low (the one you inspected last time in my ppa) * Fixing compilation errors in secmem.h by explicitly naming parent class -- Qichang Liang kcle...@users.sourceforge.net Thu, 25 Dec 2014 01:23:30 +1300 cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=medium * Adding correct build dependencies -- Timo Bingmann r...@idlebox.net Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:26:03 +0200 cryptote (0.5.390-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=medium * First public upstream beta release 0.5.390 -- Timo Bingmann r...@idlebox.net Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:03:03 +0200 cryptote (0.0.366-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=medium * Upstream beta release 0.0.366 -- Timo Bingmann r...@idlebox.net Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:59:15 + cryptote (0.0.330-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Upstream beta release 0.0.330 -- Timo Bingmann r...@idlebox.net Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:39:15 + cryptote (0.0.259-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Upstream beta release 0.0.259 -- Timo Bingmann r...@idlebox.net Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:20:25 +0200 Though none of the previous versions were publicly released. So for the current version, should I use: cryptote (0.5.390-0ubuntu3) or cryptote (0.5.390-0ubuntu1) I am very confused - debian/compat is referecing debhelper 5, we tend to rather use debhelper 9 nowdays. fixed - debian/control references as well debhelper 5 instead of 9 fixed - debian/rules: there are some lintian errors on it, make clean doesn't really clean the package and have some rules missing: W: cryptote source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 46 W: cryptote source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep W: cryptote source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch Please, consider here as well to use debhelper 9 as the rules will be way easier. debian/rules would be simply something like: #!/usr/bin/make -f #DH_VERBOSE=1 %: dh $@ and from that, you can read some debhelper documentation if you need to override some default parameters. I am going to look into that. I think there is only one binary package, so there should not be build-indep stuff. * debian/menu is not in use in ubuntu, if you don't intend to upload that package to debian, please remove it. Here is another problem: I want to get cryptote into 15.04 as soon as possible, but I don't rule out uploading that package in the future. So what should I do with debian/menu? And alternatively, do you have power to sponsor new Debian packages? Thanks! Qichang -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413380 Title: [needs-packaging] cryptote needs packaging To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1413380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1413380] [NEW] cryptote needs packaging
Public bug reported: Cryptote is a light-weight, easy to use GUI text editor which supports encryption. http://panthema.net/2009/cryptote/ yet it is not in the Ubuntu repository at the moment. I have just packaged this software for the upcoming 15.04 release, and it is available at this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~kcleung-users/+archive/ubuntu/cryptote Please have a look, and help me upload this software to the 15.04 universe repository ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413380 Title: cryptote needs packaging To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1413380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
too late for 13.10, as the feature freeze is over. However we should aim at porting openjpeg-2.0 to 14.04, and work should start *now* at a ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218228 Title: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1218228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1218228] [NEW] Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
Public bug reported: openjpeg-2.0.0 is already released in November 2012 (last year) https://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/ Please update ubuntu package to openjpeg-2.0.0 ** Affects: openjpeg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218228 Title: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/1218228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
So can we still upgrade to 2.0.0 ourselves in Ubuntu and ignore the Debian? Because the icc-profile feature which is only available in 1.5 and 2.0 is missing on the current 1.3 package in ubuntu, and packages such as darktable and gimp would immensely benefit from the icc-profile feature. Also, 1.5.1 is already available at debian-experimental http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopenjpeg-dev ** Also affects: darktable (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gimp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218228 Title: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1218228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101049] [NEW] non-free algorithms (e.g. SIFT) excluded
Public bug reported: Currently, non-free algorithms such as SIFT are excluded from the opencv_2.4.2+dfsg-0exp2. However, is it possible to include libraries and header under opencv2/non-free (that may be subject to patents in some countries) into packages such as libopencv-nonfree(-dev)? This non-free package can be included in the multiverse repository. ** Affects: opencv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101049 Title: non-free algorithms (e.g. SIFT) excluded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/+bug/1101049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
