[Bug 157041] Re: [apport] package rsync failed to install/upgrade:

2008-05-21 Thread pokkets
Followed the fix instructions, the problem has been resolved. rsync is
installed with no more error messages. Thank you. Now I'll have to be
more careful where I use my debian sources (it seemed like a great idea
at the time.)

-- 
[apport] package rsync failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 220645] Re: package ubuntu-desktop 1.102 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2008-05-01 Thread pokkets
I've had trouble with the hardy upgrade, with packages such as rsync, cupsys, 
ubuntu-standard failing to configure due to dependency problems. I have debian 
packages installed that are not supported by ubuntu.
I have since learned mixing ubuntu and debian packages could cause problems, 
but wasn't sure if all of the debian packages could be removed without making 
the system unstable. 
I got an email from getdeb.net, a site that is a source for some of the debian 
packages I've installed.
The email suggested that before a hardy upgrade all 'getdeb' packages be 
removed, and for the system to be configured with a separate home partition. 
The email has links for instructions to remove packages in synaptic, and how to 
create a separate home partition in an already installed system. (with a 
reminder to backup) I also wondered if there are other debian files that need 
to be removed. 
I have sysv-rc-2.86.ds1-38
 I read in wikki GTK+1, and GTK+2 are not compatible, and metacity uses GTK+2 
but that may not be relevant
I've included some of the details of the email including the link urls, and 
hope someone can explain in more detail, or if this applies to another bug. I 
was worried the email was spam (how to delete your home file with one key 
stroke)  
 
http://www.getdeb.net :

Fresh installs are much easier to perform if the data (/home) and the OS are 
not on the same partition. If the installation was done into a single 
partition, it is recommended to split it 
(http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/separatehome). Backup is strongly recommended 
if you are going to perform partition changes.
If you don't have a separate home and still want to perform a fresh install, 
you must backup your data to an external media or to an another disk. Then, 
reinstall the system creating the recommended partitions and restore the data 
from your backup.

If you cannot perform a fresh install and will need to do a distribution 
upgrade it is recommended that you remove all getdeb packages prior to the 
upgrade. You can remove all the getdeb packages following the procedure at 
http://www.getdeb.net/docs/uninstall.pdf .
I'll attach the getdeb file removal pdf 


** Attachment added: "untested advice from debian source to remove debian 
packages before upgrade"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14076651/uninstall.pdf

-- 
package ubuntu-desktop 1.102 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - 
leaving unconfigured
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220645
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 157041] Re: [apport] package rsync failed to install/upgrade:

2008-04-18 Thread pokkets
Same problem, rsync failed to install with terminal upgrade from gutsy
to hardy 2.6.24-16 with failure to install ubuntu-standard and kdesudo -
so far. Still updating 1 minute before cleanup.

-- 
[apport] package rsync failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 195661] Re: [hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-03-18 Thread pokkets
I did an upgrade to kernel 2.6.24-12, the cupsys seems to have installed
I used a an alternate Alpha6 Mar14 to supplement the download. I didn't
check to see if the version changed There were other packages that still
failed to load, but they are other bugs

-- 
[hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195661
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 195661] Re: [hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-03-14 Thread pokkets
I haven't been sure if it was the upgrade as much as the number of applications 
I have loaded on my system. I decided to try and load as much as I could onto 
my system , because I intend to upgrade my laptop, to a dual core, before I 
installed a system permanently on the new laptop. I now know I 'experiment' to 
much to have a permanent stable system. but being new to linux and ubuntu I 
wanted to learn as much as quickly as possible. The 'hard way' can make 
learning both necessary, and memorable. I hadn't done anything with apparmor, 
or tried to install SELinux - yet. I haven't been able to connect with 
wireless, in hardy, but I got another automatic dist-upgrade from alpha5-6 
using ethernet. Cupsys still seem to fail for the same reason. I have some kde 
programs, and unauthenticated packages, but in var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log the 
packages seemed to be ones that depended on cupsys, not the reverse. I have a 
hardya6 alternate CD, and a copy of gutsy I'm building with a similar 
application load in an effort to try and solve the problem by elimination. I 
only have Windows at all, for the sake of a canon printer. The main system I 
use is still the pre upgrade Gutsy I had in a root tar file. I haven't been 
switching between systems too often, because I've been foldingathome,(I 
discovered that when I went looking for a solution to my clock or server 
failing.) and begrudge the hour or few getting nowhere.
I know here is a difference between kubuntu and ubuntu upgrades. but not how it 
would it affect automatic upgrades on xclient-script alternate or any other 
upgrades. 
I'm spending too much space writing what I don't know. I'll update if I learn 
anything constructive.

-- 
[hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195661
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-03-11 Thread pokkets
I am curious about an upgrade which failed which I continued in bug 197199 
regarding the update-manager -d which I continued in another bug because it was 
a distro upgrade from gutsy to hardy.
This bug was said to be invalid because the distro I am using is Ubuntu 
Ultimate. As far as I can work out The upgrade was from gutsy to hardy, it was 
not an ultimate, upgrade. As far as I know one does not exist yet. I want to 
try and work the problem out because ubuntu update-manager will have a hardy 
distro upgrade in april, and I want to try and solve the entire problem before 
then. The Ultimate system seems to be a Ubuntu base, with packages added most 
of which are available in synaptic. The upgrade seems to have failed because 
the apparmor would not install cupsys, so there were associated dependency 
problems which were also ubuntu related. The Hardy system that 'failed is on 
USB, and there were problems loading wireless which I have not solved yet but 
seemed to be a problem with ndiswrapper.
Is apparmor necessary ? I know there is SELinux but I don't know enough about 
linux and ubuntu to configure it. I discovered this in bug 195661 which was 
also about a apparmour/cupsys upgrade failure filed by christer edwards, but it 
is listed as a cupsys bug.
I know when some universe and backport packages are added they can cause 
instability, The prime examples on my system have been ichthux, and Envy. Envy 
had a hardware problem no ati or nvidia card. Can packages that cause 
instability be identified before an upgrade is done? When I update-manager -d 
update-manager said my system was up to date. The USB upgrade has since 
upgraded to the hardy Alpha 6 kernel 2.6.24-11-generic which I managed with 
ethernet. cupsys still failed to configure, and crashed. I just got some new 
CDs so I'm going to burn a copy of hardy alpha 6 and install that.  Maybe I can 
just do a kernel/apparmor/cupsys transplant. Perhaps that would be like giving 
it a brain transplant. While I may be learning the 'hard way' what I learn 
usually leads to another program entirely.
I figure with the number of people turning to Ubuntu there are bound to be some 
weird bugs submitted by people only just introduced linux and ubuntu. Perhaps 
some of what I write can nip some of them in the bug.

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-03-11 Thread pokkets
The session was Xclient script
This bug was solved with two steps 
I Started from scratch on a usb to pinpoint the problem
with the same added sources I got an update icon when debian was added
Which gave a partial, then failed upgrade notification
I checked the list of upgrades, they were primarily the replacement of debian 
unstable packages with the ubuntu version. There were also packages listed 
which were not to be upgraded
I unmarked all added 3rd party sources. The prime culprit was debian Etch. When 
they were removed some irreconcilable upgrades were removed from the upgrade. 
Any programs that were listed but not upgraded were upgraded in synaptic 
package manager, where some conflicts, and dependency issues could be resolved. 
The upgrades for the irreconcilable programs would not upgrade in synaptic 
either, those were the programs that disappeared from the upgrade when the 3rd 
party sources were removed.

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-03-07 Thread pokkets
There is another thing I  that I think I contributed to the failure When I 
added Kubuntu and Edubuntu to 3rd party they offered upgrades.  I'm sure I 
upgraded with edubuntu, but when I added kubuntu  I didn't upgrade. The system 
and disks have all been 7.10, but since there hasn't been an upgrade, as it is 
seen as a source now.
in var/lib/apt/cdrom.list.distUpgrade Kubuntu is mentioned.
CD::e032efd736b74e8c1b9387dca955a778-2 "Ubuntu 7.10 _Gutsy Gibbon_ - Release 
i386 (20071016)";
CD::e032efd736b74e8c1b9387dca955a778-2::Label "Ubuntu 7.10 _Gutsy Gibbon_ - 
Release i386 (20071016)";
CD::8aaf4197d875581ff2ee8404b51d9932-2 "Kubuntu 7.10 _Gutsy Gibbon_ - Release 
i386 (20071016.1)";
CD::8aaf4197d875581ff2ee8404b51d9932-2::Label "Kubuntu 7.10 _Gutsy Gibbon_ - 
Release i386 
(20071016.1)";
in software sources, the release number was quoted, and said upgrades from CD 
cannot be downloaded
I went to terminal /media/ apt-cdrom add which was suggested in the box which 
came up after I reloaded software and the kubuntu disc number was included. I 
think the update manager is trying upgrade, when I might have to work out how 
to do it in terminal. I might get out of Xscript and go into a kde session . 
Since I added debian40r2 Synaptic has dropped its 23000 packages, and when the 
disks are unmarked, there are about 3000. There are over 20,000 on the disks, 
so the only worry is that some of the packages that can't be downloaded are in 
security and updates I think Etch has replaced the download sources out of the 
box.-There would have been a lot of doubling up otherwise. So far it hasn't 
caused any problems as far as I know, but I like to play around, knowing there 
isn't too much trouble reinstalling the system if i have root tar I'll attach 
the latest /var/log/distUpgrade

** Attachment added: "apt.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12155930/apt.log

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-03-07 Thread pokkets
I have an idea what happened. I just added debian-40r2-i386 disk 2 to
3rd party sources. There may have been some programs updated, without
dependencies which were on one of the other disks. When I installed 2
there were 40 files updated, including the some of the backports in
holding. I'm going to getting 1 with a good md5sum, and I'll wait until
I've finished with three and the fix CD before I worry about bugs. I
hope that will make the apt.log a bit clearer.

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] [NEW] dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-03-07 Thread pokkets
Public bug reported:

 I'm running ubuntu ultimate 1.7, with gnome,and kde. I have had a
previous upgrade failure, which was upgrading many kde packages, which
worked after I unticked 3rd party sources I had the box 3rd party, plus
the kde 7.10 disk. Today I added debian-40r2-disk-1 to the 3rd party,
and there was a bad md5sum, but the packages were listed, and there was
an immediate 2 file update. Many repository indexes fail to download,
an archive bin meta index file said malformed package file, and a
repoubuntu.info/dists/gutsy/binary/i386Packages.gz was forbidden. When I
include the update sources  files related to them are included. when I
looked in lib/apt/lists there were the files that were listed also
seemed to have a .gpg file with the same title. There were some
backsports updates listed, which seemed clear to install, but now while
listed, they are masked - libxine-1,mpeg,gnome,and plugins. I'm
attaching /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-log

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 195661] Re: [hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-03-04 Thread pokkets
I tried to upgrade from a gutsy system to hardy alpha 5 and had a
similar problem with cupsys 1.3.6-1ubuntu1 with kernel
2.6.24-10-generic. It couldn't find apparmor_parser, and failed.to
configure In turn a lot of other dependencies failed. The upgrade
failed, and suggested I return my system to it's original state, but I
put it on a USB Boot in case I worked out how to stabilize it later
Because I was going to try and install an ndiswrapper for the new kernel
I started off with an apt-get install build-essential, While build-
essential was already installed It gave me a good summary of the
packages that failed to configure I'll attach it. I've posted it to an
upgrade bug that was invalidated because I have a Ubuntu Ultimate
system, but this time I can be more specific.

** Attachment added: "Build-essential-Hardy-distUpdate-errorList"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12432886/Build-essential-Hardy-distUpdate-errorList

-- 
[hardy alpha 5] package cupsys 1.3.5-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195661
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197199] Re: upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages

2008-03-03 Thread pokkets
This last comment before the 'bug' is put to sleep. Unless you have any more 
questions, advice, or directions.
If there are bugs I'll check synaptics for a ubuntu logo I know with what I 
loaded on my system I was asking for trouble. I'm sure when I get new hardware 
that isn't locked on windows many 'bugs' will disappear. The hardy system on 
usb is operational. The fact i can USB boot now seems to have made the bug 
worthwhile to a point. I'll trim some of the fat from the hardy system. As far 
as I know Ultimate compiler Thee Mahn has been busy with gutsy. ultimate hardy 
is way off. There is likely however to be an automatic ubuntu distro upgrade in 
update-manager when Hardy is released in April, which will be over anything 
that is a particularly ultimate package. That's what happened when a previous 
version of ultimate went from feisty to gutsy, before ultimate gutsy was 
released. Of course there is an ultimate-upgrade icon on the desktop, but as 
far as I know it's only an icon at the moment. When the upgrade was done, 
repoubuntu.info source in 3rd party was disabled. When I last looked it was 
down due to high traffic volume. Meanwhile, I'm foldingproteinsathome. I

-- 
upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 185770] Re: [Hardy] Cannot change settings in network settings (permissions)

2008-03-03 Thread pokkets
On Hardy A5 I have the same trouble with permission being denied on the
second try without reboot. I managed to get two chances one in network
settings, and another in manual configuration. I haven't got it to
connect yet,   Hardy is on a USB so I'm on a gutsy on my main disk where
I have wireless where wireless drops out if I use a live disk for
something, so I'm used to resetting the connection, but two tries
doesn't seem enough..

-- 
[Hardy] Cannot change settings in network settings (permissions)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197647] Re: /home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB

2008-03-03 Thread pokkets

I think I can do without it. I can always change my mind. I'm still fairly new 
to linux, so I want to get the file layout installed in my mind. The memories 
aren't as good at sticking if a search engine does too much work for it. At 
least now I know what was taking up so much space. Of 1.5 GB of data in my home 
directory, tracker was 1/3
 thanks 
  pokkets

-- 
/home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197199] Re: upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages

2008-03-02 Thread pokkets
My gutsy system has
sysv-rc 2.86.ds1-38 and
sysv-rc-conf 0.99-6 in case it helps I'll go into Hardy and see what is there
I managed to restore the  tar Hardy system, over the original Ultimate 1.7 live 
disk and boot it on a USB.
I'm still having no luck with the wireless, and I get maybe two chances to 
change the network preferences before it tells me I am not allowed to do it, 
but I can keep coming back to gutsy with updates if there are any
I did an apt-get autoremove to get rid of some lib files and cupsys crashed, 
but as soon as I can work wireless I might be able to get upgrades. Because 
wireless on hardy is down, I might try wep. I did a copy-paste of the apt-cache 
show sysv-rc on hardy I'll attach it 

** Attachment added: "sysv-rc version 2.86.ds1-141ubuntu31"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12360492/sysv-rc%20version%202.86.ds1-141ubuntu31

-- 
upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197647] Re: /home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB

2008-03-02 Thread pokkets
perhaps when it asked for a package they meant something else. I thought
Synaptic package manager handled packages ?

-- 
/home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197647] [NEW] /home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB

2008-03-02 Thread pokkets
Public bug reported:

 I have tracker and tracker-search tool 0.6.3-0ubuntu3  The bug report details 
said trere was no such package,but it's in synaptic, and on my system. on a 
Ubuntu ultimate 1.7 7.10 with a number of other distros 
kde,enlightenment,gnome, and edbuntu running on the same kernel.I've had 8 DVDs 
and 1CD as 3rd party sources. I have a 8.04 on a USB(haven't been able to boot 
iton the USB yet) and 3 virtual machines a few system backups Of 214GB space, 
there is about 130 GB used With 2 USBs I just did a disk usage analysis of my 
home folder and the tracker folder in ./cache was 587.6 with 33 items (I 
restore a lot) The biggest files include file-index.db 123 MB file-contents.db 
63.2 MB file-meta.db 18 MB The file-index.db before restore was 1.9 MB 19 jan 
10.1, about 90 MB on 19 Feb
in all the large files list 7 restores,  and 1 current, starting at 6 Jan. I 
can understand tracker having a lot to keep track of, but I never use it. Why 
does it need all of those restores? surely they're history. besides which it 
can't find things I know are there  The main problem is as a result I've used 
it twice just then to look for programs I know are installed and it tells me 
there are no results. Another problem may be I installed with partition all 
root ( I have access user and fat partitions without sudo or gksudo I checked 
java, because there are jave programs at home, so perhaps it can only show me 
files to which I have r/w access. If this is so, why does the cache need to be 
in my home folder. As a result I have learned to improve or take notes with a 
text file. I know I can solve the problem to a point by sending obsolete files 
to the trash (At least thats easy at home) but I am curious as to why for 
example there are 548 files recorded for xfractint (It's an ms-dos program, not 
in applications) for example and all it will show me are a text and an odt file 
I copied from usr/share/docs ? Of course it's probably listing a lot of files 
before restore, like the ones in it's cache if there are 'preferences' I might 
confuse it and put the cache on a USB. that will confuse it.
By the way it's another bug I know,  but the disk label and device number don't 
change, UUID doesn't change  unless by the user and the sdc can be a b 
depending which usb port the external disk is plugged into, The volume's size 
never changes, just make sizes unique somehow once introduced - can't there 
just be a tag that doesn't affect the way the system sees the disk that can be 
changed on the user desktop? There's surely a better way to assign disk numbers 
than load order. Different disk numbers can be annoying with backup, restore 
and playlists for data on external drives. And no doubt systems on usb have 
trouble being loaded If a new system wants to comandeer root, just make a 
subsidiary root folder on the first system installed. If a new system can 
update grub, it can update root. I don't know enough about linux or ubunbtu to 
know if that will work. I Just thought I'd write that while I remember because 
I don't feel like writing a note.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
/home/pokkets/.cache/tracker is 587.6 MB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-29 Thread pokkets
the other bug number is 197199

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197199] Re: upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages

2008-02-29 Thread pokkets

** Attachment added: "hardy-distUpgrade.tar.bz2"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12338501/hardy-distUpgrade.tar.bz2

-- 
upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197199] [NEW] upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages

2008-02-29 Thread pokkets
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

also related bug 193879 
Yesterday I did a sudo update-manager -d from ubuntu ultimate 1.7, 7.10 with 
xclient script,gnome, and kde to hardy alpha 5.  I had also installed 
edubuntu,gobuntu enlightenment, ichthux, and gobuntu. Because I am getting a 
new laptop, I wanted to try and find out about as many distros as I could 
before I made a permanent installation on the new one. The one I have has 
windows hardware, including graphics, sound and wireless cards. The ultimate 
1.7 had a graphics program envy which because of the windows graphics card 
would not install the drivers. There is a canon mpc190 program in windows but 
but windows cannot communicate with it. so it is inactive.I have the system 
loaded with applications, mainly games, because I wanted to check the range. 
and I've found some of the best programs by accident.  
The upgrade download continued until there were about 20 files to go and gave 
some forbidden 403 errors. These seemed to be solved when I switched servers. 
The programs were then installed.
The first suggestion was to send an error report regarding cupsys, there were 
some pango warnings about georgian fonts. Other failures included things that 
seemed like hewlett packard program failures, which i thought I could remove 
intending to install the printer on windows. (I'm letting my brother have this 
one.) there were things like desktops that were dependent  on cupsys. Pulse 
audio failed I thought because of the sound card. There were also things like 
ubuntu standard, linux-restricted modules-2.6.24.10-restricted klogd  sysklodgd 
and ubuntu minimal. After 9  hours hardy had had enough and spat the dummy. It 
refused to clean up after itself and suggested I do it myself. So I decided to 
play around with it and put it in a tarball when I couldn't get 
ndiswrapper-1.51 to work -it seemed to work with hardy a3 off the installed off 
the live disk, but maybe that one wasn't as confused. I'm sure most of these 
problems will be solved with hardware that isn't so windows biased, but I 
thought maybe something in the var/log distupgrade will help. The apt.log 
section of the upfrade is 7000 lines long, but there is a summary in an apt-get 
install build essential I ran to install the ndiswrapper. It was already 
installed but it gave me the summary. I've put in the var/log/distUpgrade  
folder I'm going to archive. I've got hardy in a tgz on another disk if you 
want anything.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
upgrade-manager -d fails, without configuring packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-29 Thread pokkets
I have no doubt you're rushing to get hardy ready, but what I write can be put 
in an archive for later or deleted.  I'll try and make the attachments to the 
point. 
 When I lost shut down I tried kubuntu upgrade again.There was a complete 
upgrade, and reboot I could shut down again. As far as I could tell the system 
was working I've had no reason to change my mind.
I backed up, and went update-manager -d.
There are another few bugs with upgrade failures, but my system has a few 
distros running in parallel, so I'll leave the decision as to whether  this 
next one is a duplicate to someone with better judgment than myself.
 I'll attach a copy of a build-essential I did here, which seems to have a good 
summary of the failures, and start a new bug
Upgrade-manager reports were sent yesterday Feb29, but you may need more 
information to put them into context. If you need anything else, I have the 
restore in a tar backup, and can extract any details you want. 
It was time to see how Hardy coped with my mongrel of a system. The only thing 
that really bothered me was being unable to connect the wireless I'm finishing 
this bug here The original problem seems to have been solved, and this was a 
gutsy bug. I'll leave a reference to this bug because my system had some 
unusual qualities.  While upgrade-manager suggested I restore my system as it 
was likely to be unstable, I thought, so am I, .but I replaced it to get 
wireless back.

** Attachment added: "Build-essential-Hardy-distUpdate-errorList"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12338340/Build-essential-Hardy-distUpdate-errorList

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-28 Thread pokkets
I had a look in var/lib/apt/lists
The package that had warned DO NOT INSTALL ON A REAL SYSTEM EVER was mentioned. 
release-upgrade-apt was in synaptic, but it wasn't installed. 
release-upgrade-dpkg wasn't there. ( I know better now than to get the bright 
idea to do install THAT.) Sources couldn't verify the signature. Still 
sometimes an experiment can blow up in your face, sometimes you get penicillin. 
I'm getting a new laptop in March. You probably know whats in the list, but 
I'll send a copy. I pasted the lists together on to the one text file. My dog 
wants a chewy bone. 

** Attachment added: "Release-upgrade-apt3rdpartyvar-lib-apt-lists"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12276612/Release-upgrade-apt3rdpartyvar-lib-apt-lists

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-28 Thread pokkets
 I knew I could have been asking for trouble with debian 40r2 on ubuntu, but I 
wanted to know if I could use it as a source if I lost my internet connection  
Something I hadn't noticed because I was busy going between sessions. Shut down 
was on the main toolbar, and it went to the logon screen. it stopped at 
suspend. So I give it the 5 second death count. After the grub screen, I found 
out busybox wasn't as good as I thought it would be, got stuck at busybox, with 
an initramfs prompt. Restored and repeated the misery and lost shut down again, 
I hadn't checked if I got it back. but when I went to sources I found three new 
entries. 
http://archive.dogfood.launchpad.net/ ubuntu feisty-backport and two 
unsupported feisty update sources. I know the archive.dogfood is at launchpad, 
I had to check, but I don't know where they came from. Maybe I missed them 
while I was going around in circles. (well..so does a hard drive) I've always 
got hardyA4 and kde4 on VMplayer. I just noticed KDE4 was at my ISP list. When 
I noticed the archive.dogfood source, My dog was reminding me I'd been spending 
too much time on the computer. apt.log wont help it's at the restore date.
I know gutsy is getting old. I might wait until I see what I can screw up with 
hardy, and debian4.0r3

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-27 Thread pokkets
Maybe this is more than one bug, but I'll leave that with you.
This time debian 4.0r2etch was involved
I've another solved part of the problem I think Xscript can upgrade kde 
packages unless something in conflict has to be removed, however adept will in 
a kde session. Adept won't upgrade gnome for the same reason. xscript doesn't 
want to get involved. I may have invited this with alien upgrades,  
Default session is Xscript
This is how it went today
Tried kubuntu upgrade again, after removing envy. It said there was no upgrade, 
but there were no errors.
reinstalled disks to sources. Left disk sources ticked got another update, 
packages weren't ticked. 11 I think. Went to kde session, some packages 
upgraded in adept, reported some packages failed to upgrade. Went into gnome 
session. 7 packages ticked, busybox, sysvinit, brightside, initramfs-tools, 
initscripts sysvinit-utils
 sysvinit failed to upgrade, because it tried to overwrite 
/usr/share/man/man1/mesg.1.gz which is also in package sysvutils
Terminal details:
Errors were encountered while processing 
/cdrom/pool/main/sysvinit-utils_2.86.ds1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned error code (1)
the update failed. 
Tried again when unmarking svsvinit  it auto unmarked sysvinit-utils and init 
scripts.
Busybox, brightside, and initramfs-tools were updated.
The packages from the debian disk seem to conflict with each other, but I don't 
need them on my system, they probably aren't supposed to be there.
Once the third party sources are unmarked, the system is up to date

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-27 Thread pokkets
I know the var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log is getting to around 11,000 lines now 
and while it no doubt repeats it's self a fair bit, No doubt I'm telling you a 
lot you already know, butI hope the additional comments will help the trace, 
but I'm just trying to work out where the root of the bug is by a process of 
elimination. If I caused it, it will help me to avoid repeating the mistake. 
The binary-i386 file was from kubuntu-disk/dists/stable/main/dist-upgrader, and 
the same file was in Edubuntu which upgraded.
.
The errors were "Conflicts with installed package dpkg" same with the  I don't 
know if that will show up on the file I sent if it doesn't have access to my 
system, could be in apt.log somewhere
Another problem that might be solved when I get a new laptop. 
"WARNING:root:envy detected, trying to workaround"
 right at the bottom paragraph.
 I have an 'obsolete' Windows  graphics card that is locked into the laptop it 
can't be upgraded. Micrisoft are doing their utmost to get a monopoly-but 
that's an entirely different bug.
Envy came out of the box with ultimate 1.7, and the drivers wont install 
without nvidia, or ati . I thought I'd taken it out, but I just did so. It can 
wait until I get a dual core with a decent graphics card.
 While you can't serve two masters, a server can have two masters - Perhaps 
Ubuntu and Mandriva.  As long as one of them isn't microsoft They want to keep 
peoples minds in the box. Mr gates is getting old isn't he, and it get's harder 
to teach an old dog new tricks - but as he said One minute you're at the top of 
the Christmas tree, next minute your a falling star - or something like that.

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-27 Thread pokkets
I went into a kde session, and saw aptitude. I thought all upgrades were done 
in the xscript by update manager. Aptitude did an upgrade but it also removed 
ichthux desktop and xine. I went back into xscript, restored an earlier etc/apt 
var/log/apt and tried to update kubuntu again.
The error was "System was unable to get the prerequisites for the upgrade" and 
suggested I send the folder var/log/dist-upgrade I found an error on the disk, 
and have it in the tar file with the var/log/apt folder. I might try gnome for 
a while

** Attachment added: "dist-upgrade-bug193879.tar.bz2"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12253364/dist-upgrade-bug193879.tar.bz2

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-27 Thread pokkets
I just got another partial upgrade notification 
5 packages were listed, and one could not be installed
kaffeine0.8.5 to-0ubuntu1 to 0.8.6-ubuntu3~gutsy1
I went to synaptic and found the package I had and tried the upgrade from 
there. It said
kaffeine-xine and ichthux desktop would be removed. There has been conflict 
between ichthux-desktop, and kde before.
This was in google.
Bug #151601 in ichthux-meta (Ubuntu): ags:  gutsy
Ichthux-desktop currently requires xkeyboard-config which is a transitional 
package, and thus no longer needed. Please remove xkeyboard-config from the 
requirements for ichthux-desktop.
 Ralph Janke wrote on 2007-12-28: (permalink)
Confirmed on gutsy
 Ralph Janke wrote on 2007-12-28: (permalink)
Will be fixed in hardy
It may be one the sources of the problem, 
I keep finding there always seems to be more to it. suppose thats bugs

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-25 Thread pokkets
This comment is fairly 'verbose' and strays from the original bug report a fair 
bit, but the bug seems to have been self inflicted. I know there is the basic 
warning 'read the help files' , but I would rather learn, than be educated. I 
hope it can tie up some loose ends. When decided to go Linux, I also decided to 
get a new laptop, so it didn't matter if I ruined any part of it,  even the 
hardware. Having since learned that is unlikely, if the original install disks 
are available. and some key programs are kept on a flash drive (an  ndiswrapper 
that works with the particular Kernel and inf files, for example) I also 
thought while learning the 'hard way' can be very annoying, that fact usually 
made the lessons clearer. I've guessed wrong a lot, but usually the screw up 
has helped me find the place to look in the ubuntu community pages for the 
answer.
 I may also have come up with some conclusions now that are wrong, but I hope 
someone can point them out in case any new users consider them to be advice. 
The problem dawned on me this morning . I probably threw a spanner in the 
Kernel. Edubuntu probably upgraded the Kernel (backwards?) There had been an 
upgrade to ultimate 1.7 since it was installed. Still, by trial and error I 
learned a few things.   
 1)Before any upgrade unmark any 3rd party sources. I had heard that before but 
was reminded when the Edubuntu upgrade disabled them automatically. However now 
I have Edubuntu in the session list, and the toolbar under system - 'about  
Edubuntu' (20071017?) and perhaps that is a sign I have a lot to learn. 
 2) When adding a source  disk, if the disk is inserted before the 'add' tab in 
software sources is clicked, or return is hit in terminal apt-cdrom add, the 
option to upgrade is offered. (If there is a different kernel on the disk?) 
There is also the option to open with package manager, but so far the other 
place I have tried to add with the most recent reinstallation was within 
synaptic, which may be the same thing. Press return, or add and then it asks 
for the disk to be inserted. I don't know if it can degrade the kernel, but 
kubuntu would also have tried to upgrade the kernel. Upgrade and add are two 
completely different programs.
It helps if the kernel is both more recent, and compatible with the system. 
3) When all else fails backup home/settings with sbackup, and and start from 
scratch with a reinstall.
 It helps to get a root tar file from before trying something new and reinstall 
the system.  etc, var, and usb local are in the defaults in sbackup, and I know 
the var apt cache has debian packages but games are in usr games and after a 
restore with srestore some of the titles were included as installed but the 
applications hadn't been restored. Add/remove programs couldn't  find them to 
remove them but synaptic solved the problem after I removed them completely.   
and reinstalled. I may only have had to reinstall a lot of them. The restores 
seemed to hang, maybe I cut restore too early but after 12 hours I thought 
there may have been a problem. The tar backup.tgz in terminal is verbose, so it 
can be clear when the restore has finished  Now I try and have a root back upon 
it's own partition, preferably on it's own disk - I have a few usb hard drives 
from 80-120GB one of the reasons I have had to learn to back up- trying to 
install a system on a usb drive.- using a 40GB Acer Extensa 2355XC laptop. So 
far I haven't been able to, but read somewhere that the ubuntu kernel had 
trouble loading and booting USB external hard drive systems, Will the Hardy 
kernel have any problem? could be something to do with the way partitions on 
USB can be assigned different disk names after a reboot, a cold boot, or an 
unmount/remount,i.e. a partition that was on disk-1, can end up on disk 6 I 
might see if I can find a bug report with this problem or make a new one. I 
found out how to make a kernel for a boot cd but have had trouble burning a CD 
R/W It could also be the  hardware which is for a windows system. I might try a 
burn in windows. I took the advice of the tar backup restore page in ubuntu 
community excluding proc, mnt, sys, and I exclude media for the sake of the 
files on the usb including backup.tgz and files that won't fit on the laptop 
drive, and dev, because I am always editing the partitions so the uuid changes. 
After I reinstall the system I also sbackup grub, fstab, and mtab. to be 
restored after the system restore and before reboot. - but it can also be 
restored with an ultimate live cd, no doubt amongst others. I learned to do 
this before I learned enough about grub ,fstab, and mtab, to fix them with 
gksudo gedit, but it gave me the incentive to learn. Of course while I have 
been given reason to learn by trial and error, the advice and suggestions of 
both the ubuntu community advice/questions and forum advice questions has been 
invaluable. Most questions have been answered before I had to ask 

[Bug 193879] Re: dist-upgrade failure, could not download repository indexes

2008-02-24 Thread pokkets
There was a failure with the Kubuntu upgrade. I did a backup.tgz excluding 
etc/apt, and var/lib/apt, and reinstalled the system. The Edubuntu upgrade was 
good Then Kubuntu failed. 20071016.1 worked, 20071016 didn't It may have been 
an upgrade for feisty or it may have conflicted with the kde on 1.7. When I 
added the disk to sources the upgrade option came up I now know this was 
another program.Since I've gone to terminal added the disks at the prompt, and 
added edubuntu, Kubuntu, and the 4 debian etch disks. synaptic had 24000 
packages, but in sources there was trouble getting a lock. I didn't know why it 
wouldn't fix on the lock, but I thought maybe it was because I added disks in 
terminal before I used software sources. I deleted the lock figuring debian may 
have changed it and pulled a lock out of an early sbackup. it seemed to work.
It had trouble finding a server, but that may have been the connection. I'm 
going to forget about kubuntu Ultimate 1.7 has a kde environment, and if I find 
debian etch conflicts, I'll just pull the packages out of the pool and set up a 
personal repository on another partition. I'm not sure if it was a bug as much 
as operator error, but I was curious about the kind of disks that could be 
added, and maybe Kubuntu upgrade was designed for feisty, not when introduced 
to a gutsy system. If it helps This is the disk that I used and the isp url
http://files.bigpond.com/library/index.php?go=cat&id=812&order=time+DESC
Kubuntu v7.10 (Gutsy Gibbon) i386 DVD ISO,
File Date: 22-10-07
File Size: 4595.80 MB
Filename: kubuntu-7.10-dvd-i386.iso

-- 
dist-upgrade failure,could not download repository indexes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 141505] Re: cant get certain updates, partial distro upgrades amavisd-new

2008-02-05 Thread pokkets
Installed ubuntu ultimate 1.7 error on disc boot kubuntu-docs, mysql, errors 
kubuntu-docs mysql, dkpg. in install. corrupt image suggested, and warned all 
packages including install may not be removed. kubuntu-docs error  code 1 
occurring with 1.6, after kubuntu desktop installed. Using Acer Extensa 2355XC, 
with ndiswrapper-1.49, ndisgtk_0.7.2_1ubuntu1_1386.deb, nautilus Firefox feb 4 
version
errors kubuntu-docs in application add-remove downloaded partial upgrade 
aborted. Bug report was suggested
completely removed kubuntu-docs and reinstalled. No more errors yet

** Attachment added: "apt.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11784656/apt.log

-- 
cant get certain updates, partial distro upgrades amavisd-new
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs