[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2012-07-31 Thread Fabien Lusseau
I also think this bug to be relevant, we already have 32bits only
archivers. Arc files are becoming more and more common. Freearc is
working well on Linux but is not packaged.

I use freearc a lot (with wine because it's the fastest and easiest way
to install it nowadays).

Even on 32 bits it's way faster and compress way more efficiently than
7zip or Xz compiled for 64 bits.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471

Title:
  [needs-packaging] FreeArc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/473471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2011-10-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471

Title:
  [needs-packaging] FreeArc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/473471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-18 Thread Diaa Sami
I don't think this bug is relevant because the author of FreeArc
explicity says that a 64-bit version is a to be done in the future, so
it's not a packaging issue, the source-code needs to be modified

-- 
[needs-packaging] FreeArc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-18 Thread thometal
I think its relevant because it doesnt exist a 32bit package or a 64bit
package with 32bit depiences there is nothing

-- 
[needs-packaging] FreeArc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-04 Thread Brian Murray
*** This is an automated message ***

This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for
a new package in Ubuntu.  As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug
reports specification,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-
packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance.  Subsequently, I'm
setting this bug's status to Wishlist.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
[needs-packaging] FreeArc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs