[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Anyone working on a kernel patch to support 3.11? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 Title: [needs-packaging] Smartcam To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/259371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
smartcam is building without errors on ubuntu 11.04 x86_64. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 Title: [needs-packaging] Smartcam To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/259371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Hi again! I couldn't sleep, so I decided to dig into this "smartcam won't compile on Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit" issue a bit deeper and searched the web. Maybe you'll find the thing I found as interesting as I do - however I'm not quite sure, whether it's really about the same problem that I have on my machine. The problem I have is: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.5/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': (.text+0x12): undefined reference to `__libc_csu_fini' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.5/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': (.text+0x19): undefined reference to `__libc_csu_init' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The information I found is: (from May 2006) http://www.archivum.info/gnu.gcc.help/2006-05/00071/Re-__libc_csu_fini-and-__libc_csu_init.html (from Oct 2010) http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/undefined-reference-to-%60__libc_csu_fini-849247/ (from Sep 2011) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/837745 Please see the following tests I did and maybe you can find this useful to help us: condor@herkules:~$ uname -a Linux herkules 2.6.35-31-generic # 63-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 28 19:29:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux condor@herkules:~/Install/smartcam-1.4.0$ ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether NLS is requested... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for intltool >= 0.40.0... 0.41.1 found checking for intltool-update... /usr/bin/intltool-update checking for intltool-merge... /usr/bin/intltool-merge checking for intltool-extract... /usr/bin/intltool-extract checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for perl >= 5.8.1... 5.10.1 checking for XML::Parser... ok checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GLIB... yes checking for GTHREAD... yes checking for GTK... yes checking for DBUS... yes checking for GCONF... yes checking for hci_open_dev in -lbluetooth... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for jpeg_destroy_decompress in -ljpeg... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: creating data/Makefile config.status: creating data/smartcam.desktop.in config.status: creating data/icons/Makefile config.status: creating data/icons/16x16/Makefile config.status: creating data/icons/22x22/Makefile config.status: creating data/icons/24x24/Makefile config.status: creating data/icons/32x32/Makefile config.status: creating data/icons/48x48/Makefile config.status: creating data/phone_installs/Makefile config.status: creating po/Makefile.in config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing po/stamp-it commands condor@herkules:~/Install/smartcam-1.4.0$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/condor/Install/smartcam-1.4.0' Making all in src make[2]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/condor/Install/smartcam-1.4.0/src' dbus-binding-tool --prefix=smartcam_dbus --mode=glib-server smartcam-dbus.xml> smartcam-dbus.h make all-am make[3]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/condor/Install/smartcam-1.4.0/src' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DPACKAGE_DATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/smartcam\" -DDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share\" -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Hi Michael Gorven, Stefan Zerkalica (I subscribed you to this wishlist/bug), deion, Ruben Romero and everybody else! I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 (MAVERICK) 64 BIT (with kernel 2.6.35-31-generic # 63-Ubuntu now) and since more than 8 months I'm trying to get smartcam working. In the meantime I was able to build the smartcam kernel driver (with lots and lots of patching) and also loading it into the kernel but I can NOT COMPILE the SMARTCAM APPLICATION (see: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3463579&group_id=197856&atid=963142 ). So I tried "smartcam_1.4.0-4_amd64.deb" from STEFAN Zerkalica's PPA ( https://launchpad.net/~zerkalica/+archive/smartcam ) and it doesn't complain during installation but trying to run the smartcam app fails with a crash (segmentation fault/SEGFAULT): *** smartcam: registered DBUS service "org.gnome.smartcam" Found smartcam device file: /dev/video1 smartcam: started comm thread smartcam: port = 1 Speicherzugriffsfehler *** Then I thought maybe it doesn't work with my self-built smartcam kernel driver but needs the corresponding smartcam driver (1.4.0-4) from the same ppa - but this package seems to be build against kernel 2.6.35-25-generic (and not 2.6.35-31, which is the current one for Maverick 64 bit). Of course I stopped there and did not install the older kernel. The "Speicherzugriffsfehler" (segmentation fault) could be coming from a bug in the smartcam code that relates to "Bluetooth either not being available" (I don't have Bluetooth!), see patch http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2893361&group_id=197856&atid=963144 … or to the "Bluetooth device enumeration issue"/"bug in DynamicBtBind() causing always listen on port 1", see patch http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3096560&group_id=197856&atid=963144 … I don't know. * Regarding the "Bluetooth not being available" issue, Michael Gorven (~mgorven) provided the before mentioned first patch, but he didn't package smartcam for Maverick 64 bit. * Regarding the "bug in DynamicBtBind() causing always listen on port 1" issue, "leniviytorrent" provided the before mentioned second patch. * Regarding the packaging for Maverick 64 bit, I think Stefan Zerkalica (~zerkalica) could do the trick! Would you people be so kind to work together, if possible or STEFAN or ANYBODY, would you like to INCLUDE these PATCHES and build a working Ubuntu Maverick 64 bit PACKAGE against KERNEL 2.6.35-31-generic # 63-Ubuntu (and maybe even for newer Ubuntu releases, too)? Or what is the point I'm missing here? Thank you very very much in advance, Kind Regards, Dennis (~thecondordb) PS: In the end, I'd like to get SmartCam working for 3rd party programs like Skype, Cheese etc. on Maverick 64 bit, fetching the video stream by WiFi from my Motorola Milestone with Android 2.2.1, where the smartcam app (.apk from Android Market) already work flawlessly - but streams only to my web browser at the moment. PPS: The package description as well as the ReadMe.txt of SmartCam could be updated to mention Android and WiFi etc, too, and not only Symbian and Bluetooth, am I correct? PPPS: Please excuse me writing partially in caps - I did this for visibility purposes only - no offense - no shouting :) ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3463579 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3463579 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2893361 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2893361 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3096560 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3096560 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 Title: [needs-packaging] Smartcam To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/259371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
I can confirm the crash reported by fsaravia for Kernel 2.6.27-11-generic on Ubuntu 8.10. I get an connection from my Nokia E71 to the smartcam app and an initial picture as well. But directly after the initial webcam frame is shown, i got the same crash and then the message: "Disconnected -18" backtrace (see attached) ** Attachment added: "crash.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25945953/crash.txt -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
In Kubuntu Jaunty, 2.6.28-11-generic patch applied and the line ".release = video_device_release" in smartcam.c uncommented, /dev/video0 chmoded to 0666 compile OK, insmod, etc... program runs and when i try to connect from the phone (Nokia N73), program crashes in the phone, i can see the frame captured, and then the message: "Disconnected -18" In the computer, this backtrace (attached): ** Attachment added: "fail.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25941540/fail.txt -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
I'm on Intrepid running 2.6.27-11-generic by the way. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
I've managed to patch the file, perform the modprobe etc, however I cannot compile the PC application! ** Attachment added: "gcc_errors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25491933/gcc_errors.txt -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
On jaunty beta, with 2.6.28-11-generic, on running insmod smartcam.ko, segfaults due to a BUG_ON in v4l2-dev.c (line 229) (in drivers/media/video directory in the kernel). This BUG_ON specifically mentions that it expects a release callback from the smartcam video device. In smartcam.c, uncomment the following line after applying the patch (2.6.27.1 patch works fine). .release= video_device_release, I don't see an implementation of the release function for smartcam, so using the default implementation of the video_device's release will atleast help us bypass the BUG_ON. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Compiled with the 2.6.27 patch phil...@lappy ~/smartcam/src/driver $ sudo insmod smartcam.ko insmod: error inserting 'smartcam.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in module [20577.108145] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_ioctl2 [20577.108550] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_unregister_device [20577.108770] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_register_device [20579.635048] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_ioctl2 [20579.635451] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_unregister_device [20579.635673] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_register_device [20633.967331] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_ioctl2 [20633.967735] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_unregister_device [20633.967957] smartcam: Unknown symbol video_register_device does anyone has an 2.6.28 (and 2.6.29) patch? -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
I wonder if anyone can package it. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
@niandubay: That error is fixed by the 2.6.27 patch Unfortunately modprobe segfaults when adding it in 2.6.28. Kernel module development seems to be hell... Attached log of dmesg. ** Attachment added: "dmesg of the modprobe segfault" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23232130/dmesg -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
i have intrepid with kernell 2.6.27-12-generic ... i can`t compile driver.. juan...@juanch0-laptop:~/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver$ make -C /lib/modules/2.6.27-12-generic/build M=`pwd` modules make: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-12-generic' CC [M] /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.o /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c: En la función ‘smartcam_mmap’: /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:194: error: declaración implícita de la función ‘vmalloc_to_pfn’ /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:195: error: declaración implícita de la función ‘remap_pfn_range’ /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:195: error: ‘PAGE_SHARED’ no se declaró aquí (primer uso en esta función) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:195: error: (Cada identificador no declarado solamente se reporta una vez /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:195: error: para cada funcion en la que aparece.) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c: En el nivel principal: /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:559: error: ‘video_ioctl2’ no se declaró aquí (no en una función) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:566: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘type’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:572: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_querycap’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:572: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:573: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_enum_fmt_cap’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:573: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:574: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_g_fmt_cap’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:574: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:574: error: el elemento inicializador no es calculable al momento de la carga /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:574: error: (cerca de la inicialización de ‘smartcam_vid.tvnorms’) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:575: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_try_fmt_cap’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:575: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:575: error: el elemento inicializador no es calculable al momento de la carga /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:575: error: (cerca de la inicialización de ‘smartcam_vid.current_norm’) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:576: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_s_fmt_cap’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:576: aviso: inicialización desde un tipo de puntero incompatible /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:577: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_reqbufs’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:577: aviso: inicialización desde un tipo de puntero incompatible /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:578: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_querybuf’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:579: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_qbuf’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:579: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:580: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_dqbuf’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:580: aviso: faltan llaves alrededor del inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:580: aviso: (cerca de la inicialización de ‘smartcam_vid.lock’) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:580: aviso: la inicialización crea un entero desde un puntero sin una conversión /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:581: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_s_std’ en el inicializador /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:581: aviso: exceso de elementos en el inicializador de struct /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:581: aviso: (cerca de la inicialización de ‘smartcam_vid’) /home/juanch0/Escritorio/smartcam/src/driver/smartcam.c:582: error: se especificó el campo desconocido ‘vidioc_enum_input’ en el inicializador /h
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Got the patch implemented as follows: Copied and pasted into jedit. Saved as smartcam-linux-2.6.27.1.patch ran: patch -p0 < smartcam-linux-2.6.27.1.patch However, when running insmod smartcam.ko, I get the following error message: insmod: error inserting 'smartcam.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in module Any help would be greatly appreciated... Where am I going wrong?!? Stewart -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Hi, not sure how to implement this patch - I'm a bit of a beginner -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Use the patch above your post. It did a trick for me. Thanks a lot, Satish! -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Hi , this package seems very interresting , I ve got a N95 to test it but the driver wont compile under intrepid with the kernel : 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 24 06:42:44 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: "smartcam_compile_error" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19236570/smartcam_compile_error -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Hi I made a patch to make it compile on a 2.6.27.1 kernel in my gentoo system. I've sent the patch to the maintainer. I'm attaching it and its also available here: http://sathya.freeshell.org/smartcam- linux-2.6.27.1.patch ** Attachment added: "smartcam-linux-2.6.27.1.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1906/smartcam-linux-2.6.27.1.patch -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
Ok sounds good. I've currently got a few things on the go at once right now so if no one else takes an interest in packaging this app I'll start work on it when I can (probaby before the end of the month) and submit it for consideration into the Intrepid repositories. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
I have tested it on Hardy and it works fine even with Skype. However I have failed to compile th edriver on Intrepid. Anyway I will be happy to test the package. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
This software appears to conform to the Ubuntu new package standards now that the license has been added. I'll happily package this software, my only reservation is the fact I have no means of testing it as I don't own a nokia, as long as that is noted I don't mind starting on this at the end of the month. -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
** Changed in: ubuntu Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
GPL file has been added. Maybe is it ready for packaging now? ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
SmartCam has now GPL license file in release 2008.08.20. Thanks for packaging SmartCam in Ubuntu. Cheers, Ionut -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259371] Re: [needs-packaging] Smartcam
The source code does not include licensing information with is required for an Ubuntu package. I've asked upstream to include this. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=963142&aid=2060092&group_id=197856 -- [needs-packaging] Smartcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs