[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-09 Thread Adri2000 
Fix Released (bug #64404).

** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-05 Thread Daniel Holbach 
Thanks a lot - go ahead then.

** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: MOTU UVF Team => Adri2000
   Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-05 Thread Adri2000 
Yeah no problem.
I will subscribe to xmoto bug reports right now :)

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-05 Thread Daniel Holbach 
Adri2000: will you subscribe to Bug reports about it and make sure that
possible problems are fixed/forwarded upstream?

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler 
Hm. the package is really new in debian unstable (uploaded yesterday).
The diffstat and adri's report look ok to me.

The concern about the LCache/ directory, hm. Well, I think that's an
upstream decision. If we don't do that for edgy, we'll do it for edgy+1

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-04 Thread Daniel Holbach 
Hum, not sure about this one:
+ * IMPORTANT: People with big-endian CPUs (PowerPC, etc) should clean their
+   level cache when upgrading; that is, the first time you start the game,
+   use the -cleancache command-line argument. Alternatively delete all files
+   in your LCache/ directory.
do we actually do something about that?

Apart from that is seems ok. Reinhard, Sebastian, Andrew?

** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-04 Thread Adri2000 

** Attachment added: "xmoto_0.2.2-1_i386.build"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659658/xmoto_0.2.2-1_i386.build

** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU UVF Team

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-04 Thread Adri2000 

** Attachment added: "changelog.diff"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659657/changelog.diff

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63964] Re: UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1

2006-10-04 Thread Adri2000 

** Attachment added: "diffstat.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659656/diffstat.txt

-- 
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs