Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-06-14 Thread Tore Anderson
* Martin Pitt

> If Tore could test the actual packages in -proposed again, and you do
> too, that's fine for our purposes.

   I'm going away on holidays soon, so I won't be able to do so before
  coming home in about three weeks.

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi,

Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [2007-06-13 11:30 -]:
> I am not sure how our SRU team can do QA on this bug without a SAN...
> 
> how should we handle it?

If Tore could test the actual packages in -proposed again, and you do
too, that's fine for our purposes.

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-05-30 Thread Tore Anderson
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

> Tore, ok thanks. I will wait for when you can reboot one of them.
> 
> This bug is really annoying and i understand it's not easy for you to
> do such operation, but it's also really important for me to know that
> I didn't break existing setups.
> 
> Specially note the fact that we are moving all the operations into
> udev rules. That means that if there are issues they will show up
> only on boot or when you plug/8unplug devices.

   Hey.  I finally got the chance to test it on one machine, and booted
  it (after manually having rebuilt the initramfs image, don't know if
  that was necessary though).  No problems at all!  :-)

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-05-18 Thread Tore Anderson
* Tore Anderson

>  Just got back from holiday so I need to take care of a few loose ends
> first, and tomorrow is Constitution Day here in Norway so nobody's
> going to work.  I will try to test it early next week, hopefully that's
> okay with you.

   Built and installed OK.  Can't reboot these machines now, sorry.  :-/

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-05-16 Thread Tore Anderson
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

> i am ok if you can't test the 10GB thingy, but i would like to know
> if the package works with the other changes too on setups that are
> just not mine.
> 
> Even if i need to wait a bit longer i am good.

   Just got back from holiday so I need to take care of a few loose ends
  first, and tomorrow is Constitution Day here in Norway so nobody's
  going to work.  I will try to test it early next week, hopefully that's
  okay with you.

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-05-03 Thread Tore Anderson
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

> This should be final.
> 
> Tore it would be great if you can test it on your systems too and (if
> you can) add a couple of partitions to the SAN export. This should
> trigger the dev/mapper/multipathname[partition] to be created too
> (known to be broken in dapper at the moment).

   I'm not sure I'll be able to do so in the near future, as the 10GB LUN
  that triggered the bug has since been resized, and I don't think I have
  time to get a Dapper test rig online before the weekend (and next week
  I'll be away).

   I trust you, though.  ;-)

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-04-03 Thread Tore Anderson
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

> - change /etc/udev/rules.d/85-multipath.rules to invoke 
> /sbin/hsg80_start only if we detect that we are really on an HSG80
> and with the recognized passive path (size is set to 10GB by HSG
> firmware).

   Hm, wait.  Isn't there a better way to detect this?  You'll end up
  starting active paths to volumes that for some reason happen to be 10GB
  this way.  Not sure if that's a problem at all though, but won't maybe
  sg_turs be a better test to see if it indeed is a passive path?

   I also noticed that you don't check the vendor attribute in sysfs when
  matching the HSG80.  Probably not necessary, but for the sake of
  completeness...

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 98518] Re: Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be converted to udev rules

2007-04-03 Thread Tore Anderson
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto

> Here is the proposed patch for dapper.

   Looks good to me, it would certainly ensure that non-HSG80-using
  people like me won't run into trouble.  Can't comment much on the
  correctness of the new HSG80-specific code though.

-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
Fails to install because of brain damage in init script that should be 
converted to udev rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs