Re: UDS changes
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote: Le Tuesday 26 February 2013 23:00:45 Harald Sitter a écrit : Clearly Canonical is encouraging us to increase upstream transparency, so it only makes sense that we should all attend Akademy to discuss directly with our upstream on how to shape the future of free software. Supposedly we should have an online session discussing just how we make the most out of Akademy which (unfortunately) is only held once a year http://akademy2013.kde.org/ Maybe it would be a good idea to make Kubuntu presence at Akademy stronger. I would not go as far as suggesting we co-host a Kubuntu sprint at Akademy, but we could: - Schedule a few BoFs - Announce that Kubuntu developers will be attending Akademy, and are looking forward to discuss with KDE developers Aurélien -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel If Kubuntu wants to strength links with KDE, a good start would be to actually trust KDE maintainers on which are stable versions. Also making sure that the developers are aware of how is Kubuntu patching their software by posting the patches to upstream and let them have a say. I'm unsure what's the l10n status at the moment with Kubuntu+KDE, but using KDE infrastructure would be benefitial too. Aleix -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: UDS changes
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Aurélien Gâteau agat...@kde.org wrote: AFAIK Kubuntu policy is to get all patches reviewed upstream. That and also a as-few-patches-as-possible policy. There was a bit of slacking there recently so we have a pile of patches that are either not reviewed by upstream or should ultimately be carried upstream in a more scalable version. Nothing too invasive lying around though. HS -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: UDS changes
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 04:35:14 PM Aleix Pol wrote: If Kubuntu wants to strength links with KDE, a good start would be to actually trust KDE maintainers on which are stable versions. What does this mean? Since KDE 4.4 we've shipped every KDE point release. Sometimes we get behind (4.9.5 should be available for all users next week), but we do ship them all. Scott K -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: [kubuntu-devel] Re: UDS changes
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:25:16AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2013 04:35:14 PM Aleix Pol wrote: If Kubuntu wants to strength links with KDE, a good start would be to actually trust KDE maintainers on which are stable versions. What does this mean? Since KDE 4.4 we've shipped every KDE point release. Sometimes we get behind (4.9.5 should be available for all users next week), but we do ship them all. This is probably a reference to not doing stable release updates for each new stable release, like KDevelop (although KDevelop 4.4.1 is in 12.10). This is an issue which has probably just gone away with today's announcement/discussion. Jonathan -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: [kubuntu-devel] Re: UDS changes
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:25:16AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2013 04:35:14 PM Aleix Pol wrote: If Kubuntu wants to strength links with KDE, a good start would be to actually trust KDE maintainers on which are stable versions. What does this mean? Since KDE 4.4 we've shipped every KDE point release. Sometimes we get behind (4.9.5 should be available for all users next week), but we do ship them all. This is probably a reference to not doing stable release updates for each new stable release, like KDevelop (although KDevelop 4.4.1 is in 12.10). This is an issue which has probably just gone away with today's announcement/discussion. For all the problems a rolling release may have/cause it certainly frees up resources to deliver more stable updates. HS -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
