Re: License issues with libblkid1

2015-07-13 Thread Mishari Alarfaj
Sorry, I should have clarified.  My concern was with blkid.h header file
distributed under the libblkid-dev package (in trusty).  Looking into the
header file, it is distributed under the LGPL license.  After downloading
the source however, we can see that it contains an odd 'version.c' file
which is distributed under GPL (contrary to the rest of the source files
which are labeled as LGPL).  I have to admit I'm not an expert in software
licensing laws, but I was under the impression that any library derived
from GPL source would inherit the GPL and the headers had to reflect it as
such?

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
mathieu...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mishari Alarfaj 
 malar...@bluebelttech.com wrote:


 Hi.  I just wanted to mention that libblkid1 is currently distributed via
 ubuntu 14.04 as an LGPL libarary.  However, when viewing the source, a
 file: version.c is distributed as GPL.  I believe this either breaks the
 LGPL licensing, and the license either needs to be updated or the version.c
 file (which appears to be irrelevant) needs to be removed.  Thanks for your
 time


 A quick look at the debian/copyright file shows that it is listed (though
 not very clearly, I must admit) as having multiple different source files
 with different licenses; GPL-2+ is listed [1]. This would include version.c
 as under the GPL. (I don't know whether this is correct or not, if it
 should be GPL-2+ or just GPL-2).

 The debian/copyright file has been updated in later releases to more
 clearly list the copyright for each source file. The first stanza is a
 catch-all (*) which includes any file not explicitly listed later in the
 file [2].

 This make me feel like while util-linux might benefit a good look w.r.t
 licensing compliance, it's likely already fine (that also depends on local
 copyright law...)

 Do you have specific concerns about that file or about the general
 licensing for util-linux? Are there issues specific to your location I'm
 not aware of?

 [1]
 http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/util-linux/trusty/view/head:/debian/copyright
 [2]
 http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/util-linux/wily/view/head:/debian/copyright

 Regards,

 / Matt




-- 
-- 
Mishari Alarfaj
Software Development Engineer
Blue Belt Technologies Inc.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


License issues with libblkid1

2015-07-10 Thread Mishari Alarfaj
Hi.  I just wanted to mention that libblkid1 is currently distributed via
ubuntu 14.04 as an LGPL libarary.  However, when viewing the source, a
file: version.c is distributed as GPL.  I believe this either breaks the
LGPL licensing, and the license either needs to be updated or the version.c
file (which appears to be irrelevant) needs to be removed.  Thanks for your
time

-- 
-- 
Mishari Alarfaj
Software Development Engineer
Blue Belt Technologies Inc.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: License issues with libblkid1

2015-07-10 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mishari Alarfaj malar...@bluebelttech.com
 wrote:


 Hi.  I just wanted to mention that libblkid1 is currently distributed via
 ubuntu 14.04 as an LGPL libarary.  However, when viewing the source, a
 file: version.c is distributed as GPL.  I believe this either breaks the
 LGPL licensing, and the license either needs to be updated or the version.c
 file (which appears to be irrelevant) needs to be removed.  Thanks for your
 time


A quick look at the debian/copyright file shows that it is listed (though
not very clearly, I must admit) as having multiple different source files
with different licenses; GPL-2+ is listed [1]. This would include version.c
as under the GPL. (I don't know whether this is correct or not, if it
should be GPL-2+ or just GPL-2).

The debian/copyright file has been updated in later releases to more
clearly list the copyright for each source file. The first stanza is a
catch-all (*) which includes any file not explicitly listed later in the
file [2].

This make me feel like while util-linux might benefit a good look w.r.t
licensing compliance, it's likely already fine (that also depends on local
copyright law...)

Do you have specific concerns about that file or about the general
licensing for util-linux? Are there issues specific to your location I'm
not aware of?

[1]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/util-linux/trusty/view/head:/debian/copyright
[2]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/util-linux/wily/view/head:/debian/copyright

Regards,

/ Matt
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss