[Bug 2051560] Re: Provide python perf module
Noble verification Confirming the bug: $ uname -a Linux n-perf 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 00:40:06 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ sudo apt install linux-tools-$(uname -r) (...) $ python3 -c 'import perf; [print(c) for c in perf.cpu_map()]' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'perf' Updating to kernel in noble-proposed and rebooting: $ uname -a Linux n-perf 6.8.0-32-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed May 1 15:30:59 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux linux-tools was also updated: $ dpkg -l linux-tools-$(uname -r) Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++---- ii linux-tools-6.8.0-32-generic 6.8.0-32.32 amd64Linux kernel version specific tools for version 6.8.0-32 The python command now works: $ python3 -c 'import perf; [print(c) for c in perf.cpu_map()]' 0 Another verification also shows the module is now available: $ python3 -c 'import perf; print(perf.__file__)' /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/linux-tools-6.8.0-32/perf.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Noble verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux ** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051560 Title: Provide python perf module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2051560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
The versions used for these updates were expecting a mantic update as well, to have an upgrade path. But we can't release mantic without any testing whatsoever. Even if we don't have gcp images for mantic, the right version of cloud- init is there and available, so we could hit the bug there as well in other clouds or scenarios. What testing can we do here for mantic, since we don't have gcp images for it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
Thanks for this extra verification. Since xenial is then not affected by this bug, and there is another upcoming ubuntu-advantage-tools v32 SRU which, among many other changes, includes this same fix, let's not release v31.2.3~16.04 into xenial. This avoids an unnecessary update to xenial users, with no immediate benefit for them. cloud-init may at some point in the future be updated for xenial and then include the mentioned attach logic, and introduce this bug, at which time we can revisit this bug and verify it's fixed with the upcoming v32 update of u-a-t. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-failed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
I think the xenial verification at comment #14 was not complete, because, as we can see in the NOTICES section, the attaching was still going on, so the output of "pro status" does not yet show if services were auto-enabled or not, i.e., we don't have the STATUS column in that output. ** Tags removed: verification-done-xenial ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1980246] Re: Doesn't update /etc/nsswitch.conf when using winbind
Would be good to have this fixed in jammy as well, so I added a jammy task to the bug. ** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980246 Title: Doesn't update /etc/nsswitch.conf when using winbind To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1980246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060544] Re: ppa-purge fails on ubuntu desktop images due to awk
Fix sponsored for oracular: Uploading ppa-purge_0.2.8+bzr63-0ubuntu3.dsc Uploading ppa-purge_0.2.8+bzr63-0ubuntu3.tar.xz Uploading ppa-purge_0.2.8+bzr63-0ubuntu3_source.buildinfo Uploading ppa-purge_0.2.8+bzr63-0ubuntu3_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060544 Title: ppa-purge fails on ubuntu desktop images due to awk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppa-purge/+bug/2060544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055114] Re: fail2ban is broken in 24.04 Noble
New version is in oracular-proposed[1]: fail2ban (1.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release (LP: #2055114) * Block ssh invalid keys too (Closes: #1038779) * Follow upstream advice https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/3292#issuecomment-2078361360 to only have sshd as enabled = true in jail.d_defaults-debian.conf * Update lintian override info format in d/source/lintian-overrides on line 1-2. * Update standards version to 4.6.2, no changes needed. -- Sylvestre Ledru Thu, 02 May 2024 13:57:06 +0200 Nothing needs to be sponsored for the ubuntu devel release now. I'll mark it as fix committed, since it was uploaded. Noble is still affected, so I'm adding a noble task. This then needs to become an SRU, following [2], before anything can be uploaded to noble. 1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fail2ban/1.1.0-1 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ** Bug watch added: github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues #3292 https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/3292 ** Also affects: fail2ban (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fail2ban (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055114 Title: fail2ban is broken in 24.04 Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fail2ban/+bug/2055114/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0
Looking at [1], it states: Similarly, plain text files which include their own copyright information and are installed into the binary package unmodified need not have that copyright information copied into /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/copyright So in principle it's ok to drop the specific entry for the kernelrt.py plugin. The debian/* entry I don't know, I see many packages have an entry like that, while others don't. The files in debian/* themselves don't have any copyright note on them, and not all are part of the final binary installation. On the other hand, removing this stanza from d/copyright means we also lose the information on who did the original packaging. But another change is removing GPL-2+ for "Files: *". I'm not sure it was even correct before, as the LICENSE file in the source tree is clearly just "GPL-2" (no +). So we would have to track that one down. See how this can get complicated very quickly? Changes to d/copyright need to be meticulously verified. I would prefer they are not done here, unless such careful verification and cross-checking with the debian policy is done, and also coordination with the same package in debian. So if you want to change d/copyright, my recommendation would be to: - do that in a branch of its own - coordinate with debian, so both debian and ubuntu have the same file. Might need to update the version of the package in debian first, though (which would also benefit us both) 1. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-pkgcopyright -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395 Title: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0
I pushed the oracular debdiff to a git repo at https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+git/sosreport/+ref/oracular-patch-pilot-sosreport-update-2054395 I'm slightly concerned with the d/copyright changes. We seem to be removing attributions from others: diff -Nru sosreport-4.5.6/debian/copyright sosreport-4.7.0/debian/copyright --- sosreport-4.5.6/debian/copyright2024-04-14 22:45:27.0 +0100 +++ sosreport-4.7.0/debian/copyright2024-05-01 07:51:23.0 +0100 @@ -1,36 +1,8 @@ Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Name: sosreport -Upstream-Contact: Bryn M. Reeves +Upstream-Contact: Jake Hunsaker Source: https://github.com/sosreport/sos -Files: * -Copyright: 2012-2013 Bryn M. Reeves - 2007-2013 Red Hat, Inc. -License: GPL-2+ - -Files: sos/report/plugins/kernelrt.py -Copyright: 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -License: GPL-2 - -Files: debian/* -Copyright: 2013 Adam Stokes -License: GPL-2+ - -License: GPL-2 - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or - modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License - as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2. - . - This application is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU - General Public License for more details. - . - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software - Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, - USA. - License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by For example, the plugin sos/report/plugins/kernelrt.py is still shipped, and has the Red Hat Inc copyright text in it. I know this change was done in the upstream git repo[1], but one of the authors is the same one pushing the change here. Previously all debian/* files were removed[2], but what was restored in [1] is not the same d/copyright. 1. https://github.com/sosreport/sos/commit/314cc502ac862494973712537bf7a7a0c34f96d8 2. https://github.com/sosreport/sos/commit/098d19684456eceb6bc2cea094b30effa19c37fc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395 Title: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064390] Re: Merge backuppc-rsync from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064390 Title: Merge backuppc-rsync from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2064390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064723] [NEW] Problems with caribou
Public bug reported: I'm seeing a number of issues with the on-screen keyboard. * The on-screen keyboard pops up despite being disabled in the Ubuntu Settings. * The on-screen keyboard pops up even though a physical keyboard is connected. * When the on-screen keyboard is active, Ctrl+Tab in Firefox sometimes results in the tab/window not being resized to make room for the keyboard. Touching the screen at one position will then result in a mouse click at a different position. There's this GNOME extension: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1326/block-caribou/ https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/3222/block-caribou-36/ It has 48 and 98 thousand downloads. So it seems like a lot of people have problems with caribou. Yet it still is a non-optional part of GNOME/Ubuntu. On https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Caribou it says that the project is not under active development anymore. What's going on with caribou? Ubuntu version: 22.04 LTS `apt list` says `caribou/jammy 0.4.21-7.2 amd64`. ** Affects: caribou (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064723 Title: Problems with caribou To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caribou/+bug/2064723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062177] Please test proposed package
Hello David, or anyone else affected, Accepted remmina into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/1.4.35+dfsg-0ubuntu5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes after RDP connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/2062177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040459] Re: MRE updates of bind9 for noble
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected, Accepted bind-dyndb-ldap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb- ldap/11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040459 Title: MRE updates of bind9 for noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/+bug/2040459/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Please test proposed package
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Re: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user-data
Please also confirm, via the test plan, that if the image has the snap deb installed, that the snaps will be upgraded, i.e., that we don't break the normal use case with canonical images. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Re: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user-data
Reopening the main devel (oracular) task as the fix is not there yet, nor uploaded. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Critical Assignee: Chad Smith (chad.smith) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Please test proposed package
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062389] Please test proposed package
Hello Eduardo, or anyone else affected, Accepted openscap into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openscap/1.2.16-2ubuntu3.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062389 Title: [SRU] Fix segfault in systemdunitdependency probe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openscap/+bug/2062389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064300] Please test proposed package
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064300 Title: cli behavior changed for commands passing optional --file argument to cloud-init init, modules or single subcommand To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064300] Please test proposed package
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064300 Title: cli behavior changed for commands passing optional --file argument to cloud-init init, modules or single subcommand To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Please test proposed package
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused
a) Please upload this fix to Oracular as well. b) Interesting, this was failing in noble already before the release, i.e., the existing DEP8 test covered this scenario already: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/nbd/noble/amd64 ** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nbd/+bug/2060745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Please test proposed package
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060745] Please test proposed package
Hello Thiago, or anyone else affected, Accepted nbd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/1:3.26.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nbd/+bug/2060745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064300] Please test proposed package
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064300 Title: cli behavior changed for commands passing optional --file argument to cloud-init init, modules or single subcommand To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064132] Re: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user-data
Before release into updates, please make sure to address Oracular, and also the test plan amendment from comment #5. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064132 Title: images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user- data To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063879] Re: [SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends
> Its mere presence on a system with Ardour and Audacity installed can cause either program to crash (see LP: #2063847) Making it a recommends will still have it installed by default when easyeffects is installed, and thus cause a cash. Is that what you want? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063879 Title: [SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easyeffects/+bug/2063879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064300] Re: cli behavior changed for commands passing optional --file argument to cloud-init init, modules or single subcommand
I'm told that for noble and later, the change in behavior that this SRU is reverting will not be applied, as there it's intended. I'll thus make this clear by adding noble and Oracular tasks and marking them as invalid. ** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064300 Title: cli behavior changed for commands passing optional --file argument to cloud-init init, modules or single subcommand To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064360] Re: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files
For some reason which I cannot explain at the moment, a local build of 1.5.3-5ubuntu5.1 in noble does not produce the expected extra documentation files, so it doesn't look like the change in build-deps is enough to fix it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064360 Title: libpam-doc: doc-base reports missing files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063879] Re: [SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends
I suppose lsp-plugins{-lv2,} will be tried first.
So before this sru, if easyeffects is installed, you would get calf-
plugins (depends), and lsp-plugins-lv2 or lsp-plugins via recommends.
After the SRU, you will get easyeffects and lsp-plugins-lv2 or lsp-
plugins, and if that also is not available, only then calf-plugins.
Essentially the SRU is changing new installs to only install calf-
plugins as a last resort. What is the change in behavior of a system
with:
a) easyeffects + calf-plugins + lsp-plugins*
b) easyeffects + lsp-plugins* (and no calf-plugins)
?
I'm not familiar with any of these.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063879
Title:
[SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easyeffects/+bug/2063879/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063820] Please test proposed package
Hello Paolo, or anyone else affected, Accepted rtl8812au into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu23 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063820 Title: rtl8812au-dkms DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/2063820/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059730] Re: Focal 5.15 kernel apparmor mismatch missing snap_validate_preseed functionality in livecd-rootfs
Could you please adjust the status of the non-focal bug task? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059730 Title: Focal 5.15 kernel apparmor mismatch missing snap_validate_preseed functionality in livecd-rootfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2059730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040924] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for landscape-client has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040924 Title: /etc/update-motd.d/50-landscape-sysinfo: 24: cannot create /var/lib/landscape/landscape-sysinfo.cache: Permission denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2040924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059730] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for livecd-rootfs has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059730 Title: Focal 5.15 kernel apparmor mismatch missing snap_validate_preseed functionality in livecd-rootfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2059730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2041215] Re: dahdi-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy
What's the status in mantic and noble please? The main task in this bug is not fix released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041215 Title: dahdi-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/2041215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052642] Re: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy
This update is still missing the mantic verification, which blocks a jammy release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052642 Title: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2052642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2006402] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for landscape-client has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006402 Title: Update focal, jammy to landscape-client 23.02 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2006402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052789] Re: AppArmor profiles missing in kernel 5.15.0-1051+ release
Could you please adjust the status of the non-focal bug task? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052789 Title: AppArmor profiles missing in kernel 5.15.0-1051+ release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2052789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2036761] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ppa-purge has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036761 Title: [mantic] ppa-purge no longer purges what add-apt-repository adds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppa-purge/+bug/2036761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2027613] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for landscape-client has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027613 Title: Avoid stopping services on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2027613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063401] Re: aardvark-dns fails to build
This bug is lacking the SRU template filled in, please provide one. ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063401 Title: aardvark-dns fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aardvark-dns/+bug/2063401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063447] Re: netavark fails to build
Please provide a filled-in SRU template for this bug. ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063447 Title: netavark fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netavark/+bug/2063447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064096] Re: Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --switched-root --system --deserialize=40 splash Ok, --switched-root is there in PID 1, it's something I was looking to confirm. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064096 Title: Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2064096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
** Tags added: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-needed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064399] Re: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064399 Title: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/2064399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064386] Re: Merge adcli from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064386 Title: Merge adcli from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/2064386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064407] Re: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064407 Title: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/2064407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064384] Re: Merge samba from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064384 Title: Merge samba from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/2064384/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064404] Re: Merge frr from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: frr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064404 Title: Merge frr from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frr/+bug/2064404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064411] Re: Merge krb5 from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064411 Title: Merge krb5 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2064411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064438] Re: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: pam-p11 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064438 Title: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-p11/+bug/2064438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064442] Re: Merge pmdk from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: pmdk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064442 Title: Merge pmdk from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pmdk/+bug/2064442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064429] Re: Merge ndctl from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: ndctl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064429 Title: Merge ndctl from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndctl/+bug/2064429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064470] Re: Merge strongswan from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064470 Title: Merge strongswan from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/2064470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064475] Re: Merge unbound from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064475 Title: Merge unbound from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/2064475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064481] Re: Merge wireguard from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: wireguard (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064481 Title: Merge wireguard from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireguard/+bug/2064481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064389] Re: Merge autofs from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064389 Title: Merge autofs from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2064389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => linux-raspi (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370 Title: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064096] Re: Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE
** Description changed: + What's known so far: + - 24.04 desktop deployed with TPM+FDE shows this bug + - services confined with apparmor that need to access something in /run/systemd (like the notify socket) fail to do so, even if the apparmor profile is in complain mode + - only after running aa-disable can the service start fine + - paths logged by the apparmor DENIED or ALLOWED messages are missing the "/run" prefix from "/run/systemd/.." + - other access in /run/systemd/ are also blocked, but the most noticeable one is the notify mechanism + - comment #2 also states that azure CVM images are also impacted + + + Original description follows: + This might be related to #2064088 The rsyslog service is continually timing out and restarting. If I use a service drop-in file and change the 'Type' from 'notify' to 'simple', the service starts and appears to work normally. In the journal, I can see the attached apparmor errors. I can't make sense of them, but if it's a similar issue to #2064088, then I suspect apparmor is preventing the systemd notify function from alerting systemd that the service is up and running. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: rsyslog 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg CasperMD5CheckResult: fail CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Apr 29 10:37:46 2024 ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 - PATH=(custom, no user) - SHELL=/bin/bash - TERM=xterm-256color - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= +  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 +  PATH=(custom, no user) +  SHELL=/bin/bash +  TERM=xterm-256color +  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: rsyslog UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Description changed: What's known so far: - 24.04 desktop deployed with TPM+FDE shows this bug - services confined with apparmor that need to access something in /run/systemd (like the notify socket) fail to do so, even if the apparmor profile is in complain mode - only after running aa-disable can the service start fine - paths logged by the apparmor DENIED or ALLOWED messages are missing the "/run" prefix from "/run/systemd/.." - other access in /run/systemd/ are also blocked, but the most noticeable one is the notify mechanism - comment #2 also states that azure CVM images are also impacted - + - comment #4 has instructions on how to create such a VM locally with LXD vms Original description follows: This might be related to #2064088 The rsyslog service is continually timing out and restarting. If I use a service drop-in file and change the 'Type' from 'notify' to 'simple', the service starts and appears to work normally. In the journal, I can see the attached apparmor errors. I can't make sense of them, but if it's a similar issue to #2064088, then I suspect apparmor is preventing the systemd notify function from alerting systemd that the service is up and running. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: rsyslog 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg CasperMD5CheckResult: fail CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Apr 29 10:37:46 2024 ProcEnviron:  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8  PATH=(custom, no user)  SHELL=/bin/bash  TERM=xterm-256color  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: rsyslog UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Description changed: What's known so far: - 24.04 desktop deployed with TPM+FDE shows this bug - - services confined with apparmor that need to access something in /run/systemd (like the notify socket) fail to do so, even if the apparmor profile is in complain mode + - services confined with apparmor that need to access something in /run/systemd (like the notify socket) fail to do so, even if the apparmor profile is in complain mode. And the apparmor profile does already have rules to allow that access - only after running aa-disable can the service start fine - - paths logged by the apparmor DENIED or ALLOWED messages are missing the "/run" prefix from "/run/systemd/.." + - paths logged by the apparmor DENIED or ALLOWED messages are missing the "/run" prefix from "/run/systemd/..". When we add rules to the profile using "/systemd/" (i.e., also dropping the /run prefix), then it works - other access in /run/systemd/ are also blocked, but the most noticeable one is the notify mechanism - comment #2 also states that azure CVM images are also impacted - comment #4 has instructions on how to create such a VM locally with LXD vms Original description follows: This might be related to #2064088 The rsyslog service is
[Bug 2064096] Re: rsyslog service timeout on noble numbat
I think neither rsyslog, nor cups, or sssd, are the correct packages for this bug, but I agree that spreading out the investigation over two different bugs is not good. I'll mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088 as a duplicate, and add cups and sssd tasks to this one for tracking purposes, but I suspect the fix will be elsewhere in the end. ** Also affects: sssd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - rsyslog service timeout on noble numbat + Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE ** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064096 Title: Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2064096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2064096 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064096 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2064096 rsyslog service timeout on noble numbat -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
Marking the main devel task as invalid, because this only applies to trusty. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-advantage-tools has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
Ok, I was able to reproduce this in a VM setup (following https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/2064096/comments/4). And if the apparmor profile is removed for sssd, even though it was in complain mode (not enforce), then sssd starts just fine. To clarify, this is happening when installing Noble desktop with the TPM+FDE option. It doesn't look like it's an sssd bug. This is also happening with cups and rsyslog. Where exactly the problem is we don't know yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064096] Re: rsyslog service timeout on noble numbat
So far it's rsyslog, cups, and sssd (just confirmed via https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064096 Title: rsyslog service timeout on noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/2064096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
> and the sssd processes. ... which of course you won't have, because it's failing to start (unless you apply your workaround). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
Looks like cups is also affected: 2024-04-30T15:32:24.172187+01:00 ubu-o-8aa620b8b277 kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1714487544.169:235): apparmor="DENIED" operation="sendmsg" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" name="/systemd/notify" pid=4835 comm="cupsd" requested_mask="w" denied_mask="w" fsuid=0 ouid=0 The sssd process, however, was "ALLOWED", hinting that the apparmor profile is in complain mode: [Tue Apr 30 15:32:05 2024] audit: type=1400 audit(1714487525.544:225): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="sendmsg" class="file" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="/usr/sbin/sssd" name="systemd/notify" pid=4822 comm="sssd" requested_mask="w" denied_mask="w" fsuid=0 ouid=0 Can you try disabling the apparmor profile for sssd? It would be a command like: sudo aa-disable /usr/sbin/sssd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
Did you install this fde/tpm setup using the ubuntu desktop noble installer? Or was hit some manual setup? Can you also show the output of: ps fauxwZ If you don't want to disclose all that list, what we are looking for are the systemd processes (in particular, PID 1), and the sssd processes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
The do-release-upgrade issue is unfortunate, but I agree it's not being introduced in this update. It looks like we should think about it some more, though, given that trusty was just given some extra life, and would be good if trusty users could upgrade to the next release keeping their esm status/packages. The DEP8 infrastructure is not ready to handle trusty updates anymore, and doesn't even recognize it as a valid release when I tried to trigger the missing tests manually. Looking at the test itself, though, it's very superficial (it only checks the help output), and the other tests performed for this SRU are vastly superior and of course check that the command-line tool runs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
** Tags removed: block-proposed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064088] Re: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat
This is odd, as sssd has a good test suite[1] which exercises ldap integration, kerberos, and even smart card logins: (...) 2183s autopkgtest [16:30:29]: summary 2183s ldap-user-group-ldap-auth PASS 2183s ldap-user-group-krb5-auth PASS 2183s sssd-softhism2-certificates-tests.sh PASS 2183s sssd-smart-card-pam-auth-configs PASS I've seen that kind of permission denied errors with systemd notifications in the past when the application was under apparmor confinement, but sssd doesn't have a default apparmor profile. In any case, do you see anything in the `dmesg -wT` output or even /var/log/syslog when you try to start sssd and get this error? 1. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble/noble/amd64/s/sssd/20240421_163046_bc362@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064088 Title: sssd service fails to start in noble numbat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2064088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2033313] Re: Rename ua_logs.tar.gz to up_logs.tar.gz
Note that some files inside the tarball were also renamed, i.e., ua- status.json became pro-status.json. This should also be called out in the SRU template. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033313 Title: Rename ua_logs.tar.gz to up_logs.tar.gz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2033313/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770666/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770667/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770663/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770665/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz
apport information ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770664/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770662/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770661/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] JournalErrors.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770660/+files/JournalErrors.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] Re: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected dist-upgrade ** Description changed: I just do-release-upgraded from Jammy to Noble on a pretty minimal server. After upgrade, network was fine but DNS names could not be resolved. I discovered systemd-resolved wasn't installed. I copied and installed that package manually, which immediately resolved the problem. So I assume this is a mistake in the upgrade process. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: systemd-resolved 255.4-1ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Thu Apr 25 15:27:23 2024 SourcePackage: systemd UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-25 (0 days ago) + --- + ProblemType: Bug + ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 + Architecture: amd64 + CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown + CrashDB: ubuntu + CrashReports: 640:0:0:25766:2024-04-25 15:32:14.748564723 +:2024-04-25 15:32:14.747564766 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_docker-compose.0.crash + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 + Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader (not installed) + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 + Tags: noble dist-upgrade + Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-25 (0 days ago) + UserGroups: N/A + VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog: + INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running + INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting + _MarkForUpload: True ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464/+attachment/5770659/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056442] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for crun has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2056442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported
There was no clear indication which running kernel was used during the verifications, so I did it: Using the Dockerfile from the test plan: FROM ubuntu:noble RUN apt install -U systemd -y CMD ["/lib/systemd/systemd"] And building with "podman build -t systemd ." a) 5.15.0-105 kernel (jammy GA kernel) crun 0.17+dfsg-1.1 from jammy fails (odd, I thought it was unaffected): $ podman run --systemd always systemd Error: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported crun 0.17+dfsg-1.1ubuntu0.1 from jammy-proposed works: $ podman run --systemd always systemd (nothing here) In a separate terminal we can see it's running: $ podman ps CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES b2decb3d2820 localhost/systemd:latest /lib/systemd/syst... 34 seconds ago Up 34 seconds ago flamboyant_hertz b) Jammy HWE kernel $ uname -r 6.5.0-34-generic crun 0.17+dfsg-1.1 from jammy fails: $ podman run --systemd always systemd Error: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported crun 0.17+dfsg-1.1ubuntu0.1 from jammy-proposed works: $ podman run --systemd always systemd (nothing here) In another terminal: $ podman ps CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUSPORTS NAMES 867d113be7a3 localhost/systemd:latest /lib/systemd/syst... 2 seconds ago Up 2 seconds ago confident_mirzakhani -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2056442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported
Marking mantic as "won't fix" according to comment #33 above. ** Changed in: crun (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2056442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058193] Re: Support Synaptics fingerprint device with ID [06CB:0106]
I see it in noble[1], but not mantic[2], and there is no mention in this bug about skipping mantic on purpose. When interim releases are skipped, it's best to explicitly declare the intent and reason. 1. https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfprint/tree/libfprint/drivers/synaptics/synaptics.c?h=applied/ubuntu/devel#n50 2. https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfprint/tree/libfprint/drivers/synaptics/synaptics.c?h=applied/ubuntu/mantic-devel#n33 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058193 Title: Support Synaptics fingerprint device with ID [06CB:0106] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2058193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1990630] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tracker-miners has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990630 Title: [SRU] tracker-extract-3 crashed with signal 31 in __GI_epoll_create1() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tracker/+bug/1990630/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings
As explained in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/+bug/2053157/comments/7, the testing was conducted in the main SRU bug. I'll flip the tags accordingly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053157 Title: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2053157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1976312] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pathological has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976312 Title: [SRU] Pathological wont accept any input To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pathological/+bug/1976312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045708] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gce-compute-image- packages has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045708 Title: [SRU] Improve debian/99-gce.rules to set schedulers based on disk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gce-compute-image-packages/+bug/2045708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent
That has cleared. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-compute-engine-oslogin/+bug/2052438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059197] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nfs-utils has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Title: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together
Your verification showed "permission denied" when NFSv3 was attempted, which I expect when -t nfs4 is used, but not in the -t nfs case, or when "-t" is not used at all. Since this is a quick check, I ran these tests: root@j-nfs-server:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsd/versions -2 +3 -4 -4.0 -4.1 -4.2 Autonegotiation falls back to 3.0: root@f-nfs-client:~# mount -t nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage /mnt root@f-nfs-client:~# mount|grep nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage on /mnt type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.122.149,mountvers=3,mountport=42872,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.122.149) And when the server supports them all, and I request v3 specifically, that also works: root@j-nfs-server:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsd/versions -2 +3 +4 +4.1 +4.2 root@f-nfs-client:~# mount -t nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage /mnt -o vers=3 root@f-nfs-client:~# mount | grep nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage on /mnt type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.122.149,mountvers=3,mountport=40448,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.122.149) And autonegotiation also still works and selects 4.2 when I just use "-t nfs" (not -t nfs4): root@f-nfs-client:~# mount -t nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage /mnt root@f-nfs-client:~# mount|grep nfs j-nfs-server.vms:/storage on /mnt type nfs4 (rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.168.122.242,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.122.149) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Title: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent
google-guest-agent was promoted to main to fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-compute-engine-oslogin/+bug/2052438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059197 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Thanks for the verification, I'll mark this bug as a duplicate of that one then. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059197 mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063381 Title: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2063381/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent
I'm trying to understand and sortout a component mismatch that this update is introducing in focal. Apparently you guys stopped building bin:google-compute-engine-oslogin from src:gce-compute-images-packages a while back, and now it's src:google-compute-engine-oslogin that builds bin:google-compute-engine-oslogin. But the former was in main in focal, and it can't depend on bin:google- guest-agent which is in universe. And britney is complaining loudly[1]: Migration status for google-compute-engine-oslogin (20231004.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 to 20231004.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.3): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression Issues preventing migration: google-compute-engine-oslogin/amd64 in main cannot depend on google-guest-agent in universe google-compute-engine-oslogin/arm64 in main cannot depend on google-guest-agent in universe google-compute-engine-oslogin/armhf in main cannot depend on google-guest-agent in universe google-compute-engine-oslogin/ppc64el in main cannot depend on google-guest-agent in universe google-compute-engine-oslogin/s390x in main cannot depend on google-guest-agent in universe Impossible Depends: google-compute-engine-oslogin -> google-guest-agent/20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.3/amd64 Impossible Depends: google-compute-engine-oslogin -> google-guest-agent/20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.3/arm64 Impossible Depends: google-compute-engine-oslogin -> google-guest-agent/20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.3/armhf Impossible Depends: google-compute-engine-oslogin -> google-guest-agent/20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.3/ppc64el Impossible Depends: google-compute-engine-oslogin -> google-guest-agent/20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.3/s390x 1. https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#google-compute-engine-oslogin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-compute-engine-oslogin/+bug/2052438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052438] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for google-compute-engine- oslogin has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-compute-engine-oslogin/+bug/2052438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dpdk has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055283] Re: Intel Bluetooth AX201 needs firmware intel/ibt-0180-4150.sfi
Hi, the test plan calls out for two additional steps which I don't see in your verification: > run hciconfig, the hci0 shows up. > run checkbox testcase, it could pass. > [Checkbox job `com.canonical.certification::bluetooth/detect-output` output] Could you please clarify if you have performed these steps in mantic and jammy? Also, you said: > enable proposed ppa Could you please clarify if this was a PPA, or if it was the actual official proposed pocket for mantic and jammy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055283 Title: Intel Bluetooth AX201 needs firmware intel/ibt-0180-4150.sfi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2055283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
What's the status of this in noble please? - the noble bug task says "confirmed" - this bug's description starts with "Backport dpdk as MRE to noble once the update for noble has been completed." Are we waiting for a noble update? Noble currently has 23.11-1build3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
