[Bug 285392] Re: Softreset failed (device not ready)

2009-08-24 Thread Martien Verbruggen
Kev: How did you build that kernel? I tried building one for Ubuntu, but
end up with the error message:

II: Checking for missing symbols in new ABI...
MISS : sata_pmp_error_handler
MISS : sata_pmp_qc_defer_cmd_switch
MISS : sata_pmp_port_ops
found 3 missing symbols
EE: Symbols gone missing (what did you do!?!)

all I did was disable CONFIG_SATA_PMP in debian/config/amd64/config. Is
there something else I need to do to make this work?

I'm trying to confirm that I'm seeing bugs with the kernel, rather than
hardware problems. the SMART selftest on my disk claims it's all 100%
hunky dory, so I'm hoping that there is indeed a bug, and not hardware
failure, which is much more expensive.

-- 
Softreset failed (device not ready)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-11-27 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I just installed the new kernel (2.6.27-9-generic x86_64), but this fix
doesn't seem to have made it in there yet. nodfs seems to be an unknown
mount option for cifs.

Any indication as to which update will have this fix?

Thanks,

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-11-27 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I just installed the new kernel (2.6.27-9-generic x86_64), but this fix
doesn't seem to have made it in there yet. nodfs seems to be an unknown
mount option for cifs.

Any indication as to which update will have this fix?

Thanks,

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-11-19 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I've attached a tar file with two Wireshark dumps, as I couldn't work out how to
attach two files to a comment here directly.

If more information is required, please let me know.

Server: DNS-323, samba 3.0.24
Client: Ubuntu 8.10, kernel 2.6.27-7-generic

with standard settings:
---

Wireshark dump file: cifs.no-options.filtered.dump

mgjv# cat /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled   
1
mgjv# mount -t cifs -o rw,user=dummy,password=testme //dns-323/Shared /mnt/dummy
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
ls: cannot access /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile: No such file or directory
mgjv# touch /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
touch: setting times of `/mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile': Not a directory
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile  
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 0 2008-11-20 10:15 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
zsh: not a directory: /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 0 2008-11-20 10:15 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile 
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 1 2008-11-20 10:16 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# umount /mnt/dummy


with nounix mount option


Wireshark dump file: cifs.nounix.filtered.dump

The mode when the file has been created doesn't look right.
The behaviour is the same when /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled is set to 0.

mgjv# cat /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled
1
mgjv# mount -t cifs -o rw,user=dummy,password=testme,nounix //dns-323/Shared 
/mnt/dummy
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
ls: cannot access /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile: No such file or directory
mgjv# touch /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 0 2008-11-20 10:22 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
zsh: not a directory: /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 0 2008-11-20 10:22 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile  
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 1 2008-11-20 10:18 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# umount /mnt/dummy


** Attachment added: Two wireshark dumps.
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19798111/cifs.dumps.tar.gz

-- 
Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-11-19 Thread Martien Verbruggen
# uname -r
2.6.27-7-generic
# mount -t cifs -o rw,user=xxx,password=xxx,nodfs //dns-323/Shared /mnt/dummy
# tail -1 /var/log/messages
Nov 20 08:34:24 mgjv kernel: [ 1670.862969] CIFS: Unknown mount option nodfs

Looks like that needs an ever newer kernel.

I am having this problem with a DNS-323 NAS, so I don't easily have the
option of upgrading the Samba version on that, and would like to see
some resolution to this bug. happy to provide more information.

BTW, the nounix option changes behaviour, but does not fix it. If
wanted, I can provide test and wiretap dumps later today.

-- 
Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-11-19 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I've attached a tar file with two Wireshark dumps, as I couldn't work out how to
attach two files to a comment here directly.

If more information is required, please let me know.

Server: DNS-323, samba 3.0.24
Client: Ubuntu 8.10, kernel 2.6.27-7-generic

with standard settings:
---

Wireshark dump file: cifs.no-options.filtered.dump

mgjv# cat /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled   
1
mgjv# mount -t cifs -o rw,user=dummy,password=testme //dns-323/Shared /mnt/dummy
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
ls: cannot access /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile: No such file or directory
mgjv# touch /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
touch: setting times of `/mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile': Not a directory
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile  
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 0 2008-11-20 10:15 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
zsh: not a directory: /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 0 2008-11-20 10:15 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile 
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwxrwx 1 507 502 1 2008-11-20 10:16 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# umount /mnt/dummy


with nounix mount option


Wireshark dump file: cifs.nounix.filtered.dump

The mode when the file has been created doesn't look right.
The behaviour is the same when /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled is set to 0.

mgjv# cat /proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled
1
mgjv# mount -t cifs -o rw,user=dummy,password=testme,nounix //dns-323/Shared 
/mnt/dummy
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
ls: cannot access /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile: No such file or directory
mgjv# touch /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 0 2008-11-20 10:22 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
zsh: not a directory: /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 0 2008-11-20 10:22 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile  
mgjv# echo   /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# ls -l /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
-rwxrwSrwx 1 root root 1 2008-11-20 10:18 /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# rm /mnt/dummy/Temp/testfile
mgjv# umount /mnt/dummy


** Attachment added: Two wireshark dumps.
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19798111/cifs.dumps.tar.gz

-- 
Access to samba3.0.26 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 269292] Re: intrepid, visual effects settings are not restored after session restart

2008-11-09 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I have a similar problem, but the other way around from the original
report.

I upgraded from Hardy to Intrepid a few days ago on a few machines. The
upgrade went without glitches on two i386 installations (one VirtualBox
and one on my old laptop). On this AMD64 installation, however, there
have been some glitches, one of which is the resetting of the desktop
effects to behave like 'None' when starting a session. Like with other
people, there is nothing checked in the 'visual effects' tab when I
check.

Checking 'Extra' will re-enable things for the session, but it returns
to None again when I restart.

I work around it for now by using the Compiz Fusion Icon, and telling it
to restart the window manager, as using the 'Appearance' tabs also
resets all customisations I chose for Compiz.

-- 
intrepid, visual effects settings are not restored after session restart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222458] Re: /lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.

2008-10-01 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I've just been trying to determine where, during the boot cycle,
/lib/udev/hdparm is being called for the permanently attached disks.
While I can see the devices in /var/log/udev, I don't think that the
/lib/udev/hdparm script is run correctly, or maybe it's called too early
in the boot process. It's hard to tell, because there STILL is no
boot.log.

I think the script is called during boot before the file systems have
been mounted, and therefore /sbin/hdparm isn't even there yet. I'm
beginning to think that this is not the right place to try to call
hdparm for the permanent disks.

I'll probably just add a script to init.d that calls hdparm explicitly,
and give up on this.

-- 
/lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222458
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222458] Re: /lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.

2008-10-01 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I'm pretty sure that all /dev/[sh]d[a-z] devices would not have a digit
at the end unless they're partitions.

I don't mind using -h instead of -L.

I need to do some more testing. While the above worked fine when running
/lib/udev/hdparm from command line. i am not entirely convinced yet that
it will work during boot. I am not sure that these scripts are being
called _after_ the /dev/disk hierarchy has been built or before.

I'll play with a test installation tomorrow, when I have some time to
confirm.

-- 
/lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222458
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222458] Re: /lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.

2008-09-30 Thread Martien Verbruggen
I've run into this same problem, but I actually use /dev/disk/by-uuid/*
links, which all link to a partition on the given device, rather than
the device itself. I suggest the following as a fix for this as well as
the earlier suggested fix:

93c93,100
   DISC=$KEY
---
   if [ -L $KEY ]
   then
 DISC=$(readlink -m $KEY)
 # if this is a link to a partition, strip off the digit
 DISC=${DISC%[0-9]}
   else
 DISC=$KEY 
   fi

-- 
/lib/udev/hdparm Compares Against $DEVNAME.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222458
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs