[Bug 1445041] [NEW] Can HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE be defined by default?
Public bug reported: Hello, I'm not sure if this is a bug or a wishlist item. I'm having issues upon bootup with a service daemon freezing (ntpd in this case). I think the problem would go away (not necessarily fixed but no longer seen at least) if libnss-ldap was built with HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE defined (in config.h.in). Since OpenLDAP libraries are a depneds for libnss-ldap, and since OpenLDAP has ldap_initialize() (and ldap_init() while we're at it), then why not activate these features by default? I can provide lots of information about my particular problem symptoms with ntpd if needed. # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS Release:14.04 # # apt-cache policy libnss-ldap libnss-ldap: Installed: 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 Candidate: 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 Version table: *** 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 0 500 http://my_apt_server/staging/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 264-2.2ubuntu4 0 500 http://my_apt_server/staging/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages # What I expected to happen: No connection be made to an LDAP server due to a call to initgroups() by a process whose uid/username is listed in nss_initgroups_ignoreusers in the /etc/ldap.conf file. What happened instead: It seems that a connection is made anyways. Thank you, Deric Sullivan ** Affects: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445041 Title: Can HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE be defined by default? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/1445041/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1445041] [NEW] Can HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE be defined by default?
Public bug reported: Hello, I'm not sure if this is a bug or a wishlist item. I'm having issues upon bootup with a service daemon freezing (ntpd in this case). I think the problem would go away (not necessarily fixed but no longer seen at least) if libnss-ldap was built with HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE defined (in config.h.in). Since OpenLDAP libraries are a depneds for libnss-ldap, and since OpenLDAP has ldap_initialize() (and ldap_init() while we're at it), then why not activate these features by default? I can provide lots of information about my particular problem symptoms with ntpd if needed. # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS Release:14.04 # # apt-cache policy libnss-ldap libnss-ldap: Installed: 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 Candidate: 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 Version table: *** 264-2.2ubuntu4.14.04.1 0 500 http://my_apt_server/staging/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 264-2.2ubuntu4 0 500 http://my_apt_server/staging/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages # What I expected to happen: No connection be made to an LDAP server due to a call to initgroups() by a process whose uid/username is listed in nss_initgroups_ignoreusers in the /etc/ldap.conf file. What happened instead: It seems that a connection is made anyways. Thank you, Deric Sullivan ** Affects: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445041 Title: Can HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE be defined by default? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/1445041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1356867] [NEW] virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Attempting upgrade and got error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-33.58~precise1-generic 3.13.11.4 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-33-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: i386 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-34-generic Date: Thu Aug 14 08:01:40 2014 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20130213) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 SourcePackage: virtualbox Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356867 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1356867/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1355817] [NEW] virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: This happened immediately upon boot up. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-33.58~precise1-generic 3.13.11.4 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-33-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: i386 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-33-generic Date: Tue Aug 12 08:17:32 2014 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20130213) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 SourcePackage: virtualbox Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1355817 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1355817/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1352890] [NEW] virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Was attempting to install a hardware update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-54.81~precise1-generic 3.5.7.33 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-54-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: i386 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-32-generic Date: Tue Aug 5 08:10:25 2014 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20130213) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6 SourcePackage: virtualbox Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352890 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1352890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048792] Re: org.freedesktop.Dbus error while trying to erase USB key with Startup disk creator
A workaround for this bug: $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=1 $ sudo blockdev --rereadpt /dev/sdb After zeroing out the first megabyte erasing of the usb disk works. It is related to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb- creator/+bug/458334 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048792 Title: org.freedesktop.Dbus error while trying to erase USB key with Startup disk creator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1048792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950526] Re: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950526 Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/950526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950526] [NEW] virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: i thin ki was trying to browse the network. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.2.0-18-generic Date: Mon Mar 5 13:58:11 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 SourcePackage: virtualbox Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-08 (0 days ago) ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950526 Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/950526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926208] Re: bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()
crashed while using Chrome! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926208 Title: bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/926208/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 618951] Re: update-manager crashed with DBusException in commit()
Seems to happen to me every time I run the update-manager after installing 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618951 Title: update-manager crashed with DBusException in commit() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/618951/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823366] Re: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
Actually, the original post without the auto bond0 is from mar_rio. I'm the second person reporting the bug. I assumed that you didn't put auto bond0 because we've been quoting the README as authoritative and it doesn't have the auto for the bond. To reproduce the original bug I simplified my interfaces file to (only IPs have been changed): -- auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static bond_slaves eth0 eth1 bond_mode active-backup bond_primary eth1 bond_miimon 100 bond_updelay 2000 address 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 -- So, if I keep auto bond0 and change my interfaces file to: -- auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static bond_slaves none bond_mode active-backup bond_primary eth0 bond_miimon 100 bond_updelay 2000 address 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual bond_master bond0 bond_mode active-backup bond_primary eth0 bond_miimon 100 bond_updelay 2000 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet manual bond_master bond0 bond_mode active-backup bond_primary eth0 bond_miimon 100 bond_updelay 2000 -- Then I still have no primary after a reboot. What I think is happening is the following: If the order that the interfaces come up is bond0, eth0, eth1 then the primary will be set: ifup bond0: creates bond0 (from add_master()); no primary is set (from setup_master() with no slaves); no slaves are added (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = none); bond0 comes UP (but probably not LOWER_UP yet) ifup eth0: sees that bond0 is already created (from add_master()); should fail to set mode but continue anyway (from setup_master() with bond0 already up); no primary is set (from setup_master() with no slaves); eth0 is added as slave (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = eth0); eth0 comes UP and LOWER_UP which should cause bond0 to come LOWER_UP; ifup eth1: sees that bond0 is already created (from add_master()); should fail to set mode but continue anyway (from setup_master() with bond0 already up); primary is set to eth0 (from setup_master() with eth0 as slave); eth1 is added as slave (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = eth1); eth1 comes UP and LOWER_UP; If the order that the interfaces come up is bond0, eth1, eth0 then the primary will not be set: ifup bond0: creates bond0 (from add_master()); no primary is set (from setup_master() with no slaves); no slaves are added (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = none); bond0 comes UP (but probably not LOWER_UP yet) ifup eth1: sees that bond0 is already created (from add_master()); should fail to set mode but continue anyway (from setup_master() with bond0 already up); no primary is set (from setup_master() with no slaves); eth1 is added as slave (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = eth1); eth1 comes UP and LOWER_UP which should cause bond0 to come LOWER_UP; ifup eth0: sees that bond0 is already created (from add_master()); should fail to set mode but continue anyway (from setup_master() with bond0 already up); no primary is set (from setup_master() with only eth1 as slave); eth0 is added as slave (from enslave_slaves() with bond_slaves = eth0); eth0 comes UP and LOWER_UP; I would guess that moving the following code from setup_master() over to the end of enslave_slaves() will fix the problem: # The first slave in bond-primary found in current slaves becomes the primary. # If no slave in bond-primary is found, then primary does not change. for slave in $IF_BOND_PRIMARY ; do if grep -sq \\$slave\\ /sys/class/net/$BOND_MASTER/bonding/slaves ; then sysfs $slave primary break fi done Note: If that does fix the problem then moving the IF_BOND_ACTIVE_SLAVE section is probably also a good idea but not related specifically to this bond_primary bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366 Title: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces To manage
[Bug 823366] Re: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
Regarding comment #9: Maybe there is some type of race condition that could cause the bug but I have many servers that had never shown this bug. And regardless of any possible race condition, the SRU guarantees that the bug will appear. Regarding comment #8 and #9: I tried the config as suggested by Steve and unfortunately it makes things worse. bond0 doesn't even come up. Since bond0 no longer has an auto bond0 stanza, I see nothing in if-pre-up.d/ifenslave which would bring up bond0. Also, the README mentions: The master interface will be created and set up at the time the first slave is set up, according to bond_* options in the *slave* stanza. For this reason, in order to get consistent results, the values of all the bond_* options should be identical in the master stanza and in all the possible slave stanzas. but your example does not do this (I don't think this has anything to do with the problem but I mention it just in case). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366 Title: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/823366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823366] Re: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
I do not see this bug in lucid but I do see it in lucid-updates. Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366 Title: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/823366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823366] Re: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
I would lke to correct my previous comment. I should have said: I do not see this bug in the previous lucid-updates (1.1.0-14ubuntu2.1) but I do see it in the current lucid-updates (1.1.0-14ubuntu2.2). Thanks, Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366 Title: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/823366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482419] Re: 802.3ad interface bonding fails if started too early
The patch for this bug breaks the use of bond_primary in /etc/network/interfaces. See Bug #823366. The following piece of code from the setup_master() function in /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave will only setup a primary if the primary is listed as a slave (which will not be the case with the patch that reorders the enslave_slaves and setup_master functions. --- # The first slave in bond-primary found in current slaves becomes the primary. # If no slave in bond-primary is found, then primary does not change. for slave in $IF_BOND_PRIMARY ; do if grep -sq \\$slave\\ /sys/class/net/$BOND_MASTER/bonding/slaves ; then sysfs $slave primary break fi done --- Thanks, Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482419 Title: 802.3ad interface bonding fails if started too early To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/482419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823366] Re: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces
I've updated bug #482419 to indicate that its fix has caused this bug. Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823366 Title: bond_primary is ignored in /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/823366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn Deric Stowell requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- Abul, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Deric Accept invitation from Deric Stowell http://www.linkedin.com/e/-31usie-gq06arcy-6h/VsClekfgZyV058CshHq-UpXR0LV0YVZBJsUc6-lxUbVPUJdbtmTyZkI/blk/I2953159206_2/1BpC5vrmRLoRZcjkkZt5YCpnlOt3RApnhMpmdzgmhxrSNBszYOnPoMczARcjcRej99bTFVt49Nh5F9bPgTcjwTczcMdjcLrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/ View invitation from Deric Stowell http://www.linkedin.com/e/-31usie-gq06arcy-6h/VsClekfgZyV058CshHq-UpXR0LV0YVZBJsUc6-lxUbVPUJdbtmTyZkI/blk/I2953159206_2/39vdz0OejkNcPkVcAALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/ -- Why might connecting with Deric Stowell be a good idea? People Deric Stowell knows can discover your profile: Connecting to Deric Stowell will attract the attention of LinkedIn users. See who's been viewing your profile: http://www.linkedin.com/e/-31usie-gq06arcy-6h/wvp/inv18_wvmp/ -- (c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Martin, thanks for the clarification on how/when the fixed package moves from -proposed to -updates. But is there anything else needed? I waited 10 days to be safe, and still the package is not in -updates. It's also still listed on the Pending Ubuntu stable release updates web page. Thanks, Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Martin, thanks for the clarification on how/when the fixed package moves from -proposed to -updates. But is there anything else needed? I waited 10 days to be safe, and still the package is not in -updates. It's also still listed on the Pending Ubuntu stable release updates web page. Thanks, Deric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi, I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to do to get this fix into lucid-updates. When I look at the web page for Pending Ubuntu stable release updates (at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html;) I see, in the lucid section, that qemu-kvm is listed. But the bug #719448 is highlighted in purple which means bugs in purple are verified for a task but need verification for another task. What is the other verification that is needed? Is that something that I'm supposed to do? Thanks, Deric On 05/04/11 05:37, Martin Pitt wrote: ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Thanks again. Deric On 05/06/11 15:52, Serge Hallyn wrote: The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug was marked verification-done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi, I'm trying to figure out if there is anything else that I'm supposed to do to get this fix into lucid-updates. When I look at the web page for Pending Ubuntu stable release updates (at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html;) I see, in the lucid section, that qemu-kvm is listed. But the bug #719448 is highlighted in purple which means bugs in purple are verified for a task but need verification for another task. What is the other verification that is needed? Is that something that I'm supposed to do? Thanks, Deric On 05/04/11 05:37, Martin Pitt wrote: ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Thanks again. Deric On 05/06/11 15:52, Serge Hallyn wrote: The package will be moved to lucid-updates 7 days after this bug was marked verification-done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Please test proposed package
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:40, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Please test proposed package
Please note that I tried this on lucid only (and the bug was fixed). I don't have access to any maverick systems. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 17:30, Deric Sullivan wrote: I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Please test proposed package
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:40, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Please test proposed package
Please note that I tried this on lucid only (and the bug was fixed). I don't have access to any maverick systems. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 17:30, Deric Sullivan wrote: I installed the lucid proposed qemu-kvm package and the bug is fixed. Thanks, Deric On 05/03/11 05:42, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted qemu-kvm into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Great. Thanks. Deric On 04/30/11 15:16, Clint Byrum wrote: No it was not denied. I've gone ahead and accepted the bug for lucid/maverick SRU. ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Great. Thanks. Deric On 04/30/11 15:16, Clint Byrum wrote: No it was not denied. I've gone ahead and accepted the bug for lucid/maverick SRU. ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi Serge, Was the SRU for lucid to fix the once bug in qemu-kvm denied? I've seen an update since you requested the SRU but it doesn't seem to include the fix for the once bug. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 20:41, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca): Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid- updates? Great, thanks for testing. Yes, I'll request the SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi Serge, Was the SRU for lucid to fix the once bug in qemu-kvm denied? I've seen an update since you requested the SRU but it doesn't seem to include the fix for the once bug. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 20:41, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Deric Sullivan (deric.sulli...@ec.gc.ca): Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid- updates? Great, thanks for testing. Yes, I'll request the SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Congrats on 11.04
My system keeps halting. I guess i completely forgot that i did a PPA upgrade. now it all makes sense. Thanks!! Deric Stowell Technology Consultant a href=http://sandyeggoboy.net/ My profiles: [image: Facebook] http://facebook.com/Deric.Stowell[image: Google] http://google.com/dericnsd[image: WordPress]http://sandyeggoboy.net/[image: Twitter] http://twitter.com/sandyeggoboy Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:42 PM, John Moser john.r.mo...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/29/11 22:33, Martin Owens wrote: On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 21:11 -0400, John Moser wrote: The Gnome developers are also upset at Canonical. No idea why. It's because Canonical only ate their ice cream cone and wouldn't eat their ice cream. I remember when Gnome developers* built a rocket and visited the moon, brought back a whole ton of cheese. I tell you one thing that'll stop people using Unity... if it doesn't actually work. Hardware issues are a lot more pressing that design issues, especially now that the design is much more demanding on the hardware. Maybe, although there's a lot of press going on about this. People have been critical about Ubuntu doing things they didn't like before, though, and eventually they just eat it. Significantly this time, I've found several issues that make me worry that Ubuntu might get away with squashing Gnome-shell: - I've played with both back and forth now for a while, and Gnome-Shell is clearly better; people on-line are telling me the same thing. Still, both are leaving me confused as to where a lot of settings went (mostly, the appearance-related theming stuff; is everything now going to be dark colors and blues like some cheap sci-fi flick?), and both have a learning curve. Unity seems to have no distinction between running applications and applications you can run, which ... honestly just makes me want to find the smart phone company that the Ubuntu Developers are working for now and burn it down with them in it. Abstracting away the concept of whether an application is already running or not is horrible. - Installing Gnome3 from the PPA really does completely hose the system; after that, Unity and Gnome-classic break, only Gnome-shell works, and Gnome-shell doesn't work with my ATi card (it skews the contents of windows diagonally, ad uselessness). Imagine that, I ignored the warnings and something bad happened. Like I said, Ubuntu is Microsofting gnome-shell. They're using their market clout to squash a product that's better than theirs. I'm waiting to see Canonical try to absorb the GNOME team. Also I don't like that I can't write anything in python that looks like Unity, I have to write it all in C and talk directly to OpenGL, which is messy. If I tried to use Gnome3 then I'd end up having to write in javascript, which I hate for no apparent reason. Oh woe! Won't someone let me write cool stuff in python? Yours with hugs and kisses, Martin Owens * That ever fictitious collective aggregate. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi Serge, Thanks for looking into this. I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix. Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on the hard drive. I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first boot of -boot order=n and starting it again with -boot order=c. I'll check out your workaround of -boot priority=cn although I was not even aware of the priority parameter - I don't see it in the man page. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 18:01, Serge Hallyn wrote: With the tree at https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/fix-boot-once/ 'boot once=d' works correctly for me. The package is building at ppa :serge-hallyn/virt. I'm pushing the amd64 debs to the bug here. If you're on amd64, please test and let me know if they also work for you. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid- updates? Deric On 02/17/11 18:40, Deric Sullivan wrote: Hi Serge, Thanks for looking into this. I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix. Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on the hard drive. I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first boot of -boot order=n and starting it again with -boot order=c. I'll check out your workaround of -boot priority=cn although I was not even aware of the priority parameter - I don't see it in the man page. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 18:01, Serge Hallyn wrote: With the tree at https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/fix-boot-once/ 'boot once=d' works correctly for me. The package is building at ppa :serge-hallyn/virt. I'm pushing the amd64 debs to the bug here. If you're on amd64, please test and let me know if they also work for you. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Hi Serge, Thanks for looking into this. I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix. Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on the hard drive. I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first boot of -boot order=n and starting it again with -boot order=c. I'll check out your workaround of -boot priority=cn although I was not even aware of the priority parameter - I don't see it in the man page. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 18:01, Serge Hallyn wrote: With the tree at https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/fix-boot-once/ 'boot once=d' works correctly for me. The package is building at ppa :serge-hallyn/virt. I'm pushing the amd64 debs to the bug here. If you're on amd64, please test and let me know if they also work for you. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 719448] Re: The once parameter does not work with -boot
Thanks, that fixed the problem. Will that fix make it into lucid- updates? Deric On 02/17/11 18:40, Deric Sullivan wrote: Hi Serge, Thanks for looking into this. I am using amd64 so I'll try out the fix. Using once did not work for me even if there wasn't a valid OS on the hard drive. I'm OK with an importance of low, I was using the workaround of simply stopping the qemu-kvm after the first boot of -boot order=n and starting it again with -boot order=c. I'll check out your workaround of -boot priority=cn although I was not even aware of the priority parameter - I don't see it in the man page. Thanks, Deric On 02/17/11 18:01, Serge Hallyn wrote: With the tree at https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/fix-boot-once/ 'boot once=d' works correctly for me. The package is building at ppa :serge-hallyn/virt. I'm pushing the amd64 debs to the bug here. If you're on amd64, please test and let me know if they also work for you. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 719448] [NEW] The once parameter does not work with -boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm Package: qemu-kvm The once parameter does not seem to work with the -boot option. To reproduce: create an image file to be used as a hard disk: qemu-img create test-img 1G Starting a VM guest using once + order ignores the once: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot order=c,once=n Starting a VM guest using once ignores the once: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot once=n Starting a VM guest without once works fine: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot order=n # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 # apt-cache policy qemu-kvm qemu-kvm: Installed: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.3 Candidate: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.3 Thanks for the help, Deric ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 719448] [NEW] The once parameter does not work with -boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm Package: qemu-kvm The once parameter does not seem to work with the -boot option. To reproduce: create an image file to be used as a hard disk: qemu-img create test-img 1G Starting a VM guest using once + order ignores the once: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot order=c,once=n Starting a VM guest using once ignores the once: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot once=n Starting a VM guest without once works fine: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda test-img -m 4G -smp 2 -enable-kvm -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -name test-vm -boot order=n # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 # apt-cache policy qemu-kvm qemu-kvm: Installed: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.3 Candidate: 0.12.3+noroms-0ubuntu9.3 Thanks for the help, Deric ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719448 Title: The once parameter does not work with -boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709756] [NEW] qgit does not respect KDE color theme
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qgit When using black oxygen theme in KDE 4.5.1 (black background) some texts are invisible - branches label, tags, tree symbol (qgit 2.3) ** Affects: qgit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: colors kde ** Description changed: Binary package hint: qgit - When using black oxygen theme (black background) some texts are - invisible + When using black oxygen theme in KDE 4.5.1 (black background) some texts + are invisible - branches label, tags, tree symbol (qgit 2.3) ** Tags added: colors kde -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709756 Title: qgit does not respect KDE color theme -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642582] [NEW] Save as dialog works on very slow speed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace The system dialog save as... is very slow while loading directories or typing filename. Regression is caused by klipper. Clearing history in klipper temporarily solves the problem. kdebase-workspace 4.4.2-0ubuntu14 klipper 4.4.2-0ubuntu14 ** Affects: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: klipper -- Save as dialog works on very slow speed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636890] Re: Dell Laptop GSM modem connect to Internal Work APN
Ran new run and tried to connect to work apn, new log has been attached. ** Attachment added: modem.log.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/636890/+attachment/1582417/+files/modem.log.txt ** Summary changed: - Dell Laptop GSM modem connect to Internal Work APN + Dell Laptop GSM F3507g modem failing to connect to Internal Work APN -- Dell Laptop GSM F3507g modem failing to connect to Internal Work APN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636890] [NEW] Dell Laptop GSM modem does not authenticate via pap
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: modemmanager Using modem manager i cannot connect to work apn. From the debug log i get: Sep 13 09:12:39 ubuntu-work kernel: [ 946.936388] cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 2472 MHz (Ch 13) on phy0 Sep 13 09:13:04 ubuntu-work modem-manager: Got failure code 100: Unknown error Sep 13 09:13:05 ubuntu-work modem-manager: Got failure code 100: Unknown error Sep 13 09:13:06 ubuntu-work modem-manager: CS registration state changed: 4 Sep 13 09:13:06 ubuntu-work modem-manager: PS registration state changed: 4 Sep 13 09:13:16 ubuntu-work modem-manager: CS registration state changed: 1 Sep 13 09:13:17 ubuntu-work modem-manager: mbm_e2nap_received: connecting Sep 13 09:13:18 ubuntu-work modem-manager: PS registration state changed: 1 Sep 13 09:13:19 ubuntu-work modem-manager: mbm_e2nap_received: disconnected Attached are logs recommended from the wiki debugging modemmanager. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: modemmanager 0.4+git.20100809t153145.be28089-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 13 09:31:51 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_ZA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: modemmanager ** Affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Dell Laptop GSM modem does not authenticate via pap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636890] Re: Dell Laptop GSM modem does not authenticate via pap
** Attachment added: modem.log.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890/+attachment/1576886/+files/modem.log.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890/+attachment/1576887/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Dell Laptop GSM modem does not authenticate via pap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636890] Re: Dell Laptop GSM modem connect to Internal Work APN
** Summary changed: - Dell Laptop GSM modem does not authenticate via pap + Dell Laptop GSM modem connect to Internal Work APN -- Dell Laptop GSM modem connect to Internal Work APN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] Re: evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
Debug symbols added for evolution-data-server and new backtrace run. Evolution version: 2.30.3-1ubuntu1 Evolution-data-server: 2.30.3-1ubuntu2 Still segfaults. Attached is the backtrace with correct usage of the thread apply all bt full. ** Attachment added: gdb-evolution-e-addressbook-factory.txt.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/623794/+attachment/1557492/+files/gdb-evolution-e-addressbook-factory.txt.gz -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] Re: evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
Backtrace with 'thread apply all bt full' ** Attachment added: backtrace - thread apply all bt full https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/623794/+attachment/1536956/+files/gdb-evolution-e-addressbook-factory.txt.gz -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] Re: evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
Hi Pedro I have run an update and upgrade this morning and tried again. The evolution address book no longer segfaults and works as it should. I will test over the next couple of days. If needed i can downgrade the evolution to get the backtrace but as it is fixed now with the new version being 2.30.2-1ubuntu2 I am unsure how to proceed. Please advise. Regards Thank you for your help with this. -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] [NEW] evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Ubuntu Version: 10.10 maverick Program: Evolution Version: 2.30.2-0ubuntu11 Problem: I have had this problem since trying evolution, previous versions too, with our groupwise mail system. The address book always quits when going into it selecting our Novell Address Book. It also quits when trying to compose a message and an address is looked up from the address book. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution 2.30.2-0ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-17.23-generic 2.6.35.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-17-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Aug 25 07:00:29 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_ZA.utf8 SourcePackage: evolution XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1950): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (bluetooth-applet:1944): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_set_sensitive: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed (nautilus:1941): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != NULL' failed ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] Re: evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
** Attachment added: Valgrind logs for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794/+attachment/1517271/+files/valgrind-logs-evolution.tar.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794/+attachment/1517272/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794/+attachment/1517273/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794/+attachment/1517274/+files/ProcStatus.txt -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623794] Re: evolution address book has quit unexpectedly
I Am not sure if this is what your looking for, I have tried to run gdb for evolution but don't see any information for the address book segfaulting. There is no executable evolution-data-server but the log attached is for the /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory If there is anything else i can try to give more information. This seems to have been a problem for a while, i thought the newer version of evolution would maybe fix it. ** Attachment added: gdb log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/623794/+attachment/1518592/+files/gdb-evolution-e-addressbook-factory.txt.gz -- evolution address book has quit unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609171] Re: pgadmin3 does not start on Maverick Meerkat
after installing version from debian: pgadmin3-data (1.10.5-1) and pgadmin3 (1.10.5-1) everything works fine -- pgadmin3 does not start on Maverick Meerkat https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583012] Re: [intel] movie player does not display video on dual screen
** Summary changed: - movie player does not display video on dual screen + [intel] movie player does not display video on dual screen -- [intel] movie player does not display video on dual screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563042] Re: Dual screen crashes X server on Intel 915
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 559039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559039 it can be solved by disabling desktop effects (for now) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 559039 X Crashes when enabling second monitor -- Dual screen crashes X server on Intel 915 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583012] [NEW] movie player does not display video on dual screen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg When non-cloned screen (extended desktop) is setted up, movie player does not display any video while playing *.avi movie (on any of two screens), just sound - tested also on kaffeine, mplayer. When screen is cloned video works normally. Could be an intel driver bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xorg 1:7.5+5ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-21.59-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed May 19 20:53:08 2010 DkmsStatus: blcr, 0.8.2, 2.6.31-21-generic, i686: installed blcr, 0.8.2, 2.6.32-22-generic, i686: installed MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D620 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=cf5f4102-2a95-490f-8f9a-666bc4c5cf02 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= PATH=(cususername, user) LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xorg dmi.bios.date: 04/03/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A08 dmi.board.name: 0TD761 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA08:bd04/03/2007:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD620:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0TD761:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude D620 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: i686 kernel: 2.6.31-21-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 kde kubuntu lucid xorg xserver -- movie player does not display video on dual screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583012] Re: movie player does not display video on dual screen
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741493/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741494/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741495/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741496/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741497/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741499/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741500/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741501/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741502/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741503/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741504/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741505/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741506/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741507/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741508/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741509/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741510/XorgLog.gz ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741511/XorgLogOld.gz ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741512/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741513/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741514/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741515/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48741516/xkbcomp.txt ** Tags added: kde kubuntu xorg xserver -- movie player does not display video on dual screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559039] Re: X Crashes when enabling second monitor
even with disabled desktop effects (extended desktop mode) pretty random crash: (II) XKB: reuse xkmfile /var/lib/xkb/server-396BC46DFAA812E9D898F4577B66AF8390BA1F07.xkm (II) XKB: reuse xkmfile /var/lib/xkb/server-396BC46DFAA812E9D898F4577B66AF8390BA1F07.xkm (II) XKB: reuse xkmfile /var/lib/xkb/server-396BC46DFAA812E9D898F4577B66AF8390BA1F07.xkm Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x3b) [0x80e937b] 1: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x61c7d) [0x80a9c7d] 2: (vdso) (__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0) [0xced410] 3: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x20a486) [0x1200486] 4: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_mesa_execute_program+0x2a2d) [0x113d18d] 5: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_swrast_exec_fragment_program+0x1a4) [0x1200724] 6: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x16640f) [0x115c40f] 7: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_swrast_write_rgba_span+0x10b0) [0x115dba0] 8: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x1805d2) [0x11765d2] 9: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x159e5f) [0x114fe5f] 10: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_swrast_Triangle+0x2d) [0x114f05d] 11: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x18cdaf) [0x1182daf] 12: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x18cdf5) [0x1182df5] 13: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x125377) [0x111b377] 14: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x1269c9) [0x111c9c9] 15: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_tnl_run_pipeline+0x163) [0x11106b3] 16: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (0xff6000+0x719fd) [0x10679fd] 17: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_tnl_draw_prims+0xc76) [0x406] 18: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_tnl_vbo_draw_prims+0x79) [0x869] 19: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (vbo_exec_vtx_flush+0x5f4) [0x1109884] 20: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (vbo_exec_FlushVertices_internal+0x97) [0x11056a7] 21: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (vbo_exec_FlushVertices+0x50) [0x1105700] 22: /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so (_mesa_MatrixMode+0xdf) [0x10ca1ef] 23: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so (0x5ab000+0x8d09) [0x5b3d09] 24: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so (0x5ab000+0x32324) [0x5dd324] 25: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so (0x5ab000+0x36c22) [0x5e1c22] 26: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x2a477) [0x8072477] 27: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x1ed7a) [0x8066d7a] 28: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x32ebd6] 29: /usr/bin/X (0x8048000+0x1e961) [0x8066961] Segmentation fault at address (nil) Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. Please also check the log file at /var/log/Xorg.0.log for additional information. (II) Video Bus: Close (II) UnloadModule: evdev -- X Crashes when enabling second monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559039] Re: X Crashes when enabling second monitor
Quite the same problem with Intel(r) 82945GM (Dell Latitude D620). Cloning display works fine but exteded desktop with enbled desktop effects always crashes Xserver Here's log: (...) (II) A4Tech RF USB Mouse: Close (II) UnloadModule: evdev (II) Logitech USB Optical Mouse: Close (II) UnloadModule: evdev Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x3b) [0x8133d6b] 1: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x55) [0x80c7d35] 2: [0xf1a400] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libshadow.so(shadowRemove+0x4e) [0x22bf2e] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libshadow.so [0x22c3e4] 5: /usr/bin/X [0x80c6b3e] 6: /usr/bin/X [0x8111bac] 7: /usr/bin/X [0x811de9c] 8: /usr/bin/X [0x812439c] 9: /usr/bin/X [0x80cf6ce] 10: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//vesa_drv.so [0xfa0bb8] 11: /usr/bin/X [0x80c784c] 12: /usr/bin/X [0x816143e] 13: /usr/bin/X [0x80e17f5] 14: /usr/bin/X [0x80cc192] 15: /usr/bin/X [0x814a890] 16: /usr/bin/X [0x817bf49] 17: /usr/bin/X [0x8144516] 18: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so [0x15fd0a] 19: /usr/bin/X(main+0x428) [0x80725a8] 20: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0xb8db56] 21: /usr/bin/X [0x80719c1] Saw signal 11. Server aborting. ddxSigGiveUp: Closing log -- X Crashes when enabling second monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358255] Re: [jaunty] Root on nvidia raid 1 mirror does not boot
I'm also experiencing the same type of problem. I have found a work-
around, although I'm unsure of any implications.
$ uname -r
2.6.28-11-server
$ lspci | grep RAID
00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA
Controller (rev 03)
~$ dmraid --version
dmraid version: 1.0.0.rc15 (2008-09-17) shared
dmraid library version: 1.0.0.rc15 (2008.09.17)
device-mapper version: unknown
$ sudo dmraid -s
*** Group superset .ddf1_disks
-- Active Subset
name : ddf1_OS
size : 1464973440
stride : 128
type : mirror
status : ok
subsets: 0
devs : 2
spares : 0
$ sudo dmraid -ddd -ay
DEBUG: _find_set: searching .ddf1_disks
DEBUG: _find_set: not found .ddf1_disks
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: not found ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: not found ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: searching .ddf1_disks
DEBUG: _find_set: found .ddf1_disks
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: found ddf1_OS
DEBUG: _find_set: found ddf1_OS
DEBUG: checking ddf1 device /dev/sda
DEBUG: checking ddf1 device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: set status of set ddf1_OS to 16
DEBUG: set status of set .ddf1_disks to 16
RAID set ddf1_OS already active
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found ddf1_OS1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching ddf1_OS5
DEBUG: _find_set: not found ddf1_OS5
RAID set ddf1_OS1 already active
RAID set ddf1_OS5 already active
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set ddf1_OS
DEBUG: freeing device ddf1_OS, path /dev/sda
DEBUG: freeing device ddf1_OS, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set .ddf1_disks
DEBUG: freeing device .ddf1_disks, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device .ddf1_disks, path /dev/sda
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set ddf1_OS1
DEBUG: freeing device ddf1_OS1, path /dev/mapper/ddf1_OS
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set ddf1_OS5
DEBUG: freeing device ddf1_OS5, path /dev/mapper/ddf1_OS
Here's the work-around I'm using:
Modified /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/dmraid to read:
#!/bin/sh
# local-top script for dmraid.
PREREQS=
prereqs()
{
echo $PREREQS
}
case $1 in
# get pre-requisites
prereqs)
prereqs
exit 0
;;
esac
# Activate any dmraid arrays that were not identified by udev and vol_id.
#for dev in $(dmraid -r -c); do
# dmraid-activate $dev
#done
# Adding this seems to work.
sleep 2
dmraid -ay
then ran `update-initramfs -u` and after a reboot it booted right up and no
longer went to busybox.
--
[jaunty] Root on nvidia raid 1 mirror does not boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279011] Re: [g45] virtual consoles not shown, Intel G45
I am new to launchpad; please forgive me if I'm not following the right protocol, but I think this is the best way for me to get some help. The nasty bit: I'm using the CentOS 5.3 distro. The good bit: you have found and fixed the exact bug I'm having w/Intel DG45ID mobo w/G45 and Samsung SyncMaster226BW. Virtual consoles don't work, ctrl-alt-F?, but then F and it comes back. Get an initial 80x40 login then startx screen at boot; when I log out of X, get the dark screen Not optimum mode... but blind startx works. Does anyone know the CentOS/RHEL 5.3 package corresponding to xserver- xorg-video-intel? Or how I might take the info from here back to the CentOS folks? Thanks. -- [g45] virtual consoles not shown, Intel G45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334066] Re: xorg is terribly slow after Intrepid - Jaunty upgrade
Same issue on Dell Latitude D620 (Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller) Jaunty Kubuntu top: VIRT | RES | SHR | S | %CPU | %MEM | TIME+ | COMMAND 690m | 165m | 8400 | R | 65 | 8.2 | 90:10.59 | Xorg Rendering windows is unbeareably slow especially when swiching desktop -- xorg is terribly slow after Intrepid - Jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334066] Re: xorg is terribly slow after Intrepid - Jaunty upgrade
after disabling desktops effects it is possible to work... this one is quite bad :-/ $ glxgears 351 frames in 5.1 seconds = 68.535 FPS 631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 126.155 FPS 662 frames in 5.0 seconds = 132.250 FPS 596 frames in 5.1 seconds = 117.785 FPS 353 frames in 5.0 seconds = 70.579 FPS -- xorg is terribly slow after Intrepid - Jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159333] Re: GRUB crash at startup ERROR 15
I had the same problem on Intrepid 8.10. There are 3 hard drives on my computer and after normal installation I got error 2. So I erased MBR a reinstalled Kubuntu, then I got error 15. Fixing grub from boot CD didn't helped at all. As a desperate option I tried installation from live desktop and now everything works fine. Thanks guys -- GRUB crash at startup ERROR 15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57789] Re: Crossfading option causes skipping
I can also confirm that. With allowed crossfading sometimes amarok starts playing first few seconds and then skips to another. When I press previous track button, amarok plays whole track, which skipped before Kubuntu 8.04 Amarok 1.4.9.1 KDE 3.5.10 -- Crossfading option causes skipping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
