Re: Should package ubuntu-mobile depend on xorg (or something?)
> I think it should > > Suggest you file a bug report to that effect > (if you don't know how, run apt-get install reportbug) Ok, I filed it here : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mobile/+bug/221495 Thank you, Michael Moore > > > > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 02:54 -0600, Michael Moore wrote: > > I install Ubuntu server edition 8.04 rc, then did an apt-get install > > ubuntu-mobile. It didn't install xorg, and as a result I couldn't run > > startx or run UME. Should the ubuntu-mobile package include a > > dependency that would allow the user to use ubuntu-mobile without > > further major package installation? > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Michael Moore > > - > > My failed attempts to draw : http://stuporglue.com/ > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Anthony P (Tony) Godshall > Sr. SW Engineer > Ampro Computers > San Jose office > -- Michael Moore - My failed attempts to draw : http://stuporglue.com/ -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Should package ubuntu-mobile depend on xorg (or something?)
I install Ubuntu server edition 8.04 rc, then did an apt-get install ubuntu-mobile. It didn't install xorg, and as a result I couldn't run startx or run UME. Should the ubuntu-mobile package include a dependency that would allow the user to use ubuntu-mobile without further major package installation? Thanks, -- Michael Moore - My failed attempts to draw : http://stuporglue.com/ -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
Re: Boot time +8sec with freedesktop.org changes
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Shane Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spencer, Bob wrote: > > Perhaps a light-weight daemon that uses inotify to listen for changes > > to /usr/share/applications and then update the cache. That seems > > easier than requiring changes to debian packages, but it would be > > running all the time and new packages are installed less frequently. > Possibly a dumb question, but, perchance, does dpkg (or apt) utilize > dbus to send notifications of successful package install/removal? If > so, why not simply create a dbus service for that message and execute a > cache update on trigger? > > Shane... If the cache updating only needs to be done after dpkg is called, why not use dpkg-divert to move the real dpkg to dpkg.real, and have the script named dpkg call dpkg.real and then update the cache? Then no daemon needs to be running at all. dpkg-divert : http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/118 -- Michael Moore - My failed attempts to draw : http://stuporglue.com/ -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile