Re: NX 3.2.0 packages

[Marcelo Boveto Shima]

I just uploaded.

Lots have been done in the packages.

 - A team was created with some guys that were working on it.
https://launchpad.net/~freenx-team
 - The packaging is hosted at bzr.
 - PPA repository was created.

Can someone take a look at nx and nxcompshad that is in revu?

Thanks
Shima

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Nicolas Valcarcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi,
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 16:14 -0300, Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a possibility that FreeNX + NX packages to get accepted into
> > universe?
>
> Yes, your goal must be Ibex, since we are long past FF. You should
> upload it to REVU:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
>
> > The packages are on my ppa:
> > https://launchpad.net/~marceloshima/+archive
> >
> > Pros and Cons:
> > - NX is a fork of Xorg 6.9.
> >It's duplicate source code.
> >
> > - There is no security problem because only 3 libs (libX11, libXext
> > and libXrender)
> > are shipped on the package and they can have the security patches
> > ported from dapper.
> > I remember it was a problem because NX was a fork of XFree86.
> >
> > - This libs can be renamed to libXXX-nx. So will not conflict with the
> > Xorg ones.
> >
> > - libXcomp, NXProxy and qtnx (NX client) are already in. We need the
> > server to make the
> > client useful.
> >
> > - Freenx is shell scripts. But we have Freenx-NG that is python.
> > This was another problem when it was proposed to get in some years
> > ago.
> >
> > Regards
> > Marcelo Shima
> --
> aka nxvl
> Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D  BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE
> gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: NX 3.2.0 packages

[Nicolas Valcarcel]

Hi,
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 16:14 -0300, Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Is there a possibility that FreeNX + NX packages to get accepted into
> universe?

Yes, your goal must be Ibex, since we are long past FF. You should
upload it to REVU:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU

> The packages are on my ppa:
> https://launchpad.net/~marceloshima/+archive
> 
> Pros and Cons:
> - NX is a fork of Xorg 6.9.
>It's duplicate source code.
> 
> - There is no security problem because only 3 libs (libX11, libXext
> and libXrender)
> are shipped on the package and they can have the security patches
> ported from dapper.
> I remember it was a problem because NX was a fork of XFree86.
> 
> - This libs can be renamed to libXXX-nx. So will not conflict with the
> Xorg ones.
> 
> - libXcomp, NXProxy and qtnx (NX client) are already in. We need the
> server to make the
> client useful.
> 
> - Freenx is shell scripts. But we have Freenx-NG that is python.
> This was another problem when it was proposed to get in some years
> ago.
> 
> Regards
> Marcelo Shima
-- 
aka nxvl
Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D  BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

NX 3.2.0 packages

[Marcelo Boveto Shima]

Hello,

Is there a possibility that FreeNX + NX packages to get accepted into
universe?

The packages are on my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~marceloshima/+archive

Pros and Cons:
- NX is a fork of Xorg 6.9.
   It's duplicate source code.

- There is no security problem because only 3 libs (libX11, libXext and
libXrender)
are shipped on the package and they can have the security patches ported
from dapper.
I remember it was a problem because NX was a fork of XFree86.

- This libs can be renamed to libXXX-nx. So will not conflict with the Xorg
ones.

- libXcomp, NXProxy and qtnx (NX client) are already in. We need the server
to make the
client useful.

- Freenx is shell scripts. But we have Freenx-NG that is python.
This was another problem when it was proposed to get in some years ago.

Regards
Marcelo Shima
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu