Re: QA Meeting, call for testing on Ubuntu Studio and meeting log
Hello everyone. I'm Howard Chan, member of Ubuntu Studio Team and also a member of the community QA. For Ubuntu QA testers, please read point 1 and 2. For Ubuntu Studio Users, please read point 1 and 3. 1. Call for Ubuntu Studio testing The Ubuntu Studio team is looking for testers. Please join https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers in Launchpad and also test ISOs in http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/. We would like to see testing efforts on Ubuntu Studio 12.04.1 and 12.10. 2. Reminder for QA meeting on Wednesday I will be chair again for Ubuntu QA Meeting tomorrow at 14:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting. The agenda is in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings. Phill Whiteside (phillw) has removed the Ubuntu Flavors item from agenda. We will mix it with Ubuntu Updates section. Please come to the meeting. 3. Ubuntu Studio Meeting Logs and action items The log is now in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2012August13 The action items are as follows! Action items - Len-nb and smartboyhw to find more people to test 12.04.1 daily images - : stochastic to write a draft for changes between 12.04 and 12.04.1 - holstein and Len-nb to find someone to publishing committs - : Len-nb to add menu item on xchat that starts #ubuntustudio - : stochastic and Len-nb and holstein and smartboyhw to set up a graphics and publishing sub-committee for teh abovementioned metas Thank you all for reading this email. 2012/8/14 Ho Wan Chan > > -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
QA Meeting, call for testing on Ubuntu Studio and meeting log
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: [Lubuntu-qa] ISO Testing Feedback
Hi Nick, (you will have to tell me one day if you prefer nicholas over nick :) ) One thing that I pick up time and time again is 'red' bugs for ubiquity. Any system can make a 100% installable system, but if Ubiquity falls over, we are all . chooses polite word How about "Up the creek without a paddle". I do, hand on heart, say that not enough attention and testing of the default installer is done. Regards, Phill. On 14 August 2012 01:47, Greg Faith wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Nicholas Skaggs > wrote: > > > > Greetings everyone! After each milestone I generally review everything > that happened during the milestone, trying to understand how we did, and > how it went for you as a community. The release team does the same, > comparing how their team did on respins, communicaton, etc. However, > especially given the recent confusion of cadence testing, and it itself > being an experiment, I'd like to take a moment to specifically invite > everyone to provide feedback on how iso testing has been this cycle, and in > particular this last week. This is entirely open-ended, but I'll leave some > questions for you to think about. > > > > Did you find the testing itself easy to complete? > > Was it easy for you to follow along with how the testing was going? > > Did you have fun!? > > Specific to the idea of "cadence testing" (that is, to test outside of > milestone at regular intervals), did you find the testing useful or > otherwise productive expenditure of our collective "time and effort" as a > community? > > > > I don't want to share too much of my thoughts so as to not influence the > discussion at first. However, I will say it can be difficult to keep > abreast of what's happening during the testing weeks as it is and that > without the ability to use the isotracker effectively during a cadence week > makes it even harder. During the cadence week, using the isotracker, people > were lost as to what to do or the status of what was trying to be achieved. > If we continue to aim for this type of testing, we'll need to expand the > workarounds and ultimately enhance the isotracker to support the testing > effort. > > > > Nicholas > > > > P.S. Just a quick note; I am always available for feedback or discussion > in any manner you wish. Email, IRC, voice or google hangout, skype, > whatever you wish. Any idea or topic is fair game. I'd love to hear from > you! > > > > -- > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > > Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > Nicholas et al, > > Personally I think the testing last week was well timed with the > changes that are taking place in Ubiquity. We found some bugs that > will allow the devs a little more time to fix before the next cycle. > If those changes led you to call for the cadence testing you did well. > > It appears a couple of critical ubiquity bugs will be cleared with > ubiquity - 2.11.21. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1035167 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1034954 > > > Maybe in tomorrow's spins. I will test a few tomorrow for sure. > > As far as fun goes.. Yeah I have fun testing mostly on my new/refurb > Lenovo T61p. > > My 2 & 1/2 cents, > Greg nm_geo > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: [Lubuntu-qa] ISO Testing Feedback
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > > Greetings everyone! After each milestone I generally review everything that > happened during the milestone, trying to understand how we did, and how it > went for you as a community. The release team does the same, comparing how > their team did on respins, communicaton, etc. However, especially given the > recent confusion of cadence testing, and it itself being an experiment, I'd > like to take a moment to specifically invite everyone to provide feedback on > how iso testing has been this cycle, and in particular this last week. This > is entirely open-ended, but I'll leave some questions for you to think about. > > Did you find the testing itself easy to complete? > Was it easy for you to follow along with how the testing was going? > Did you have fun!? > Specific to the idea of "cadence testing" (that is, to test outside of > milestone at regular intervals), did you find the testing useful or otherwise > productive expenditure of our collective "time and effort" as a community? > > I don't want to share too much of my thoughts so as to not influence the > discussion at first. However, I will say it can be difficult to keep abreast > of what's happening during the testing weeks as it is and that without the > ability to use the isotracker effectively during a cadence week makes it even > harder. During the cadence week, using the isotracker, people were lost as to > what to do or the status of what was trying to be achieved. If we continue to > aim for this type of testing, we'll need to expand the workarounds and > ultimately enhance the isotracker to support the testing effort. > > Nicholas > > P.S. Just a quick note; I am always available for feedback or discussion in > any manner you wish. Email, IRC, voice or google hangout, skype, whatever you > wish. Any idea or topic is fair game. I'd love to hear from you! > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp Nicholas et al, Personally I think the testing last week was well timed with the changes that are taking place in Ubiquity. We found some bugs that will allow the devs a little more time to fix before the next cycle. If those changes led you to call for the cadence testing you did well. It appears a couple of critical ubiquity bugs will be cleared with ubiquity - 2.11.21. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1035167 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1034954 Maybe in tomorrow's spins. I will test a few tomorrow for sure. As far as fun goes.. Yeah I have fun testing mostly on my new/refurb Lenovo T61p. My 2 & 1/2 cents, Greg nm_geo -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
ISO Testing Feedback
Greetings everyone! After each milestone I generally review everything that happened during the milestone, trying to understand how we did, and how it went for you as a community. The release team does the same, comparing how their team did on respins, communicaton, etc. However, especially given the recent confusion of cadence testing, and it itself being an experiment, I'd like to take a moment to specifically invite everyone to provide feedback on how iso testing has been this cycle, and in particular this last week. This is entirely open-ended, but I'll leave some questions for you to think about. Did you find the testing itself easy to complete? Was it easy for you to follow along with how the testing was going? Did you have fun!? Specific to the idea of "cadence testing" (that is, to test outside of milestone at regular intervals), did you find the testing useful or otherwise productive expenditure of our collective "time and effort" as a community? I don't want to share too much of my thoughts so as to not influence the discussion at first. However, I will say it can be difficult to keep abreast of what's happening during the testing weeks as it is and that without the ability to use the isotracker effectively during a cadence week makes it even harder. During the cadence week, using the isotracker, people were lost as to what to do or the status of what was trying to be achieved. If we continue to aim for this type of testing, we'll need to expand the workarounds and ultimately enhance the isotracker to support the testing effort. Nicholas P.S. Just a quick note; I am always available for feedback or discussion in any manner you wish. Email, IRC, voice or google hangout, skype, whatever you wish. Any idea or topic is fair game. I'd love to hear from you! -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Ask Ubuntu Question on Volume.
I sent a reply -- basically we need to determine if it's something that is broken in config, or with pulseaudio. There's a new upstream version he can test, and we can see if the older version of the audio stack works for him. Finally, thew pulseaudio folks will likely have asome tweaks to try. Nicholas On 08/12/2012 10:45 PM, John Kim wrote: Is there a way to solve this? Volume jumps to 100% when inserting or removing headphones http://askubuntu.com/q/175121/71219?sem=2 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
