Re: Ubuntu installation slideshow is empty
At pt_BR this happens too. Cheers. - André Gondim E-mail: andregon...@ubuntu.com Blog: http://andregondim.eti.br OpenPGP keys: C9721403 - On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:54, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > all bugs normally get filed to > > http://launchpad.net > not sure if there is a place specific to translators. someone feel free to > correct me if i am wrong on this > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Krasimir Chonov wrote: > >> Now I`m testing dauli-build of Ubuntu from 17.09.2009 and I was very >> suprised when selected Bulgarian language for the installation and there was >> no slideshow. Just empty screen under the progress bar. Below is screenshot >> of the installation. If this is a bug where should I report it? >> >> http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/885/ubuntu17092009200909172.png >> >> -- >> ubuntu-translators mailing list >> ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators >> > > > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > > -- > ubuntu-translators mailing list > ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators > > -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Possible UI freeze exception for usb-creator
>From https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/432542: * Adds PolicyKit support. The gksu password dialog is no longer shown. No passwords are required to use usb-creator in the default PolicyKit configuration. * Moves logging to ~/.usbcreator.log from /tmp/usb-creator.log. * Icons are shown next to the drives once again now that usb-creator uses gio. * Non-size columns in both tree views will expand to fill available space, but the size columns will stay fixed (but resizeable). * Adds a retry dialog (that has existed in the Windows frontend for quite some time) so that the user can attempt to continue when the md5sums of written files do not match their source. These changes are all necessary. There were a number of odd UI issues when usb-creator was run as root. The lack of icons and the poorly spaced columns were a regression from 9.04, and the missing retry dialog meant that often needed functionality, while present, could not be used (outside of Windows). -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Re: Codenames for versions
2009/9/18 Tom Davies : > Hi :) > > There are many places where the codename of a release is used in Answers > Section and in the Community Documentation and even (i think) in the > official guides. Many noobs get all "confused about the numbers after the > decimal". I have, more than once, had the exact oposite experience, where the fact the codenames are so readily used in support have made users confused about exactly what jaunty is and so on > Also there seems to be some cnfusion about whether this 9.10 > release is Kosmic or Karmic, although that might just be people having fun > with it. > > I think it is worh avoiding using anything that restricts a translation down > to a single release but in some cases it is, of course, vital. > > Just my opinion but the codenames seem to be more user-friendly to a high > percentage of people/noobs. I disagree. People are used to thinking about different iterations of software in terms of version numbers. We really should not deviate from that practice. Besides, you really only need to mention it once to each user how the versionnumbers works and then they get it. Regards Kenneth Nielsen -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Codenames for versions
Hi :) There are many places where the codename of a release is used in Answers Section and in the Community Documentation and even (i think) in the official guides. Many noobs get all "confused about the numbers after the decimal". Also there seems to be some cnfusion about whether this 9.10 release is Kosmic or Karmic, although that might just be people having fun with it. I think it is worh avoiding using anything that restricts a translation down to a single release but in some cases it is, of course, vital. Just my opinion but the codenames seem to be more user-friendly to a high percentage of people/noobs. Many regards to you all from Tom :) -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Re: Ubuntu installation slideshow is empty
all bugs normally get filed to http://launchpad.net not sure if there is a place specific to translators. someone feel free to correct me if i am wrong on this On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Krasimir Chonov wrote: > Now I`m testing dauli-build of Ubuntu from 17.09.2009 and I was very > suprised when selected Bulgarian language for the installation and there was > no slideshow. Just empty screen under the progress bar. Below is screenshot > of the installation. If this is a bug where should I report it? > > http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/885/ubuntu17092009200909172.png > > -- > ubuntu-translators mailing list > ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators > -- Jonathan Aquilina -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
Re: Changes to strings in update-manager
> I have a little bit of a doubt though with one string. This is it: > > Your system uses an ARM CPU that is older than the ARMv6 architecture. > All packages in karmic were built with optimizations requiring ARMv6 > as the minimal architecture. It is not possible to upgrade your system > to a new Ubuntu release with this hardware. > > Shouldn't the word "karmic" be avoided from UI element? (even if they > appear in ARM architecture...) Wouldn't it be better to substitute it > with a generic "Ubuntu" or with a generic "in this version of Ubuntu"? > > Ciao. > > -- > Milo Casagrande It was my general understanding that the development codenames, i.e. "Karmic Koala" or whatever, were in fact only development codenames and that they should therefor not be used in any sense as soon as the distribution is released. At that time the distribution _becomes_ "Ubuntu 9.10" and that is the name that should be used. Regards Kenneth Nielsen -- ubuntu-translators mailing list ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators
