RE: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-03-13 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 3:44 PM -0800 3/8/03, erik hansen wrote:
>is there a tutorial on plugins?

Not yet but I plan one. There is already some additional documentation
(mostly in How Tos).

--
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Runtime Revolution Limited - The Solution for Software Development
http://www.runrev.com/


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-03-08 Thread erik hansen
--- "Jeanne A. E. DeVoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The best thing is to create a plugin.

is there a tutorial on plugins?

TIA

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-27 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 5:43 PM -0800 1/22/03, erik hansen wrote:
>anyway, it would be nice to know if there is
>something like the HC "Home" stack where a
>startup handler fires when the Rev app is
>clicked. then "AA" could be scripted to open automatically.

There is a "home" stack (it's the license stack), but it's locked and
therefore not a place for customizations, unlike the HC Home stack.

The best thing is to create a plugin. Then you can set up the Plugins
Editor to open it automatically during startup, and include in it whatever
handlers you need to have available.

--
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Runtime Revolution Limited - The Solution for Software Development
http://www.runrev.com/


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-24 Thread erik hansen

--- "Wolfgang M. Bereuter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > is a "splash screen" always a seperate stack
> Have a look at the rev archive.

ok.

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-24 Thread Wolfgang M. Bereuter

On Freitag, Jänner 24, 2003, at 01:18  Uhr, erik hansen wrote:


ja dass hilft. eine frage:
is a "splash screen" always a seperate stack or

is not - but should be, because of the problem that it cannot save 
itself on WIN and *nix.
Does the term also apply to a single card used in
this manner?

I dont think so, because of the saving issue. try it with a substack...
But i think, here are a lot of experts which can explain this better 
than me. Have a look at the rev archive. If I remember well we had this 
issue a lot of times in the last years...

regards
Wolfgang M. Bereuter

Learn easy with trainingsmaps©

INTERNETTRAINER Wolfgang M. Bereuter
Edelhofg. 17/11, A-1180 Wien, Austria
...
http://www.internettrainer.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Tel: ++43/1/ 961 0418, Fax: ++43/1/ 479 2539

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-23 Thread erik hansen

--- Rob Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > How many times will the mainstack that is
> the standalone be opened during runtime?
> >
> >many.

> How does one open a standalone many times
> without quitting it each 
> time before opening it again.?

right. it is NOT a standalone.

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-23 Thread erik hansen

--- "Wolfgang M. Bereuter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What I do is:
> Main stack= Splashscreen (1 card) (solves also
> the problem that it 
> cannot save etc...)
> put any preopen stack script (depend what you
> wnat to do) into it
> all items on this stack onMouseup are cheking a
> field in another stack 
> (no matter what the user clicks)
> If this check is ok I send the user to the
> "real" Main stack otherwise 
> to another stack
> 
> If you dont want o force the user to click make
> a send message after 
> some time...
> 
> hope thats understandable and helps,
> wenn nicht ruf mich einfach an

ja dass hilft. eine frage:
is a "splash screen" always a seperate stack or
does the term also apply to a single card used in
this manner?

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-23 Thread Rob Cozens
 > How many times will the mainstack that is the

 standalone be opened during
 runtime?


many.


Hi erik,

How does one open a standalone many times without quitting it each 
time before opening it again.?
--

Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.com/who.htm

"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."

from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631)
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-23 Thread Wolfgang M. Bereuter

On Donnerstag, Jänner 23, 2003, at 02:12  Uhr, erik hansen wrote:


Simpler:  if yo uwant initialization in either
the dev environment or as a
standalone, just move your init stuff to a
preOpenStack handler in the first
card of the main stack.


right, and i did try that. the thing is, i only
want this initialization to happen once, on
startup. the preOpenStack handler is activated
each time the stack is opened. maybe the usewr
does not want re-initialization.


What I do is:
Main stack= Splashscreen (1 card) (solves also the problem that it 
cannot save etc...)
put any preopen stack script (depend what you wnat to do) into it
all items on this stack onMouseup are cheking a field in another stack 
(no matter what the user clicks)
If this check is ok I send the user to the "real" Main stack otherwise 
to another stack

If you dont want o force the user to click make a send message after 
some time...

hope thats understandable and helps,
wenn nicht ruf mich einfach an

regards
Wolfgang M. Bereuter

Learn easy with trainingsmaps©

INTERNETTRAINER Wolfgang M. Bereuter
Edelhofg. 17/11, A-1180 Wien, Austria
...
http://www.internettrainer.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Tel: ++43/1/ 961 0418, Fax: ++43/1/ 479 2539

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Gaskin
erik hansen wrote:

> 
> --- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
>>> i want this initialization to happen once, on
>>> startup. the preOpenStack handler is
>> activated
>>> each time the stack is opened. maybe the
>> usewr
>>> does not want re-initialization.
>> 
>> How many times will the mainstack that is the
>> standalone be opened during
>> runtime?
> 
> many.
> 
> and the preopenstack handler sends "startup" (on
> line 1) everytime ANY stack opens.

Not if it's in the _card_ script; only the stack script of a main stack is
in the message path for substacks.


-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Developer of WebMerge 2.1: Publish any database on any site
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread erik hansen

--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> > i want this initialization to happen once, on
> > startup. the preOpenStack handler is
> activated
> > each time the stack is opened. maybe the
> usewr
> > does not want re-initialization.
> 
> How many times will the mainstack that is the
> standalone be opened during
> runtime?

many.

and the preopenstack handler sends "startup" (on
line 1) everytime ANY stack opens. and the
startup handler runs. i put "starting again" &&
the time in the startup handler to be sure.

wait until 2 right? as lomg as it doesn't crash.

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



RE: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread erik hansen

Richard & Monte,

"on startUp" worked in the stack script of the
first stack i opened, "AA"! i moved the handler
from what was going to be a "splash" stack.

anyway, it would be nice to know if there is
something like the HC "Home" stack where a
startup handler fires when the Rev app is
clicked. then "AA" could be scripted to open automatically.

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Gaskin
erik hansen wrote:

> 
> --- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> "on startup" works on the first stack opened
>> when
>>> you start the Revolution app (from the
>> Transcript
>>> Dictionary). this occurs before i open my own
>>> first stack. what is this mysterious masked
>> stack
>>> and can i put my very own "on startup" into
>> that script?
>> 
>> Simpler:  if yo uwant initialization in either
>> the dev environment or as a
>> standalone, just move your init stuff to a
>> preOpenStack handler in the first
>> card of the main stack.
> 
> right, and i did try that. the thing is, i only
> want this initialization to happen once, on
> startup. the preOpenStack handler is activated
> each time the stack is opened. maybe the usewr
> does not want re-initialization.

How many times will the mainstack that is the standalone be opened during
runtime?

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Developer of WebMerge 2.1: Publish any database on any site
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



RE: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread erik hansen

--- Monte Goulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 
> The startUp script can go in the script of your
> standalone stack. It
> executes before preOpenStack and only once per
> session.

thanks, that sounds useful but i have yet to
create a standalone. the idea of not being able
to access all the code makes me break out in a
cold sweat!

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread erik hansen

--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > "on startup" works on the first stack opened
> when
> > you start the Revolution app (from the
> Transcript
> > Dictionary). this occurs before i open my own
> > first stack. what is this mysterious masked
> stack
> > and can i put my very own "on startup" into
> that script?
> 
> Simpler:  if yo uwant initialization in either
> the dev environment or as a
> standalone, just move your init stuff to a
> preOpenStack handler in the first
> card of the main stack.

right, and i did try that. the thing is, i only
want this initialization to happen once, on
startup. the preOpenStack handler is activated
each time the stack is opened. maybe the usewr
does not want re-initialization.

once i saw the names of other RR stacks that were
opened (before ones own) when you first click on
the Revolution application file. or was that MC?

anyway, thanks for the info.

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread Dar Scott

On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 02:21 PM, Thomas Bähler wrote:


I have a stack with two substacks both in palette style. In the 
startup script ("on startUp") one of the substacks should
be opened ("if stackname is not among the lines of the openStacks"). 
On my Mac with OS X the stack works OK but the
distribution for Windows (a standalone) won't show the substack that 
should be opened on startUp.

One time I had trouble like this.  It got fixed when I move startup 
from the card script to the stack script of the main stack.

Dar Scott

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Thomas,


Hello List

Something strange happens with a Project of mine, so I guess there's 
some stupid code in my script.

I have a stack with two substacks both in palette style. In the 
startup script ("on startUp") one of the substacks should
be opened ("if stackname is not among the lines of the openStacks"). 
On my Mac with OS X the stack works OK but the
distribution for Windows (a standalone) won't show the substack that 
should be opened on startUp.

Have you tried "on preopenstack" instead of "on startup", which should 
be used
when using faceless apps started by the commandline or as cgis.

Just a thought...

The other substack is opened by clicking a button. This one shows up, 
but not in palette style. In the script
of this button I use the palette command, and on OS X it works fine 
even as standalone but not on Windows 2000.

You could try to set the style in the "preopenstack"-handler of that 
palette...

Does anybody have a clue?
(Mac OS X 10.1.5, Runrev 1.1.1, Windows 2000 Professional)


Hope this helps.


Thanks
Thomas


Regards

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



StartUp handler on Windows

2003-01-22 Thread Thomas Bähler
Hello List

Something strange happens with a Project of mine, so I guess there's 
some stupid code in my script.

I have a stack with two substacks both in palette style. In the startup 
script ("on startUp") one of the substacks should
be opened ("if stackname is not among the lines of the openStacks"). On 
my Mac with OS X the stack works OK but the
distribution for Windows (a standalone) won't show the substack that 
should be opened on startUp.
The other substack is opened by clicking a button. This one shows up, 
but not in palette style. In the script
of this button I use the palette command, and on OS X it works fine even 
as standalone but not on Windows 2000.

Does anybody have a clue?
(Mac OS X 10.1.5, Runrev 1.1.1, Windows 2000 Professional)

Thanks

Thomas

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution