K3B hangs on FC14 x64

[Mick M.]

Hi;
  when I run k3b as 'mick' it hangs at the coloured 'checking system' box.

I 'yum erase k3b*' then 'yum install k3b*' with the same result.
Fully updated F14 x64 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 

When 'su -' k3b from konsole:

[root@localhost mick]# k3b
K3bQProcess::QProcess(0x0)
K3bQProcess::QProcess(0x0)
k3b(15305)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_projects" with 
KXMLGUIFactory! 
k3b(15305)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_dir_tree" with 
KXMLGUIFactory! 
k3b(15305)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "view_contents" with 
KXMLGUIFactory! 
k3b(15305)/kdeui (kdelibs): Attempt to use QAction "location_bar" with 
KXMLGUIFactory! 
QMetaObject::invokeMethod: No such method 
K3b::Application::loadCommandLineOptionsForNewInstance()
[root@localhost mick]# 

Then I can use it just fine.

When I close it:
QCoreApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver
klauncher(12193)/kio (KLauncher): SlavePool: No communication with slave. 

klauncher(12193)/kio (KLauncher): SlavePool: No communication with slave. 

klauncher(12193)/kio (KLauncher): SlavePool: No communication with slave. 

klauncher(12193)/kio (KLauncher): SlavePool: No communication with slave. 


[root@localhost mick]# rpm -qa k3b*
k3b-devel-2.0.2-2.fc14.x86_64
k3b-2.0.2-2.fc14.x86_64
k3b-common-2.0.2-2.fc14.noarch
k3b-extras-freeworld-2.0.1-2.fc14.x86_64
k3b-libs-2.0.2-2.fc14.x86_64

Any ideas?

Mick.

Standard guarantee applies - 30 feet or 30 seconds, whichever comes first.

#  find / -name "*your base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;


  
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Qn about rsnapshot/rsync directory filter rules

[Suvayu Ali]

Hi Cameron,

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:49:39 +1100
Cameron Simpson  wrote:

> They're just like ACLs: first match applies. From the man page, undef
> "FILTER RULES":
> 
>   As  the  list  of  files/directories to transfer is built, rsync
> checks each name to be transferred against the list  of
> include/exclude  pat- terns in turn, and the first matching pattern
> is acted on
> 
> So to rsync just specific directories one's rules might read (however
> expressed):
> 
>   + /dir1
>   + /dir2
>   - /*
> 
> to do just dir1 and dir2.
> 
> Cheers,

Yes, I finally figured this out. For some reason the language in the
man page seemed unclear to me at the time. Now that I understand the
subtlety, I'm not sure there is a better way to phrase it. :-p Maybe it
needs more examples.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Qn about rsnapshot/rsync directory filter rules

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:49 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 20Feb2011 22:22, Patrick O'Callaghan  wrote:
> | The include/exclude rules are just passed through to rsync. The man page
> | for rsync has a fairly extensive discussion of the syntax. I don't see a
> | direct statement that the rules are evaluated in strict order, but it
> | seems natural.
> 
> They're just like ACLs: first match applies. From the man page, undef
> "FILTER RULES":
> 
>   As  the  list  of  files/directories to transfer is built, rsync checks
>   each name to be transferred against the list  of include/exclude  pat-
>   terns in turn, and the first matching pattern is acted on

Good. It's what I supposed but hadn't seen in the man page.

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

X not starting after today's updates

[Joe Zeff]

The subject gives you the gist of the message.  To avoid retyping, I'm 
copying the body of my post to fedoraforums.org:

Today's updates included several Xorg components so I logged out, 
planning on logging back in. Instead, I got the splash screen, not the 
login screen. I tried going to other consoles and got the expected text 
login, except for Ctrl-Alt-F7 which got a blank screen. Logging in, 
either as myself or as root and trying startx failed, claiming that it 
couldn't find a screen. I tried (as root) telinit 3, which worked. Then, 
logged in as myself, I tried this:

su -c 'telinit 5'

It failed, with the same error. I'm reluctant to reboot unless and until 
I have to because that's rarely the right answer in the Linux world and 
because, right now, I doubt it would work. I'm posting from my laptop, 
and won't be updating it until I know my desktop's working OK.

BTW, my desktop has F 14 with Gnome, and an nVidia graphics cards for 
which I use kmod-nvidia. Any suggestions?

-- Post added at 07:22 PM -- Previous post was at 06:57 
PM --

More info:

The error message is that the kmod is 260.19.29 but the driver is 260.19.36.

Checking with yum, I find that I have that newer version of the kmod 
(and akmod as well). However, last time I rebooted for a kernel update, 
the kmod wasn't there so my box used akmod to build it. Is there a way, 
other than a reboot, to get the right version of kmod running? I'll 
reboot if and only if needed, but I'd rather make sure it's the right 
thing first.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Qn about rsnapshot/rsync directory filter rules

[Cameron Simpson]

On 20Feb2011 22:22, Patrick O'Callaghan  wrote:
| The include/exclude rules are just passed through to rsync. The man page
| for rsync has a fairly extensive discussion of the syntax. I don't see a
| direct statement that the rules are evaluated in strict order, but it
| seems natural.

They're just like ACLs: first match applies. From the man page, undef
"FILTER RULES":

  As  the  list  of  files/directories to transfer is built, rsync checks
  each name to be transferred against the list  of include/exclude  pat-
  terns in turn, and the first matching pattern is acted on

So to rsync just specific directories one's rules might read (however
expressed):

  + /dir1
  + /dir2
  - /*

to do just dir1 and dir2.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson  DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

The ZZR-1100 remains the big, fast, versatile bike for the rider with a
regular pillion passenger or the desire to humiliate just about every
other road user who attempted to match its straight line acceleration. - REVS
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Patrick Bartek]

--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:

> On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim 
> wrote:
> >
> >> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
> >> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
> >> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop.
> Even if I
> >> have BIOS set to
> >> boot off Cdrom.
> >>
> >> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled
> in Bios
> >> to be first
> >> boot device, won't work,  in all cases
> it  will
> >> only Attempt to Load
> >> Windows.
> >>
> >> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot
> process.
> > This may be a stupid question, but have you checked
> the ORDER of the chosen boot devices in BIOS?  If the
> hard drive is first in the boot chain, even if the CDROM
> drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard
> drive first to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD
> being in the CDROM drive.
> >
> > B
> Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is
> second boot device.

Okay.  Two more stupid questions:

1. Is the drive a CD drive or DVD one?
2. Is Fedora on a CD or DVD?

Had to ask.  It wouldn't be the first time I put a DVD in the CD drive of an 
old machine and wondered why it wasn't reading.

Have you checksummed both the downloaded Fedora file and burned media?

> I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop
> bootup setup to 
> bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and
> ignores the cdrom.

Never heard of that.  I've fixed plenty of Windows XP and Vista installs on 
various machines including Vaios by booting off a CD.  Never had a problem.  
Try booting the Vaio while repeatedly pressing F8.  Do you get a Boot Device 
Menu or something similar?  See if you can boot Windows into Safe Mode or to 
the Repair console.  If you have one, have you tried booting from a Windows 
install CD/DVD?  Or any other bootable CD?  You may have a bad CD/DVD drive.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Martin Taylor]

Whoops ignore that reply. Wrong thread!!

Martin

On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Martin Taylor wrote:

> I have verified the CDROM disks and have tried burning multiple disks on 
> different machines.
> 
> The CDROM is the first drive in the BIOS that is why Isolinux is being read 
> from the CD during the boot process.
> 
> But the boot process is stalling around the Isolinux read process. 
> 
> I was hoping to get some pointers on how to burn a CD that enables more debug 
> output on that process or some specific knowledge of known Isolinux issues 
> with certain hardware.
> 
> Thanks Martin
> 
> 
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Vincent Li wrote:
> 
>> Just want to double confirm that have you set the USB CDROM for the first 
>> boot device?
>> 
>> If yes, please verify whether the boot cd is corrupt? Or you could use 
>> another CD for testing.
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Jim  wrote:
>> On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> > --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:
>> >
>> >> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
>> >> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
>> >> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
>> >> have BIOS set to
>> >> boot off Cdrom.
>> >>
>> >> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
>> >> to be first
>> >> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
>> >> only Attempt to Load
>> >> Windows.
>> >>
>> >> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
>> > This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the 
>> > chosen boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot 
>> > chain, even if the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to 
>> > the hard drive first to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being 
>> > in the CDROM drive.
>> >
>> > B
>> Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is second boot device.
>> 
>> I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop bootup setup to
>> bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and ignores the cdrom.
>> --
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Thanks&Regards
>> 
>>Vincent Li (李锐聪)
>> Tel: 13433906991
>> MSN: liruic...@msn.cn
>> 
>> -- 
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> 

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Martin Taylor]

I have verified the CDROM disks and have tried burning multiple disks on 
different machines.

The CDROM is the first drive in the BIOS that is why Isolinux is being read 
from the CD during the boot process.

But the boot process is stalling around the Isolinux read process. 

I was hoping to get some pointers on how to burn a CD that enables more debug 
output on that process or some specific knowledge of known Isolinux issues with 
certain hardware.

Thanks Martin


On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Vincent Li wrote:

> Just want to double confirm that have you set the USB CDROM for the first 
> boot device?
> 
> If yes, please verify whether the boot cd is corrupt? Or you could use 
> another CD for testing.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Jim  wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:
> >
> >> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
> >> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
> >> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
> >> have BIOS set to
> >> boot off Cdrom.
> >>
> >> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
> >> to be first
> >> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
> >> only Attempt to Load
> >> Windows.
> >>
> >> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
> > This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the chosen 
> > boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot chain, even 
> > if the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard drive 
> > first to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being in the CDROM 
> > drive.
> >
> > B
> Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is second boot device.
> 
> I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop bootup setup to
> bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and ignores the cdrom.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks&Regards
> 
>Vincent Li (李锐聪)
> Tel: 13433906991
> MSN: liruic...@msn.cn
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

RE: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Michael Miles]

Just a thought.

Reset bios to default and press the key to get to boot menu on startup and see 
if that will work

I had a big problem with a USB flash drive and I had to reset the bios and 
reboot.

Also I could not get the DVD install disk to work.

Only the fedora 14 live cd would work then I just installed it to hard drive

Michael

 

From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Vincent Li
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 15:33
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

 

Just want to double confirm that have you set the USB CDROM for the first boot 
device?

If yes, please verify whether the boot cd is corrupt? Or you could use another 
CD for testing.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Jim  wrote:

On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:
>
>> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
>> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
>> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
>> have BIOS set to
>> boot off Cdrom.
>>
>> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
>> to be first
>> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
>> only Attempt to Load
>> Windows.
>>
>> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
> This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the chosen 
> boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot chain, even if 
> the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard drive first 
> to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being in the CDROM drive.
>
> B

Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is second boot device.

I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop bootup setup to
bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and ignores the cdrom.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines




-- 
Thanks&Regards

   Vincent Li (李锐聪)
Tel: 13433906991
MSN: liruic...@msn.cn

  _  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3457 - Release Date: 02/21/11

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Expanding an LVM partition at the front

[Roberto Ragusa]

On 02/21/2011 09:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:

> I'm not positive this would work and it certainly isn't elegant but...
> 
> Could you just:
> - Create a partition in the space preceding the current partition
> - Add the partition to the existing vg
> - Allocate those extents to the current lv
> - Expand the file system to fill the now extended lv.
> 
> I don't even like the idea, I'm just wondering if it would work. I
> don't see why this would be any different that allocating extents from
> several drives to make one lv / file system...

It works perfectly. I'm doing it all the time.

The original poster said he was evaluating this option too.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Vincent Li]

Just want to double confirm that have you set the USB CDROM for the first
boot device?

If yes, please verify whether the boot cd is corrupt? Or you could use
another CD for testing.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Jim  wrote:

> On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:
> >
> >> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
> >> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
> >> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
> >> have BIOS set to
> >> boot off Cdrom.
> >>
> >> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
> >> to be first
> >> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
> >> only Attempt to Load
> >> Windows.
> >>
> >> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
> > This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the
> chosen boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot chain,
> even if the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard
> drive first to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being in the
> CDROM drive.
> >
> > B
> Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is second boot
> device.
>
> I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop bootup setup to
> bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and ignores the cdrom.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>



-- 
Thanks&Regards

   Vincent Li (李锐聪)
Tel: 13433906991
MSN: liruic...@msn.cn
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 Isolinux hangs CD install

[Vincent Li]

Maybe there is something wrong with the boot CD which you burned. Could you
please try to boot ISO from hard disk to confirm that?


On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Martin Taylor  wrote:

>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:20 AM, compdoc wrote:
>
> >> I don't think we have a broken hardware issue. I can install older revs
> of
> > Fedora including 12 and 9 just fine.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like a hardware issue. What mode is the sata controller set
> > for in the bios? AHCI would be best...
> >
> > Is it using sata, or is it scsi, or ide?
> >
>
> The CD/DVD ROM is IDE
>
> The startup hard disk is SCSI
>
>
> Martin
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>



-- 
Thanks&Regards

   Vincent Li (李锐聪)
Tel: 13433906991
MSN: liruic...@msn.cn
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

jerky mouse historical posting

[Tom Horsley]

I thought the jerky mouse problem sounded familiar.
I finally found the modprobe file I added to
help my mouse and doing searches from it led me
to this thread:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-December/389083.html
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 USB Mouse Problem [RESOLVED]

[john wendel]

On 02/21/2011 11:37 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:24:06AM -0800, john wendel wrote:
>> I just installed Fedora 14 LXDE on an old laptop, that had been running
>> Fedora 10. Everything is fine except for the Microsoft USB wireless
>> mouse, which worked fine under Fedora 10. The mouse is detected, but it
>> doesn't move correctly (jerky and confined to a small area of the
>> screen). I tried a wired USB mouse and it works fine.
>>
>> Any clues will be appreciated.
>>
>
> John:
>
> I have a MS Wireless Notebook Optial Mouse 3000 that I've been using
> for over 2 years on my eeepc, which has run Fedora 10, 11, 12, 13,
> and now 14 (but always the gnome edition) and I don't, generally,
> have that kind of trouble.
>
> having said that, it IS sensitive to both distance between the mouse
> and usb dongle, as well as objects blocking the direct path.
>
> for example, at my desk at home, the eeepc goes to the left of my
> desktop's keyboard while the mouse goes to the right. the keyboard seems
> to cause a 'shadow' between the two, which causes intermittent results
> in moving and clicking. if I move the keyboard a few inches so it isn't
> in the direct line, it works fine. I've seen the same thing if I put
> the usb dongle into the left side USB port while the mouse is on the
> right, as if the computer itself is obstructing the signal.
>
> so, when I'm at home, I have a short usb cable that I plug into the
> eeepc and put the dongle into the other end thereof, and place
> it near the mousepad on the right.
>
> I've seen the same behavior with this mouse on another laptop I
> sometimes use (windoze), butwhen using a similarly small logitech
> wireless notebook mouse it isn't a problem.
>
> I take that to mean there may be a weaker signal between the dongle and
> the mouse when using the MS mouse/dongle than when using the Logitech.
>
> Or you may want to try replacing the battery/ies in the mouse to see if
> that helps.
>
> Fred

Thanks for the tips. I bought a Logitech notebook mouse, and it's 
working great.  Moved the MS mouse to a Fedora 13 box and it's also 
working fine. Strange.

John

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 USB Mouse Problem

[JB]

JB  gmail.com> writes:

> ...

Results of Google search: fedora Microsoft USB wireless mouse

These are recommendations/solutions/woodoo magic:

"...I had to press the "connect"-button on the bottom of the mouse...LOL!"

"... have you checked battery on the wireless mouse? weak ones cause
 anomalies."

"I looks as though win is writing some microcode to the USB receiver that
 breaks it for subsequent use with linux."
"First and easiest for me is when I need switch from Windows 7 then I do
 a complete shut-down (not just a reboot) and then boot straight to ubuntu or
 other Linux distro.
 Second if you have access to the USB port that the wireless receiver is
 plugged into then you can just unplug it after you have already rebooted from
 Windows and are completely booted into Linux. (I believe this clears some
 settings in the receiver itself that are stored there by the windows drivers
 for whatever reason)."

"...mouse section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Protocol" "auto"
# Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "yes"
EndSection
"

"... 'yum erase bluez' "

My guess:
enable USB Legacy Support in BIOS.

Hope it helps :-)

JB


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Richard Shaw]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Robert Nichols
 wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 08:14 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Gordon Messmer  wrote:
>>> On 02/20/2011 10:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
 I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
 package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build.
>>>
>>> Spec files don't normally require the entire chain to be listed.  What
>>> problem are you trying to solve that isn't solved by listing the
>>> "immediate" build or runtime requirements?
>>
>> I was just tying to not be redundant. For instance, the package relies
>> on mlt and mlt-python. I don't have to include mlt because mlt-python
>> already requires it.
>
> You should include in your dependencies all the things you directly
> require and not worry about redundancy.  You should not assume that
> you don't need to require Package-B because you also require
> Package-A, and Package-A requires Package-B.  Those dependencies
> can change.  Let's say that one day Package-B gets split into
> Package-B and Package-B-libs, and Package-A now just requires
> Package-B-libs.  If your actual need is for Package-B, you would
> get a run-time failure if Package-B was not installed.

Maybe I mis-read the wiki then.While there is a lot of good
documentation, it's not quite enough to teach yourself without help.

Richard

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Expanding an LVM partition at the front

[Richard Shaw]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roberto Ragusa  wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 08:17 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>> I deleted the partition immediately in front of an LVM physical volume.
>> I'd like to use the freed space as part of the LVM volume group.  I know
>> I could create a new partition in the same place, make it a physical
>> volume and add it to the group, but because the space is contiguous, I
>> wondered if it is possible just to move the front of the existing PV
>> partition to include the freed space.
>>
>> I tried changing the start of the partition using fdisk, but then the PV
>> is no longer recognized by LVM.  I suppose that means that there is
>> information about the PV stored in a particular location at the front of
>> the partition.  Putting the starting point back makes the PV
>> recognizable again.
>>
>> So is there a utility that can move the front of a physical volume
>> partition?  (gparted and fdisk apparently can't).
>
> What you are attempting is quite dangerous.
>
> I don't know if automated tools exist for this, but you should
> do this:
>
> let's suppose you have this layout
>
> partition 5 cyl 1600-1999 empty space
> partition 6 cyl 2000-2999 existing PV
>
> - destroy partition 5 and 6 with fdisk (not joking!)
> - copy data from 2000-2999 to 1600-2599 (dd on /dev/sda with appropriate 
> bs,seek,skip,count)
> - now create partition 5 on 1600-2599
>
> At this point you should have your PV available again and you
> have simplified your problem to "I want to enlarge a PV", which you can do
> with fdisk (part5 from 1600 to 2999) and pvresize.
>
> Another probably much safer solution would be:
>
> - get a spare disk (even USB external one)
> - create new PV, add to VG, pvmove your PV to the new PV
> - destroy and recreate your PV
> - pvmove from USB PV to enlarged PV
> - remove USB PV
>
> This is less error prone. It can happen while the filesystem is R/W mounted 
> too.

I'm not positive this would work and it certainly isn't elegant but...

Could you just:
- Create a partition in the space preceding the current partition
- Add the partition to the existing vg
- Allocate those extents to the current lv
- Expand the file system to fill the now extended lv.

I don't even like the idea, I'm just wondering if it would work. I
don't see why this would be any different that allocating extents from
several drives to make one lv / file system...

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Expanding an LVM partition at the front

[Roberto Ragusa]

On 02/21/2011 08:17 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I deleted the partition immediately in front of an LVM physical volume.
> I'd like to use the freed space as part of the LVM volume group.  I know
> I could create a new partition in the same place, make it a physical
> volume and add it to the group, but because the space is contiguous, I
> wondered if it is possible just to move the front of the existing PV
> partition to include the freed space.  
> 
> I tried changing the start of the partition using fdisk, but then the PV
> is no longer recognized by LVM.  I suppose that means that there is
> information about the PV stored in a particular location at the front of
> the partition.  Putting the starting point back makes the PV
> recognizable again.
> 
> So is there a utility that can move the front of a physical volume
> partition?  (gparted and fdisk apparently can't).

What you are attempting is quite dangerous.

I don't know if automated tools exist for this, but you should
do this:

let's suppose you have this layout

partition 5 cyl 1600-1999 empty space
partition 6 cyl 2000-2999 existing PV

- destroy partition 5 and 6 with fdisk (not joking!)
- copy data from 2000-2999 to 1600-2599 (dd on /dev/sda with appropriate 
bs,seek,skip,count)
- now create partition 5 on 1600-2599

At this point you should have your PV available again and you
have simplified your problem to "I want to enlarge a PV", which you can do
with fdisk (part5 from 1600 to 2999) and pvresize.

Another probably much safer solution would be:

- get a spare disk (even USB external one)
- create new PV, add to VG, pvmove your PV to the new PV
- destroy and recreate your PV
- pvmove from USB PV to enlarged PV
- remove USB PV

This is less error prone. It can happen while the filesystem is R/W mounted too.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: XFS errors... can't repair them

[Heinz Diehl]

On 21.02.2011, Martín Marqués wrote: 

> Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: XFS internal error
> XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 358 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c.
> Caller 0xa0fc126e
> Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: Pid: 979, comm: flush-8:0 Tainted: P
> 2.6.34.7-66.fc13.x86_64 #1
> Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
> xfs_error_report+0x41/0x43 [xfs]
> Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
> xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near+0x370/0xa0f [xfs]
[]

Looks like the btree structure of free blocks got corrupted after free
space has been allocated (had a short look into xfs_alloc.c, but I'm by 
no means an XFS specialist and not familiar with the code either). 

This could indicate a defective partition/harddrive.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Jim]

On 02/21/2011 02:33 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:
>
>> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
>> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS,
>> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
>> have BIOS set to
>> boot off Cdrom.
>>
>> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
>> to be first
>> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
>> only Attempt to Load
>> Windows.
>>
>> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
> This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the chosen 
> boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot chain, even if 
> the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard drive first 
> to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being in the CDROM drive.
>
> B
Done that, cdrom is first boot device, and hard drive is second boot device.

I think this is a Vista install and Sony has the laptop bootup setup to 
bootup  on a path to Windows on hard drive. and ignores the cdrom.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 USB Mouse Problem

[fred smith]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:24:06AM -0800, john wendel wrote:
> I just installed Fedora 14 LXDE on an old laptop, that had been running 
> Fedora 10. Everything is fine except for the Microsoft USB wireless 
> mouse, which worked fine under Fedora 10. The mouse is detected, but it 
> doesn't move correctly (jerky and confined to a small area of the 
> screen). I tried a wired USB mouse and it works fine.
> 
> Any clues will be appreciated.
> 

John:

I have a MS Wireless Notebook Optial Mouse 3000 that I've been using
for over 2 years on my eeepc, which has run Fedora 10, 11, 12, 13, 
and now 14 (but always the gnome edition) and I don't, generally,
have that kind of trouble.

having said that, it IS sensitive to both distance between the mouse
and usb dongle, as well as objects blocking the direct path.

for example, at my desk at home, the eeepc goes to the left of my
desktop's keyboard while the mouse goes to the right. the keyboard seems
to cause a 'shadow' between the two, which causes intermittent results
in moving and clicking. if I move the keyboard a few inches so it isn't
in the direct line, it works fine. I've seen the same thing if I put
the usb dongle into the left side USB port while the mouse is on the
right, as if the computer itself is obstructing the signal.

so, when I'm at home, I have a short usb cable that I plug into the
eeepc and put the dongle into the other end thereof, and place
it near the mousepad on the right.

I've seen the same behavior with this mouse on another laptop I 
sometimes use (windoze), butwhen using a similarly small logitech
wireless notebook mouse it isn't a problem.

I take that to mean there may be a weaker signal between the dongle and
the mouse when using the MS mouse/dongle than when using the Logitech.

Or you may want to try replacing the battery/ies in the mouse to see if
that helps.

Fred
-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen."
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Patrick Bartek]

--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jim  wrote:

> A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on
> cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS, 
> trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I
> have BIOS set to 
> boot off Cdrom.
> 
> I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios
> to be first 
> boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will
> only Attempt to Load 
> Windows.
> 
> It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.

This may be a stupid question, but have you checked the ORDER of the chosen 
boot devices in BIOS?  If the hard drive is first in the boot chain, even if 
the CDROM drive is set as bootable, BIOS will stll go to the hard drive first 
to boot the system regardless of a bootable CD being in the CDROM drive.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Expanding an LVM partition at the front

[Matthew Saltzman]

I deleted the partition immediately in front of an LVM physical volume.
I'd like to use the freed space as part of the LVM volume group.  I know
I could create a new partition in the same place, make it a physical
volume and add it to the group, but because the space is contiguous, I
wondered if it is possible just to move the front of the existing PV
partition to include the freed space.  

I tried changing the start of the partition using fdisk, but then the PV
is no longer recognized by LVM.  I suppose that means that there is
information about the PV stored in a particular location at the front of
the partition.  Putting the starting point back makes the PV
recognizable again.

So is there a utility that can move the front of a physical volume
partition?  (gparted and fdisk apparently can't).

TIA.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 USB Mouse Problem

[JB]

john wendel  comcast.net> writes:

> ...

Google search: usb jerky mouse

Also,
$ less -i /var/log/Xorg.0.log
search for mouse

JB




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Trying to install Fedora 14 on a Stubborn Sony Vaio

[Jim]

A Sony Vaio will not let me boot on cdrom with a Crashed Windows OS, 
trying  to install Fedora only on laptop. Even if I have BIOS set to 
boot off Cdrom.

I even hooked a external cdrom to usb and enabled in Bios to be first 
boot device, won't work,  in all cases it  will only Attempt to Load 
Windows.

It won't even let you disable hard drive in Boot process.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 Isolinux hangs CD install

[Martin Taylor]

On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:20 AM, compdoc wrote:

>> I don't think we have a broken hardware issue. I can install older revs of
> Fedora including 12 and 9 just fine.
> 
> 
> It does sound like a hardware issue. What mode is the sata controller set
> for in the bios? AHCI would be best...
> 
> Is it using sata, or is it scsi, or ide?
> 

The CD/DVD ROM is IDE

The startup hard disk is SCSI


Martin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Fedora 14 USB Mouse Problem

[john wendel]

I just installed Fedora 14 LXDE on an old laptop, that had been running 
Fedora 10. Everything is fine except for the Microsoft USB wireless 
mouse, which worked fine under Fedora 10. The mouse is detected, but it 
doesn't move correctly (jerky and confined to a small area of the 
screen). I tried a wired USB mouse and it works fine.

Any clues will be appreciated.

Regards,

John
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

RE: Fedora 14 Isolinux hangs CD install

[compdoc]

> I don't think we have a broken hardware issue. I can install older revs of
Fedora including 12 and 9 just fine.


It does sound like a hardware issue. What mode is the sata controller set
for in the bios? AHCI would be best...

Is it using sata, or is it scsi, or ide?



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 Isolinux hangs CD install

[Martin Taylor]

 By the way I am trying to install the x86_64 version.
 Installing on a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2 motherboard based system with the
 latest 2.0c BIOS installed.
 
 Martin
 
>>> Can you run the i386 version?
>>> 
>>> James McKenzie
>>> 
>> I haven't tried it. I assume i386 is just the 32 bit version. The naming 
>> convention is confusing. You would think they'd call is x86. I would rather 
>> install the 64 bit OS if at all possible.
>> 
> i5/686 could also be the 32 bit version.  If you can install that 
> version and not the x86_64, then something is not right with your hardware.
> 

I guess I don't fully understand the .iso versions. How do the i386/i686 .isos 
differ from the x86 and x86_64 ? Can you point me to a link that describes the 
differences?

I don't think we have a broken hardware issue. I can install older revs of 
Fedora including 12 and 9 just fine.
This is something new since 12 in the initial startup script or Isolinux itself 
that tickles a peculiarity of my configuration. Is there a way to turn on any 
debug output during the early stages of the CD install process during the 
Isolinux startup?

Martin

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

R: Re: R: Re: Samba misconfiguration

[antonio.montagn...@alice.it]

>Messaggio originale
>Da: craigwh...@azapple.com
>Data: 21-feb-2011 
16.43
>A: 
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Samba 
misconfiguration
>
>On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:38 +0100, antonio.montagnani@alice.
it wrote:
>> 
>
>> I attach a log file of a test with samba trying to connect 
by smbclient...I 
>> am at a dead point.
>
>no ability to look at the log 
until much, much later.
>
>What is output of command...
>
>pdbedit -Lv antonio

>
>?
>
>Craig
>
>
>-- 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and

>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>-- 
>users 
mailing list
>users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>To unsubscribe or change 
subscription options:
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users>Guidelines: 
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
 pdbedit -Lv antonio
INFO: Current debug levels:
  all: True/10
  tdb: 
False/0
  printdrivers: False/0
  lanman: False/0
  smb: False/0
  rpc_parse: 
False/0
  rpc_srv: False/0
  rpc_cli: False/0
  passdb: False/0
  sam: False/0

  auth: False/0
  winbind: False/0
  vfs: False/0
  idmap: False/0
  quota: 
False/0
  acls: False/0
  locking: False/0
  msdfs: False/0
  dmapi: False/0
  
registry: False/0
doing parameter server string = Samba Server Version %v
doing 
parameter print command = 
doing parameter guest ok = yes
doing parameter 
workgroup = workgroup
doing parameter username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
doing 
parameter security = user
doing parameter lprm command = 
doing parameter max 
log size = 50
doing parameter wins support = Yes
doing parameter guest account 
= nfsnobody
pm_process() returned Yes
lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes

set_server_role: role = ROLE_STANDALONE
Attempting to register new charset UCS-
2LE
Registered charset UCS-2LE
Attempting to register new charset UTF-16LE

Registered charset UTF-16LE
Attempting to register new charset UCS-2BE

Registered charset UCS-2BE
Attempting to register new charset UTF-16BE

Registered charset UTF-16BE
Attempting to register new charset UTF8
Registered 
charset UTF8
Attempting to register new charset UTF-8
Registered charset UTF-8

Attempting to register new charset ASCII
Registered charset ASCII
Attempting to 
register new charset 646
Registered charset 646
Attempting to register new 
charset ISO-8859-1
Registered charset ISO-8859-1
Attempting to register new 
charset UCS2-HEX
Registered charset UCS2-HEX
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for 
LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Netbios name list:-

my_netbios_names[0]="ACER"
Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam

Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam'
Attempting to register passdb 
backend ldapsam_compat
Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam_compat'

Attempting to register passdb backend NDS_ldapsam
Successfully added passdb 
backend 'NDS_ldapsam'
Attempting to register passdb backend NDS_ldapsam_compat

Successfully added passdb backend 'NDS_ldapsam_compat'
Attempting to register 
passdb backend smbpasswd
Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd'

Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam
Successfully added passdb backend 
'tdbsam'
Attempting to register passdb backend wbc_sam
Successfully added 
passdb backend 'wbc_sam'
Attempting to find a passdb backend to match tdbsam 
(tdbsam)
Found pdb backend tdbsam
pdb backend tdbsam has a valid init

tdbsam_open: successfully opened /var/lib/samba/private/passdb.tdb

pdb_set_username: setting username antonio, was 
pdb_set_domain: setting domain 
ACER, was 
pdb_set_nt_username: setting nt username , was 
pdb_set_full_name: 
setting full name antonio, was 
Home server: acer
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' 
for LOCALE
Substituting charset 'UTF-8' for LOCALE
pdb_set_homedir: setting 
home dir \\acer\antonio, was 
pdb_set_dir_drive: setting dir drive , was NULL

pdb_set_logon_script: setting logon script , was 
Home server: acer

pdb_set_profile_path: setting profile path \\acer\antonio\profile, was 

pdb_set_workstations: setting workstations , was 
account_policy_get: name: 
pass

Re: R: Re: Samba misconfiguration

[Craig White]

On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:38 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> 

> I attach a log file of a test with samba trying to connect by smbclient...I 
> am at a dead point.

no ability to look at the log until much, much later.

What is output of command...

pdbedit -Lv antonio

?

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

R: Re: Samba misconfiguration

[antonio.montagn...@alice.it]

>Messaggio originale
>Da: antonio.montagn...@alice.it
>Data: 21-feb-
2011 13.57
>A: 
>Ogg: R: Re: Samba 
misconfiguration
>
>
>
>>Messaggio originale
>>Da: craigwhite@azapple.
com
>>Data: 21-feb-2011 
>13.34
>>A: 
>>Ogg: Re: 
Samba misconfiguration
>>
>
>>On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:59 +0100, Antonio M 
wrote:
>>> 2011/2/21 Antonio M 
>:
>>> > 
2011/2/21 Antonio M montagn...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> > this is the 
result of testing samba:
>>> >
>>> 
>> smbclient -L Acer -U antonio
>>> > Enter 
antonio's password:
>>> > Domain=
>[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.
fc14]
>>> >
>>> >
>Sharename   Type  Comment
>>> >
-     ---
>
>>> >homes   Disk  Home 
Directories
>>> >
>Musica  Disk
>>> >IPC$
IPC   IPC Service (Samba 
>Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14)
>>> >NRG-
MP-C3300Printer   NRG MP 
>C3300
>>> >Hewlett-Packard-HP-LaserJet-
5100-Series Printer   Hewlett-
>Packard HP
>>> > LaserJet 5100 Series
>>> 
>antonio Disk  Home 
>Directories
>>> > Domain=[WORKGROUP] 
OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
>>> >
>
>>> >
Server   Comment
>>> >-
>---
>>> 
>ACER Samba Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14
>>> 
>>
>>> 
>WorkgroupMaster
>>> >-

>---
>>> >PROTEAMLXSERVERLX
>>> >

>WORKGROUPACER
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Antonio Montagnani

>>> > 
>Skype : amontag52
>>> > SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
>>> >
>>> 
>>> 
When I try to 
>connect by smbclient I get:
>>> 
>>> smbclient //Acer/Musica -U 
antonio
>>> Enter 
>antonio's password:
>>> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=
[Samba 3.5.6-71.
>fc14]
>>> smb: \> ls
>>> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \*

>>
>>assuming the 
>Linux user 'antonio' has privileges to
>>access 
/home/antonio/Musica then the 
>problem would seem to be that you
>>haven't 
added the samba user antonio yet.
>>
>
>>smbpasswd -a antonio
>>
>>Craig
>>
>>

>>-- 
>
>
>antonio was already added.Anyway I re-
>installed user but nothing 
changed.
>Tnx anyway - you have already helped me on 
>same issue on a 
different machine, but I forgot the how-to :-)
>
>Antonio
>-- 
>users mailing 
list
>users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>To unsubscribe or change subscription 
options:
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users>Guidelines: 
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>

I attach a log file of a test with samba trying to connect by smbclient...I 
am at a dead point.

sambalog
Description: Binary data
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 09:29 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 08:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 08:15 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nichols
> >>   wrote:
> >>> On 02/20/2011 12:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>  I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
>  package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
>  doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
>  " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/program.
> 
>  Anyone have a solution they like?
> >>>
> >>> Unless you use "-y" on the command line or have "assumeyes" in your
> >>> yum.conf file, yum is going to prompt for confirmation before actually
> >>> removing anything.
> >>
> >> Obviously. I was just trying to find a method that's failsafe. One
> >> could argue that it's very easy to accidentally add -y or press y at
> >> the prompt because that's what you're used to doing.
> >
> > echo N|yum erase foo
> >
> > Not elegant but it works.
> 
> Even if someone has "assumeyes" in the yum.conf file?  Pardon me, but
> I'm reluctant to test that.

No need to test it, as it clearly wouldn't work, but the OP was worried
about accidentally hitting 'y' so I'm assuming he doesn't have
'assumeyes' set.

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Robert Nichols]

On 02/21/2011 08:14 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Gordon Messmer  wrote:
>> On 02/20/2011 10:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
>>> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build.
>>
>> Spec files don't normally require the entire chain to be listed.  What
>> problem are you trying to solve that isn't solved by listing the
>> "immediate" build or runtime requirements?
>
> I was just tying to not be redundant. For instance, the package relies
> on mlt and mlt-python. I don't have to include mlt because mlt-python
> already requires it.

You should include in your dependencies all the things you directly
require and not worry about redundancy.  You should not assume that
you don't need to require Package-B because you also require
Package-A, and Package-A requires Package-B.  Those dependencies
can change.  Let's say that one day Package-B gets split into
Package-B and Package-B-libs, and Package-A now just requires
Package-B-libs.  If your actual need is for Package-B, you would
get a run-time failure if Package-B was not installed.

-- 
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Robert Nichols]

On 02/21/2011 08:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 08:15 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nichols
>>   wrote:
>>> On 02/20/2011 12:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
 I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
 package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
 doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
 " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/program.

 Anyone have a solution they like?
>>>
>>> Unless you use "-y" on the command line or have "assumeyes" in your
>>> yum.conf file, yum is going to prompt for confirmation before actually
>>> removing anything.
>>
>> Obviously. I was just trying to find a method that's failsafe. One
>> could argue that it's very easy to accidentally add -y or press y at
>> the prompt because that's what you're used to doing.
>
> echo N|yum erase foo
>
> Not elegant but it works.

Even if someone has "assumeyes" in the yum.conf file?  Pardon me, but
I'm reluctant to test that.

-- 
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora 14 Isolinux hangs CD install

[James McKenzie]

On 2/21/11 12:22 AM, Martin Taylor wrote:
>>> By the way I am trying to install the x86_64 version.
>>> Installing on a Supermicro X6DH8-XG2 motherboard based system with the
>>> latest 2.0c BIOS installed.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>> Can you run the i386 version?
>>
>> James McKenzie
>>
> I haven't tried it. I assume i386 is just the 32 bit version. The naming 
> convention is confusing. You would think they'd call is x86. I would rather 
> install the 64 bit OS if at all possible.
>
i5/686 could also be the 32 bit version.  If you can install that 
version and not the x86_64, then something is not right with your hardware.

James McKenzie

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Richard Shaw]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
 wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 08:15 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nichols
>>  wrote:
>> > On 02/20/2011 12:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> >> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
>> >> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
>> >> doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
>> >> " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/program.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone have a solution they like?
>> >
>> > Unless you use "-y" on the command line or have "assumeyes" in your
>> > yum.conf file, yum is going to prompt for confirmation before actually
>> > removing anything.
>>
>> Obviously. I was just trying to find a method that's failsafe. One
>> could argue that it's very easy to accidentally add -y or press y at
>> the prompt because that's what you're used to doing.
>
> echo N|yum erase foo
>
> Not elegant but it works.

Hmmm I could wrap that in my own shell script to make it more
memorable. Something like "depcheck" or the like.

Thanks,
Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 08:15 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nichols
>  wrote:
> > On 02/20/2011 12:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
> >> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
> >> doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
> >> " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/program.
> >>
> >> Anyone have a solution they like?
> >
> > Unless you use "-y" on the command line or have "assumeyes" in your
> > yum.conf file, yum is going to prompt for confirmation before actually
> > removing anything.
> 
> Obviously. I was just trying to find a method that's failsafe. One
> could argue that it's very easy to accidentally add -y or press y at
> the prompt because that's what you're used to doing.

echo N|yum erase foo

Not elegant but it works.

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Richard Shaw]

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nichols
 wrote:
> On 02/20/2011 12:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
>> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build. There
>> doesn't seem to be a non-destructive equivalent to "yum erase
>> " to see if I need to explicitly include a package/program.
>>
>> Anyone have a solution they like?
>
> Unless you use "-y" on the command line or have "assumeyes" in your
> yum.conf file, yum is going to prompt for confirmation before actually
> removing anything.

Obviously. I was just trying to find a method that's failsafe. One
could argue that it's very easy to accidentally add -y or press y at
the prompt because that's what you're used to doing.

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Richard Shaw]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Gordon Messmer  wrote:
> On 02/20/2011 10:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
>> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build.
>
> Spec files don't normally require the entire chain to be listed.  What
> problem are you trying to solve that isn't solved by listing the
> "immediate" build or runtime requirements?

I was just tying to not be redundant. For instance, the package relies
on mlt and mlt-python. I don't have to include mlt because mlt-python
already requires it.

yum erase just doesn't seem like a very elegant solution...

Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: XFS errors... can't repair them

[Martín Marqués]

This was the message that I found in my /var/log/messages at the time
the FS was filling up. This message repeats lots of times, changing
only the page number.

Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: XFS internal error
XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN at line 358 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c.
Caller 0xa0fc126e
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: Pid: 979, comm: flush-8:0 Tainted: P
2.6.34.7-66.fc13.x86_64 #1
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_error_report+0x41/0x43 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near+0x370/0xa0f [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_alloc_fixup_trees+0x256/0x291 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near+0x370/0xa0f [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_alloc_ag_vextent+0x31/0xfb [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_alloc_vextent+0x31e/0x4aa [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_bmap_btalloc+0x32b/0x4c8 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_bmap_alloc+0xe/0x10 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] xfs_bmapi+0x6dd/0xd79 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
kmem_zone_alloc+0x69/0xb1 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
xfs_iext_get_ext+0x45/0x69 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_iomap_write_allocate+0x20b/0x32b [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] xfs_iomap+0x306/0x381 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_map_blocks+0x2d/0x31 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_page_state_convert+0x29c/0x531 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot+0x84/0xa9
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_vm_writepage+0xdc/0x11c [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] __writepage+0x17/0x30
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
write_cache_pages+0x20f/0x345
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? __writepage+0x0/0x30
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
generic_writepages+0x24/0x26
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
xfs_vm_writepages+0x4d/0x56 [xfs]
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] do_writepages+0x21/0x2a
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
writeback_single_inode+0xbe/0x1df
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
writeback_inodes_wb+0x2e3/0x3a0
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] wb_writeback+0x139/0x1bb
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? call_rcu_sched+0x15/0x17
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? call_rcu+0xe/0x10
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] wb_do_writeback+0x6e/0x15c
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
bdi_writeback_task+0x3f/0xc0
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? bdi_start_fn+0x0/0xd9
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] bdi_start_fn+0x71/0xd9
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? bdi_start_fn+0x0/0xd9
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] kthread+0x7f/0x87
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: []
kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ? kthread+0x0/0x87
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: [] ?
kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
Feb 21 09:47:08 dagobah kernel: Filesystem "sda3": page discard on
page ea1da470, inode 0x18000164, offset 308723712.


El día 21 de febrero de 2011 10:36, Martín Marqués
 escribió:
> I have a system with /home in XFS format. Just today I tried to copy a
> big file not knowing that there was little space left in the device.
> The thing is that the system didn't let me access /home anymore (not
> even as root). I rebooted and tried to use xfs_check and xfs_repair,
> with no luck (it looks as if they do nothing).
>
> BTW, no reboot /home doesn't get mounted printing a lot of error messages.
>
> Any ideas?
>




-- 
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

R: Re: Samba misconfiguration

[antonio.montagn...@alice.it]

>Messaggio originale
>Da: craigwh...@azapple.com
>Data: 21-feb-2011 
13.34
>A: 
>Ogg: Re: Samba misconfiguration
>

>On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:59 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> 2011/2/21 Antonio M 
:
>> > 2011/2/21 Antonio M :
>> >>
>> > this is the result of testing samba:
>> >
>> 
> smbclient -L Acer -U antonio
>> > Enter antonio's password:
>> > Domain=
[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
>> >
>> >
Sharename   Type  Comment
>> >-     ---

>> >homes   Disk  Home Directories
>> >
Musica  Disk
>> >IPC$IPC   IPC Service (Samba 
Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14)
>> >NRG-MP-C3300Printer   NRG MP 
C3300
>> >Hewlett-Packard-HP-LaserJet-5100-Series Printer   Hewlett-
Packard HP
>> > LaserJet 5100 Series
>> >antonio Disk  Home 
Directories
>> > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
>> >

>> >Server   Comment
>> >-
---
>> >ACER Samba Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14
>> 
>
>> >WorkgroupMaster
>> >-
---
>> >PROTEAMLXSERVERLX
>> >
WORKGROUPACER
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Antonio Montagnani
>> > 
Skype : amontag52
>> > SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
>> >
>> 
>> When I try to 
connect by smbclient I get:
>> 
>> smbclient //Acer/Musica -U antonio
>> Enter 
antonio's password:
>> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.
fc14]
>> smb: \> ls
>> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \*
>
>assuming the 
Linux user 'antonio' has privileges to
>access /home/antonio/Musica then the 
problem would seem to be that you
>haven't added the samba user antonio yet.
>

>smbpasswd -a antonio
>
>Craig
>
>
>-- 


antonio was already added.Anyway I re-
installed user but nothing changed.
Tnx anyway - you have already helped me on 
same issue on a different machine, but I forgot the how-to :-)

Antonio
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

XFS errors... can't repair them

[Martín Marqués]

I have a system with /home in XFS format. Just today I tried to copy a
big file not knowing that there was little space left in the device.
The thing is that the system didn't let me access /home anymore (not
even as root). I rebooted and tried to use xfs_check and xfs_repair,
with no luck (it looks as if they do nothing).

BTW, no reboot /home doesn't get mounted printing a lot of error messages.

Any ideas?

-- 
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Samba misconfiguration

[Craig White]

On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:59 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> 2011/2/21 Antonio M :
> > 2011/2/21 Antonio M :
> >>
> > this is the result of testing samba:
> >
> > smbclient -L Acer -U antonio
> > Enter antonio's password:
> > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
> >
> >Sharename   Type  Comment
> >-     ---
> >homes   Disk  Home Directories
> >Musica  Disk
> >IPC$IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server Version 
> > 3.5.6-71.fc14)
> >NRG-MP-C3300Printer   NRG MP C3300
> >Hewlett-Packard-HP-LaserJet-5100-Series Printer   Hewlett-Packard HP
> > LaserJet 5100 Series
> >antonio Disk  Home Directories
> > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
> >
> >Server   Comment
> >----
> >ACER Samba Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14
> >
> >WorkgroupMaster
> >----
> >PROTEAMLXSERVERLX
> >WORKGROUPACER
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Antonio Montagnani
> > Skype : amontag52
> > SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
> >
> 
> When I try to connect by smbclient I get:
> 
> smbclient //Acer/Musica -U antonio
> Enter antonio's password:
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
> smb: \> ls
> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \*

assuming the Linux user 'antonio' has privileges to
access /home/antonio/Musica then the problem would seem to be that you
haven't added the samba user antonio yet.

smbpasswd -a antonio

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Samba misconfiguration

[Antonio M]

2011/2/21 Antonio M :
> 2011/2/21 Antonio M :
>>
> this is the result of testing samba:
>
> smbclient -L Acer -U antonio
> Enter antonio's password:
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
>
>        Sharename       Type      Comment
>        -             ---
>        homes           Disk      Home Directories
>        Musica          Disk
>        IPC$            IPC       IPC Service (Samba Server Version 
> 3.5.6-71.fc14)
>        NRG-MP-C3300    Printer   NRG MP C3300
>        Hewlett-Packard-HP-LaserJet-5100-Series Printer   Hewlett-Packard HP
> LaserJet 5100 Series
>        antonio         Disk      Home Directories
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
>
>        Server               Comment
>        -            ---
>        ACER                 Samba Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14
>
>        Workgroup            Master
>        -            ---
>        PROTEAMLX            SERVERLX
>        WORKGROUP            ACER
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Montagnani
> Skype : amontag52
> SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
>

When I try to connect by smbclient I get:

smbclient //Acer/Musica -U antonio
Enter antonio's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]
smb: \> ls
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \*

-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Mapserver & Postgis

[Greg Mc Randal]

Hi,

I've been tasked with compiling Mapserver on Fedora 14 so that it can
support Oracle. Thing is I'd like it to support PostGIS too.

Calling ./configure with --with-postgis seems to work ok, returns "  PostGIS
support:   -DUSE_POSTGIS -DPOSTGIS_HAS_SERVER_VERSION", but then
make gives the error

g++ -g  -fPIC -Wall -DHAVE_VSNPRINTF -DNEED_STRLCAT -DNEED_STRRSTR
-DUSE_FASTCGI   -DUSE_WMS_LYR -DUSE_WFS_LYR -DUSE_SOS_SVR -DUSE_LIBXML2
-DUSE_CURL -DUSE_WCS_SVR -DUSE_WFS_SVR -DUSE_WMS_SVR  -DUSE_ORACLESPATIAL
 -DUSE_POSTGIS -DPOSTGIS_HAS_SERVER_VERSION -DUSE_TIFF -DUSE_GDAL -DUSE_OGR
-DUSE_GEOS -DGEOS_HAS_SIMPLIFY  -DUSE_THREAD -DUSE_PROJ -DUSE_EPPL
 -DUSE_AGG -DUSE_GD_GIF -DUSE_GD_PNG -DUSE_GD_JPEG -DUSE_GD_WBMP
-DUSE_GD_FT -DGD_HAS_FTEX_XSHOW -DGD_HAS_GDIMAGEGIFPTR
-DGD_HAS_GETBITMAPFONTS -DUSE_ICONV -DUSE_ZLIB -I/usr/include
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include
 -I/opt/mapserver/dependencies/instantclient_11_2/sdk/include
-I/opt/mapserver/dependencies/instantclient_11_2/rdbms/demo
-I/opt/mapserver/dependencies/instantclient_11_2/rdbms/public -I/usr/include
   -I/usr/include/libxml2   shp2img.o  -L. -lmapserver -lgd -L/usr/lib64
-lgd -ljpeg -lfreetype -lpng -lz -lXpm -lX11  -ltiff -ljpeg -lfreetype
-lpng -lz -lXpm -lX11  -lproj -ljpeg -lpng  -L/usr/local/lib -lgdal
-L/usr/lib64 -lgeos_c -L/opt/mapserver/dependencies/instantclient_11_2/lib
-lclntsh -lnnz11 -ljpeg -lpng -L/usr/lib64 -lpq -lz -lpthread -lm -lrt -ldl
-lcurl  -L/usr/lib64 -lpq -lpgport -lxslt -lxml2 -lpam -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5
-lcom_err -lgssapi_krb5 -lz -lreadline -lcrypt -ldl -lm   -lcurl
-L/opt/mapserver/dependencies/instantclient_11_2 -lclntsh -L/usr/lib64
-lgeos_c -lpthread -lc -lfcgi -lz -lxml2 -lz -lm  -lm -lstdc++-o shp2img
*/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpgport*
*/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpam*
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1417824#post1417824 Seems to
say that *libpgport.a* isn't supported in Fedora 14, but if I install the
version of Mapserver from the Defora repositories it supports PostGIS. Is
there some magic I'm missing out on that the package maintainers have?

Thanks,

Greg

** Legal Notice **
This is a confidential communication and is intended only for the addressee 
indicated in the message (or duly authorised to be responsible for the delivery 
of the message to such person). You are specifically prohibited from copying 
this message or delivering the same, or any part thereof, to any other person, 
whomsoever or howsoever, unless you receive written authorisation from us to 
do. If you are anyone other than the intended addressee, or person duly 
authorised and responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
addressee, you should destroy this message and notify us immediately. Please 
note that we accept no responsibility whatsoever in the event that this message 
or any other email message or any part thereof becomes known or is communicated 
to anyone other than the intended recipient or other person authorised in 
writing by us to receive it, howsoever arising, and disclaim all liability for 
any losses or damage which may be sustained by any person as a 
 result thereof. All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no 
viruses are present in this e-mail. As our company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we 
recommend that you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to 
use.  Mapflow Limited 6th Floor, OConnell Bridge House, D'Olier St,Dublin 2, 
Ireland. Registered in Ireland. Registration No. 272682. Mapflow International 
Limited T/A Mapflow, 6th Floor, OConnell Bridge House, D'Olier St,Dublin 2, 
Ireland. Registered in Ireland. Registration No. 400646.Armanatta Holding 
Limited 6th Floor, OConnell Bridge House, D'Olier St,Dublin 2, Ireland. 
Registered in Ireland. Registration No. 421498.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Running ssh on unreserved ports

[Anne Wilson]

On Sunday 20 February 2011 22:13:16 Patrick Kobly wrote:
> On 2011-02-20, at 9:05 AM, "Alex"  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >>> Fail2ban is easy to set up, and I've seen it stop attempts here.
> > 
> > Everything helps, but this is one that I wouldn't really rely on, in
> > case the log file format for ssh changed in some way, or the script
> > died and it wasn't noticed.
> 
From the Fail2ban main page:

Fail2ban scans log files like /var/log/pwdfail or /var/log/apache/error_log 
and bans IP that makes too many password failures. It updates firewall rules 
to reject the IP address.

Brute force attacks are stopped in their tracks.  You configure how many 
consecutive failures are allowed before blocking occurs.  We all occasionally 
mis-type a password or use the wrong password, but normally we only do that 
once, so three or four consecutive failures are very suspect.

Anne
-- 
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Samba misconfiguration

[Antonio M]

2011/2/21 Antonio M :
> I have two similar computers, more or less with the same configuration
> (i.e. also same name of folders)
> On one computers folders are shared through the network, on the other
> one I see the shared folder, but when I click on it I get "Impossible
> to show folder content-Permissions are not sufficient"
>
> I have same users with same password.Any idea??
>
> This is my /est/samba.conf  valid for both computers:
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
> # Date: 2007/12/22 22:50:04
>
> [global]
>        log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> ;       printer = ML-1610
> ;       lpq command = %p
>        cups options = raw
>        print command =
> ;       printing = cups
>        server string = Samba Server Version %v
>        username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
>        comment = Samsung Laser
>        lprm command =
> ;       passdb backend = tdbsam
>        max log size = 50
>        wins support = Yes
>        workgroup = workgroup
>        security = user
> ;       encrypt passwords = yes
>        guest ok = yes
> ;       guest account = nobody
>
> [homes]
>        comment = Home Directories
>        valid users = MYDOMAIN\%S
>        read only = No
>
> [Printers]
>        comment = All Printers
>        path = /var/spool/samba
>        printable = Yes
>        writeable = yes
> ;       browseable = yes
>        valid users = antonio, nfsnobody
>
>
> [Musica]
>        path = /home/antonio/Musica
>        read only = no
> ;       browseable = yes
>        valid users = antonio
>
>
> --
> Antonio Montagnani
> Skype : amontag52
> SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
>
this is the result of testing samba:

smbclient -L Acer -U antonio
Enter antonio's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
homes   Disk  Home Directories
Musica  Disk
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (Samba Server Version 
3.5.6-71.fc14)
NRG-MP-C3300Printer   NRG MP C3300
Hewlett-Packard-HP-LaserJet-5100-Series Printer   Hewlett-Packard HP
LaserJet 5100 Series
antonio Disk  Home Directories
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-71.fc14]

Server   Comment
----
ACER Samba Server Version 3.5.6-71.fc14

WorkgroupMaster
----
PROTEAMLXSERVERLX
WORKGROUPACER



-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: yum erase the best way to do reverse dependency checking?

[Gordon Messmer]

On 02/20/2011 10:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I was googling for a way to figure out a dependency chain for a
> package I'm trying to flush out a spec file for and build.

Spec files don't normally require the entire chain to be listed.  What 
problem are you trying to solve that isn't solved by listing the 
"immediate" build or runtime requirements?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: USB mounting help

[JB]

Geoffrey Leach  hughes.net> writes:

> ...

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=167203

http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/support.php

http://www.teaser.fr/~hfiguiere/linux/digicam.html
...
Kodak CX73000x040a/0x0578 (PTP)   MMC/SDPTP (usb) gphoto2/ptp (usb)
...

$ yum list "*photo2*"
Installed Packages
...

$ $ grep -ir 0578 /lib/udev/rules.d/
/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libgphoto2.rules:ATTRS{idVendor}=="040a",
ATTRS{idProduct}=="0578", ENV{ID_GPHOTO2}="1", ENV{GPHOTO2_DRIVER}="proprietary"
/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libgphoto2.rules:ATTRS{idVendor}=="040a",
ATTRS{idProduct}=="0578", ENV{ID_GPHOTO2}="1", ENV{GPHOTO2_DRIVER}="proprietary"
 
Hope that helps.

JB


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Samba misconfiguration

[Antonio M]

I have two similar computers, more or less with the same configuration
(i.e. also same name of folders)
On one computers folders are shared through the network, on the other
one I see the shared folder, but when I click on it I get "Impossible
to show folder content-Permissions are not sufficient"

I have same users with same password.Any idea??

This is my /est/samba.conf  valid for both computers:

# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2007/12/22 22:50:04

[global]
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
;   printer = ML-1610
;   lpq command = %p
cups options = raw
print command =
;   printing = cups
server string = Samba Server Version %v
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
comment = Samsung Laser
lprm command =
;   passdb backend = tdbsam
max log size = 50
wins support = Yes
workgroup = workgroup
security = user
;   encrypt passwords = yes
guest ok = yes
;   guest account = nobody

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = MYDOMAIN\%S
read only = No

[Printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
writeable = yes
;   browseable = yes
valid users = antonio, nfsnobody


[Musica]
path = /home/antonio/Musica
read only = no
;   browseable = yes
valid users = antonio


-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines