[389-users] Error in Replication
Hi, I am trying to replicate Windows 2K3 Ad to 389DS server, following things have been done. 1. Pass sync utility on AD 2. Install CA Certificate, export the same to import it on the 389DS server. certutil command gives me the following output CA certificate CTu,u,u server-cert u,u,u Server-Cert u,u,u psync2 CT,C,C 3. Replication agreement is also in place. While I getting following errors: 1. When the password is changed on the windows AD, it tries to connect to the 389ds server and following is the error on 389ds Server [25/Mar/2011:02:22:33 +051800] conn=25 fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from 10.100.109.159 to 10.100.109.157 [25/Mar/2011:02:22:33 +051800] conn=25 op=-1 fd=64 closed - SSL peer cannot verify your certificate. 2. When 389Ds tries to replicate to Windows Server, it provides the following error [25/Mar/2011:16:16:50 +051800] slapi_ldap_bind - Error: could not send bind request for id [cn=Syncing 389DS,cn=Users,dc=ggdk,dc=com] mech [SIMPLE]: error 81 (Can't contact LDAP server) -8179 (Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognized.) 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) Please provide help me in solving the issues. Regards, Kamal Batra +919810795008 -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Firefox 4.0 for F14 x86_64
Le 24/03/2011 02:38, James M. Leddy a écrit : Only thing I had to edit from the f14 rpms was the false dependcy for 0.7 libnotify. Let me know if I forgot any deps, but I think all it is is xulrunner and firefox: http://people.redhat.com/jleddy/firefox4/ Why another one ... ? spot [1] already provides a firefox4 (parallel install) and I [2] already provides a firefox (replace standard) And xulrunner-2.0 is probably a bad idea for f14 (except if you also want to rebuild all package which use it) Remi. [1] http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/firefox4/ [2] http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2011/03/22/Firefox-4-en -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VirtualBox multi cpu
Yes, indeed I've modified the number of cpus via the command line : VBoxManage modifyvm MyVM --cpus x From 3 cpus, the performances go down... But I don't really understand why... If someone can give me ways of explanations... Le 22/03/11 20:52, Kevin Martin a écrit : On 03/22/2011 01:00 PM, Christopher A. Williams wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:25 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: On 03/22/2011 12:11 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: --- On Tue, 3/22/11, Luc MAIGNANluc.maig...@winxpert.com wrote: I use VirtualBox on a RHEL5 with 24 cores (6 x4-cores processors). But it seems like only one or two processors are used. How can I configure VirtualBox and/or my virtual machine to allow it to use all processors ? Does this not work: Start the VirtualBox interface, choose the virtual machine you want to work on, but don't start it; click on System in the Details list, choose Processor, set Processor(s) slider up to the number of virtual CPUs you want to use. From the VirtualBox v. 3.1.6 manual: 3.4.2 “Processor†tab On the “Processor†tab, you can set how many virtual CPU cores the guest operating systems should see. Starting with version 3.0, VirtualBox supports symmetrical multi-processing (SMP) and can present up to 32 virtual CPU cores to each virtual machine. You should not, however, configure virtual machines to use more CPU cores than you have available physically. B It sounds as if the host is not allocating VM's to more than a few CPU's. Adding additional CPU's in the VB screen may or may not cause the host O.S. to work as planned. It may just allocate more VM virtual CPU's to the same physical CPU's. I'm thinking that there's a bug in the host O.S. kernel that's not allocating the VM's to all of the CPU's correctly. So taskset may be the only answer until he can get on a newer kernel. ...Ummm no, that's not how this works. In reality, allocating more virtual CPUs (aka a vCPU or virtual processor) to a VM - be it VirtualBox, VMware, Hyper-V, etc., actually does a have a direct correlation to the number of CPU cores that are used by that VM on the physical host. The more vCPUs, the more physical cores are allocated to the VM by the system scheduler foa given set of CPU cycles (be that the hypervisor, the host OS, or both as appropriate). That's also why you shouldn't (actually can't) allocate more vCPUs than the lesser of either the number of CPU cores on the host system or the total number that the hypervisor will support (32 in the case of vBox). Be careful when doing multi-vCPU VMs though. Adding more does not necessarily mean you will get a boost in performance of either the VM or the host system. In fact, there are cases where this can actually cause a performance decrease. Make sure you know that the VM will use the number of cores (vCPUs) you are wanting to allocate. This is also something that must be pre-allocated in vBox. Thus, the correct procedure is to add virtual CPUs via the Processor tab as described above. Other hypervisors (VMware vSphere, Hyper-V) are starting to support hot add of vCPUs on Windows and Linux VMs. None, however, support a hot remove of vCPUs at this time. Cheers, Chris (VMware Certified Advanced Professional - Datacenter Design) But that's not what the OP said. He said that the machine had 24 cores and the the VM's were being allocated to only a cpu or two. It sounds like the OP has multiple VM's with multi virtual cpu's per VM setup and that either the virtual machine manager on the host wasn't allocating the virtual cpu's around correctly or that the kernel is not allocating them correctly. He doesn't mention which version of VirtualBox (he's not using VMWare) he's using, nor does he mention if he's tried to allocate more virtual cpu's than would fit on 2 physical cpu's. It's possible that he just doesn't have enough virtual cpu's allocated to need more than 2 physical cpu's in use. K -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Kerberos howto
Hi, I want to setup a kerberso server to have a SSO fro all my network services. Can someone give me a place where I can find a reasonable howto ? BR -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
sound problem
Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. Regards Adel ps: I am using GNOME desktop -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/03/2011 09:35, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. pulseaudio -k pulseaudio --start - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2LDcgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVXYACfcPq+4qxN6JW8Q92LtHIkJCg/ d/YAoIuXpHpKoZ6mVit82qOlp0Me/4z2 =evgu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
Hello I think that the gnome version that I have have a problem with sound. I restarted pulseaudio but there is no sound. I tried to play something in konsole but with no result. regards Adel Le 24 mars 2011 10:24, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fra écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/03/2011 09:35, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. pulseaudio -k pulseaudio --start - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2LDcgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVXYACfcPq+4qxN6JW8Q92LtHIkJCg/ d/YAoIuXpHpKoZ6mVit82qOlp0Me/4z2 =evgu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
mplayer probleme on F14
Hi list I think that there is a repository problem on F14. mplayer could not be lunched correctly although it was istalled with yum [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ !mpla mplayer -playlist mms://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libglut.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Best regards Adel -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
On 03/24/2011 10:59 AM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I think that there is a repository problem on F14. mplayer could not be lunched correctly although it was istalled with yum [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ !mpla mplayer -playlist mms://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci http://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libglut.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory yum install freeglut -- Athmane Madjoudj -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Need help with rpmbuild
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:21:16 -0400
Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Specifically the install section. I'm not understanding how the
%install section works with the %files section.
I hope this is not considered OT.
The RPM_BUILD_ROOT should exactly mirror the direcotry structure you
want to have your package files installed into. If you want the file
in /tmp, then you would want to use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/tmp as the
destination. You must create RPM_BUILD_ROOT/tmp. If it was me, I'd
use the install command to do this in one step:
%install
install -p -m755 -D %{name} RPM_BUILD_ROOT/tmp/%{name}
Ah, Thanks. That helped. Now I need to lookup the syntax of the install
macro.
And thanks to Chris JD too.
Steve
--
Changing lives one card at a time
http://www.send1cardnow.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VirtualBox multi cpu
On 23/03/11 02:00, Christopher A. Williams wrote: This is also something that must be pre-allocated in vBox. Thus, the correct procedure is to add virtual CPUs via the Processor tab as described above. Other hypervisors (VMware vSphere, Hyper-V) are starting to support hot add of vCPUs on Windows and Linux VMs. None, however, support a hot remove of vCPUs at this time. I believe VirtualBox does support hot add and remove of processors. -- Ian Chapman. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Need help with rpmbuild
On Mar 24, 2011 7:20 AM, Steve Blackwell zep...@cfl.rr.com wrote: Ah, Thanks. That helped. Now I need to lookup the syntax of the install macro. The install I'm referring to here is a normal command, not a macro. Use man install. -- Todd -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Virtual Box Windows -
On 22/03/11 22:22, Claude Jones wrote: On Tuesday, March 22, 2011, Bob Goodwin wrote: I've installed virtualbox on this F-14 computer and it appears to be working, however now I need a copy of Windows to run in it in order to solve my other problem. I have several copies of WindowsXP Pro including the one that came with this computer but refuses to run unless that drive is plugged into the first slot. That problem occurs because initially I had a computer failure and elected to replace the computer and install the hard drives from the failed unit into the new one. The old one had a Windows partition that was selectable from grub and would operate normally if needed. Once the drives were swapped into this computer and Windows selected it would protest that perhaps I had a virus and refuse to boot. :-) The details go on and on but my question is would I have to buy a copy of Windows to use virtualbox or is there a way to make it use the original copy on the disk containing WindowsXP that came with this computer? If I swap data cables around Windows still boots. It is installed by itself on an 80 gig sata drive. Bob I think I'd try virtualization of your physical machine - I've done that a lot to go to VMWare VMs, but there's a way to use VMWare free tools to get to a VirtualBox VM - here's one site that explains the process: http://www.sysprobs.com/physical-virtual-virtualbox-virtualbox-p2v -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA Thanks Claude, I spent some time with that yesterday after reading this but that page is pretty hard to follow. Poor example images that are different than I see? I will have another go at it and let you know if it works for me. Bob Zuni, VA. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VirtualBox multi cpu
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 08:47 +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: Yes, indeed I've modified the number of cpus via the command line : VBoxManage modifyvm MyVM --cpus x From 3 cpus, the performances go down... But I don't really understand why... If someone can give me ways of explanations... Sure...! This has to do with the way hypervisor schedulers work with virtual SMB. In your case, the VM you are running may simply not need or use more than 2 CPU cores, or assigning 3 or more cores causes the scheduler to have to prioritize things in a less efficient way. Perhaps both are happening as well. Here's how this works: Basically, a multi-vCPU VM has to be scheduled for the same number of CPU cores for every CPU cycle (2 vCPUs, 2 cores; 3 vCPUs, 3 cores; and so forth). And this part is absolutely key: This gets done regardless of if there is actually anything for these cores to do. So, if you have a 4 vCPU VM that only has work to do for a single core, you still have to schedule 4 cores - of which 3 cores will be scheduled to basically do ...NOTHING! These cores cannot be used to perform other work during this time. I hope you can see that scheduling CPU cores to do nothing could cause a performance decrease. You basically are forcing the scheduler to choose which will do nothing as well. Further, scheduling vCPUs in odd numbers (like 3 vCPUs on a quad-core processor) causes other effects on performance due to scheduling conflicts. Say, for example, I have a 3 vCPU VM and a 2 vCPU VM running on a quad-core processor. I can never schedule these two to execute at the same time because I don't have enough cores. So, the general rule of thumb for how many vCPUs you need on a VM goes something like this: Highly threaded systems and applications will tend to need - and use - more cores, so configure more vCPUs for them. Things that tend to be heavy on calculations will tend to need fewer cores. Also, configure your VMs taking the total number of cores you have on the system into account so as to minimize possible scheduling conflicts. I usually use multiples of 2 vCPUs (1, 2, 4, 8) and avoid odd numbered vCPU configurations. That's especially true on quad-core processors. Six-core processors give you a little more flexibility (you could do combinations of 1, 2, 4, 6), but the same general rule still applies. In any case, make sure you understand the actual CPU needs of the system and application you are running. I have seen a single vCPU VM use more processor time on a dual-socket, quad-core box than an 8-way VM running on the same machine at the same time. In that case, the 8-way VM was happy as a clam because it wasn't that busy, but the single vCPU VM was redlining the processor because it wanted even more than what physical resources were available. Hope that helps explain things for you! Chris -- == If you are calm while all around you is chaos, then you probably haven't fully understood the magnitude of the situation. --Unknown -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VirtualBox multi cpu
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 19:46 +0800, Ian Chapman wrote: On 23/03/11 02:00, Christopher A. Williams wrote: This is also something that must be pre-allocated in vBox. Thus, the correct procedure is to add virtual CPUs via the Processor tab as described above. Other hypervisors (VMware vSphere, Hyper-V) are starting to support hot add of vCPUs on Windows and Linux VMs. None, however, support a hot remove of vCPUs at this time. I believe VirtualBox does support hot add and remove of processors. ...Indeed! Must have missed that update. It's right here in the documentation: http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.html#cpuhotplug You do need to pre-configure the VM to enable it, as well as specify the max number of vCPUs it can have. But once you've done that, you're good to go. Thanks for pointing it out. Chris -- == If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure. -- Former President Bill Clinton -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
Hello, In fact, I have search the web for the problem. I found that there are somes posts that talk about sound problem with F14. However, My probleme is that the loose of the sound take place 3 days after the installation. Initially, I had sound. I tried also with kde desktop; but with no result. Could you help please Regards 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello I think that the gnome version that I have have a problem with sound. I restarted pulseaudio but there is no sound. I tried to play something in konsole but with no result. regards Adel Le 24 mars 2011 10:24, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/03/2011 09:35, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. pulseaudio -k pulseaudio --start - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2LDcgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVXYACfcPq+4qxN6JW8Q92LtHIkJCg/ d/YAoIuXpHpKoZ6mVit82qOlp0Me/4z2 =evgu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: install fedoro in windows 7
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 22:56 +, Timothy Murphy wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: AMRISH SONAWANE wrote: have one problem my dvd drive is not working. Can u tell me how can install fedora on laptop. Pls suggest me all the steps as soon as possible. The only alternative is to use a USB flash drive. I agree that is a sensible way to do it, but is it really the only way? It might help to use UNetbootin. You can get it at: http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ This allows you to produce a Live USB or Live CD of about 50 Linux versions (including Fedora 14). Then boot Liveusb (or LiveCD) and choose the option to download the distribution onto your computer. -- === Who cares if it doesn't do anything? It was made with our new Triple-Iso-Bifurcated-Krypton-Gate-MOS process ... === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Firefox 4 ?
When will Firefox 4 be coming to Fedora 14 ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:09:51 +0100, Athmane wrote: On 03/24/2011 10:59 AM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I think that there is a repository problem on F14. mplayer could not be lunched correctly although it was istalled with yum [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ !mpla mplayer -playlist mms://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci http://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libglut.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory yum install freeglut While this may be enough, please be so kind and don't just work around the problem, but examine it further and report it to the mplayer packagers. It may be just a missing dependency for a library that is dlopen'ed at run-time (and hence it would not become an automatic RPM dependency). On i686, here mplayer does not depend on that library or the freeglut package: $ repoquery --whatrequires libglut.so.3|grep mplayer $ repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires freeglut|grep mplayer $ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
On 03/24/2011 02:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: It may be just a missing dependency for a library that is dlopen'ed at run-time (and hence it would not become an automatic RPM dependency). On i686, here mplayer does not depend on that library or the freeglut package: $ repoquery --whatrequires libglut.so.3|grep mplayer $ repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires freeglut|grep mplayer $ On x86_64 I get the same (non-) answers from repoquery, but: $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|fgrep glut libglut.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x003dcfa0) Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
On 03/24/2011 02:33 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 03/24/2011 02:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: It may be just a missing dependency for a library that is dlopen'ed at run-time (and hence it would not become an automatic RPM dependency). On i686, here mplayer does not depend on that library or the freeglut package: $ repoquery --whatrequires libglut.so.3|grep mplayer $ repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires freeglut|grep mplayer $ On x86_64 I get the same (non-) answers from repoquery, but: $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|fgrep glut libglut.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x003dcfa0) Mogens There's two package providing 'libglut.so.3' (assuming that you have installed rpmfusion-nonfree), I'm not sure about ABI compatibility #yum provides libglut.so.3 Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Adding en_US to language list freeglut-2.6.0-5.fc14.i686 : A freely licensed alternative to the GLUT library Repo: fedora Matched from: Other : libglut.so.3 Cg-docs-3.0.0015-1.fc14.i686 : NVIDIA Cg Toolkit documentation Repo: rpmfusion-nonfree-updates Matched from: Other : libglut.so.3 -- Athmane Madjoudj -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Firefox 4 ?
On 03/24/2011 08:04 AM, Jim wrote: When will Firefox 4 be coming to Fedora 14 ? It works very well. Download from mozilla.org and put it in ~/firefox. Run it from there and set it to be your default browser and that's that. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:33 +0100, Mogens Kjaer a écrit : On 03/24/2011 02:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: It may be just a missing dependency for a library that is dlopen'ed at run-time (and hence it would not become an automatic RPM dependency). On i686, here mplayer does not depend on that library or the freeglut package: $ repoquery --whatrequires libglut.so.3|grep mplayer $ repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires freeglut|grep mplayer $ On x86_64 I get the same (non-) answers from repoquery, but: $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|fgrep glut libglut.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x003dcfa0) Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk I just had the same problem. It seems CG-docs, from RPM Fusion nonfree, is guilty: it provides also libglut.so.3: $ repoquery --provides Cg-docs | grep libglut libglut.so.3 libglut.so.3()(64bit) Yet the installation of this library intrigues me: $ repoquery -l Cg-docs | grep libglut /usr/share/doc/Cg-docs-3.0.0015/examples/Tools/trace/libglut.so.3 /usr/share/doc/Cg-docs-3.0.0015/examples/Tools/trace/libglut.so.3 I don't know what those files do in /usr/share/doc/... Anyway freeglut and Cg-docs are in concurrence to provide libglut.so.3... And Cg-docs won in my case. I fixed it by removing Cg-docs (and so mplayer), and installing freeglut and the previously removed package by excluding the rpmfusion-nonfree repo (to avoid Cg-docs being installed again). I will report the bug to the RPM Fusion BZ if it was not already done. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
solved 2011/3/24 Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com On 03/24/2011 10:59 AM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I think that there is a repository problem on F14. mplayer could not be lunched correctly although it was istalled with yum [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ !mpla mplayer -playlist mms://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci http://stream1.tanitweb.com/rtci mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libglut.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory yum install freeglut -- Athmane Madjoudj -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Firefox 4 ?
On 03/24/2011 09:04 AM, Jim wrote: When will Firefox 4 be coming to Fedora 14 ? I am running it from the REMI repo. -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:45 +0100, Mohamed El Morabity a écrit : I will report the bug to the RPM Fusion BZ if it was not already done. It was already reported: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1668 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Firefox 4 ?
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:47:56 -0500 Kevin J. Cummings cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote: On 03/24/2011 09:04 AM, Jim wrote: When will Firefox 4 be coming to Fedora 14 ? I am running it from the REMI repo. I believe that the question may have been when it will be available from the updates repo? Ranjan -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: yum doesn't work as expected with clean
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: The yum clean packages command removes all cached rpms as desired, but leaves all the drpm files. I wondered why my disk space was getting tight on a small server, and that was the issue. Is that intended behavior? It appears to already be reported: https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568504 I wonder if yum clean plugins will remove them? -- William Hooper -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
Hello, It is me again [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ pulseaudio --start E: main.c: Daemon startup failed. I followed this link to configure my pulseaudio but when starting pulseaudio I get this problem. Can pulseaudio tell me why the daemon does not start? http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=253735 Thanks 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello, In fact, I have search the web for the problem. I found that there are somes posts that talk about sound problem with F14. However, My probleme is that the loose of the sound take place 3 days after the installation. Initially, I had sound. I tried also with kde desktop; but with no result. Could you help please Regards 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello I think that the gnome version that I have have a problem with sound. I restarted pulseaudio but there is no sound. I tried to play something in konsole but with no result. regards Adel Le 24 mars 2011 10:24, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/03/2011 09:35, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. pulseaudio -k pulseaudio --start - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2LDcgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVXYACfcPq+4qxN6JW8Q92LtHIkJCg/ d/YAoIuXpHpKoZ6mVit82qOlp0Me/4z2 =evgu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
Hi I found these messages in /var/log/messages *Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21197]: module-alsa-sink.c: Failed to parse module arguments Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21197]: module.c: Failed to load module module-alsa-sink (argument: sink_name=M1010LT_Analog_Out device=hw:M1010LT channels=10 channel_map=left,right,aux0,aux1,aux2,aux3,aux4,au x5,aux6,aux7): initialization failed. Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21197]: main.c: Module load failed. Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21197]: main.c: Failed to initialize daemon. Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21192]: main.c: Daemon startup failed. *But I don't know what to do!!! any help please. regards* * 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello, It is me again [adel@localhost deveuropar]$ pulseaudio --start E: main.c: Daemon startup failed. I followed this link to configure my pulseaudio but when starting pulseaudio I get this problem. Can pulseaudio tell me why the daemon does not start? http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=253735 Thanks 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello, In fact, I have search the web for the problem. I found that there are somes posts that talk about sound problem with F14. However, My probleme is that the loose of the sound take place 3 days after the installation. Initially, I had sound. I tried also with kde desktop; but with no result. Could you help please Regards 2011/3/24 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hello I think that the gnome version that I have have a problem with sound. I restarted pulseaudio but there is no sound. I tried to play something in konsole but with no result. regards Adel Le 24 mars 2011 10:24, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/03/2011 09:35, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : Hello, I have a sound problem with my new F14 installed on dell laptop. I want to know if it is possible to restart the sound server without restarting Fedora. pulseaudio -k pulseaudio --start - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2LDcgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVXYACfcPq+4qxN6JW8Q92LtHIkJCg/ d/YAoIuXpHpKoZ6mVit82qOlp0Me/4z2 =evgu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- PhD candidate in Computer Science Address 3 avenue lamine, cité ezzahra, Sousse 4000 Tunisia tel: +216 97 246 706 (+33640302046 jusqu'au 15/6) fax: +216 71 391 166 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/detecting-certificate-authority-compromises-and-web-browser-collusion Users of Mozilla Firefox that are concerned about this issue should enable security.OCSP.require in the about:config dialog. How can i enable this feature in Google Chrome/Chromium? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
Fedora 14: If I: $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 8.8.4.4 $ where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf? Thank you! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Firefox 4.0 for F14 x86_64
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 24/03/2011 02:38, James M. Leddy a écrit : Only thing I had to edit from the f14 rpms was the false dependcy for 0.7 libnotify. Let me know if I forgot any deps, but I think all it is is xulrunner and firefox: http://people.redhat.com/jleddy/firefox4/ Why another one ... ? spot [1] already provides a firefox4 (parallel install) and I [2] already provides a firefox (replace standard) No reason, I wasn't aware that it had already been done. And xulrunner-2.0 is probably a bad idea for f14 (except if you also want to rebuild all package which use it) True. This is only applicable to my case, Firefox is the only binary that uses it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: mplayer probleme on F14
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:33:37 +0100, Mogens wrote: On 03/24/2011 02:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: It may be just a missing dependency for a library that is dlopen'ed at run-time (and hence it would not become an automatic RPM dependency). On i686, here mplayer does not depend on that library or the freeglut package: $ repoquery --whatrequires libglut.so.3|grep mplayer $ repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires freeglut|grep mplayer $ On x86_64 I get the same (non-) answers from repoquery, but: $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|fgrep glut libglut.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3 (0x003dcfa0) Hmmm, why is that? $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|cut -f1 -d ' '|wc -l 86 $ rpm -qR mplayer|grep -v ')'|grep ^lib|wc -l 56 $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|grep FLAC libFLAC.so.8 = /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.8 (0x06d0d000) $ rpm -qR mplayer|grep FLAC $ ldd /usr/bin/mplayer|grep ncurs libncurses.so.5 = /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x06972000) libncursesw.so.5 = /lib/libncursesw.so.5 (0x008a8000) $ rpm -qR mplayer|grep ncurs $ There are many more. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Firefox 4 ?
The fedora wiki http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_4 says that Firefox 4 won't be in the official repository for Fedora 14. I am also running it from the REMI repo. 2011/3/24 Ranjan Maitra mai...@iastate.edu On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:47:56 -0500 Kevin J. Cummings cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote: On 03/24/2011 09:04 AM, Jim wrote: When will Firefox 4 be coming to Fedora 14 ? I am running it from the REMI repo. I believe that the question may have been when it will be available from the updates repo? Ranjan -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- Guohua Tang Research Center for Information Retrieval, Harbin Institute of Technology ir.hit.edu.cn/~tangguohua --- icycandy.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
On 03/24/2011 10:03 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: Fedora 14: If I: $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 8.8.4.4 $ where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf? Thank you! Open NetworkManager by right clicking on the network manager icon in the system tray and select Edit Connections. Select the connection in question, click EDIT, click in the IPv4 tab, and enter the DHS servers. Click SAVE. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Virtual Box Windows -
http://www.sysprobs.com/physical-virtual-virtualbox-virtualbox-p2v -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA Thanks Claude, I spent some time with that yesterday after reading this but that page is pretty hard to follow. Poor example images that are different than I see? I will have another go at it and let you know if it works for me. If you want to go virtual, it's easy enough to do with the imaging programs clonezilla or Acronis. First, it's probably a good idea to create a backup image with clonezilla or Acronis so you can put it back the way it was if it all goes wrong. Then, in XP open the Add/Remove Programs control panel and remove all your drivers: video card, sound card, chipset, etc. If you're familiar with Sysprep, run this next and shut down. Now, boot with your image program and create the backup again of this stripped down, sysprepped XP. Then create your VM and its virtual drive, and restore the stripped down image to the virtual drive. It might work fine without using Sysprep since XP should have drivers for the virtual hardware in the VM. Just don't try to use 'virtio' hardware until the VM is up and running. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
sorry, i meant with command line, not by clicking :\ Be Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:32:54 -0700 Steven Stern írta On 03/24/2011 10:03 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: Fedora 14: If I: $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 8.8.4.4 $ where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf? Thank you! Open NetworkManager by right clicking on the network manager icon in the system tray and select Edit Connections. Select the connection in question, click EDIT, click in the IPv4 tab, and enter the DHS servers. Click SAVE. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[389-users] epic failure configuring single-master replication
I'm trying to setup/configure single-master replication between 2 brand-new centos-ds (aka 'dirsrv') v8.1 servers. Centos directory server is derived from '389 directory server'. I can't find any community support for it beyond this list. Please pardon the centos intrusion on your list. I'm following the directions at http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.1/html/Administration_Guide/index.html . I'm on the last step, which is to tell the supplier (i.e. the 'single master' in my environment) to replicate itself to the consumer, which, according to the guide I'm following, had already been prepped for this. However, the gui console said The consumer initialization has unsuccessfully completed. The error received by the replica is: '6 Replication error acquiring replica: no such replica.' The supplier's error log (/var/log/dirsrv/slapd-instance/error) said these 2 things several times: NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=DivideAndConquer (mkeds3:389): Unable to acquire replica: there is no replicated area dc=infinityhealthcare,dc=com on the consumer server. Replication is aborting. NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=DivideAndConquer (mkeds3:389): Incremental update failed and requires administrator action The same log on the consumer (mkeds3), says this: NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=12 op=3 replica=unknown: Unable to acquire replica: error: no such replica All evidence suggests the consumer doesn't have, but need, a replica place for my suffix dc=infinity... However, I followed the directions at http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.1/html/Administration_Guide/Managing_Replication-Configuring_Single_Master_Replication.html#Configuring_Single_Master_Replication-Configuring_the_Read_Only_Replica_on_the_Consumer_Server , without error. Is there a missing step I didn't do? Thanks, Jon -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
johhny_at_poland77 wrote: sorry, i meant with command line, not by clicking :\ Edit the traditional network interface configuration file. For eth0 it would be: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 The DNS options are like this: DNS1=4.2.2.1 DNS2=4.2.2.2 DNS3= You may or may not have those options already present. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
On 03/24/2011 10:57 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: sorry, i meant with command line, not by clicking :\ Be Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:32:54 -0700 Steven Stern Ãrta On 03/24/2011 10:03 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: Fedora 14: If I: $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 8.8.4.4 $ where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf? Thank you! Open NetworkManager by right clicking on the network manager icon in the system tray and select Edit Connections. Select the connection in question, click EDIT, click in the IPv4 tab, and enter the DHS servers. Click SAVE. -- Both nmcli and cnetworkmanager don't seem to modify settings. You can always edit the right files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: sound problem
Mar 24 15:50:09 localhost pulseaudio[21192]: main.c: Daemon startup failed. *But I don't know what to do!!! any help please. I don't have a solution to your problem, but you might want to check out the archives of this site: http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma If you're into 'serious' audio, PlanetCCRMA is the place for fedora users to hang out. They will most likely know the answer. Frode -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Wireless adaptor DWL G-122 E1 /Fedora14 Intel pentium(r)dual 3.00Ghz
Dear users members, I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB. Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0 I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware adaptors with no results. Any help is welcome. Kind regards Vicenc Melendez -- 2007 Jazztel - Jazz Telecom, S.A.U. http://www.jazztel.com Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo. Dear users members, I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB. Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0 I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware adaptors with no results. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Wireless adaptor DWL G-122 E1 /Fedora14 Intel pentium(r)dual 3.00Ghz
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 18:51 +0100, vicenc.melen...@dixieland.jazztel.es wrote: Dear users members, I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB. Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0 I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware adaptors with no results. Please post the output of lsusb command with the device plugged into a USB port. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:58:48 -0700, johhny_at_poland77 johhny_at_polan...@zoho.com wrote: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/detecting-certificate-authority-compromises-and-web-browser-collusion Users of Mozilla Firefox that are concerned about this issue should enable security.OCSP.require in the about:config dialog. How can i enable this feature in Google Chrome/Chromium? about:config is a URL that you can visit. You can then click on the the setting to modify it's value. You can also type in a pattern to use as a filter so that there are less settings shown. Depnding on what you are really worried about, you might be better off totally disabling the checking the bad certificate list instead of bothering to have the black list block access to web pages. Sending all of the certifictes you visit to the CA to verify may be a bigger security risk than being tricked into visiting a web page with an incorrectly issued certificate. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:58:48 -0700, johhny_at_poland77 johhny_at_polan...@zoho.com wrote: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/detecting-certificate-authority-compromises-and-web-browser-collusion Users of Mozilla Firefox that are concerned about this issue should enable security.OCSP.require in the about:config dialog. How can i enable this feature in Google Chrome/Chromium? about:config is a URL that you can visit. You can then click on the the setting to modify it's value. You can also type in a pattern to use as a filter so that there are less settings shown. Depnding on what you are really worried about, you might be better off totally disabling the checking the bad certificate list instead of bothering to have the black list block access to web pages. Sending all of the certifictes you visit to the CA to verify may be a bigger security risk than being tricked into visiting a web page with an incorrectly issued certificate. Wierd advice IMHO. There are a number of practical reasons for not checking CRLs (Certificate Revocation Lists) all the time, but sending cert serial numbers to the CA is not among them. The serial number is not secret information (neither is the cert itself of course). If you don't trust the CA, then better disable certs entirely, not just CRL checking. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:16:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: Wierd advice IMHO. There are a number of practical reasons for not checking CRLs (Certificate Revocation Lists) all the time, but sending cert serial numbers to the CA is not among them. The serial number is not secret information (neither is the cert itself of course). If you don't trust the CA, then better disable certs entirely, not just CRL checking. Sending the serial number to the CA allows the CA to guess (with high probability of being correct) that you are visiting the web page that they sold the certificate for. This information can be resold to other companies for marketing purposes (or other reasons). If there is any money in this, I wouldn't expect Verisign to pass the opportunity up based on other similar stuff they have done. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
rename flash drive auto mount point
Hi, I am running Fedora 13/gnome When I insert my 8g flash drive it is mounted on: mount ... /dev/sdb1 on /media/_body _ht type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=500,gid=500,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush) How the heck did it come up with that name: _body _ht How can I fix it? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:10 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:16:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: Wierd advice IMHO. There are a number of practical reasons for not checking CRLs (Certificate Revocation Lists) all the time, but sending cert serial numbers to the CA is not among them. The serial number is not secret information (neither is the cert itself of course). If you don't trust the CA, then better disable certs entirely, not just CRL checking. Sending the serial number to the CA allows the CA to guess (with high probability of being correct) that you are visiting the web page that they sold the certificate for. This information can be resold to other companies for marketing purposes (or other reasons). If there is any money in this, I wouldn't expect Verisign to pass the opportunity up based on other similar stuff they have done. Even if that's true, it doesn't belie what I just said. If you don't trust the CA, don't use their services at all. There does not exist, and never can exist, a means of securing communication between two parties that don't trust each other unless they both decide to place some level of trust in a third party. CAs are just one way to do that (and clearly they need to get their act together). Web-of-trust mechanisms are another but I don't know of any mainstream browsers that support them. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HOW to set “security.OCSP.require” in Google Chrome/Chromium?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:12:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote: Even if that's true, it doesn't belie what I just said. If you don't trust the CA, don't use their services at all. There is a difference between trusting them to certify a site and to not resell data about you. Some people may trust them for one of these but not the other. But for the record I do remove the certificates in firefox as the certification of some CA who talked a browser manufacturer into including their certs doesn't provide significant weight with me. There does not exist, and never can exist, a means of securing communication between two parties that don't trust each other unless they both decide to place some level of trust in a third party. CAs are just one way to do that (and clearly they need to get their act together). Web-of-trust mechanisms are another but I don't know of any mainstream browsers that support them. Web of trust is better than hierarchical for general use. But also it would be have been nice if browsers were design to help you make sure you are communicating with the same entity as the last time. (Sort of like how ssh does things.) For cert changes, one could sign new certs with the old ones. The current warning system is more like a protection racket that a security system. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: rename flash drive auto mount point
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:41 -0400, Howard wrote: Hi, I am running Fedora 13/gnome When I insert my 8g flash drive it is mounted on: mount ... /dev/sdb1 on /media/_body _ht type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=500,gid=500,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush) How the heck did it come up with that name: _body _ht How can I fix it? As Tom indicated _body is the name of your drive. The manufacturer or the last program you ran to place files on the usb gave it that name. In my case my Fedora 14 liveusb is named FEDORA. But I am confused by the output you show for the mount command. Compare it to the output of the mount on my machine. Where did the come from in your output. Is the name of your usb drive _body /dev/sdb1 on /media/FEDORA type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=500,gid=500,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,showexec,flush) -- === When the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to treat everything as if it were a nail. -- Abraham Maslow === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 vlc update problem.
F14, fully up to date before this. vlc installed. # yum update Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libdirect-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libfusion-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 --- Package directfb.i686 0:1.4.11-3.fc14 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-extras.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-gtkhtml2.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-libegg.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package libgadu.i686 0:1.10.1-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libgnome-keyring.i686 0:2.32.0-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libgnome-keyring-devel.i686 0:2.32.0-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libv4l.i686 0:0.8.3-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package tcl.i686 1:8.5.9-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package tk.i686 1:8.5.9-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package xine-lib.i686 0:1.1.19-2.fc14.2 set to be updated --- Package xine-lib-extras.i686 0:1.1.19-2.fc14.2 set to be updated --- Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.16-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package xulrunner-devel.i686 0:1.9.2.16-1.fc14 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution DEBUG: [] Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libfusion-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libfusion-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libfusion-1.4.so.0 Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libdirect-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libdirect-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libdirect-1.4.so.0 Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 vlc update problem.
On 03/24/2011 06:06 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote: F14, fully up to date before this. vlc installed. # yum update Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libdirect-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libfusion-1.4.so.0 for package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 --- Package directfb.i686 0:1.4.11-3.fc14 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-extras.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-gtkhtml2.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package gnome-python2-libegg.i686 0:2.25.3-29.fc14.1 set to be updated --- Package libgadu.i686 0:1.10.1-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libgnome-keyring.i686 0:2.32.0-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libgnome-keyring-devel.i686 0:2.32.0-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package libv4l.i686 0:0.8.3-2.fc14 set to be updated --- Package tcl.i686 1:8.5.9-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package tk.i686 1:8.5.9-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package xine-lib.i686 0:1.1.19-2.fc14.2 set to be updated --- Package xine-lib-extras.i686 0:1.1.19-2.fc14.2 set to be updated --- Package xulrunner.i686 0:1.9.2.16-1.fc14 set to be updated --- Package xulrunner-devel.i686 0:1.9.2.16-1.fc14 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution DEBUG: [] Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libfusion-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libfusion-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libfusion-1.4.so.0 Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libdirect-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libdirect-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libdirect-1.4.so.0 Error: Package: vlc-extras-1.1.7-1.fc14.i686 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.i686 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.i686 (fedora) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I'm seeing the same thing, but when I try and update directfb, and the conflicts I'm seeing are with: xine-libs and mplayer. -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libdirect-1.4.so.0()(64bit) for package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 -- Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) for package: 4:mplayer-1.0-80_snap20110221.fc14.x86_64 -- Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) for package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 -- Processing Dependency: libfusion-1.4.so.0()(64bit) for package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 --- Package directfb.x86_64 0:1.4.11-3.fc14 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 (@anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211827.x86_64) Requires: libfusion-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.x86_64 (@updates) libfusion-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora) libfusion-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.x86_64 (@anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211827.x86_64) Requires: libdirect-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.x86_64 (@updates) libdirect-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora) libdirect-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package: 4:mplayer-1.0-80_snap20110221.fc14.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.x86_64 (@updates) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package:
Linux on ARM tablets?
I'm not familiar with modern tablets. I only own a 4 years old Nokia N800, -which is more like a larger Linux PDA used sideways- before the tablets market and craze even existed. So, I'm not sure about what media the OS stored in on modern Android tablets. Do those feature flash memory chips soldered on the main board? SD slots? compactflash with IDE controller?. Having said that, I wonder if anyone tried installing linux on tablets that otherwise run Android or other OSs? I'm giving serious thought to buying a RIM Playbook, but I'm not sure I'll be comfortable with QNX The CPU is confirmed to be a dual-core TI ARM. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Blackberry-PlayBook-CPU-Confirmed-1GHz-Dual-core-TI-OMAP4430-177205.shtml So what are the chances of RIM making it easy to replace the OS with Fedora/ARM? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM I really, really would like to see RedHat putting some effort into seeing Fedora running on modern tablets... if only for OS mindshare and promotional purposes... FC -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 vlc update problem.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:48:53 -0400, Kevin wrote: Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem Yet another well tested update. B^) And a bunch of dependencies with = Requires instead of = Requires. Seems the new directfb package is now providing libdirectfb-1.4.so.5 instead of libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 . --skip-broken will update everything else, but the problem with directfb remains. Not really. Unless it breaks something in Fedora's repos. The problem is with vlc, because RPM Fusion can only build against the new directfb if it appears in Fedora stable Updates repo. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14,xine-lib-1.1.19-2.fc14.2 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 11:28 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: On 03/24/2011 10:57 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: sorry, i meant with command line, not by clicking :\ Be Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:32:54 -0700 Steven Stern Ãrta On 03/24/2011 10:03 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote: Fedora 14: If I: $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 8.8.8.8 nameserver 8.8.4.4 $ where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf? Thank you! Open NetworkManager by right clicking on the network manager icon in the system tray and select Edit Connections. Select the connection in question, click EDIT, click in the IPv4 tab, and enter the DHS servers. Click SAVE. -- Both nmcli and cnetworkmanager don't seem to modify settings. You can always edit the right files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts -- -- Steve If you're talking to a DHCP server then shouldn't NetworkManager be getting the DNS information from there? When NetworkManager switches connections I thought it updated resolv.conf from whatever DHCP server it talked to. -- Mark C. Allman, PMP, CSM -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
rename flash drive auto mount point
Is the name of your usb drive _body / not quite , it's: _body// _ht ...with the newline. It looks like it's been snipped from the end of an html file except for the underscores. I am surprised that the programmers allow this kind of naming. I think allowing spaces in file names is wrong too. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with the Joneses. I found a semi solution using mtools which I left a in a page here: http://how0909.freeshell.org/linux/rename_flash_automount.txt But I'm still looking for others. I think that there is probably a udev rule or something to find and edit which would be the right way to fix this (I guess). Thanks for the interest. / -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the new RESOLV.conf file?
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:13 -0400, Mark C. Allman wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 11:28 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:57 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
sorry, i meant with command line, not by clicking :\
Be Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:32:54 -0700 Steven Stern Ãrta
On 03/24/2011 10:03 AM, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
Fedora 14:
If I:
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
$
where can i set the nameservers (so I don't have to set them after a
reboot), if the NetworkManager rewrites them in the /etc/resolv.conf?
Thank you!
Open NetworkManager by right clicking on the network manager icon in the
system tray and select Edit Connections. Select the connection in
question, click EDIT, click in the IPv4 tab, and enter the DHS servers.
Click SAVE.
--
Both nmcli and cnetworkmanager don't seem to modify settings. You can
always edit the right files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
If you're talking to a DHCP server then shouldn't NetworkManager be
getting the DNS information from there? When NetworkManager switches
connections I thought it updated resolv.conf from whatever DHCP server
it talked to.
No, that is only a common but special case for hosts at the edge of a
network, such as a workstation. The most common exceptions to this
would be:
1) situations where I want my own DNS, not my providers
2) situations where I am sitting between 2 networks, which DNS field
should I take?
3) it is not required that DHCP provide me DNS fields - that is a
commonly configured field only
4) situations where I do not want DNS to preempt local sources like
FILES.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 vlc update problem.
On 03/24/2011 07:16 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:48:53 -0400, Kevin wrote: Updated By: directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: directfb-1.4.3-1.fc14.x86_64 (fedora) libdirectfb-1.4.so.0()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem Yet another well tested update. B^) And a bunch of dependencies with = Requires instead of = Requires. Seems the new directfb package is now providing libdirectfb-1.4.so.5 instead of libdirectfb-1.4.so.0 . --skip-broken will update everything else, but the problem with directfb remains. Not really. Unless it breaks something in Fedora's repos. The problem is with vlc, because RPM Fusion can only build against the new directfb if it appears in Fedora stable Updates repo. Hey, I never said which packages were at fault. I actually complained about the = dependencies instead of = (which should have not then been a problem). I didn't bother to check which repos built xine-lib or mplayer on my system. Yeup, both were built by ATRPMS. B^) (and it looks like linuxguy123's vlc-extras packages comes from rpmfusion.) And I disagree about other repos not being able to build against a package unless it is in Fedora stable. That's what Fedora updates-testing, atrpms-testing, rpmfusion-free-updates-testing, and rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing repos are all about. Then when fedora pushes a package to stable, all the other repos have to do is push their dependent packages to their stable repos as well. Its called planned cooperation. I thought it was already going on. I never had this problem getting a new nvidia or fglrx kernel driver from them any time a new kernel gets released. How is this different? (Maybe because the nvidia and fglrx builders were more diligent about checking updates-testing for upcoming releases?) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/directfb-1.4.11-3.fc14,xine-lib-1.1.19-2.fc14.2 Wow. 3 for, 3 against, a total Karma of 1, and they pushed to stable (looks like because it had stayed in testing for 7 days. Just because 7 days had lapsed, it doesn't mean the update gets better, does it?) Doesn't seem very overwhelmingly confident It looks like they knew there were still problems with the update, and didn't care. OTOH, if they did poke the other maintainers and got no response, I can't blame them very much. Ouch. -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Linux on ARM tablets?
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 19:55 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: I really, really would like to see RedHat putting some effort into seeing Fedora running on modern tablets... +1 on this. Especially now that I have lost all confidence in Meego and Google seems to share less and less of Android. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 vlc update problem.
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:47 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: snip I appreciate the discussion on this situation. I really didn't mean to stir up the hornet's nest on this. The good news is that a) yum works incredibly well at sorting out the situation and allows everything else to update in spite of the vlc issue and b) vlc still works. We don't live in a perfect Linux world, but its still a very good one. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
