Re: [389-users] slapd process is hang
On 06/01/2014 09:53 AM, G, Rajendra Babu (STSD campus) wrote: Hi All, I am using 389 directory server 1.2.11.21 and I have noticed following error message in the error log and slapd process is stop responding in the mulrtimaster environment. Kindly let me know this fix got fixed in any releases, if yes please provide me the bug /url . Error log message: repl5_tot_create_async_result_thread failed.Netscape Portable Runtime error -5974 (Insufficient system resources.) repl5_inc_run: repl5_tot_create_async_result_thread failed; error - -1 Thanks in Advance, Regards, Rajendra -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users Review the system memory usage, add some RAM if not enough free memory to hold your db depending on the entry cache setting with nsslapd-cachememsize, restart the Directory Server. See https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Performance_Tuning_Guide/memoryusage.html#tuning-entry-cache 7.1. Tuning the Entry Cache or review the file descriptor use and configuration. M. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Volume too low on F20 (32bit)
On 2 June 2014 02:23, Oliver Ruebenacker cur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, After a fresh install of Fedora 20, 32bit, and adding enough packages to watch YouTube videos, I have sound (for both the YouTube videos and for Clanbomber), but the volume is way too low, almost inaudible. I have a volume setting widget on the lower panel and I set volume to maximum. I also set the volume to maximum in alsamixer and pavucontrol, even after setting VolumeOverdrive to true in kmixrc. I have kmix running. I removed and installed back pulseaudio to see if it makes a difference, and it seems it does not. When I start kmixctrl in a terminal, it finishes without anything happening. When using alsamixer are you looking at the volume for pulseaudio or at the hardware mixer volume? (Use F6 to change the device you're looking at.) -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung ML-2165W printer help
Sun, 01 Jun 2014 09:39:00 -0700 Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com kirjoitti: Has anybody else had any success with this particular printer model? Thanks for any help or tips, Mike Wright I have it working... Downloaded driver, installed and Fedora found printer ok... Jarmo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Volume too low on F20 (32bit)
Hello, On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Someone someone...@openmailbox.org wrote: On 06/02/2014 09:23 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: Hello, After a fresh install of Fedora 20, 32bit, and adding enough packages to watch YouTube videos, I have sound (for both the YouTube videos and for Clanbomber), but the volume is way too low, almost inaudible. I have a volume setting widget on the lower panel and I set volume to maximum. I also set the volume to maximum in alsamixer and pavucontrol, even after setting VolumeOverdrive to true in kmixrc. I have kmix running. I removed and installed back pulseaudio to see if it makes a difference, and it seems it does not. When I start kmixctrl in a terminal, it finishes without anything happening. Any ideas? Thanks! Best, Oliver I've been running 64 bit F20 LXDE for some time now, and I had been having tons of hiccups with my sound. I resolved the latest by removing the pulseaudio and alsa-plugins-pulseaudio packages, and, as someone else suggested, running sudo alsactl init. The person who suggested that explained that it's often required to be run periodically. About three days ago, I noticed that my sound was suddenly very low and faint, but I was on my way out of town when I noticed, so I didn't manage to troubleshoot at all, but now that I'm back, I tried that alsactl command again, and it fixed the issue entirely. To recap, my suggestion to you is: sudo yum remove pulseaudio alsa-plugins-pulseaudio sudo alsactl init ..and, if that doesn't work, maybe try rebooting and testing again after that. Thanks for the suggestion, but it made no change. Best, Oliver Good luck. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Oliver Ruebenacker Founder at Relomics Consulting http://www.relomics.com Be always grateful, but never satisfied. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Volume too low on F20 (32bit)
Hello, On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 June 2014 02:23, Oliver Ruebenacker cur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, After a fresh install of Fedora 20, 32bit, and adding enough packages to watch YouTube videos, I have sound (for both the YouTube videos and for Clanbomber), but the volume is way too low, almost inaudible. I have a volume setting widget on the lower panel and I set volume to maximum. I also set the volume to maximum in alsamixer and pavucontrol, even after setting VolumeOverdrive to true in kmixrc. I have kmix running. I removed and installed back pulseaudio to see if it makes a difference, and it seems it does not. When I start kmixctrl in a terminal, it finishes without anything happening. When using alsamixer are you looking at the volume for pulseaudio or at the hardware mixer volume? (Use F6 to change the device you're looking at.) Thanks for suggesting F6. I have no idea what all these dials in alsamixer mean, but I rotated through all I could find with F6 and set all to maximum (most were already), but unfortunately I noticed no change in volumne. Best, Oliver -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Oliver Ruebenacker Founder at Relomics Consulting http://www.relomics.com Be always grateful, but never satisfied. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: QuickSynergy
On 30 May 2014 19:56, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote: Hope that helps. Thanks very much for the exhaustive reply! Sadly not. I suspect it might be something to do with the odd network configuration at $JOB; my machines both have 2 different IP addresses on 2 different subnets. I've tried both IPs, although on one, they're on different 3rd octets and can't ping one another. I've tried running Synergy with ``sudo``. No difference. I've tried bumping the port # up from 24800 to 24801; no difference. (Obviously I changed it on both ends.) I've tried picking a random high port (42424); no difference. I've checked with ``lsof'' that nothing's using the standard ports - it isn't. I'm out of ideas, TBH. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adding minimal X windows
Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu writes: I built a Fedora 20 system as a server, without a desktop. It turns out, no X server is installed at all in that case. I'd like to add a minimal X server without adding a complete desktop environment, so I can log in remotely and run system configuration tools. [...] What's the best way to get just a basic X server in Fedora 20? Xvnc from the tigervnc-server-minimal package might be nice for this purpose. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: QuickSynergy
On 06/02/2014 08:57 AM, Liam Proven issued this missive: On 30 May 2014 19:56, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote: Hope that helps. Thanks very much for the exhaustive reply! Sadly not. I suspect it might be something to do with the odd network configuration at $JOB; my machines both have 2 different IP addresses on 2 different subnets. I've tried both IPs, although on one, they're on different 3rd octets and can't ping one another. I've tried running Synergy with ``sudo``. No difference. I've tried bumping the port # up from 24800 to 24801; no difference. (Obviously I changed it on both ends.) I've tried picking a random high port (42424); no difference. I've checked with ``lsof'' that nothing's using the standard ports - it isn't. I'm out of ideas, TBH. Ok, the machines MUST be able to ping each other. If they can't, you need to get that sorted first. If they have funky network configs, you should try to ping via IP addresses instead of host names and see if that works and you may have to add some routes to get it functional. Note that the Synergy configs will work with IPs or hostnames (or both), but the machines involved MUST be able to talk to each other. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Okay, who put a stop payment on my reality check?- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:36:52AM +0200, lee wrote: Someone someone...@openmailbox.org writes: I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone had any luck with playing sound? Logged in as a second user, that user cannot play sound. This hasn`t been fixed since F17 :( Any idea how to fix that? The only salient effect of pulseaudio, to my non-discriminating ears, is to impose misguided restrictions that prevent anyone but the first to login from creating sound. Empirically, these restrictions are implemented in the package alsa-plugins-pulseaudio, and by removing it, the restrictions disappear. It's also necessary to edit /etc/group to make every last user a member of group 'audio'. yum info alsa-plugins-pulseaudio tells us: This plugin allows any program that uses the ALSA API to access a PulseAudio sound daemon. In other words, native ALSA applications can play and record sound across a network. Since I have discovered no need to operate sound across a network, but frequently want others than myself, ie, root, to generate audible signals, removing this package has been beneficial. After doing so I add to the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local a line like /usr/bin/play /usr/share/sounds/KDE-Sys-Log-In.ogg for a pleasing audible alert that systemd is finally done. -- David A. De GraafDATIX, Inc.Hendersonville, NC d...@datix.us www.datix.us Wagner's music is better than it sounds. -Mark Twain -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Trying to ping from a subinterface.
On Fedora 20 x86_64. According to man ping, ping should work from a subinterface specifying either the interface name or its address: -I interface interface is either an address, or an interface name. If inter‐ face is an address, it sets source address to specified inter‐ face address. If interface in an interface name, it sets source interface to specified interface. I've got a subinterface and I'm trying to ping from it. # ifconfig eth3:sub1 eth3:sub1: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 172.17.30.143 netmask 255.255.254.0 broadcast 172.17.31.255 ether 90:e2:ba:34:46:41 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) device memory 0xdc7e-dc80 If I ping from the address, it works as specified. If I specify the interface name instead, I see: # ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 ping: SO_BINDTODEVICE: Invalid argument Investigating a little deeper: # strace ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 execve(/usr/bin/ping, [ping, -I, eth3:sub1, 172.17.30.1], [/* 38 vars */]) = 0 ... setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE, eth3:sub1\0, 13) = -1 ENODEV (No such device) ... +++ exited with 2 +++ Any thoughts? -- Dave Close -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Adding minimal X windows
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 08:08 +0630, Sudhir Khanger wrote: On Sunday, June 01, 2014 02:53:52 PM Matthew Saltzman wrote: I built a Fedora 20 system as a server, without a desktop. It turns out, no X server is installed at all in that case. I'd like to add a minimal X server without adding a complete desktop environment, so I can log in remotely and run system configuration tools. The documentation I've found suggests yum groupinstall Basic X Window System or yum groupinstall X Window System but neither of those groups exist. There is a Basic Desktop group, but it installs a bunch of unnecessary desktop tools. What's the best way to get just a basic X server in Fedora 20? TIA. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu Have you checked out group Basic Desktop? If I ever want to go minimal I tend to go along with i3. You should try that. [donnie@fedora ~]$ yum group info Basic Desktop Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, langpacks, local, refresh- packagekit, show-leaves Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in * tlp: repo.warpnine.de * tlp-updates: repo.warpnine.de * updates: mirrors.ispros.com.bd Environment Group: Basic Desktop Environment-Id: basic-desktop-environment Description: X Window System with a choice of window manager. Mandatory Groups: base-x +basic-desktop core dial-up fonts guest-desktop-agents hardware-support multimedia standard Optional Groups: +cinnamon-desktop +firefox +gnome-desktop +input-methods kde-desktop +legacy-fonts libreoffice +lxde-desktop +mate-desktop +sugar-desktop +xfce-desktop +xmonad +xmonad-mate Group: Basic Desktop Group-Id: basic-desktop Description: Basic X Window System with a choice of window manager. Mandatory Packages: adwaita-cursor-theme adwaita-gtk2-theme adwaita-gtk3-theme +awesome +dwm +fedora-icon-theme gnome-icon-theme-symbolic i3 initial-setup +lightdm +metacity +openbox +ratpoison +xmonad-basic I did look at that and would prefer not to add most of the desktop components it includes. I did manage to get an X server going by installing xorg-x11-xinit. Might have to patch a few things up later, but so far it's working well enough. Thanks for the suggestion. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: mailinglist issues (Was: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?)
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com writes: On 06/01/14 10:14, Sudhir Khanger wrote: Off topic. Is this email sent from your personal email server? I am asking because Google shows a warning that they can't verify if this message was sent by the wsrcc.com. You get this warning because of this header in the email. Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org designates 209.132.181.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@; dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=wsrcc.com Bingo. Right on the money. I've not looked into itbut I don't think dkim/dmarc works very well with mailing lists. It can. Mailman has already been changed to take ownership of the From: line pointing it to some list-owned address and injecting a reply-to optionally to allow unicast msgs to work too. The problem is that mailing lists forging From addresses looks the same to software as a spammer forging the same. No progress is going to be made till mailing lists stop doing that. I guess this explains why a lot of mailinglist posts started going to spam on Gmail recently (including this message). This started about 2 months ago. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: mailinglist issues (Was: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?)
On 6/2/2014 3:30 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com writes: On 06/01/14 10:14, Sudhir Khanger wrote: Off topic. Is this email sent from your personal email server? I am asking because Google shows a warning that they can't verify if this message was sent by the wsrcc.com. You get this warning because of this header in the email. Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org designates 209.132.181.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@; dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=wsrcc.com Bingo. Right on the money. I've not looked into itbut I don't think dkim/dmarc works very well with mailing lists. It can. Mailman has already been changed to take ownership of the From: line pointing it to some list-owned address and injecting a reply-to optionally to allow unicast msgs to work too. The problem is that mailing lists forging From addresses looks the same to software as a spammer forging the same. No progress is going to be made till mailing lists stop doing that. I guess this explains why a lot of mailinglist posts started going to spam on Gmail recently (including this message). This started about 2 months ago. The only mailing list emails that Gmail sends to spam, for me, are those that come from Linux users that have their own email server(s). And all of those come from post to Linux mailing lists. -- David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: QuickSynergy
On 2 June 2014 19:04, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote: Ok, the machines MUST be able to ping each other. If they can't, you need to get that sorted first. If they have funky network configs, you should try to ping via IP addresses instead of host names and see if that works and you may have to add some routes to get it functional. Note that the Synergy configs will work with IPs or hostnames (or both), but the machines involved MUST be able to talk to each other. Pinging works OK on the 192.168.v.w subnet that they're both in. But looking at ifconfig, the real address is a 10.x.y.z one and the 192.* one is... something else. They can ping each other on the 192.* address but not on the 10.* address. I can get the server to start on the host (i.e. with k/b mouse) but the remote machine I want to control says it can't connect. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: mailinglist issues
David dgbo...@gmail.com writes: The only mailing list emails that Gmail sends to spam, for me, are those that come from Linux users that have their own email server(s). And all of those come from post to Linux mailing lists. Yahoo and AOL both have similar DMARC, DKIM, SPF settings and senders from those domains should also go to spam (unless Gmail is special casing them). Although, I can't imagine there is much overlap between AOL users and those that post to linux mailing lists. -wolfgang -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: QuickSynergy
On 06/02/2014 02:13 PM, Liam Proven issued this missive: On 2 June 2014 19:04, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote: Ok, the machines MUST be able to ping each other. If they can't, you need to get that sorted first. If they have funky network configs, you should try to ping via IP addresses instead of host names and see if that works and you may have to add some routes to get it functional. Note that the Synergy configs will work with IPs or hostnames (or both), but the machines involved MUST be able to talk to each other. Pinging works OK on the 192.168.v.w subnet that they're both in. But looking at ifconfig, the real address is a 10.x.y.z one and the 192.* one is... something else. They can ping each other on the 192.* address but not on the 10.* address. I can get the server to start on the host (i.e. with k/b mouse) but the remote machine I want to control says it can't connect. On the server, do the netstat -lpnt and make sure synergys is listening on either 0.0.0.0:24800 or 192.168.v.w:24800. On my machine: # netstat -lpnt | grep synergy tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:24800 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3988/synergys The 0.0.0.0:24800 means that it's listening on all the IP addresses my machine has and would allow any client to connect as long as the client can connect to one of the addresses my machine uses. Think of the 0.0.0.0 bit as a wildcard. On the client, make sure you run synergyc -d ERROR 192.168.v.w where 192.168.v.w is the address of the server on that 192.168 network that the two machines share. If you don't specify the server's IP address to the client, then the client will probably be trying to connect over the OTHER network, and no, that won't work. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Treat each day as if it's your last...a lot of crying and whining - - usually gets you what you want! -- Sam Sledge- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying to ping from a subinterface.
On 06/02/2014 11:18 AM, CLOSE Dave issued this missive: On Fedora 20 x86_64. According to man ping, ping should work from a subinterface specifying either the interface name or its address: -I interface interface is either an address, or an interface name. If inter‐ face is an address, it sets source address to specified inter‐ face address. If interface in an interface name, it sets source interface to specified interface. I've got a subinterface and I'm trying to ping from it. # ifconfig eth3:sub1 eth3:sub1: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 172.17.30.143 netmask 255.255.254.0 broadcast 172.17.31.255 ether 90:e2:ba:34:46:41 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) device memory 0xdc7e-dc80 If I ping from the address, it works as specified. If I specify the interface name instead, I see: # ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 ping: SO_BINDTODEVICE: Invalid argument Investigating a little deeper: # strace ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 execve(/usr/bin/ping, [ping, -I, eth3:sub1, 172.17.30.1], [/* 38 vars */]) = 0 ... setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE, eth3:sub1\0, 13) = -1 ENODEV (No such device) ... +++ exited with 2 +++ Any thoughts? eth3:sub1 isn't an interface, it's an alias. The interface name is the bit before the : (or . in the case of a VLAN). If you were to do a netstat -rn, you'd only see eth3 as a network device. You wouldn't see eth3:sub1 listed. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -First Law of Work: - -If you can't get it done in the first 24 hours, work nights.- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 16:36 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: I would have installed Fedora, but they say the requirements are at least 4GB RAM. 2GB should be possible... From the official Fedora 20 release notes http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview: Minimum System Configuration 1GHz or faster processor 1GB System Memory 10GB unallocated drive space -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying to ping from a subinterface.
I wrote: # ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 ping: SO_BINDTODEVICE: Invalid argument Rick Stevens responded: eth3:sub1 isn't an interface, it's an alias. The interface name is the bit before the : (or . in the case of a VLAN). If you were to do a netstat -rn, you'd only see eth3 as a network device. You wouldn't see eth3:sub1 listed. Thanks. And you are obviously correct, technically. But this command worked as I expected on earlier versions of Fedora. We now have many procedures with such commands embedded and were surprised to discover they no longer work on F20. Why was it changed? -- Dave Close -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying to ping from a subinterface.
I wrote: Thanks. And you are obviously correct, technically. But this command worked as I expected on earlier versions of Fedora. We now have many procedures with such commands embedded and were surprised to discover they no longer work on F20. Why was it changed? I take it back. I was led to believe things were working in the past. In fact, the difference is that F20 refuses to do the ping whereas earlier versions complained and then fell back to pinging from the interface address. F20: # ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 ping: SO_BINDTODEVICE: Invalid argument F14: # ping -I eth3:sub1 172.17.30.1 Warning: cannot bind to specified iface, falling back: No such device PING 172.17.30.1 (172.17.30.1) from 172.17.30.161 eth3:sub1: 64 bytes from ... Sorry for the confusion. -- Dave Close -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?
On Jun 2, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Powell, Michael michael_pow...@mentor.com wrote: On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 16:36 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: I would have installed Fedora, but they say the requirements are at least 4GB RAM. 2GB should be possible... From the official Fedora 20 release notes http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview: Minimum System Configuration 1GHz or faster processor 1GB System Memory 10GB unallocated drive space Yes it will install and work. With a web browser it's a bit tight, and may end up swapping to disk. Neverthless, impressive, right now for me on OS X the kernel is taking up 700MB alone; and wired memory is 1.34GB. So yeah… oinkster. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?
Chris Murphy writes: On Jun 2, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Powell, Michael michael_pow...@mentor.com wrote: On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 16:36 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: I would have installed Fedora, but they say the requirements are at least 4GB RAM. 2GB should be possible... From the official Fedora 20 release notes http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/sect- Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview: Minimum System Configuration 1GHz or faster processor 1GB System Memory 10GB unallocated drive space Yes it will install and work. With a web browser it's a bit tight, and may end up swapping to disk. Neverthless, impressive, right now for me on OS X the kernel is taking up 700MB alone; and wired memory is 1.34GB. So yeah… oinkster. I have Fedora 20 running on a laptop with 1.5gb of RAM. Gnome desktop is slow, but usable. I also have it running on an eee 900 mini-laptop, also with 1.5gb or RAM using the XFCE desktop. It's slow, and just bearable. pgp4lBWQ5HCEb.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
