[Pw_forum] Re [8] : US-PP of Au

2010-09-15 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Lorenzo

Thank you to reply.
It is always segmentation fault. My system is 3-atoms Au cluster.
this cluster forms a chain of atoms but the calculations never finished
because of segmentation fault.

Dear Gabriele

the work was completely don with kinetic-energy cutoff=32.  Ry and
charge density cutoff  = 320.  Ry .


*Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):

 atom   1 type  1   force =-0.9579   -0.95790.
 atom   2 type  1   force = 0.00013265   -0.36860.
 atom   3 type  1   force =-0.36860.000132650.

 Total force = 0.000237 Total SCF correction = 0.000290
 SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr

 bfgs converged in  24 scf cycles and  19 bfgs steps
 (criteria: energy < 0.10E-03, force < 0.10E-02)

 End of BFGS Geometry Optimization

 Final energy   =-262.9046471560 Ry
Begin final coordinates

ATOMIC_POSITIONS (angstrom)
Au   1.381049485   1.381049485   0.0
Au   3.868137287  -1.139186772   0.0
Au  -1.139186772   3.868137287   0.0
End final coordinates*


Best wishes.
Reza.Shidpour
Institute for Nanoscienec and Nanotechnology,
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100915/97843a52/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Re [7] : US-PP of Au

2010-09-13 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Gabriele

Thank you for your comments in pwscf forum.

I performed your suggestion that ecut is set to 32 Ry. The structure was
relaxed and  I repeated with ecut=20 , 22 Ry.
It seems that the structure did not relaxed with this point "
*
.
 ...
 the Fermi energy is-5.0636 ev

!total energy  =-262.94392529 Ry
 Harris-Foulkes estimate   =-262.94392533 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy<   0.0006 Ry

 The total energy is the sum of the following terms:

 one-electron contribution =-323.90644330 Ry
 hartree contribution  = 178.85727642 Ry
 xc contribution   =-104.02662243 Ry
 ewald contribution= -13.85257067 Ry
 smearing contrib. (-TS)   =  -0.01556530 Ry

 convergence has been achieved in   2 iterations

 Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):


 negative rho (up, down):  0.998E-04 0.000E+00
 atom   1 type  1   force = 0.0.002237110.
 atom   2 type  1   force =-0.00165978   -0.001118560.
 atom   3 type  1   force = 0.00165978   -0.001118560.

 Total force = 0.003608 Total SCF correction = 0.000988
 SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr

 The maximum number of steps has been reached.

 End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
Begin final coordinates

ATOMIC_POSITIONS (angstrom)
Au   0.0   0.248435531   0.0
Au  -2.339313337   1.325352234   0.0
Au   2.339313337   1.325352234   0.0
End final coordinates*




Questions :

1) The electron_maxstep is equaled 100. What is purpose of "number of
states" ?

2) Should I consider system to be semiconducting  If I want to simulate
4-atoms cluster?


Best Regards,
Reza.Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100913/57452288/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Re [6] : US-PP of Au

2010-09-13 Thread reza shidpoor
 Dear Paolo

Thank you for reply.

With ecut = 72 Ry , I repeated the simulation five times. The simulation
proceeded
several scf iterations and several bfgs iterations  but the jobs were never
finished. ( I attached one of the out puts. )

Is it possible the ecut is so great that RAM is not sufficient for 3-atoms
cluster ?

Best regards.

Reza.Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100913/09d10f15/attachment-0001.htm
 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Au3_relax_6.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 53837 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100913/09d10f15/attachment-0002.obj
 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Au3_relax.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 772 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100913/09d10f15/attachment-0003.obj
 


[Pw_forum] Re [5] : PP-US of Au

2010-09-09 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Gabriele and Dear  Paolo

Thank you for previous comments.

I used your hints and I run small cluster with only 3 atoms but the previous
problem has remained.

Input file

&control
calculation='relax'
title='Au3Cluster'
restart_mode='from_scratch'
outdir='./tmp'
prefix='Au3'
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
pseudo_dir = './'
wf_collect=.true.
 /
&system
ibrav=  2, celldm(1) =  26,nat=  3, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =72.0, ecutrho=560.0,
occupations='smearing', smearing='fd', degauss=0.01
nspin=1,
 /
&electrons
   electron_maxstep=100,
   diagonalization='cg',
   conv_thr=1.0D-6,
   mixing_beta=0.1,
 /
&ions
   ion_dynamics='bfgs'
/
&cell
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Au  196.97  Au.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}

Au0.0000.0000.000
Au4.1100.0000.000
Au  0.000   4.1100.000

K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 2  1 1 1



and

The Error :

forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image  PCRoutineLine
Source
pw.x   0052089C  addusdens_ 27
addusdens.f90
pw.x   004DCB76  sum_band_ 153
sum_band.f90
pw.x   0044B7D7  electrons_287
electrons.f90
pw.x   0040BA6E  MAIN__ 92
pwscf.f90
pw.x   0040B8DC  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc.so.6  2AE29DCF2ABD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   0040B7D9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown


Question : Is it possible that the source of error is related to be
semiconducting while I identified metal in input file with smearing keyword
?



Best Regards,
Reza.Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100909/666e63a9/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Re [4] : PP-US of Au

2010-08-30 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Gabriele and Dear Paolo

I am very grateful to you for helping. To reply the Gabriele 's question , I
mention that I use 4 cpu
(Intel? Core?2 Quad Processor *Q9550* (12M Cache, 2.83 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)).

Dear gentlemans

I try to perform your comments certainly and I will inform you the
conclusion of process.

Best Regards,
Reza.Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100830/51735991/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Re [3] : PP-US of Au

2010-08-29 Thread reza shidpoor
*Dear Gabriele *

*Thank you for your comment. I know that you and co-workers attempt
perseveringly so
I apperciate from your efforts but I mention some points :

1 ) All of examples ( 35 examples ) has been run successfully.
2 ) The RAM of my system is sufficient for 13 atoms (RAM = 8 Gigabyte DDR3).
3 ) I tested a case . I used informations related to 01 example ( Si - scf
).
I constructed a input file from a imaginary 13-atom Si cluster that is
different from
previous input file in type of atoms and pseudopotential. Then I run scf
calculation both of them.*

*Input File related to Au :

 &control
calculation='scf'
title='Au13Cluster'
restart_mode='from_scratch'
outdir='./tmp'
prefix='Au13'
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
pseudo_dir = './'
 /
 &system
ibrav= 2, celldm(1) =  38,nat=  13, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =40.0, ecutrho=400.0,
occupations='smearing',smearing='gaussian',degauss=0.01,
nspin=1,
 /
 &electrons
   electron_maxstep=100,
   diagonalization='cg',
   conv_thr=1.0D-6,
   mixing_beta=0.5,
 /
&ions
   ion_dynamics='bfgs'
/
&cell
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Au  196.97  Au.pbe-nd-van.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Au  4.844   4.844   4.844
Au  0.000   4.844   7.833
Au  4.844   7.833   0.000
Au  4.844   7.833   9.688
Au  9.688   4.844   1.855
Au  1.855   0.000   4.844
Au  1.855   9.688   4.844
Au  4.844   1.855   9.688
Au  7.833   9.688   4.844
Au  4.844   1.855   0.000
Au  9.688   4.844   7.833
Au  7.833   0.000   4.844
Au  0.000   4.844   1.855
K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 2  1 1 1*


*After of several minutes, the result was *


* Largest allocated arrays est. size (Mb) dimensions
Kohn-Sham Wavefunctions   110.74 Mb (  84386,  86)
NL pseudopotentials   217.61 Mb (  84386, 169)
Each V/rho on FFT grid 51.50 Mb (3375000)
Each G-vector array 9.18 Mb (1203541)
G-vector shells 0.03 Mb (   3661)
 Largest temporary arrays est. size (Mb) dimensions
Each subspace H/S matrix0.11 Mb ( 86,  86)
Each  matrix  0.22 Mb (169,  86)
Arrays for rho mixing 411.99 Mb (3375000,   8)

 Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
 Check: negative starting charge=   -0.356687

 starting charge  142.84904, renormalised to  143.0

 negative rho (up, down):  0.357E+00 0.000E+00
 Starting wfc are  117 atomic wfcs

 total cpu time spent up to now is255.53 secs

 per-process dynamical memory:  1035.0 Mb

 Self-consistent Calculation

 iteration #  1 ecut=51.00 Ry beta=0.50
 CG style diagonalization
 ethr =  1.00E-02,  avg # of iterations =  2.1
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image  PCRoutineLine
Source
pw.x   0052089C  addusdens_ 27
addusdens.f90
pw.x   004DCB76  sum_band_ 153
sum_band.f90
pw.x   0044B7D7  electrons_287
electrons.f90
pw.x   0040BA6E  MAIN__ 92
pwscf.f90
pw.x   0040B8DC  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
libc.so.6  2B500B54CABD  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown
pw.x   0040B7D9  Unknown   Unknown  Unknown*


 *Now , for input file related Si *

*&control
calculation='scf
title='Si13Cluster
restart_mode='from_scratch
outdir='./tmp
prefix='Si13
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
pseudo_dir = './
 /
 &system
ibrav=  2, celldm(1) =  38,nat=  13, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =40.0, ecutrho=400.0,
occupations='smearing',smearing='mp',degauss= 0.01,
nspin=1,
 /
 &electrons
   electron_maxstep=100,
   diagonalization='cg',
   conv_thr=1.0D-6,
   mixing_beta=0.5,
 /
&ions

/
&cell
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Si  28.086  Si.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Si0.000 0.000 0.000
Si  0.000   4.844   7.833
Si  4.844   7.833   0.000
Si  4.844   7.833   9.688
Si  9.688   4.844   1.855
Si  1.855   0.000   4.844
Si  1.855   9.688   4.844
Si  4.844   1.855   9.688
Si  7.833   9.688   4.844
Si  4.844   1.855   0.000
Si  9.688   4.844   7.833
Si  7.833   0.000   4.844
Si  0.000   4.844   1.855
K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 2  1 1 1
*
*And the result was :*

*...
...
iteration # 50 ecut=40.00 Ry beta=0.50
 CG style diagonalization
 ethr =  2.38E-05,  avg # of iterations =  3.8

 negative rho (up, down):  0.442E-07 0.000E+00

 total cpu time spent up to now is   7717.21 secs

 total energy  = -97.69548088 Ry
 Harris-Foulkes estimate   = -97.70290819 Ry
 estimated scf accuracy<   0.46657030 Ry

 iteration # 51 ecut=40.00 Ry beta=0.50
 CG sty

[Pw_forum] Re [2]: PP-US of Au

2010-08-29 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Paolo

I appreciate from your advise. I try to examine this on other machine. ( If
I could find )
But I have a question . I did not use parallelism.
With complete compiling of PWSCF and running all of examples without even
one error ( I accentuate "all of examples" ) ,  Is it possible that the
fault is included from hard/soft ware or parallelism ?

Best regards.
R.Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100829/f51d4cf8/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] PP-US of Au

2010-08-28 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear QE Developers and Users

I use PWSCF for simulation of Au13 cluster. I complied software completely
and I run all of examples without error.

My system seems suitable for this purpose.(RAM = 8 GIGABYTE , PROCESSOR =
QUADCORE 2.8 , OPERATION SYSTEM =
UBUNTU 9.10) but the software stops with segmentation fault error (code 174)
frequently.
I studied user-guide and writings in forum and I performed these actions :
1) all of libraries are compiled completely (ifort & mkl & ic).
2) I checked position of atoms with xcrysden and I did not found any
problem.
3) I used almost of US pseudopotentials for Au in site and all of them have
problem.
4) I tried to use diagonalization='cg' but this error remained.

Is it possible that all of PP-US related to Au are bad pseudopotential,
typically with a ghost, or a USPP giving non-positive charge
density, leading to a violation of positiveness of the S matrix appearing in
the USPP formalism ?  OR  Is PWSCF unable to simulate heavy atoms such as Au
or Pd because of lack of suitable USPP?

I really appreciate you for solving this problem.


My input file :

&control
calculation='relax'
title='Au13'
restart_mode='from_scratch'
outdir='./tmp'
prefix='Au13'
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
pseudo_dir = './'
 /
 &system
ibrav= 2, celldm(1) =  38,nat=  13, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =52.0, ecutrho=520.0,
occupations='smearing',smearing='mv',degauss=0.01,
nspin=1,
 /
 &electrons
   electron_maxstep=100,
   diagonalization='cg',
   conv_thr=1.0D-6,
   mixing_beta=0.5,
 /
&ions
   ion_dynamics='bfgs'
/
&cell
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Au  196.97  Au.pbe-nd-van.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Au  4.844   4.844   4.844
Au  0.000   4.844   7.833
Au  4.844   7.833   0.000
Au  4.844   7.833   9.688
Au  9.688   4.844   1.855
Au  1.855   0.000   4.844
Au  1.855   9.688   4.844
Au  4.844   1.855   9.688
Au  7.833   9.688   4.844
Au  4.844   1.855   0.000
Au  9.688   4.844   7.833
Au  7.833   0.000   4.844
Au  0.000   4.844   1.855
K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 2  1 1 1

Reza . Shidpour
SUT
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100828/f5de871e/attachment-0001.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Problem about applying US-PP in Au

2010-08-24 Thread reza shidpoor
Dear Pwscf users

I use pwscf for simulation of Au cluster (RAM = 8 GIGABYTE , PROCESSOR =
QUADCORE 2.8 , OPERATION SYSTEM =
UBUNTU 9.10) . With employing all of (ultrasoft) pseudopotentials*** *in
espresso site, I face to the segmentation
fault error but with employing a non-US pseudopotential this error
disappeares.
Would you please helping me about solving this error ?

input file :

&control
calculation='scf'
title='Au_ Pd_surface'
restart_mode='from_scratch'
outdir='./tmp'
prefix='Au_Pd'
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
pseudo_dir = '/home/reza/pseudo/'
 /
 &system
ibrav=  6, celldm(1) =  23.137,celldm(3)=2,nat=  72, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =40.0, ecutrho=400.0,
occupations='smearing',smearing='mp',degauss= 0.01,
nspin=1
 /
 &electrons
   electron_maxstep=100,
   conv_thr=1.0D-6,
   mixing_beta=0.5,
 /
&ions
/
&cell
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Au  196.97   Au.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Au  00 0
Au  2.042.04 0
Au  02.04 2.04
Au  2.040 2.04
Au  4.080 0
Au  6.122.04 0
Au  4.082.04 2.04
Au  6.120 2.04
Au  8.160 0
Au  10.22.04 0
Au  8.162.04 2.04
Au  10.20 2.04
Au  04.08 0
Au  2.046.12 0
Au  06.12 2.04
Au  2.044.08 2.04
Au  4.084.08 0
Au  6.126.12 0
Au  4.086.12 2.04
Au  6.124.08 2.04
Au  8.164.08 0
Au  10.26.12 0
Au  8.166.12 2.04
Au  10.24.08 2.04
Au  08.16 0
Au  2.0410.2 0
Au  010.2 2.04
Au  2.048.16 2.04
Au  4.088.16 0
Au  6.1210.2 0
Au  4.0810.2 2.04
Au  6.128.16 2.04
Au  8.168.16 0
Au  10.210.2 0
Au  8.1610.2 2.04
Au  10.28.16 2.04
Au  00 4.08
Au  2.042.04 4.08
Au  02.04 6.12
Au  2.040 6.12
Au  4.080 4.08
Au  6.122.04 4.08
Au  4.082.04 6.12
Au  6.120 6.12
Au  8.160 4.08
Au  10.22.04 4.08
Au  8.162.04 6.12
Au  10.20 6.12
Au  04.08 4.08
Au  2.046.12 4.08
Au  06.12 6.12
Au  2.044.08 6.12
Au  4.084.08 4.08
Au  6.126.12 4.08
Au  4.086.12 6.12
Au  6.124.08 6.12
Au  8.164.08 4.08
Au  10.26.12 4.08
Au  8.166.12 6.12
Au  10.24.08 6.12
Au  08.16 4.08
Au  2.0410.2 4.08
Au  010.2 6.12
Au  2.048.16 6.12
Au  4.088.16 4.08
Au  6.1210.2 4.08
Au  4.0810.2 6.12
Au  6.128.16 6.12
Au  8.168.16 4.08
Au  10.210.2 4.08
Au  8.1610.2 6.12
Au  10.28.16 6.12
K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 1  1 1 1
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100824/725b54f5/attachment.htm