Re: How to output a element within maven.xml

2003-09-07 Thread dion
Huh??

The ant plugin does this ok.

using xmlns="dummy"
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:  http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/


Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2003 08:13:16 AM:

> The problem:
> 
> I want to generate a jnlp manifest, they have no namespace and have 
> children called "property" and "jar".
> 
> However, the no-namespace "property" and "jar" elements are defined in 
> all maven.xml and included scripts... namely they are attached to their 
> associated ant tasks.
> And the problem is general: there is no-way to output an element that 
> has no-namespace and the name of an existing tag without the use of 
>  (which is very verbose).
> 
> One approach would be to say that if the jeez taglib-namespace is 
> defined as part of the namespaces, then the default-namespace should not 

> be mapped to jeez taglib.
> This might break a lot of things.
> 
> A more delicate approach would be to have an element that disables this 
> mapping for all its children. Unless the jeez to no-namespace binding is 

>   well isolated, this can be very hard.
> It would be the most elegant way.
> I could then use
>
> http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> > 
> > 
> > Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2003 06:53:00 PM:
> > 
> > 
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I am currently making a bunch of JNLP output within a maven.xml and... 

> >>maven complains that the jar element needs a jar-file to be 
specified...
> >>
> >>Well... I tried putting everything in the no-namespace world, but that 

> >>doesn't help either...
> >>
> >>My current solution is to use  but it's definitely 
> >>unelegant... Is there a way hidden way to have a no-namespace element 
> >>being output without it being considered as a tag to execute ?
> >>
> >>For example, I think that if the maven.xml included a namespace 
> >>declaration of the jeez, ant, or jelly tag-libs, then the 
> >>default-namespace approach (which maps anything in the 
> >>no-namespace-world to the jeez taglib) should be dropped.
> >>
> >>Does it make sense ?
> >>
> >>Paul
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to output a element within maven.xml

2003-09-07 Thread Paul Libbrecht
The problem:

I want to generate a jnlp manifest, they have no namespace and have 
children called "property" and "jar".

However, the no-namespace "property" and "jar" elements are defined in 
all maven.xml and included scripts... namely they are attached to their 
associated ant tasks.
And the problem is general: there is no-way to output an element that 
has no-namespace and the name of an existing tag without the use of 
 (which is very verbose).

One approach would be to say that if the jeez taglib-namespace is 
defined as part of the namespaces, then the default-namespace should not 
be mapped to jeez taglib.
This might break a lot of things.

A more delicate approach would be to have an element that disables this 
mapping for all its children. Unless the jeez to no-namespace binding is 
 well isolated, this can be very hard.
It would be the most elegant way.
I could then use
	
	 post us a sample
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:  http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2003 06:53:00 PM:


Hi,

I am currently making a bunch of JNLP output within a maven.xml and... 
maven complains that the jar element needs a jar-file to be specified...

Well... I tried putting everything in the no-namespace world, but that 
doesn't help either...

My current solution is to use  but it's definitely 
unelegant... Is there a way hidden way to have a no-namespace element 
being output without it being considered as a tag to execute ?

For example, I think that if the maven.xml included a namespace 
declaration of the jeez, ant, or jelly tag-libs, then the 
default-namespace approach (which maps anything in the 
no-namespace-world to the jeez taglib) should be dropped.

Does it make sense ?

Paul



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]