Re: Rules Q: chickenpox weeds
I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had help from weeds. Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my opinion, if you are in an english speaking situation. Some of these can misfire rather badly in other languages. Which is not surprising, as they are based on english language word formation rules and statistics. I'm sure bits of these have made it into various SA rules over time. But I don't know of any concerted effort to move any of these complete rulesets into SA. Loren
RE: Rules Q: chickenpox weeds
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had help from weeds. Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my opinion, if you are in an english speaking situation. Some of these can misfire rather badly in other languages. Which is not surprising, as they are based on english language word formation rules and statistics. I'm sure bits of these have made it into various SA rules over time. But I don't know of any concerted effort to move any of these complete rulesets into SA. According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and presumably the newer versions as well). http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets Bowie
RE: Rules Q: chickenpox weeds
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/08/2005 02:03:08 PM: According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and presumably the newer versions as well). http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets Bowie Ah, that's right. I couldn't remember why I wasn't running with backhair anymore. Andy --And no [EMAIL PROTECTED] comments. :)
