[no subject]

2010-05-06 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 22D9E53828A.AD1D4
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D9E53828A
for ; Thu,  6 May 2010 11:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be2e408.8090...@zuka.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 11:45:12 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: error with jk_module
References: <4be1ea75.2020...@christopherschultz.net>
In-Reply-To: <4be1ea75.2020...@christopherschultz.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070302070406020309060004"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--070302070406020309060004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I will implement the  stuff (thanks also to Andre) but I think 
I finally figured it out. First, it turns out I had another version of 
apache on the server I did not realize. (this server was managed by 
someone else before me and I did not know exactly what was on it). There 
was the 2.0.53 version, which was a yum install. Then there was the 
2.2.3 version, a separate instance of Apache I installed which is 
listening on a different IP. But there was also a third instance of 
2.2.3 installed but was not running. However, the modules in question 
were actually compile for that version, hence the complaining. so I 
stopped the 2.0.53 version and cranked up the 2.2.3 version. Still 
complained a bit so I recompiled a fresh module for that version and 
voila, there she works!

Why don't EVER have to stop learning ;-)

Thanks again to those who took the time to try and answer my questions.

Regards to all.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dave,
>
> On 5/5/2010 3:05 PM, Dave Filchak wrote:
>
>> Actually, the server version for this instance is 2.0.52 and I have the
>> following now in my config:
>>
>> LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>>
>> and when I test the config I get:
>>
>> API module structure `jk_module' in file
>> /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
>> Apache module DSO?
>>  
> What happens when you do:
>
> $ file /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>
> Did you check the md5sum from the mirror you used to download?
>
>
>> I made sure I downloaded the .so for Apache 2.0.x so I think that is
>> right. I have a tomcat app running so I am wondering, do I have to shut
>> it down before trying to restart the server or testing the config?
>>  
> No, you can (re)start Apache and Tomcat in any order.
>
>
>> If I comment the LoadModule out, then it starts complaining about the
>> JkWorkersFile and if I comment that, the the JkShmFile ... and on it
>> goes. It is very annoying.
>>  
> Try doing this:
>
> 
>JkLogFile /var/log/apache2/mod_jk.log
>JkLogLevel Info
>JkShmFile /var/log/apache2/jk-runtime-status
>JkWorkersFile /etc/apache2/jk_workers.properties
> 
>
> The "IfModule" will have Apache skip the mod_jk configuration if the
> module isn't loaded.
>
> - -chris
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvh6nUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDJLwCaAqeaw+0BcvExFTc+LQuetmTf
> qbsAnj/7H3tTjdR4yaynOprElZlxwbdD
> =zVQn
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

--070302070406020309060004--

[no subject]

2010-05-06 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 22D9E53828A.AD1D4
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D9E53828A
for ; Thu,  6 May 2010 11:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be2e408.8090...@zuka.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 11:45:12 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: error with jk_module
References: <4be1ea75.2020...@christopherschultz.net>
In-Reply-To: <4be1ea75.2020...@christopherschultz.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070302070406020309060004"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--070302070406020309060004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I will implement the  stuff (thanks also to Andre) but I think 
I finally figured it out. First, it turns out I had another version of 
apache on the server I did not realize. (this server was managed by 
someone else before me and I did not know exactly what was on it). There 
was the 2.0.53 version, which was a yum install. Then there was the 
2.2.3 version, a separate instance of Apache I installed which is 
listening on a different IP. But there was also a third instance of 
2.2.3 installed but was not running. However, the modules in question 
were actually compile for that version, hence the complaining. so I 
stopped the 2.0.53 version and cranked up the 2.2.3 version. Still 
complained a bit so I recompiled a fresh module for that version and 
voila, there she works!

Why don't EVER have to stop learning ;-)

Thanks again to those who took the time to try and answer my questions.

Regards to all.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dave,
>
> On 5/5/2010 3:05 PM, Dave Filchak wrote:
>
>> Actually, the server version for this instance is 2.0.52 and I have the
>> following now in my config:
>>
>> LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>>
>> and when I test the config I get:
>>
>> API module structure `jk_module' in file
>> /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
>> Apache module DSO?
>>  
> What happens when you do:
>
> $ file /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>
> Did you check the md5sum from the mirror you used to download?
>
>
>> I made sure I downloaded the .so for Apache 2.0.x so I think that is
>> right. I have a tomcat app running so I am wondering, do I have to shut
>> it down before trying to restart the server or testing the config?
>>  
> No, you can (re)start Apache and Tomcat in any order.
>
>
>> If I comment the LoadModule out, then it starts complaining about the
>> JkWorkersFile and if I comment that, the the JkShmFile ... and on it
>> goes. It is very annoying.
>>  
> Try doing this:
>
> 
>JkLogFile /var/log/apache2/mod_jk.log
>JkLogLevel Info
>JkShmFile /var/log/apache2/jk-runtime-status
>JkWorkersFile /etc/apache2/jk_workers.properties
> 
>
> The "IfModule" will have Apache skip the mod_jk configuration if the
> module isn't loaded.
>
> - -chris
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvh6nUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDJLwCaAqeaw+0BcvExFTc+LQuetmTf
> qbsAnj/7H3tTjdR4yaynOprElZlxwbdD
> =zVQn
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

--070302070406020309060004--

[no subject]

2010-05-05 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: DEFBF538263.AD9A5
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFBF538263;
Wed,  5 May 2010 15:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be1c16d.5010...@zuka.net>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:05:17 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List 
CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 
Subject: Re: Re: error with jk_module
References: <4be0a632.8010...@ice-sa.com>
In-Reply-To: <4be0a632.8010...@ice-sa.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="000205080009000906020401"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--000205080009000906020401
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Actually, the server version for this instance is 2.0.52 and I have the
following now in my config:

LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so

and when I test the config I get:

API module structure `jk_module' in file
/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
Apache module DSO?

I made sure I downloaded the .so for Apache 2.0.x so I think that is
right. I have a tomcat app running so I am wondering, do I have to shut
it down before trying to restart the server or testing the config? I
really need to restart the server because it was listening on all
interfaces to port 443 and I needed to stop that happening. But I do not
want to restart until I figure out why the hell I am getting this error.
If I comment the LoadModule out, then it starts complaining about the
JkWorkersFile and if I comment that, the the JkShmFile ... and on it
goes. It is very annoying.

Dave



On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Dave Filchak wrote:
> ...
> this :
>>
>> httpd: Syntax error on line 439 of 
>> /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: API module structure `jk_module' 
>> in file /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.0.X.so is 
>> garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
>>
> ...
> and this :
>>
>> LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>>
> do not seem to match (the filename), unless mod_jk.so is a link to the 
> other one. Are you sure it is ?
>
> Also, if it is a link, and if your Apache is a 2.2 version, then it 
> would appear that you may have downloaded a wrong version of the 
> mod_jk.so.  The end of the version says "httpd-2.0.X.so", which would 
> appear to make it a version for Apache 2.0.x, not 2.2.x.
>
>
>

--000205080009000906020401--

[no subject]

2010-05-05 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: DEFBF538263.AD9A5
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFBF538263;
Wed,  5 May 2010 15:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be1c16d.5010...@zuka.net>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 15:05:17 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List 
CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 
Subject: Re: Re: error with jk_module
References: <4be0a632.8010...@ice-sa.com>
In-Reply-To: <4be0a632.8010...@ice-sa.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="000205080009000906020401"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--000205080009000906020401
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Actually, the server version for this instance is 2.0.52 and I have the
following now in my config:

LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so

and when I test the config I get:

API module structure `jk_module' in file
/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
Apache module DSO?

I made sure I downloaded the .so for Apache 2.0.x so I think that is
right. I have a tomcat app running so I am wondering, do I have to shut
it down before trying to restart the server or testing the config? I
really need to restart the server because it was listening on all
interfaces to port 443 and I needed to stop that happening. But I do not
want to restart until I figure out why the hell I am getting this error.
If I comment the LoadModule out, then it starts complaining about the
JkWorkersFile and if I comment that, the the JkShmFile ... and on it
goes. It is very annoying.

Dave



On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Dave Filchak wrote:
> ...
> this :
>>
>> httpd: Syntax error on line 439 of 
>> /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: API module structure `jk_module' 
>> in file /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.0.X.so is 
>> garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
>>
> ...
> and this :
>>
>> LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so
>>
> do not seem to match (the filename), unless mod_jk.so is a link to the 
> other one. Are you sure it is ?
>
> Also, if it is a link, and if your Apache is a 2.2 version, then it 
> would appear that you may have downloaded a wrong version of the 
> mod_jk.so.  The end of the version says "httpd-2.0.X.so", which would 
> appear to make it a version for Apache 2.0.x, not 2.2.x.
>
>
>

--000205080009000906020401--

[no subject]

2010-05-04 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: AEE69538190.ABB3E
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE69538190
for ; Tue,  4 May 2010 18:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be0a2de.5080...@zuka.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 18:42:38 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: error with jk_module
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="040106080009080709090308"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:73.05954/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--040106080009080709090308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can somebody enlighten me on what this means? I have been struggling 
with this for a while and need to restart my server but keep getting 
this config error.

httpd: Syntax error on line 439 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: 
API module structure `jk_module' in file 
/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.0.X.so is garbled - 
perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

I have the following compiled in modules in Apache 2.2.3, 64-bit.

Compiled in modules:
   core.c
   mod_authn_file.c
   mod_authn_dbd.c
   mod_authn_default.c
   mod_authz_host.c
   mod_authz_groupfile.c
   mod_authz_user.c
   mod_authz_default.c
   mod_auth_basic.c
   mod_cache.c
   mod_disk_cache.c
   mod_dbd.c
   mod_echo.c
   mod_include.c
   mod_filter.c
   mod_log_config.c
   mod_env.c
   mod_mime_magic.c
   mod_expires.c
   mod_headers.c
   mod_usertrack.c
   mod_setenvif.c
   mod_ssl.c
   worker.c
   http_core.c
   mod_mime.c
   mod_dav.c
   mod_status.c
   mod_autoindex.c
   mod_asis.c
   mod_info.c
   mod_cgid.c
   mod_cgi.c
   mod_dav_fs.c
   mod_negotiation.c
   mod_dir.c
   mod_imagemap.c
   mod_actions.c
   mod_userdir.c
   mod_alias.c
   mod_rewrite.c
   mod_so.c

I am using Tomcat 6.0.18 and am trying to load this module like so:

LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so

I really am not sure what is the problem here. Is the module actually 
garbled or is it something else that produces this very misleading error?

Regards,

Dave





--040106080009080709090308--

[no subject]

2010-05-04 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: AEE69538190.ABB3E
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE69538190
for ; Tue,  4 May 2010 18:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be0a2de.5080...@zuka.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 18:42:38 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: error with jk_module
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="040106080009080709090308"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:73.05954/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--040106080009080709090308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can somebody enlighten me on what this means? I have been struggling 
with this for a while and need to restart my server but keep getting 
this config error.

httpd: Syntax error on line 439 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: 
API module structure `jk_module' in file 
/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.0.X.so is garbled - 
perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

I have the following compiled in modules in Apache 2.2.3, 64-bit.

Compiled in modules:
   core.c
   mod_authn_file.c
   mod_authn_dbd.c
   mod_authn_default.c
   mod_authz_host.c
   mod_authz_groupfile.c
   mod_authz_user.c
   mod_authz_default.c
   mod_auth_basic.c
   mod_cache.c
   mod_disk_cache.c
   mod_dbd.c
   mod_echo.c
   mod_include.c
   mod_filter.c
   mod_log_config.c
   mod_env.c
   mod_mime_magic.c
   mod_expires.c
   mod_headers.c
   mod_usertrack.c
   mod_setenvif.c
   mod_ssl.c
   worker.c
   http_core.c
   mod_mime.c
   mod_dav.c
   mod_status.c
   mod_autoindex.c
   mod_asis.c
   mod_info.c
   mod_cgid.c
   mod_cgi.c
   mod_dav_fs.c
   mod_negotiation.c
   mod_dir.c
   mod_imagemap.c
   mod_actions.c
   mod_userdir.c
   mod_alias.c
   mod_rewrite.c
   mod_so.c

I am using Tomcat 6.0.18 and am trying to load this module like so:

LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so

I really am not sure what is the problem here. Is the module actually 
garbled or is it something else that produces this very misleading error?

Regards,

Dave





--040106080009080709090308--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: B0236538235.AD627
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0236538235;
Tue,  4 May 2010 00:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf9e9d.4040...@zuka.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 00:12:13 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Thomas 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: <4bdf5246.3040...@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4bdf5246.3040...@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="000501090100060602030207"
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 3/1/0.33/70
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--000501090100060602030207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for this. I did use the address attribute for port 80. No check 
that. I think what I did was pit address=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX but did not 
specify the port ... just the address as it also listens on ports up in 
the 8000 range I believe. How do I stop it from listening on port 443? I 
will need to have another site (non tomcat) listening on 443 on the same 
IP under Apache. This machine basically has three IP numbers assigned to it.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 23:40, Dave Filchak wrote:
>
>> Humm ... sorry it has taken a while to get back to you with this. I have
>> been busy trying to get all my clients up. There is not a lot of them
>> but it is very time consuming. Before I get to all the configs, does
>> Tomcat, by default, take over ALL the ips' on port 443 i.e. 0.0.0.0:443?
>> If so, where would/could I set this to only listen on one IP or even do
>> not listen for 443 as I have another app that I will need for that port.
>>  
> By default, Tomcat will listen to all IPv4 and IPv6 addressed on the
> specified port.
>
> Use the address attribute of the connector to limit this to all IPv4
> only, all IPv6 only or a apecific IPv4 or IPv6 address.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>

--000501090100060602030207--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: B0236538235.AD627
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0236538235;
Tue,  4 May 2010 00:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf9e9d.4040...@zuka.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 00:12:13 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Thomas 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: <4bdf5246.3040...@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4bdf5246.3040...@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="000501090100060602030207"
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--000501090100060602030207
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for this. I did use the address attribute for port 80. No check 
that. I think what I did was pit address=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX but did not 
specify the port ... just the address as it also listens on ports up in 
the 8000 range I believe. How do I stop it from listening on port 443? I 
will need to have another site (non tomcat) listening on 443 on the same 
IP under Apache. This machine basically has three IP numbers assigned to it.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 23:40, Dave Filchak wrote:
>
>> Humm ... sorry it has taken a while to get back to you with this. I have
>> been busy trying to get all my clients up. There is not a lot of them
>> but it is very time consuming. Before I get to all the configs, does
>> Tomcat, by default, take over ALL the ips' on port 443 i.e. 0.0.0.0:443?
>> If so, where would/could I set this to only listen on one IP or even do
>> not listen for 443 as I have another app that I will need for that port.
>>  
> By default, Tomcat will listen to all IPv4 and IPv6 addressed on the
> specified port.
>
> Use the address attribute of the connector to limit this to all IPv4
> only, all IPv6 only or a apecific IPv4 or IPv6 address.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>

--000501090100060602030207--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 66C1153823B.AFC52
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C1153823B;
Mon,  3 May 2010 18:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf52b1.6020...@zuka.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 18:48:17 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Smithan John 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="050206000901070405080803"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--050206000901070405080803
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Smithan

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Smithan John wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please provide below information:
>
>
> - The port on which the old Apache instance is running.
>
Both instances run on port 80 but are on different IP numbers.
> - The port on which the new Apache instance is configured.
> - Does the whole setup use only DNS resolution or do we have a CSS(Secure
> Switch) layer.
>
DNS only
> Regards,
> Smithan.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Dave Filchak  wrote:
>
>
>> Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a
>> machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front end.
>> I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance that was
>> already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, with a
>> separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have been better to
>> just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it to work. The
>> default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address attribute to the
>> server.xml files so that it would not listen on all interfaces. So, I have
>> the new instance sort of working but for some reason, on all but two virtual
>> sites, I cannot access them if I use www.somedomain.com. Only if I use
>> somedomain.com. As I said, two of the sites work fine. The dns resolves
>> correctly to either www.somedomain.com or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat
>> or could tomcat be screwing this up somehow (actually, I guess it would have
>> been me who screwed it up somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this
>> point so some help would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this
>> issue or help on how I could have simply used the original instance to
>> server my non-tomcat php sites.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>  
>
>
>

--050206000901070405080803--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 66C1153823B.AFC52
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C1153823B;
Mon,  3 May 2010 18:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf52b1.6020...@zuka.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 18:48:17 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Smithan John 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="050206000901070405080803"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--050206000901070405080803
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Smithan

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Smithan John wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please provide below information:
>
>
> - The port on which the old Apache instance is running.
>
Both instances run on port 80 but are on different IP numbers.
> - The port on which the new Apache instance is configured.
> - Does the whole setup use only DNS resolution or do we have a CSS(Secure
> Switch) layer.
>
DNS only
> Regards,
> Smithan.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Dave Filchak  wrote:
>
>
>> Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a
>> machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front end.
>> I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance that was
>> already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, with a
>> separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have been better to
>> just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it to work. The
>> default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address attribute to the
>> server.xml files so that it would not listen on all interfaces. So, I have
>> the new instance sort of working but for some reason, on all but two virtual
>> sites, I cannot access them if I use www.somedomain.com. Only if I use
>> somedomain.com. As I said, two of the sites work fine. The dns resolves
>> correctly to either www.somedomain.com or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat
>> or could tomcat be screwing this up somehow (actually, I guess it would have
>> been me who screwed it up somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this
>> point so some help would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this
>> issue or help on how I could have simply used the original instance to
>> server my non-tomcat php sites.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>  
>
>
>

--050206000901070405080803--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 5186753823B.AD285
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5186753823B;
Mon,  3 May 2010 18:42:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf50fa.70...@zuka.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 18:40:58 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Smithan John 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="090903060903010408070801"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--090903060903010408070801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Humm ... sorry it has taken a while to get back to you with this. I have 
been busy trying to get all my clients up. There is not a lot of them 
but it is very time consuming. Before I get to all the configs, does 
Tomcat, by default, take over ALL the ips' on port 443 i.e. 0.0.0.0:443? 
If so, where would/could I set this to only listen on one IP or even do 
not listen for 443 as I have another app that I will need for that port.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Smithan John wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please provide below information:
>
>
> - The port on which the old Apache instance is running.
> - The port on which the new Apache instance is configured.
> - Does the whole setup use only DNS resolution or do we have a CSS(Secure
> Switch) layer.
>
> Regards,
> Smithan.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Dave Filchak  wrote:
>
>
>> Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a
>> machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front end.
>> I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance that was
>> already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, with a
>> separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have been better to
>> just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it to work. The
>> default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address attribute to the
>> server.xml files so that it would not listen on all interfaces. So, I have
>> the new instance sort of working but for some reason, on all but two virtual
>> sites, I cannot access them if I use www.somedomain.com. Only if I use
>> somedomain.com. As I said, two of the sites work fine. The dns resolves
>> correctly to either www.somedomain.com or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat
>> or could tomcat be screwing this up somehow (actually, I guess it would have
>> been me who screwed it up somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this
>> point so some help would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this
>> issue or help on how I could have simply used the original instance to
>> server my non-tomcat php sites.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>  
>
>
>

--090903060903010408070801--

[no subject]

2010-05-03 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 5186753823B.AD285
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5186753823B;
Mon,  3 May 2010 18:42:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bdf50fa.70...@zuka.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 18:40:58 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Smithan John 
CC: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Re: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="090903060903010408070801"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--090903060903010408070801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Humm ... sorry it has taken a while to get back to you with this. I have 
been busy trying to get all my clients up. There is not a lot of them 
but it is very time consuming. Before I get to all the configs, does 
Tomcat, by default, take over ALL the ips' on port 443 i.e. 0.0.0.0:443? 
If so, where would/could I set this to only listen on one IP or even do 
not listen for 443 as I have another app that I will need for that port.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

On 22/07/64 2:59 PM, Smithan John wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please provide below information:
>
>
> - The port on which the old Apache instance is running.
> - The port on which the new Apache instance is configured.
> - Does the whole setup use only DNS resolution or do we have a CSS(Secure
> Switch) layer.
>
> Regards,
> Smithan.
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Dave Filchak  wrote:
>
>
>> Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a
>> machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front end.
>> I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance that was
>> already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, with a
>> separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have been better to
>> just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it to work. The
>> default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address attribute to the
>> server.xml files so that it would not listen on all interfaces. So, I have
>> the new instance sort of working but for some reason, on all but two virtual
>> sites, I cannot access them if I use www.somedomain.com. Only if I use
>> somedomain.com. As I said, two of the sites work fine. The dns resolves
>> correctly to either www.somedomain.com or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat
>> or could tomcat be screwing this up somehow (actually, I guess it would have
>> been me who screwed it up somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this
>> point so some help would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this
>> issue or help on how I could have simply used the original instance to
>> server my non-tomcat php sites.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>  
>
>
>

--090903060903010408070801--

[no subject]

2010-05-02 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 49AB853821E.AE729
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AB853821E
for ; Sun,  2 May 2010 15:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bddd3f9.3080...@zuka.net>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 15:35:21 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="060208010707020700080002"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:26.44926/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--060208010707020700080002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a 
machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front 
end. I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance 
that was already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, 
with a separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have 
been better to just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it 
to work. The default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address 
attribute to the server.xml files so that it would not listen on all 
interfaces. So, I have the new instance sort of working but for some 
reason, on all but two virtual sites, I cannot access them if I use 
www.somedomain.com. Only if I use somedomain.com. As I said, two of the 
sites work fine. The dns resolves correctly to either www.somedomain.com 
or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat or could tomcat be screwing this up 
somehow (actually, I guess it would have been me who screwed it up 
somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this point so some help 
would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this issue or help on 
how I could have simply used the original instance to server my 
non-tomcat php sites.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

--060208010707020700080002--

[no subject]

2010-05-02 Thread Tomcat Users List 
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 49AB853821E.AE729
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AB853821E
for ; Sun,  2 May 2010 15:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4bddd3f9.3080...@zuka.net>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 15:35:21 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) 
Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat on a machine with multiple ip addresses
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="060208010707020700080002"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:26.44926/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

--060208010707020700080002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Due to a hard drive failure, I am needing to move some websites to a 
machine that has Tomcat already running on it with Apache as the front 
end. I was unable to get the sites working using the Apache instance 
that was already there so, I installed a second instance on the machine, 
with a separate pid and listening on a different ip. ( it would have 
been better to just use the same Apache instance but I could not get it 
to work. The default Tomcat page kept coming up) I added the address 
attribute to the server.xml files so that it would not listen on all 
interfaces. So, I have the new instance sort of working but for some 
reason, on all but two virtual sites, I cannot access them if I use 
www.somedomain.com. Only if I use somedomain.com. As I said, two of the 
sites work fine. The dns resolves correctly to either www.somedomain.com 
or somedomain.com. So, can tomcat or could tomcat be screwing this up 
somehow (actually, I guess it would have been me who screwed it up 
somewhere). I am not well versed in tomcat at this point so some help 
would be greatly appreciated. Either just to solve this issue or help on 
how I could have simply used the original instance to server my 
non-tomcat php sites.

Thanks in advance.

Dave

--060208010707020700080002--