RE: [Veritas-bu] What exactly does suspended media mean?

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Layne
Several reasons, but most likely, Netbackup was attempting to try to use 
this media to write to, had problems and suspended the tape, in case the media 
is bad, could not be written to, or was write protected.
 
Are 
any images present on the media? If you use the Media Lists, it will tell you 
when it was last used, when its due to expire too :-)
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Barber, Layne 
  (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 March 
  2006 16:22To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] What exactly does suspended media mean?
  I have several 
  tapes that show as suspended. What does this mean?
   
  Thank You,
   
  Layne Barber
  Systems Analyst II
  Unisys Corp.
  DISA Montgomery
  Comm. 334-416-3402
  DSN 596-3402
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning issues: LTO-3/ADIC i2k and NBU 5.1 MP3

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Hi Brian
I had an LTO1 ADIC, and to be very truthful, I ended up doing it manually,
because the tape request simply did not interact with Netbackup 3.4

Not only that, the ADIC constantly wanted the drive to be cleaned almost
every other day. And I found this hard to believe, because if you do too
many cleans you would end up damaging the drive heads I guess!

The things to check would be the Barcode Rules, that its identified as a
cleaning tape, but as I said I never got it to automatically work. I checked
the amount of times the drives had been used and where required cleaned
them!

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Greenberg, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 16:08
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning issues: LTO-3/ADIC i2k and NBU 5.1 MP3


I have a ADIC i2k with LTO-3 (IBM) drives in it and NBU 5.1 MP3 running on
RH Linux AS3 but I seem to be having some issues with drive cleaning.


Some of the drives have the red 'C' indicator on the front of the drive with
the amber light flashing signaling that the drive needs to be cleaned.
However, the tapealert notification doesn't seem to be getting to NBU to do
the clean on the drive.  

Yes, there are cleaning tapes in the library, in the correct partition and
are labeled properly.  When I issue a tpclean command or do it from the GUI
it works fine.  The problem is I have to do all that manually.  

The tape alert doesn't seem to be getting to NBU.  I checked the messages
file but that doesn't seem to be giving me enough info.

Anyone have a suggestion for me on where to look next?

Brian Greenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Urgent Quick Question - NBU 5.1 Master Properties "Schedule Backu p Attempts"

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Guys
Got a Remote Win2k3 
NBU Master / Media Server scenario, that has their "Schedule Backup Attempts" 
set to "1" every 12 hours!
 
The reason being, is 
that SAP Backup run, and they do not want these jobs to 
retry!
 
Is there a way, to 
maybe specify a specific client can retry backup attempts more than once, 
without upsetting the schedule backup attempts for the SAP 
clients.
 
Problem: Server 
hosts clients that hold 4TB of Data, checkpoints not enabled adn when a failure 
occurs, it fails and thats it!! No more retry!!
 
If anyone has an 
alternative solution, please let me know
Thanks
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


Re: [Veritas-bu] Resolved: No available tapes

2006-03-01 Thread Yoseph Leleputra
To avoid this case happen again   running /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/goodies/available_media   And you will now media status at your library .      Joe  Geoff Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Thanks for everyone who responded.     I did some digging and found that we are using two retention levels for our backups, and the fact that NBU doesn't mix retention levels completely explains why we get some backups fail with 96 errors, but others before and after complete with no problems.  We have a small library, and will need to do more work in the future to be sure there are available tapes for all the classes.  Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. 
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning issues: LTO-3/ADIC i2k and NBU 5.1 MP3

2006-03-01 Thread Yoseph Leleputra
Did you using barcode from adic or not.   Right now I have a similar problem like you and my suspect is barcode problemNow i am using barcode from local market .      Joe"Greenberg, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  I have a ADIC i2k with LTO-3 (IBM) drives in it and NBU 5.1 MP3 runningon RH Linux AS3 but I seem to be having some issues with drive cleaning.Some of the drives have the red 'C' indicator on the front of the drivewith the amber light flashing signaling that the drive needs to becleaned. However, the tapealert notification doesn't seem to be gettingto NBU to do the clean on the drive. Yes, there are cleaning tapes in the library, in the correct partitionand are labeled properly. When I issue a tpclean command or do it fromthe!
 GUI it
 works fine. The problem is I have to do all that manually. The tape alert doesn't seem to be getting to NBU. I checked themessages file but that doesn't seem to be giving me enough info.Anyone have a suggestion for me on where to look next?Brian Greenberg[EMAIL PROTECTED]___Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduhttp://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-01 Thread Konstantin 'Kastus' Shchuka
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:01:29PM -0500, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) wrote:
> I've got a Solaris 8 server running NBU 4.5.
>  
> Where exactly is the GUI?!  Do I have to install it separately?

No, you don't.

>  
> Everyone keeps talking about the "Java GUI" but I can't seem to find it.

/usr/openv/java/jnbSA

-- 
Konstantin 'Kastus' Shchuka
Unix System Administrator
Epocrates Inc.
tel 650.227.1786
fax 650.592.6995
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-01 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Ah - you're right.  The one in ../netbackup/bin is a link:

> ls -ld /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/jnbSA
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root other 21 Sep 14  2004
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/jnbSA -> /usr/openv/java/jnbSA



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Austin
Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:40 PM
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix


/usr/openv/java/jnbSA

On 3/1/06, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got a Solaris 8 server running NBU 4.5.
>
> Where exactly is the GUI?!  Do I have to install it separately?
>
> Everyone keeps talking about the "Java GUI" but I can't seem to find it.
>
> Thanx,
>
>
> -Jonathan
>

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-01 Thread Mark . Donaldson



> which 
jnbSA/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/jnbSA

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Martin, 
  Jonathan (Contractor)Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:01 
  PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix
  I've 
  got a Solaris 8 server running NBU 4.5.
   
  Where exactly is the GUI?!  Do I have to install it 
  separately?
   
  Everyone keeps talking about the "Java GUI" but I can't seem to find 
  it.
   
  Thanx,
   
  -Jonathan
   


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-01 Thread Austin Murphy
/usr/openv/java/jnbSA

On 3/1/06, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got a Solaris 8 server running NBU 4.5.
>
> Where exactly is the GUI?!  Do I have to install it separately?
>
> Everyone keeps talking about the "Java GUI" but I can't seem to find it.
>
> Thanx,
>
>
> -Jonathan
>

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-01 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)



I've 
got a Solaris 8 server running NBU 4.5.
 
Where 
exactly is the GUI?!  Do I have to install it 
separately?
 
Everyone keeps talking about the "Java GUI" but I can't seem to find 
it.
 
Thanx,
 
-Jonathan
 


RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread Conner, Neil
Run the Netbackup services with a domain account that has the necessary
permissions on both machines.  Domain admin might be overkill, but it's
a good place to start.

-Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:18 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

The services are running as local system, the problem is that I need a
domain 
user in a backup_exit_notify script to able to do something on a share
on 
another machine.

Regards
Michael

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:56:52 - , WEAVER, Simon wrote
> Michael
> I wonder if you are looking for local Administrator rights on the
Netbackup
> computer, which will effectively allow you to make changes to this box
> 
> Simon Weaver 
> Technical Support 
> Windows Domain Administrator
> 
> EADS Astrium 
> Tel: 02392-708598
> 
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 01 March 2006 12:49
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows
> 
> Hello
> 
> Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at 
> runas but
> 
> it seems to be interactively only.
> 
> Unfortunately I can't just change the Netbackup Services users.
> 
> Regards
> Michael
> 
> --
> Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
>  disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by 
> return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute 
> the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind 
> EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
> 
> EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
> Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread King, Cheryl








I get these all the time.  However,
when I first put in SSO, I had an unusually high # of them, like more than 50
every night.  I’m trying to remember what Veritas support had me do
to get these down to a more reasonable # and I think it was adding
SSO_SCAN_ABILITY = 9 to /usr/openv/volmgr/vm.conf on the master server. 
This will make the master server the SCAN host most of the time.

 

SSO_SCAN_ABILITY may have
from to 0 - 9. The larger the scan ability, the more likely the host will be to
become the scan host.  Setting it to zero means it will never become the
SCAN_HOST.

 

When a 134 occurs the
jobs will re-que if the backup window is still open.   The 134 happens
when a job starts and all drives are already assigned.  In my case, where
all 4 media servers share all 8 tape drives, I could probably set the other
media servers to 0 so they would never become the SCAN_HOST and I’d
eliminate the 134s.  I might try that. 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006
7:10 AM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing
jobs due to busy resources(134)



 

Does anyone know which kernel sysctl or configuration option or
netbackup? option is related to this error?
Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd limit?

Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue? 

Thanks,

Justin.








Re:[Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message



On second thought, 
disregard the touch file ;)
 
Did a little 
reading and realized I should probably make sure it's gone off all of my 
servers...
 
Ouch!
 
Kate
 

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, 
Katherine ASent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:12 PMTo: 
Justin PiszczCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

What version of 
NetBackup are you running? 
 
There are some 
entries you can put into bp.conf:
 
WAIT_IN_QUEUE = 
YESQUEUE_ON_ERROR = YES
And there is 
a touch file you can put in:
 
/usr/openv/volmgr/DISABLE_RESOURCES_BUSY

~Kate
 

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin 
PiszczSent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:10 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing 
jobs due to busy resources(134)Does anyone know which 
kernel sysctl or configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this 
error?Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd 
limit?Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue? 
Thanks,Justin.




This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If 
youthink you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the 
senderbyreply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank 
you.Aetna 


RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message



On second thought, 
disregard the touch file ;)
 
Did a little 
reading and realized I should probably make sure it's gone off all of my 
servers...
 
Ouch!
 
Kate
 

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, 
Katherine ASent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:12 PMTo: 
Justin PiszczCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

What version of 
NetBackup are you running? 
 
There are some 
entries you can put into bp.conf:
 
WAIT_IN_QUEUE = 
YESQUEUE_ON_ERROR = YES
And there is 
a touch file you can put in:
 
/usr/openv/volmgr/DISABLE_RESOURCES_BUSY

~Kate
 

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin 
PiszczSent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:10 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing 
jobs due to busy resources(134)Does anyone know which 
kernel sysctl or configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this 
error?Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd 
limit?Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue? 
Thanks,Justin.




This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If 
youthink you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the 
senderbyreply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank 
you.Aetna 


RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message





What version of 
NetBackup are you running? 
 
There are some 
entries you can put into bp.conf:
 
WAIT_IN_QUEUE = 
YESQUEUE_ON_ERROR = YES
And there is 
a touch file you can put in:
 
/usr/openv/volmgr/DISABLE_RESOURCES_BUSY

~Kate
 

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin 
PiszczSent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:10 AMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing 
jobs due to busy resources(134)Does anyone know which 
kernel sysctl or configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this 
error?Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd 
limit?Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue? 
Thanks,Justin.




This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.  If youthink you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the senderbyreply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.  Thank you.Aetna





[Veritas-bu] Resolved: No available tapes

2006-03-01 Thread Geoff Hazel
Thanks for everyone who responded.     I did some digging and found that we are using two retention levels for our backups, and the fact that NBU doesn't mix retention levels completely explains why we get some backups fail with 96 errors, but others before and after complete with no problems.  We have a small library, and will need to do more work in the future to be sure there are available tapes for all the classes.
		Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze. 


[Veritas-bu] What exactly does suspended media mean?

2006-03-01 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)



I have several tapes 
that show as suspended. What does this mean?
 
Thank You,
 
Layne Barber
Systems Analyst II
Unisys Corp.
DISA Montgomery
Comm. 334-416-3402
DSN 596-3402
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0MP1, Exchange 2K3 on Win2K3

2006-03-01 Thread Brooks, Jason
All,
We are testing Exchange Backups for NBU 6 today.  I was able to
successfully backup the information store, but I can't get the Mailboxes
or Public Folders to backup.

Config Information:

Policy:
Type - MS-Exchange-Server
Storage Unit - tape unit
Volume Pool - Exchange
Schedule - two defined
Full
Incremental
Clients - Exchange Server
Backup Selections - 
NEW_STREAM
Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes:\
NEW_STREAM
Microsoft Exchange Public Folders:\

With this default, the backup returned a 71 - none of the files in the
file list exist(71)

So, to try and hone down the problem, I played a bit.

First, tried specifying a particular Public Folder.  Gave up.

Went to Mailboxes.  Tried Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes:\[b]*.  Tried
Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes:\[broo]*.  Both of these returned a 69 -
invalid filelist specification(69).

Anyone have any suggestions?  The setup of this followed the NetBackup
for Microsoft Exchange Server System Administrator's Guide.  The only
place I can think there may be a resolution is here (Admin Guide, pages
20 & 21):

3.  Right-click on the virtual server name and select
Properties.
4.  Click on the Security tab.
5.  Select the NetBackup Client service account under the Name
pane. 
6.  Under Permissions, select Receive As and Send As.

When we set the Receive As and Send As permissions for the NBU Client
service account, the Deny rule was also in place as an inheritance.  I
have yet to figure from where it was inherited or how to deactivate it.

Is this a likely source of the issue?  Suggestions?

Thanks,
Jason



Jason Brooks
Computer Systems Engineer
IITS - Longwood University
voice - (434) 395-2916
fax - (434) 395-2035
mailto:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread David Rock
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 13:48]:
> Hello
> 
> Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at runas but 
> it seems to be interactively only.

You should be doing su - interactively only, anyway.  What are you
actually trying to do?  Are you trying to script something, or just run
as Administrator to briefly accomplish something?

-- 
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Cleaning issues: LTO-3/ADIC i2k and NBU 5.1 MP3

2006-03-01 Thread Greenberg, Brian
I have a ADIC i2k with LTO-3 (IBM) drives in it and NBU 5.1 MP3 running
on RH Linux AS3 but I seem to be having some issues with drive cleaning.


Some of the drives have the red 'C' indicator on the front of the drive
with the amber light flashing signaling that the drive needs to be
cleaned.  However, the tapealert notification doesn't seem to be getting
to NBU to do the clean on the drive.  

Yes, there are cleaning tapes in the library, in the correct partition
and are labeled properly.  When I issue a tpclean command or do it from
the GUI it works fine.  The problem is I have to do all that manually.  

The tape alert doesn't seem to be getting to NBU.  I checked the
messages file but that doesn't seem to be giving me enough info.

Anyone have a suggestion for me on where to look next?

Brian Greenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
I've used a Freeware Utlity called SANUR in the past.

http://www.commandline.co.uk/sanur/

It looks like its no longer in development, but downloads are still
avalible.

-Jonathan 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:18 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

The services are running as local system, the problem is that I need a
domain user in a backup_exit_notify script to able to do something on a
share on another machine.

Regards
Michael

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:56:52 - , WEAVER, Simon wrote
> Michael
> I wonder if you are looking for local Administrator rights on the 
> Netbackup computer, which will effectively allow you to make changes 
> to this box
> 
> Simon Weaver
> Technical Support
> Windows Domain Administrator
> 
> EADS Astrium
> Tel: 02392-708598
> 
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 March 2006 12:49
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows
> 
> Hello
> 
> Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at 
> runas but
> 
> it seems to be interactively only.
> 
> Unfortunately I can't just change the Netbackup Services users.
> 
> Regards
> Michael
> 
> --
> Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,  
> disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by 
> return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute 
> the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind 
> EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
> 
> EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 
> Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Justin
Only 
time I see this is when there are no more tape drives available for Netbackup to 
use (ie: 50 jobs running, all using the tape drives and 20 queueing because 
resources are busy).
 
How 
many jobs is your netbackup running concurrently when you get these 
messages?
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Justin Piszcz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 March 2006 
  14:10To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy 
  resources(134)Does anyone know which kernel sysctl or 
  configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this error?Is it 
  the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd limit?Anyone ever get 
  these in the past and then fix the issue? 
Thanks,Justin.

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread ida3248b
The services are running as local system, the problem is that I need a domain 
user in a backup_exit_notify script to able to do something on a share on 
another machine.

Regards
Michael

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:56:52 - , WEAVER, Simon wrote
> Michael
> I wonder if you are looking for local Administrator rights on the Netbackup
> computer, which will effectively allow you to make changes to this box
> 
> Simon Weaver 
> Technical Support 
> Windows Domain Administrator
> 
> EADS Astrium 
> Tel: 02392-708598
> 
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 01 March 2006 12:49
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows
> 
> Hello
> 
> Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at 
> runas but
> 
> it seems to be interactively only.
> 
> Unfortunately I can't just change the Netbackup Services users.
> 
> Regards
> Michael
> 
> --
> Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> This email is for the intended addressee only.
> If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
>  disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by 
> return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute 
> the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind 
> EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.
> 
> EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
> Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 
> 2AS, England


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)

2006-03-01 Thread Justin Piszcz
Does anyone know which kernel sysctl or configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this error?Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd limit?Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue?
Thanks,Justin.


RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread Jeff Lightner
Whether it's a kill -9 of a process or a Glock 9 used on a fellow admin
you're likely to have problems afterwards that make you question the
wisdom of the kill.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:16 AM
To: 'Bob Stump'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


Whack the Admin! But if this happens again check 2 things.

1) Device Monitor, see if any tapes are awaiting to be loaded
2) Check the client, stop Netbackup and kill any backup processes
3) Whack the Admin again to make you feel better
4) Look for another way to whack the Admin

:-)

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 13:14
To: WEAVER, Simon; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


No. But, I just found out that another admin was not patient with a
netbackup stop and so used kill -9 on the bpsched processes. The
processes
were then like a zombie and would not respond to any attempts to
suspend/cancel/slap in the face.

Think maybe I could just go into a directory and wack some files next
time I
see this? Or should I wack the other admin :-) jk





>>> "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/1/2006 8:00 AM >>>

Bob
Can you not SUSPEND the jobs, to allow you to perform this action and
then
restart?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 12:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job



I stop/started the netbackup services.
That isn't an easy thing to do since I have backups running 7x24 I was
hoping to discover a way without doing the proverbial bounce.



>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2006 12:12 PM >>>
I have this all the time on my busy system.  It'll often clean up when
the
entire running job queue is empty & then the scheduler seems to cleanup
these strays.

If it doesn't cleanup then, I get rid of them by bouncing my master
server
processes.

Usually getting an idle period is enough to clean these up.

-M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not. So, I
went to
the command line but I still could not kill it. Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc
02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc
02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate
or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The
views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS
Astrium
Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain,
disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Ro

RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Whack the Admin! But if this happens again check 2 things.

1) Device Monitor, see if any tapes are awaiting to be loaded
2) Check the client, stop Netbackup and kill any backup processes
3) Whack the Admin again to make you feel better
4) Look for another way to whack the Admin

:-)

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 13:14
To: WEAVER, Simon; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


No. But, I just found out that another admin was not patient with a
netbackup stop and so used kill -9 on the bpsched processes. The processes
were then like a zombie and would not respond to any attempts to
suspend/cancel/slap in the face.

Think maybe I could just go into a directory and wack some files next time I
see this? Or should I wack the other admin :-) jk





>>> "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/1/2006 8:00 AM >>>

Bob
Can you not SUSPEND the jobs, to allow you to perform this action and then
restart?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 12:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job



I stop/started the netbackup services.
That isn't an easy thing to do since I have backups running 7x24 I was
hoping to discover a way without doing the proverbial bounce.



>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2006 12:12 PM >>>
I have this all the time on my busy system.  It'll often clean up when the
entire running job queue is empty & then the scheduler seems to cleanup
these strays.

If it doesn't cleanup then, I get rid of them by bouncing my master server
processes.

Usually getting an idle period is enough to clean these up.

-M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not. So, I went to
the command line but I still could not kill it. Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The
views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium
Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread Bob Stump
No. But, I just found out that another admin was not patient with a netbackup 
stop and so used kill -9 on the bpsched processes.
The processes were then like a zombie and would not respond to any attempts to 
suspend/cancel/slap in the face.

Think maybe I could just go into a directory and wack some files next time I 
see this?
Or should I wack the other admin :-) jk





>>> "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/1/2006 8:00 AM >>>

Bob
Can you not SUSPEND the jobs, to allow you to perform this action and then
restart?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 12:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job



I stop/started the netbackup services.
That isn't an easy thing to do since I have backups running 7x24 I was
hoping to discover a way without doing the proverbial bounce.



>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2006 12:12 PM >>>
I have this all the time on my busy system.  It'll often clean up when the
entire running job queue is empty & then the scheduler seems to cleanup
these strays.

If it doesn't cleanup then, I get rid of them by bouncing my master server
processes.

Usually getting an idle period is enough to clean these up.

-M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not. So, I went to
the command line but I still could not kill it. Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] OT: vxsvc process runaway

2006-03-01 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message



As far 
as I can tell, nothing at all had changed on this box.
Since 
it's a lab box, there's no change control process, so no logging of 
changes.
 
It's a 
Solaris box, no AV running.
 
I 
ended up killing the vxsvc process and disabling the SXXisisd startup script, 
untill I can determine root cause.
only 
side effect is that it will have to be started manually in order to use the VEA 
GUI, then shutdown again.
Not a 
big deal, as I use it maybe once a year. LOL.
 
Paul

  
  -Original Message-From: WEAVER, Simon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 1, 2006 3:02 
  AMTo: Paul Keating; veritas-buSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 
  OT: vxsvc process runaway
  Paul
  What 
  I would do, is verify if any changes have been made to this server (ie: 
  applications installed, AV update ect) that could be causing a memory 
  leak.
   
  As 
  an after thought, anything that I find misbehaving, I tend to verify its 
  running the latest version and the OS has the latest SP or 
  updates.
   
  Maybe, if AV is running, turn it off perhaps as a 
  test.
   
  Or 
  you could uninstall / resinstall the application again and see if the problem 
  continues. I was chasing a memory leak which I thought was an AV process but 
  in fact it was a Quota 3rd party application that was to blame! Since 
  uninstalling, box remains stable!
   
  Turned out the software had an update that killed 
  it!!
  Regards
   
   
  Simon 
  WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
  EADS 
  AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
  Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original Message-From: Paul Keating 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 
17:52To: veritas-buSubject: [Veritas-bu] OT: vxsvc 
process runaway
I know it's a 
vxvm question, but I'm guessing many of your are likely running 
vxvm.
 
On one of my 
Netbackup servers (lab system) I've got a process called vxsvc that seems to 
be misbehaving.
This machine has 
been running for about 18 months, and this only started last 
week.
 
When the system 
boots, the process appears consuming 65M of memory. (which is the same as 
all of my other boxes which are behaving.)
On this 
particular machine after about 48 hours, it's grown to the point where it's 
consumed all 2GB of physical memory, and all the configured 
swap.
The machine 
hangs hard, and has to be powercycled.
 
If I kill the 
process, the system continues to work fine, except you cannot use the VEA 
GUIwhich isn't normally a big dealif I need to run it, I can start 
vxsvc, do what needs to be done with VEA then kill vxsvc 
again.
 
One of these 
days, I'll have time to work on resolving it, but for now, it's just a 
nuisance has anyone seen this before?
 
Paul
  


  This email is for the intended 
addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not 
use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the 
sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily 
constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email 
shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales 
No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, 
Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Bob
Can you not SUSPEND the jobs, to allow you to perform this action and then
restart?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 12:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job



I stop/started the netbackup services.
That isn't an easy thing to do since I have backups running 7x24 I was
hoping to discover a way without doing the proverbial bounce.



>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2006 12:12 PM >>>
I have this all the time on my busy system.  It'll often clean up when the
entire running job queue is empty & then the scheduler seems to cleanup
these strays.

If it doesn't cleanup then, I get rid of them by bouncing my master server
processes.

Usually getting an idle period is enough to clean these up.

-M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not. So, I went to
the command line but I still could not kill it. Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Michael
I wonder if you are looking for local Administrator rights on the Netbackup
computer, which will effectively allow you to make changes to this box

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 March 2006 12:49
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Su - for windows


Hello

Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at runas but

it seems to be interactively only.

Unfortunately I can't just change the Netbackup Services users.

Regards
Michael

--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread Bob Stump

I stop/started the netbackup services.
That isn't an easy thing to do since I have backups running 7x24
I was hoping to discover a way without doing the proverbial bounce.



>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/28/2006 12:12 PM >>>
I have this all the time on my busy system.  It'll often clean up when the
entire running job queue is empty & then the scheduler seems to cleanup
these strays.

If it doesn't cleanup then, I get rid of them by bouncing my master server
processes.

Usually getting an idle period is enough to clean these up.

-M

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not.
So, I went to the command line but I still could not kill it.
Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Su - for windows

2006-03-01 Thread ida3248b
Hello

Does somebody know of a su - command for windows, I have looked at runas but 
it seems to be interactively only.

Unfortunately I can't just change the Netbackup Services users.

Regards
Michael

--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

2006-03-01 Thread Bobby Williams
In this case is was mscvp70.dll.

We backed out the MP4 patch then uninstalled 5.1, rebooted, reinstalled 5.1,
patched back to MP4.  Support told me to back out the patch first or VSP
would never work correctly on the client again.

The DLL is not a Veritas DLL, but the client was patched with MS patches
right before this error started.  It may be a DLL that NB looks for at
install and installs if it is not there.

Anyway, the client reinstall fixed my problem 




Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, Tennessee  37421
423-296-8200

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

Do you know what the DLL is that is "gone"?  I've had similar failures
related to bpfis.exe, but a different error message than what Simon posted.
Mine is always an error in the Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library :
Runtime Error!

I upgraded my Master, Media, and this server to NBU 6 MP1.  All three
Win2k3.  That error is gone, but the client still fails.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:29 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon; 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

bpfis.exe is used by VSP.  I have an issue where a DLL used by bpfis is
"gone" and bpfis is causing backups of the system state to fail on a W2K
server.



From: "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/02/28 Tue AM 09:05:05 EST
To: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'"
 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client


Guys
 
Win2k3 NBU 5.1 Server with a shedload of clients for a remote site I am
looking after
 
Can you help? I appear to have been getting alot of problems with a client
backup and in the Win2k3 Application Log:
 
Reporting queued error: faulting application bpfis.exe, version 5.1.0.135,
faulting module libvfutil.dll, version 4.1.118.0, fault address 0x5724.

Has anyone seen this or have any advice? As a result of the above, backups
complete with status 196 backup window closed.

Rebooted, stopped and restarted Netbackup Client, but no joy !

Thanks

Simon



This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, TN  37421 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Why does one class only have trouble finding fre e tapes?

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Geoff
96 
tells me that the tape is probably full and the Netbackup application cannot 
find anymore tapes to use - hence... it fails!
 
The 
Media Lists Report tool will show you whether the tape is full, or is near the 
capacity of the tape. Hence, if compression is no good, the hardware will only 
squeeze what data it can on the media after that it relies on netbackup to 
throw more blank tapes!
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Geoff Hazel 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 
  19:07To: Kohli, ViditCc: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Why does 
  one class only have trouble finding free tapes?
  I received a number of similar answers, and unfortunately it's not the 
  volume pool, all the tapes are in the same pool, there's only one pool.
   
  However, I have another possibility:  Will netbackup throw the 96 
  error if there isn't enough room to write the backup completely?  It 
  seems that even the cumulative backups for this particular server are quite 
  large compared to the other servers, on an order of 10x larger.  If we're 
  getting low on space, is it possible that the other backups complete because 
  they still fit?"Kohli, Vidit" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

check media type set for media volume 
pool set 


From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff 
HazelSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:35 PMTo: 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Why does 
one class only have trouble finding free tapes?

I have a Netbackup system (3.4) running on a SUN box, backing up about 
a dozen clients.  I have one class for one server, and this class will 
come up with 96 errors "no media available" when other backups before or 
after seen to have no trouble finding media.
 
 96    ptseattle 
shared   
Cumulative sunsys2 02/14/2006 
03:00:19 
(unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none 
available)  0    
sunsys2   
sunsys2  Cumulative 
sunsys2 02/14/2006 03:08:34
Any reason you can think of why this is happening?


Yahoo! MailBring photos to life! New 
PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS 
MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENT MAY BE PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY OR 
OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE. If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, copying or use of this message and any attachment ! is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify us immediately by replying to the message and permanently delete it 
from your computer and destroy any printout 
  thereof.
  
  
  Brings words and photos together (easily) withPhotoMail 
  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] OT: vxsvc process runaway

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



Paul
What I 
would do, is verify if any changes have been made to this server (ie: 
applications installed, AV update ect) that could be causing a memory 
leak.
 
As an 
after thought, anything that I find misbehaving, I tend to verify its running 
the latest version and the OS has the latest SP or updates.
 
Maybe, 
if AV is running, turn it off perhaps as a test.
 
Or you 
could uninstall / resinstall the application again and see if the problem 
continues. I was chasing a memory leak which I thought was an AV process but in 
fact it was a Quota 3rd party application that was to blame! Since uninstalling, 
box remains stable!
 
Turned 
out the software had an update that killed it!!
Regards
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul Keating 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 
  17:52To: veritas-buSubject: [Veritas-bu] OT: vxsvc 
  process runaway
  I know it's a vxvm 
  question, but I'm guessing many of your are likely running 
  vxvm.
   
  On one of my 
  Netbackup servers (lab system) I've got a process called vxsvc that seems to 
  be misbehaving.
  This machine has 
  been running for about 18 months, and this only started last 
  week.
   
  When the system 
  boots, the process appears consuming 65M of memory. (which is the same as all 
  of my other boxes which are behaving.)
  On this particular 
  machine after about 48 hours, it's grown to the point where it's consumed all 
  2GB of physical memory, and all the configured swap.
  The machine hangs 
  hard, and has to be powercycled.
   
  If I kill the 
  process, the system continues to work fine, except you cannot use the VEA 
  GUIwhich isn't normally a big dealif I need to run it, I can start 
  vxsvc, do what needs to be done with VEA then kill vxsvc 
  again.
   
  One of these days, 
  I'll have time to work on resolving it, but for now, it's just a 
  nuisance has anyone seen this before?
   
  Paul

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Jason
Is the client updated to the same version of NBU with the same MP applied?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Brooks, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 February 2006 17:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client


Do you know what the DLL is that is "gone"?  I've had similar failures
related to bpfis.exe, but a different error message than what Simon posted.
Mine is always an error in the Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library :
Runtime Error!

I upgraded my Master, Media, and this server to NBU 6 MP1.  All three
Win2k3.  That error is gone, but the client still fails.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:29 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon; 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

bpfis.exe is used by VSP.  I have an issue where a DLL used by bpfis is
"gone" and bpfis is causing backups of the system state to fail on a W2K
server.



From: "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/02/28 Tue AM 09:05:05 EST
To: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'"
 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client


Guys
 
Win2k3 NBU 5.1 Server with a shedload of clients for a remote site I am
looking after
 
Can you help? I appear to have been getting alot of problems with a client
backup and in the Win2k3 Application Log:
 
Reporting queued error: faulting application bpfis.exe, version 5.1.0.135,
faulting module libvfutil.dll, version 4.1.118.0, fault address 0x5724.

Has anyone seen this or have any advice? As a result of the above, backups
complete with status 196 backup window closed.

Rebooted, stopped and restarted Netbackup Client, but no joy !

Thanks

Simon



This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The
views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium
Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, TN  37421 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Why don't tapes hold the same amount of data?

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



All 
sorts of reasons Geoff, all down to the type of file size and data stored on the 
tape, whether the data can or cannot be compressed, and if the robot or tape 
drive can compress the data.
 
I 
think others have given opinions on this, but thats my 
opinion
 
 
Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Geoff Hazel 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 
  17:36To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] Why don't tapes hold the same amount of 
data?
  We have all the same tapes in the robot library, but when I look at the 
  "full" tapes I see a wide difference in the amount of data they have:
   
  A00085  HCART    TLD  
  0   16 
  -   3 
  151715893    FULLA00088  
  HCART    TLD  
  0   7  
  -   1 
  255478199    FULLA00089  
  HCART    TLD  
  0   10 
  -   1 
  343680501    FULLA00090  
  HCART    TLD  
  0   13 
  -   3 
  315433835    FULL
  Why do some tapes hold twice as much data as other tapes?
  
  
  Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus 
  scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Thanks, I did in fact as a course of action, turn off VSS last night as I
noticed someone has re-enabled it and hence why the backups started to fail.

This seems to have worked - I also disabled tracker.exe too on the Win2k3
box

Thanks for the clarification

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 February 2006 17:29
To: WEAVER, Simon; 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client


bpfis.exe is used by VSP.  I have an issue where a DLL used by bpfis is
"gone" and bpfis is causing backups of the system state to fail on a W2K
server.



From: "WEAVER, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/02/28 Tue AM 09:05:05 EST
To: "'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'"
 
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Dr Watson Win2k3 Netbackup Client


Guys
 
Win2k3 NBU 5.1 Server with a shedload of clients for a remote site I am
looking after
 
Can you help? I appear to have been getting alot of problems with a client
backup and in the Win2k3 Application Log:
 
Reporting queued error: faulting application bpfis.exe, version 5.1.0.135,
faulting module libvfutil.dll, version 4.1.118.0, fault address 0x5724.

Has anyone seen this or have any advice? As a result of the above, backups
complete with status 196 backup window closed.

Rebooted, stopped and restarted Netbackup Client, but no joy !

Thanks

Simon



This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The
views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium
Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, TN  37421 

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Bob
Did you try stopping / restarting the backup services on the client and on
the backup master server?

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 February 2006 16:23
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job


I tried to cancel a queued job via the java GUI and could not. So, I went to
the command line but I still could not kill it. Any other suggestions?

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   

# bpdbjobs -cancel 19536
Canceling 1 jobs

# bpdbjobs -report -jobid 19536
 JobID  State Stat   Client   Policy Schedule
Started  Ended
 19536 Queued  mickey18.00_sun18.00_sun_inc 02/27/06
18:02   



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu