[Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Quick frozen tape question,

I need to re-visit the docs.

When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Storage Group Ordering Question

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Under 5.1MP4,

If I change the ordering of a Storage Unit GROUP, I have to bp.kill_all 
and re-launch NetBackup.

I was wondering is there a bpadm reload command to make these changes take 
effect or must I always bounce NetBackup?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Group Ordering Question

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Change the ordering of the Storage Units in a Storage Unit Group rather.

Justin.

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:

 Under 5.1MP4,

 If I change the ordering of a Storage Unit GROUP, I have to bp.kill_all and 
 re-launch NetBackup.

 I was wondering is there a bpadm reload command to make these changes take 
 effect or must I always bounce NetBackup?

 Justin.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Ueli Schweizer
It will try to do the restore using the frozen tape.

Ueli Schweizer

AGITE Software AG . Boesch 43 . CH-6331 Huenenberg . Switzerland
Direct: +41 79 204 9190 . Phone: +41 41 781 5678 . Fax: +41 41 781 5677
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.AGITE-Software.com 

backupVISUAL...
  ...we make life on backup easy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:20 AM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

Quick frozen tape question,

I need to re-visit the docs.

When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Thanks.

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Ueli Schweizer wrote:

 It will try to do the restore using the frozen tape.

 Ueli Schweizer

 AGITE Software AG . Boesch 43 . CH-6331 Huenenberg . Switzerland
 Direct: +41 79 204 9190 . Phone: +41 41 781 5678 . Fax: +41 41 781 5677
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.AGITE-Software.com

 backupVISUAL...
  ...we make life on backup easy
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:20 AM
 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] RAW partition restore to alternate location

2007-02-16 Thread Rolf C
Is it possible to redirect a raw partition backup to an alternate location on a 
Windows client?
 
F.e. I do a RAW backup from mountpoint \\.\c:\temp\mount and i want to restore 
it to \\.\J:
 
I receive the following error message WRN - can't open raw device: 
\\.\j:/\\.\c:\Temp\mount\ (NULL) (WIN32 2: The system cannot find the file 
specified. )
 
I also tried to restore from a backup made of \\.\m: to \\.\j: resulting in the 
same error.
 
Thanks
_
Windows Live™ Messenger 8.1 is here! Download now.
http://g.msn.com/8reen_us/EN/INSTALL_MSN_MESSENGER_DL.EXE___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
Typically we make tapes SUSPENDED rather than FROZEN when we want to
reserve them for a restore (e.g. avoid vaulting using them for
duplication or other backups using them).  I was under the impression
you couldn't restore from a FROZEN tape.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 5:37 AM
To: Ueli Schweizer
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

Thanks.

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Ueli Schweizer wrote:

 It will try to do the restore using the frozen tape.

 Ueli Schweizer

 AGITE Software AG . Boesch 43 . CH-6331 Huenenberg . Switzerland
 Direct: +41 79 204 9190 . Phone: +41 41 781 5678 . Fax: +41 41 781
5677
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.AGITE-Software.com

 backupVISUAL...
  ...we make life on backup easy
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:20 AM
 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Windows Backups Restored to Linux Boxes

2007-02-16 Thread Jones, Courtenay
Enviroment: NBU 6.0 MP4 on Windows 2K3 machine
 
We have a fairly large VMware shop in house for all of Windows boxes. To
back up these VM images, we end up taking tarballs of the VMDK files,
and dropping them to a Windows boxe with several large attached luns.
This works flawlessly...
 
But, we are going to DR here shortly, and we were hoping to just drop
the tarballs directly onto LINUX boxes running ESX. I can restore the
tarballs, but the restore comes up incomplete.
 
I see the following errors in our logs:
 
08:47:16 2/16/2007: Restore Started
 
08:47:17 (23828.xxx) Restore job id 23828 will require 1 image.
08:47:17 (23828.xxx) Media id R00086 is needed for the restore.
08:47:17 (23828.xxx) Media id R00081 is needed for the restore.
 
08:47:54 (23828.001) Restoring from image created 2/12/2007 2:44:16 PM
08:48:03 (23828.001) INF - Waiting for positioning of media id R00086 on
server sbs09932bu002.usncraleigh9901.int.wolseley.com for reading.
08:48:53 (23828.001) INF - Beginning restore from server
sbs09932bu002.usncraleigh9901.int.wolseley.com to client
sbs09932vi001.carolinaholdings.internal.
09:04:23 (23828.001) Windows security info file type 'L' for
.SeCuRiTy.106, ignored...
09:04:23 (23828.001)
/W/snaps/sbs09932vi004.carolinaholdings.internal/sbs09932vm031_11.tgz
09:04:23 (23828.001) Changed
/W/snaps/sbs09932vi004.carolinaholdings.internal/sbs09932vm031_11.tgz to
/restored/sbs09932vm031_11.tgz
09:06:20 (23828.001) Unexpected EOF on archive file
09:06:20 (23828.001) (23828.001) INF - TAR EXITING WITH STATUS = 0
09:06:20 (23828.001) (23828.001) INF - TAR RESTORED 0 OF 1 FILES
SUCCESSFULLY
09:06:20 (23828.001) (23828.001) INF - TAR KEPT 0 EXISTING FILES
09:06:20 (23828.001) (23828.001) INF - TAR PARTIALLY RESTORED 0 FILES
 
09:06:21 (23828.001) Status of restore from image created 2/12/2007
2:44:16 PM = the restore failed to recover the requested files
 
09:06:24 (23828.xxx) INF - Status = the restore failed to recover the
requested files.
 
When I try to untar the tarballs, I see the following errors:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] restored]# tar -zxfv sbs09932vm031_11.tgz
tar (child): v: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: sbs09932vm031_11.tgz: Not found in archive
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] restored]#

 
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
 
 

Regards,

 
-cj
Courtenay Jones
UNIX Administrator, Systems Engineering


Wolseley North American Division * 8020 Arco Corporate Drive * Raleigh *
NC * 27617

 

T: +1 (919) 431 1882 * F: +1 (919) 431 1198 * M: +1 (919) 673 3983

 

www.wolseley.com http://www.wolseley.com/ 

Wolseley plc registered office 

Parkview 1220 Arlington Business Park 

Theale Nr Reading RG7 4GA United Kingdom

Registration No. 29846 England







 

 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Same here, which is why I asked, I guess I should try it and/or consult 
the docs.


On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Jeff Lightner wrote:

 Typically we make tapes SUSPENDED rather than FROZEN when we want to
 reserve them for a restore (e.g. avoid vaulting using them for
 duplication or other backups using them).  I was under the impression
 you couldn't restore from a FROZEN tape.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 5:37 AM
 To: Ueli Schweizer
 Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

 Thanks.

 On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Ueli Schweizer wrote:

 It will try to do the restore using the frozen tape.

 Ueli Schweizer

 AGITE Software AG . Boesch 43 . CH-6331 Huenenberg . Switzerland
 Direct: +41 79 204 9190 . Phone: +41 41 781 5678 . Fax: +41 41 781
 5677
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.AGITE-Software.com

 backupVISUAL...
  ...we make life on backup easy
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:20 AM
 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Whelan, Patrick
Point of clarification.
The only differences between FROZEN and SUSPENDED:
1) Suspending has to be done manually
2) When all the images on a SUSPENDED tape have expired the tape will be 
re-used.

Otherwise they are treated the same in that NetBackup will read from the tape 
if a restore needs it.

Regards,

Patrick Whelan
NetBackup Specialist
Architect  Engineering
+44 20 7863 5243

Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most! - Unknown

There are only 10 kinds of people on earth - those who understand binary
and those who don't.

... Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte 
-- Martin Niemöller

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner
Sent: 16 February 2007 14:34
To: Justin Piszcz; Ueli Schweizer
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

Typically we make tapes SUSPENDED rather than FROZEN when we want to
reserve them for a restore (e.g. avoid vaulting using them for
duplication or other backups using them).  I was under the impression
you couldn't restore from a FROZEN tape.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 5:37 AM
To: Ueli Schweizer
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

Thanks.

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Ueli Schweizer wrote:

 It will try to do the restore using the frozen tape.

 Ueli Schweizer

 AGITE Software AG . Boesch 43 . CH-6331 Huenenberg . Switzerland
 Direct: +41 79 204 9190 . Phone: +41 41 781 5678 . Fax: +41 41 781
5677
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.AGITE-Software.com

 backupVISUAL...
  ...we make life on backup easy
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
 Piszcz
 Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:20 AM
 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


*
The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be disclosed 
to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. 

The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may also 
be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not the named addressee and/or have 
received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. 

Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept responsibility 
for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any viruses. 

No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, its 
subsidiaries or affiliates (COLT) and any other party by email Communications 
unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party.  

Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate 
potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more information 
refer to www.colt.net or contact us on +44(0)20 7390 3900.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] SOLUTION - Serious master issue...

2007-02-16 Thread Hampus Lind
Hi all,

 

We got Syamntec consulting to find and solve the problem for us.. (of course
for a price)

 

They found that we had 3 oracle clients that very querying the image
database like crazy... Which caused bpdbm and bprd to start new process all
the time..

 

When I presented this for support they all of a sudden found that this was a
known problem which where to be solved in MP7.

 

We have 3 oracle crosschecks from 3 different clients which had been running
for over a month causing these problems.

 

 

Answer from support:

 

As promised here is a list of possible workarounds which may help relieve
the problems you are experiencing. The bug report that we have opened for
this is titled RMAN catalog maintenance functions taking too long and use
excessive resources on the master server.  - 

 

Workaround:

Until the fix is released in a NetBackup Maintenance Pack, there are several
things which can decrease the time required for RMAN maintenance.  Implement
these recommendations in the order shown, testing after each change, until
the maintenance time required is within an acceptable time.  

 

- Schedule crosscheck or other maintenance functions to run more frequently.
If they are running only once a day, schedule them to run several times
during the day. 

 

- If there are multiple Oracle hosts running maintenance functions, stagger
the start time of the jobs so they do not overlap.

 

- Change the RMAN script so there are multiple backup files or logs per
backup set rather than a single file or log per set.

 

- Change the RMAN script so the backup piece name format statement
includes_%t as the last format specification.

 

 

 

 

Now I will raise hell and learn Symantec support (especially the once we had
in US) some really nasty Swedish words. :-)

 

 

I would like to thank all of you on this list, you have been great.

 

 

Kind regards,

 

 

 

Hampus Lind

Rikspolisstyrelsen

National Police Board

Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43

Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] SOLUTION - Serious master issue...

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Good to know, nice follow-up! Thanks!

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Hampus Lind wrote:

 Hi all,



 We got Syamntec consulting to find and solve the problem for us.. (of course
 for a price)



 They found that we had 3 oracle clients that very querying the image
 database like crazy... Which caused bpdbm and bprd to start new process all
 the time..



 When I presented this for support they all of a sudden found that this was a
 known problem which where to be solved in MP7.



 We have 3 oracle crosschecks from 3 different clients which had been running
 for over a month causing these problems.





 Answer from support:



 As promised here is a list of possible workarounds which may help relieve
 the problems you are experiencing. The bug report that we have opened for
 this is titled RMAN catalog maintenance functions taking too long and use
 excessive resources on the master server.  -



 Workaround:

 Until the fix is released in a NetBackup Maintenance Pack, there are several
 things which can decrease the time required for RMAN maintenance.  Implement
 these recommendations in the order shown, testing after each change, until
 the maintenance time required is within an acceptable time.



 - Schedule crosscheck or other maintenance functions to run more frequently.
 If they are running only once a day, schedule them to run several times
 during the day.



 - If there are multiple Oracle hosts running maintenance functions, stagger
 the start time of the jobs so they do not overlap.



 - Change the RMAN script so there are multiple backup files or logs per
 backup set rather than a single file or log per set.



 - Change the RMAN script so the backup piece name format statement
 includes_%t as the last format specification.









 Now I will raise hell and learn Symantec support (especially the once we had
 in US) some really nasty Swedish words. :-)





 I would like to thank all of you on this list, you have been great.





 Kind regards,







 Hampus Lind

 Rikspolisstyrelsen

 National Police Board

 Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43

 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66

 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] bpstart/bpend and requeued jobs (134)

2007-02-16 Thread Ellis, Jason
I have a minor problem with a set of bpstart and bpend notify scripts
and jobs that are requeued. 

 

A quick background on my scripts: the bpstart script creates a snap-shot
of a volume, and then using Volume Manager mounts that snap-shot volume
to a Media server to back it up. After the bpstart script runs it
creates a lock file to prevent a duplicate backup job from starting
(either through a fluke of the scheduler or by mistake of an admin). The
bpend script unmounts the volume and destroys the snap-shot. The bpend
script usually takes between two and five minutes to complete (depending
on the size of the volume snapped), and when the bpend script is
finished is when it removes the lock file created by the bpstart script.
This means if a job is requeued and then goes active while the bpend
script is still running the job will fail with a 73 (bpstart exits with
a non-zero status) because of a lock meant to prevent duplicate backup
jobs.

 

My other concern is I don't need to create, and then destroy the
snap-shot each time the job is requeued. I'd prefer to have the bpend
script test if the job was requeued and if so to not run and setup the
bpstart script to also not run (as long as the drive is mounted). I've
tried to mitigate this with some logic, but apparently (conversely to
what Symantec told me) the status code 134 is not passed to the bpend
script upon requeing. I did some testing and have one days worth of data
that indicates the status code sent to bpend is 66 when a job is
requeued.

 

My question is: Has anybody else run into a similar problem with bpstart
and bpend notify scripts and requeued jobs? If so, what have you done
with your scripts to mitigate it? Is the status code 66 the typical
status code you will see with a requeued job? Or is the status code
different depending on the reason the job was requeued?

 

Thanks in advanced!

 

Jason Ellis
Technical Consultant, Data Protection Team
IndyMac Bank, La Mirada Datacenter
Phone: (714) 520-3414
Mobile: (714) 889-8734

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backups Restored to Linux Boxes

2007-02-16 Thread Jones, Courtenay
That was a typo on my part - Forgive me, I am going on about 3 hours  of
sleep.

We figured out the solution - we backup the tarballs that are currently
sitting on a windows box with a standard policy. We will be moving the
luns that are tied to that Windows box and shifting them over to be
attached to our Linux boxes.

Thanks for the help... 


Regards,

-cj
Courtenay Jones





-Original Message-
From: Sander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:40 PM
To: Jones, Courtenay
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backups Restored to Linux Boxes

Jones, Courtenay wrote (ao):
But, we are going to DR here shortly, and we were hoping to just
drop
the tarballs directly onto LINUX boxes running ESX. I can restore
the
tarballs, but the restore comes up incomplete.

FWIW, ESX runs on top of the iron, not on top of Linux.

I see the following errors in our logs:
 
08:47:16 2/16/2007: Restore Started

Do you also get errors in the backup log? Or are you sure the tarballs
get mangled during the restore?

When I try to untar the tarballs, I see the following errors:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] restored]# tar -zxfv sbs09932vm031_11.tgz
tar (child): v: Cannot open: No such file or directory

You are trying to untar file 'v' ..

tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: sbs09932vm031_11.tgz: Not found in archive

.. and extracting sbs09932vm031_11.tgz from it.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

Can you try with 'tar xf sbs09932vm031_11.tgz' ?

How big are your tarballs and the VMDK files they include? And to what
filesystem are you recovering?

With kind regards, Sander

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NetBackup upgrade to 6.0 and Shared Storage Option

2007-02-16 Thread Rongsheng Fang
Hi,

Currently we are running NB 5.0 and doing LAN-based backups. We have one 
tape library (StorageTek L180) that is directly connected to the master 
server. We'll be upgrading our backup infrastructure with the following 
changes:

1) two master servers running NB 6.0 on Sun Solaris 10/SPARC that are 
clustered using VCS 5.0
2) we'll be doing SAN-based backups using NB's SSO option.

Even though I did read through Shared Storage Option (SSO) Topics of 
Veritas NetBackup 6.0 Media Manager SA's Guide page by page, I still 
have a few questions:

1) How does Veritas license SSO? Is it based on tape drives?

2) Does each master/media server that will be sharing the tape drives 
need an individual SSO license, or one single SSO license is needed and 
can be installed on all the servers?

3) We'll be connecting the L180 to the SAN switch during the upgrade. Do 
we just connect the robot to the FC switch, or we need to connect the 
robot and all of the tape drives that are in it to the FC switch?

4) We'll be running EMM on the master servers which will act as the host 
allocating and deallocating tap drives. Do the master servers need to be 
connected to the SAN?


TIA, and have a nice weekend!

Rongsheng
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error?

2007-02-16 Thread bbb bb
we have DELL Redhat LINUX As 4.4 server with Netbackup 6.0 on it.  I found 
on backup log file have following messages:

03:09:11.602 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression:   99% 
/u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf
03:09:11.602 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while 
backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf.
03:09:11.890 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression:   98% 
/u2/hotbketdb3/controlfilebk.ctl
03:09:48.921 [1173] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression:   99% 
/u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf
03:09:48.936 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression:   99% 
/u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf
03:09:48.936 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while 
backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf.


I am pretty sure those files are NOT touch during backup time.  Why we still 
get ERR - inode change time ..?

How to fix it?

Thanks.

_
http://homepage.msn.com/zune?icid=hmetagline

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Wayne T Smith
Frozen tapes can still be read. 

For example, my Frozen tapes are still selected by Vault for copying.  
The read of data off the Frozen tape is a restore of sorts.

Frozen is like Suspended (NetBackup will no longer write to it), except 
that it's sticky when the images on the tape expire.

Vault, at least v5.1 uses Suspend to help manage its output tapes.

cheers, wayne

Justin Piszcz wrote, in part,  on 2/16/2007 4:19 AM:
 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
   
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Frozen tape characteristics?

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Piszcz
Thank you for everyone's input on this issue.

Much appreciated!

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Wayne T Smith wrote:

 Frozen tapes can still be read.

 For example, my Frozen tapes are still selected by Vault for copying.
 The read of data off the Frozen tape is a restore of sorts.

 Frozen is like Suspended (NetBackup will no longer write to it), except
 that it's sticky when the images on the tape expire.

 Vault, at least v5.1 uses Suspend to help manage its output tapes.

 cheers, wayne

 Justin Piszcz wrote, in part,  on 2/16/2007 4:19 AM:
 Quick frozen tape question,

 I need to re-visit the docs.

 When a tape is frozen, no more backups can be written to it.
 When a tape is frozen and it is part of a restore, what happens?
 It says the media is unavailable or does it try to do the restore?

 Justin.
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] V-80-33 Could not Create ORB / V-80-10231 Error initializing ServiceManager.

2007-02-16 Thread Vassileff, Glen
Hello All
 
I wonder if anyone had come across the follwoing error messages:
 
VERITAS: V-80-33 Could not Create ORB.
VERITAS: V-80-10231 Error initializing ServiceManager.
VERITAS: V-80-49 CORBA::Exception caught while resolving RootPOA, system 
exception, ID 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/BAD_PARAM:1.0'
 
We started seeing them after an upgrade to NetBackup 6. I suspect they come 
from ICS / PBX packages and I do not think they affect NetBackup functionality.
 
Nevertheless, I wonder what this means and how to get rid of them.
 
Regards,
 
Glen
 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu