Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked
Hi You will need to know what was your offline catalog backup tape label before you start: 1. Make sure to call the server the same name as per the original server. 2. Get your robot and drives working on the new server. 3. Install netbackup and patch to 6.5.3. 4. Configure your robot and drives on netbackup. 5. Don’t worry about any other configs at this stage. After recovery the original settings will be back. 6. Run media inventory and check under media tab, check in which slot the catalog tape reside. Let’s say it’s in slot 5 for this example. 7. On command line in …\VERITAS\volmgr\bin\ run robtest. 8. Select your robot and then run m s5 d1 (this means move slot 5 to drive 1) 9. When it comes back successful loaded, exit out of robtest with Q. 10. Then in …\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\admincmd\ run bprecover –l –tpath \\.\Tape0 file:///\\.\Tape0 11. This should come back with catalog information. If not do #9 again but change to Tape1, Tape1 and so on until you get the catalog info. 12. When you have the info, run in …\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\admincmd\ bprecover –r –tpath \\.\Tape0 file:///\\.\Tape0 (or whatever tape drive gave you your catalog info) 13. It will start running and prompt you before it starts recovery of the next part of the catalog. 14. When done, stop and restart the netbackup services. 15. Or in …\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\admincmd\ run bprecover –r ALL – tpath \\.\Tape0 file:///\\.\Tape0 (or whatever tape drive gave you your catalog info) 16. It will start running and when done, stop netbackup services and restart. 17. Check your settings and change where necessary. Hopes this help. JR From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:17 PM To: Spearman, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked Install Netbackup and get your library working. Put your catalog backup tape in the library. Inventory the catalog backup tape. Run Phase I and Phase II import of the Catalog Tape Restore the drfile from the tape (unless you already have it available) Use the Catalog Recovery Wizard to restore the Catalog (and other bits) -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Spearman, David Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:07 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked Our Windows 6.5.3 master tanked at the worst possible time. We have a scaler i2000 with 10 lto-4 drives attached. I have read the instructions from veritas on using bprecover a dozen times and cannot for the life of me figure out what they are trying to say. 1. Put tape in drive (fine, which one?) 2. Run command bprecover –r –ALL –tpath device_pathtape drive ? The examples are garbage Any help? David Spearman County of henrico ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked
Install Netbackup and get your library working. Put your catalog backup tape in the library. Inventory the catalog backup tape. Run Phase I and Phase II import of the Catalog Tape Restore the drfile from the tape (unless you already have it available) Use the Catalog Recovery Wizard to restore the Catalog (and other bits) -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Spearman, David Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:07 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked Our Windows 6.5.3 master tanked at the worst possible time. We have a scaler i2000 with 10 lto-4 drives attached. I have read the instructions from veritas on using bprecover a dozen times and cannot for the life of me figure out what they are trying to say. 1. Put tape in drive (fine, which one?) 2. Run command bprecover –r –ALL –tpath device_pathtape drive ? The examples are garbage Any help? David Spearman County of henrico ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked
Were you performing hot-catalog backups? Here's a snip from the email I get after each catalog backup (incremental or full), maybe this will set you up? = Catalog Recovery Procedure for the Loss of an Entire Catalog You should create a detailed disaster recovery plan to follow should it become necessary to restore your organization's data in the event of a disaster. A checklist of required tasks can be a tremendous tool in assisting associates in triage. For example, after the facility is safe for data to be restored, the power and data infrastructure need to be verified. When these tasks are completed, the following scenarios will help to quickly restore the NetBackup environment, and in turn, restore applications and data. Disaster Recovery Procedure using the DR Image File In the event of a catastrophic failure, use the following procedure to rebuild the previous NetBackup environment. Note: If new hardware is required, make sure that the devices contain drives capable of reading the media and that the drive controllers are capable of mounting the drives. 1. Install NetBackup. 2. Configure the devices necessary to read the media listed above. 3. Inventory the media. 4. Make sure that the master server can access the attached DR image file. Start the NetBackup Recovery Wizard from the NetBackup Administration Console. Or, start the wizard from a command line by entering bprecover -wizard. Disaster Recovery Procedure without the DR Image File NOTE: ONLY ATTEMPT THIS AS A LAST RESORT If you do not have the attachment included with this email, use the following instructions to recover your catalog: 1. Install NetBackup. 2. Configure the devices necessary to read the media listed above. 3. Inventory the media. 4. Run: bpimport -create_db_info [-server name] -id PD1158 5. Go to the following directory to find the DR image file Hot-Catalog-Backup_1256122911_INCR: snip 6. Delete the other files in the directory. 7. Open Hot-Catalog-Backup_1256122911_INCR file and find the BACKUP_ID (for example: snip_1256122911). 8. Run: bpimport [-server name] -backupid snip_1256122911 9. Run: bprestore -T -w [-L progress_log] -C snip -t 35 -p Hot-Catalog-Backup -X -s 1256122911 -e 1256122911 / 10. Run the BAR user interface to restore the remaining image database if the DR image is a result of an incremental backup. 11. To recover the NetBackup relational database, run: bprecover -r -nbdb 12. Stop and Start NetBackup 13. Configure the devices if any device has changed since the last backup. 14. To make sure the volume information is updated, inventory the media to update the NetBackup database. = -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Spearman, David Sent: October 21, 2009 1:07 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked Our Windows 6.5.3 master tanked at the worst possible time. We have a scaler i2000 with 10 lto-4 drives attached. I have read the instructions from veritas on using bprecover a dozen times and cannot for the life of me figure out what they are trying to say. 1. Put tape in drive (fine, which one?) 2. Run command bprecover -r -ALL -tpath device_pathtape drive ? The examples are garbage Any help? David Spearman County of henrico La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked
I will state that this worked for me, I did not have the e-mail capture of the drfile setup and I followed that LAST RESORT and it worked successfully. Only thing it did not restore was the NBU encryption DB/keys for LTO-4 encryption. You need to know which tape you wrote the catalog to though. Luckily, I had an e-mail of which tape was written to last for the catalog. A regular restore w/drfile works well, have done it many times, but in this case it sounds like you lost everything. You need to get NBU installed etc, setup your robot/drives, then perform the steps under LAST RESORT -- you do need to know what tape was the catalog though. Justin. On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Jonathan Dyck wrote: Were you performing hot-catalog backups? Here's a snip from the email I get after each catalog backup (incremental or full), maybe this will set you up? = Catalog Recovery Procedure for the Loss of an Entire Catalog You should create a detailed disaster recovery plan to follow should it become necessary to restore your organization's data in the event of a disaster. A checklist of required tasks can be a tremendous tool in assisting associates in triage. For example, after the facility is safe for data to be restored, the power and data infrastructure need to be verified. When these tasks are completed, the following scenarios will help to quickly restore the NetBackup environment, and in turn, restore applications and data. Disaster Recovery Procedure using the DR Image File In the event of a catastrophic failure, use the following procedure to rebuild the previous NetBackup environment. Note: If new hardware is required, make sure that the devices contain drives capable of reading the media and that the drive controllers are capable of mounting the drives. 1. Install NetBackup. 2. Configure the devices necessary to read the media listed above. 3. Inventory the media. 4. Make sure that the master server can access the attached DR image file. Start the NetBackup Recovery Wizard from the NetBackup Administration Console. Or, start the wizard from a command line by entering bprecover -wizard. Disaster Recovery Procedure without the DR Image File NOTE: ONLY ATTEMPT THIS AS A LAST RESORT If you do not have the attachment included with this email, use the following instructions to recover your catalog: 1. Install NetBackup. 2. Configure the devices necessary to read the media listed above. 3. Inventory the media. 4. Run: bpimport -create_db_info [-server name] -id PD1158 5. Go to the following directory to find the DR image file Hot-Catalog-Backup_1256122911_INCR: snip 6. Delete the other files in the directory. 7. Open Hot-Catalog-Backup_1256122911_INCR file and find the BACKUP_ID (for example: snip_1256122911). 8. Run: bpimport [-server name] -backupid snip_1256122911 9. Run: bprestore -T -w [-L progress_log] -C snip -t 35 -p Hot-Catalog-Backup -X -s 1256122911 -e 1256122911 / 10. Run the BAR user interface to restore the remaining image database if the DR image is a result of an incremental backup. 11. To recover the NetBackup relational database, run: bprecover -r -nbdb 12. Stop and Start NetBackup 13. Configure the devices if any device has changed since the last backup. 14. To make sure the volume information is updated, inventory the media to update the NetBackup database. = -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Spearman, David Sent: October 21, 2009 1:07 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked Our Windows 6.5.3 master tanked at the worst possible time. We have a scaler i2000 with 10 lto-4 drives attached. I have read the instructions from veritas on using bprecover a dozen times and cannot for the life of me figure out what they are trying to say. 1. Put tape in drive (fine, which one?) 2. Run command bprecover -r -ALL -tpath device_pathtape drive ? The examples are garbage Any help? David Spearman County of henrico La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 and 64-bit Win2k3 R2 BMR
You need to upgrade to 6.5.4. It was the first release to support 64 bit Windows systems. I'm not sure on how well it works, because I've switched to a different shop, but yes, what you are seeing is expected with 6.5.3 and Windows 64 bit OS. Dan Ryan Please think about resource conservation before you print this message -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:38 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 and 64-bit Win2k3 R2 BMR Hi All I think this may be an out of support issue, but thought I would roll it on the list in case anyone else seen it... Setup is 32-bit NBU 6.5.3 Win2k3 SP2 New client is 64-bit Win2k R2 SP2 with Netbackup client 6.5.3 and SQL Server DB extension. While running a test backup, the BMR option failed with the following... 02/09/2009 10:54:53 - Error bpbrm(pid=6652) BMRERR: Did not receive bmr client request from pthvcentre01, status = 0 02/09/2009 10:54:53 - end writing Status 26 The file level backup completed fine, with no errors. I found a web link, but is failing with Page cannot be displayed. It looks like BMR may not work with 64-bit Win2k3 R2, but can anyone clarify? Thanks Simon This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (513) 229-5500 or by email (postmas...@medplus.com). After replying, please erase it from your computer system. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 and 64-bit Win2k3 R2 BMR
Hi All I think this may be an out of support issue, but thought I would roll it on the list in case anyone else seen it... Setup is 32-bit NBU 6.5.3 Win2k3 SP2 New client is 64-bit Win2k R2 SP2 with Netbackup client 6.5.3 and SQL Server DB extension. While running a test backup, the BMR option failed with the following... 02/09/2009 10:54:53 - Error bpbrm(pid=6652) BMRERR: Did not receive bmr client request from pthvcentre01, status = 0 02/09/2009 10:54:53 - end writing Status 26 The file level backup completed fine, with no errors. I found a web link, but is failing with Page cannot be displayed. It looks like BMR may not work with 64-bit Win2k3 R2, but can anyone clarify? Thanks Simon This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Poss Bug - System Volume Information Folder
Evening Found a problem, which I got a work around on, but wondered if Symantec can validate this for me For some reason, some of the Win2k3 Servers volume are filling up. Investigation showed it was the System Volume Information Folder that was the culprit. As I know this folder contains Shadow Copy info (VSS), I went to check if Shadow Copies was running, and found it was all disabled. I believe NetBackup could be the culprit here. To get around the problem, I turn on shadow copy for a 300mb limit. This purges out the System Volume Information folder. But any ideas why it is doing it? Backups configured on the client to use VSS and rather than abort on error, set to disable snapshot and continue. Any feedback would be good. Thanks Regards Simon This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. Thanks Simrat ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.com wrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
Found this... http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM To: Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.com wrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
Not as a master/media - but have had issues with it just as a client. Any new install of a 2008 box I get 49 errors ( Symantec does not know what causes it). I can put them back to 6.5.2a and they work fine, but at 6.5.3(1) they fail with 49's. The thing is that working with them to troubleshoot, I would upgrade them again and they would work. I cannot figure out why. I just installed 5 new 2008 clients. All failed first time. Next night 3 worked but 2 of them are still failing with 49's. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sekhon Simrat S. Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:03 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. Thanks Simrat ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
I did some testing with Master/Media 6.5.3 on Windows 2008 x86 and things seem to be running fairly well except when I try to backup windows 2008 master server itself. I am seeing performance hit when I backup win 2008 master. I heard that this can be resolved by using certain exclusions for windows 2008 clients. I was able to find something for Backup Exec 12 but haven’t found anything for NB 6.5.3. I have tested exchange 2007 mailbox backups and they seem to be running fine. Hot catalog backups seem to be running fine. I will test Exchange 2007 information store and SQL 2005 database backup later today. From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:30 AM To: Ed Wilts; Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 Found this... http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM To: Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.commailto:sssek...@vasc.com wrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote: Found this... http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Which clearly states that a 6.5.3 master is NOT supported on Windows 2008. NetBackup 6.5.x Master Server support is not currently planned for WS2008. The next m*ajor *version release of NetBackup is currently planned to support 2008 on Master Servers. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Simon -- *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ed Wilts *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM *To:* Sekhon Simrat S. *Cc:* Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.comwrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
Hi As the technote states : NetBackup 6.5.x Master Server support is not currently planned for WS2008. The next major version release of NetBackup is currently planned to support 2008 on Master Servers http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Regards, Si From: Sekhon Simrat S. [mailto:sssek...@vasc.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:14 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Ed Wilts Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 I did some testing with Master/Media 6.5.3 on Windows 2008 x86 and things seem to be running fairly well except when I try to backup windows 2008 master server itself. I am seeing performance hit when I backup win 2008 master. I heard that this can be resolved by using certain exclusions for windows 2008 clients. I was able to find something for Backup Exec 12 but haven't found anything for NB 6.5.3. I have tested exchange 2007 mailbox backups and they seem to be running fine. Hot catalog backups seem to be running fine. I will test Exchange 2007 information store and SQL 2005 database backup later today. From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:30 AM To: Ed Wilts; Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 Found this... http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM To: Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.com wrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
Exactly. Thought I would post for the originator :) From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewi...@ewilts.org] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:40 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Sekhon Simrat S.; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote: Found this... http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Which clearly states that a 6.5.3 master is NOT supported on Windows 2008. NetBackup 6.5.x Master Server support is not currently planned for WS2008. The next major version release of NetBackup is currently planned to support 2008 on Master Servers. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM To: Sekhon Simrat S. Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sekhon Simrat S. sssek...@vasc.com wrote: Has anyone run into any issues with NB 6.5.3 Master/Media server on Windows 2008 SP1x86 ? Any unpleasant surprises? I would appreciate if you could share your experience. I'd have to check the compatibility list to be sure but I don't believe that a master server is supported on Windows 2008 yet. .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3/Image Cleanup processes fail with Status 47
NBU 6.5.3/Image Cleanup processes fail with Status 47, the same error occurs when attempting the following command: #nbdelete -allvolumes -force. Also, used the bpsyncinfo -L command and the output was not correct for the Media servers configured. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query
Thanks Gabriel This is what I have tried. The Vault is setup for the correct volume group and pools, the criteria to be met are all backups, all policies etc etc in the last 8 days. Duplication is skipped as this is taken care of in the SLP, catalog backup skipped for the purpose of testing. As I am in implementation I continuously duplicate to this volume group so there are definitely valid image copies that meet the criteria. However the vault runs successfully however finds no images. From your mail below are you suggesting promote the duplicate copy to primary ? and in turn the vault will then meet its criteria? Thanks in advance David Clooney From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel [mailto:gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz] Sent: 04 March 2009 21:54 To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query No, Vault can certainly send duplicates off site. In fact, prior to the advent of SLPs, most people duplicated images within Vault and sent those off site. (I've always theoretically preferred to send my originals off-site and promote my duplicates to be short on-site retention, which Vault can also do, but I've never walked into an environment already set up that way.) Just create the Vault within the robot where the duplicates are and specify the appropriate limitations (probably by volume pool in your case), skip the duplication step, perform the catalog backup (really, please, perform the catalog backup), and eject and generate reports. -- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz, 215 231 1556 From: Clooney, David [mailto:david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:56 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query Hi All Am I correct in saying that vault can only vault backups and not duplications? I.e. I am busy implementing a VTL(with NDMP functionality) and utilising NBU Lifecycle management polices. As the VTL is equipped with NDMP Version 4 we are able to zone in physical drives on the backend of the VTL and pretty much setup NDMP STU's to write to these physical devices. The reason for this approach is that when we duplicate an image from a VTL volume to a physical volume the VTL becomes the data mover. I now want to setup a process on the volume group that the physical backend volumes reside in, however these volumes are filled with duplications and not backups. I am guessing , as new to vault, that you cannot vault duplicated images? Any suggestions would be helpful. Regards David Clooney From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of cksteh...@pepco.com Sent: 04 March 2009 16:54 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi Pranav I suggest you read the Symantec documentation Check out this document http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm Carl -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 Pranav netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 03/04/2009 11:30 AM Please respond to VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi, We are planning to upgrade our media server from 5.0.5 to6.5.2 Please provide the necessary steps that we should follow while doing this and also looking for a solution to check media inconsistency. We are also planning to attach a lto4 library with this. So ,does this library can read lto2 tapes if we need to restore something. Thanks! Pranav +-- |This was sent by pranav_vent...@hotmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query
I'd need to know a lot more about your Vault and SLP configuration to say why Vault's failing to pick your duplicated media. If you shoot me the output of nbstl -L and your vault.xml (maybe pass it through the following Perl script first to make it easier to sanitize any of your employer's private information if you need to) privately, I'll be happy to take a look. ---8--- #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use XML::Simple; use Data::Dumper; my $data = XMLin(-); $Data::Dumper::Indent = 1; $Data::Dumper::Maxdepth = 0; print Dumper($data); ---8--- I wasn't suggesting that vaulting originals rather than duplicates would fix the problem you're describing (you can't, actually, vault true originals: your originals are on a VTL), just that it's theoretically a better way to go because it exposes media failures sooner (but not enough better that I've bothered to go change the setup in any environment I've walked into). -- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz, 215 231 1556 From: Clooney, David [mailto:david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:00 AM To: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query Thanks Gabriel This is what I have tried. The Vault is setup for the correct volume group and pools, the criteria to be met are all backups, all policies etc etc in the last 8 days. Duplication is skipped as this is taken care of in the SLP, catalog backup skipped for the purpose of testing. As I am in implementation I continuously duplicate to this volume group so there are definitely valid image copies that meet the criteria. However the vault runs successfully however finds no images. From your mail below are you suggesting promote the duplicate copy to primary ? and in turn the vault will then meet its criteria? Thanks in advance David Clooney From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel [mailto:gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz] Sent: 04 March 2009 21:54 To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query No, Vault can certainly send duplicates off site. In fact, prior to the advent of SLPs, most people duplicated images within Vault and sent those off site. (I've always theoretically preferred to send my originals off-site and promote my duplicates to be short on-site retention, which Vault can also do, but I've never walked into an environment already set up that way.) Just create the Vault within the robot where the duplicates are and specify the appropriate limitations (probably by volume pool in your case), skip the duplication step, perform the catalog backup (really, please, perform the catalog backup), and eject and generate reports. -- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz, 215 231 1556 From: Clooney, David [mailto:david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:56 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query Hi All Am I correct in saying that vault can only vault backups and not duplications? I.e. I am busy implementing a VTL(with NDMP functionality) and utilising NBU Lifecycle management polices. As the VTL is equipped with NDMP Version 4 we are able to zone in physical drives on the backend of the VTL and pretty much setup NDMP STU's to write to these physical devices. The reason for this approach is that when we duplicate an image from a VTL volume to a physical volume the VTL becomes the data mover. I now want to setup a process on the volume group that the physical backend volumes reside in, however these volumes are filled with duplications and not backups. I am guessing , as new to vault, that you cannot vault duplicated images? Any suggestions would be helpful. Regards David Clooney From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of cksteh...@pepco.com Sent: 04 March 2009 16:54 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi Pranav I suggest you read the Symantec documentation Check out this document http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm Carl -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 Pranav netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 03/04/2009 11:30 AM Please respond to VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi, We are planning to upgrade our media server from 5.0.5 to6.5.2 Please provide the necessary steps that we should follow while doing
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query
Hi All Am I correct in saying that vault can only vault backups and not duplications? I.e. I am busy implementing a VTL(with NDMP functionality) and utilising NBU Lifecycle management polices. As the VTL is equipped with NDMP Version 4 we are able to zone in physical drives on the backend of the VTL and pretty much setup NDMP STU's to write to these physical devices. The reason for this approach is that when we duplicate an image from a VTL volume to a physical volume the VTL becomes the data mover. I now want to setup a process on the volume group that the physical backend volumes reside in, however these volumes are filled with duplications and not backups. I am guessing , as new to vault, that you cannot vault duplicated images? Any suggestions would be helpful. Regards David Clooney From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of cksteh...@pepco.com Sent: 04 March 2009 16:54 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi Pranav I suggest you read the Symantec documentation Check out this document http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm Carl -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 Pranav netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 03/04/2009 11:30 AM Please respond to VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi, We are planning to upgrade our media server from 5.0.5 to6.5.2 Please provide the necessary steps that we should follow while doing this and also looking for a solution to check media inconsistency. We are also planning to attach a lto4 library with this. So ,does this library can read lto2 tapes if we need to restore something. Thanks! Pranav +-- |This was sent by pranav_vent...@hotmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity. If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. For all U.K. corporate disclosures, please refer to www.bankofamerica.com/ukcompanies ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query
No, Vault can certainly send duplicates off site. In fact, prior to the advent of SLPs, most people duplicated images within Vault and sent those off site. (I've always theoretically preferred to send my originals off-site and promote my duplicates to be short on-site retention, which Vault can also do, but I've never walked into an environment already set up that way.) Just create the Vault within the robot where the duplicates are and specify the appropriate limitations (probably by volume pool in your case), skip the duplication step, perform the catalog backup (really, please, perform the catalog backup), and eject and generate reports. -- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz, 215 231 1556 From: Clooney, David [mailto:david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:56 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query Hi All Am I correct in saying that vault can only vault backups and not duplications? I.e. I am busy implementing a VTL(with NDMP functionality) and utilising NBU Lifecycle management polices. As the VTL is equipped with NDMP Version 4 we are able to zone in physical drives on the backend of the VTL and pretty much setup NDMP STU's to write to these physical devices. The reason for this approach is that when we duplicate an image from a VTL volume to a physical volume the VTL becomes the data mover. I now want to setup a process on the volume group that the physical backend volumes reside in, however these volumes are filled with duplications and not backups. I am guessing , as new to vault, that you cannot vault duplicated images? Any suggestions would be helpful. Regards David Clooney From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of cksteh...@pepco.com Sent: 04 March 2009 16:54 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi Pranav I suggest you read the Symantec documentation Check out this document http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm Carl -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 Pranav netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 03/04/2009 11:30 AM Please respond to VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Upgrading media server from 5.0.5 to 6.5.2 Hi, We are planning to upgrade our media server from 5.0.5 to6.5.2 Please provide the necessary steps that we should follow while doing this and also looking for a solution to check media inconsistency. We are also planning to attach a lto4 library with this. So ,does this library can read lto2 tapes if we need to restore something. Thanks! Pranav +-- |This was sent by pranav_vent...@hotmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 on Windows and VMWARE Backups
Thanks. When I do my restore test, I will let you know. For now it is going to be 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals Cheers MK --- On Tue, 1/6/09, bob944 bob...@attglobal.net wrote: From: bob944 bob...@attglobal.net Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 on Windows and VMWARE Backups To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: mikeki...@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 8:56 AM I am configuring VCB backups for NBU 6.5.3, for FlashBackup-Windows policy, there are 4 options for backup types under Snapshot Client Options. These are 0 - File 1 - FullVM 2 - Mapped FullVM 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals From reading the docs, Option 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals, looks like best of both world, it will let me restore single files and restore full guest VM. It also allows incremental level backups. Is there any disadvantage when using it compraed to other types. I am trying to avoid running 2 or more backups to completely protect a VM. 3 is the correct choice; it does exactly what the manual says it does: a snapshot backup of the vmdk for a full (and from which you can restore individual files or the whole VM), and a normal, file-based backup for incrementals. Set up the schedules in the same policy, throw windows and clients at it and it will work like you expect NetBackup to work. It worked as advertised in my test environment, though my restore testing was minimal. An aside: Restoring files to VMs is, to somebody not used to VMware, kludgy, so do read up on how to restore and test that part before you need it. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 on Windows and VMWARE Backups
I am configuring VCB backups for NBU 6.5.3, for FlashBackup-Windows policy, there are 4 options for backup types under Snapshot Client Options. These are 0 - File 1 - FullVM 2 - Mapped FullVM 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals From reading the docs, Option 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals, looks like best of both world, it will let me restore single files and restore full guest VM. It also allows incremental level backups. Is there any disadvantage when using it compraed to other types. I am trying to avoid running 2 or more backups to completely protect a VM. 3 is the correct choice; it does exactly what the manual says it does: a snapshot backup of the vmdk for a full (and from which you can restore individual files or the whole VM), and a normal, file-based backup for incrementals. Set up the schedules in the same policy, throw windows and clients at it and it will work like you expect NetBackup to work. It worked as advertised in my test environment, though my restore testing was minimal. An aside: Restoring files to VMs is, to somebody not used to VMware, kludgy, so do read up on how to restore and test that part before you need it. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Bob, I have to disagree with you, for once. You can only use the java version with that same major revision; it is not backwards compatible to other revision levels (6.5 is not backwards compatible to 6.0 or lower, etc.). The java client is forward and backwards compatible within the same major revision - for the most part, there are things that may not work/populate if the Master is at a higher level than the Java client. I made this suggestion for backwards compatibility at the users forum, but it didn't sound like there would be much work put into it as the new user interface will take care of this. As stated, installing them to separate directories does the trick when multiple java versions/patch levels are needed on the same workstation. If you are not able to change the install directory, edit this key in the registry to contain the path that you want to install to: HKLM\Software\VERITAS\NetBackup - java (NB-Java)\InstallPath Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/ P Think before you print CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system. bob944 bob...@attglobal.net Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 01/01/2009 05:30 PM Please respond to bob...@attglobal.net To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as IME, all patch/MP versions are backwards compatible within that major version (5.1, 6.0, 6.5). It's possible, even likely, that each major version understands the previous versions so that you could use, say, a 6.5 jdc to admin your 6.5 master and a 6.0 and a 5.x media server. Install the 6.5.3 patch as recommended and tell us. When in doubt, you can always install to separate directories c:\program files\veritas\jav51 c:\program files\veritas\jav60 c:\program files\veritas\jav65 Note: it used to be that you couldn't choose the windows installation option to change the java admin console installation path if a version was already installed to the default (c:\program files\veritas?); you'd have to uninstall that one first. Since then, I install each major version to its own directory as above. Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x Can't help you with that. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Mr Major said: Bob, I have to disagree with you, for once. It's okay; I'm not invested in it. :-) And thanks for the implied kudo. You can only use the java version with that same major revision; and The java client is forward and backwards compatible within the same major revision - for the most part, there are things that may not work/populate if the Master is at a higher level than the Java client. I'm fine with that. That in my experience it seems backwards-compatible within all levels of 5.1, within all levels of 5.0, within all levels of 6.5 is what I at least _meant_ to convey with IME, all patch/MP versions are backwards compatible within that major version (5.1, 6.0, 6.5). it is not backwards compatible to other revision levels (6.5 is not backwards compatible to 6.0 or lower, etc.). And that's the part I didn't know about (never tried it) but thought mightt work: It's possible, even likely, that each major version understands the previous versions Not as likely as I'd thought, apparently. Now we know that it's possible, but not true. :-) Thanks for clearing that up, Rusty. -Original Message- From: rusty.ma...@sungard.com [mailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:00 PM To: bob...@attglobal.net Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console Bob, I have to disagree with you, for once. You can only use the java version with that same major revision; it is not backwards compatible to other revision levels (6.5 is not backwards compatible to 6.0 or lower, etc.). The java client is forward and backwards compatible within the same major revision - for the most part, there are things that may not work/populate if the Master is at a higher level than the Java client. I made this suggestion for backwards compatibility at the users forum, but it didn't sound like there would be much work put into it as the new user interface will take care of this. As stated, installing them to separate directories does the trick when multiple java versions/patch levels are needed on the same workstation. If you are not able to change the install directory, edit this key in the registry to contain the path that you want to install to: HKLM\Software\VERITAS\NetBackup - java (NB-Java)\InstallPath Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/ P Think before you print CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system. bob944 bob...@attglobal.net Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 01/01/2009 05:30 PM Please respond to bob...@attglobal.net Toveritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc SubjectRe: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as IME, all patch/MP versions are backwards compatible within that major version (5.1, 6.0, 6.5). b so that you could use, say, a 6.5 jdc to admin your 6.5 master and a 6.0 and a 5.x media server. Install the 6.5.3 patch as recommended and tell us. When in doubt, you can always install to separate directories c:\program files\veritas\jav51 c:\program files\veritas\jav60 c:\program files\veritas\jav65 Note: it used to be that you couldn't choose the windows installation option to change the java admin console installation path if a version was already installed to the default (c:\program files\veritas?); you'd have to uninstall that one first. Since then, I install each major version to its own directory as above. Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x Can't help you with that. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Remember to follow the rules. Master server and gui have to be the same level and same or higher then anything else. Media servers and clients and be lower then the master and the gui. If you have to have more then one version the install the console versions in different places and run the one you need. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Peacock Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 8:13 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 on Windows and VMWARE Backups
Hi All I am configuring VCB backups for NBU 6.5.3, for FlashBackup-Windows policy, there are 4 options for backup types under Snapshot Client Options. These are 0 - File 1 - FullVM 2 - Mapped FullVM 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals From reading the docs, Option 3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals, looks like best of both world, it will let me restore single files and restore full guest VM. It also allows incremental level backups. Is there any disadvantage when using it compraed to other types. I am trying to avoid running 2 or more backups to completely protect a VM. Thx ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
I know I used the 6.5.3 JAV to connect to 6.5.2 because 6.5.2 JAV had a bug so we installed it early. I don't know how far back it will connect. --- On Thu, 1/1/09, Dennis Peacock netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: From: Dennis Peacock netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Thursday, January 1, 2009, 8:13 AM Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Thanks, but I need to be able to support multiple versions...like 6.0, 6.5, 6.5.2, and 6.5.3 as well as IME, all patch/MP versions are backwards compatible within that major version (5.1, 6.0, 6.5). It's possible, even likely, that each major version understands the previous versions so that you could use, say, a 6.5 jdc to admin your 6.5 master and a 6.0 and a 5.x media server. Install the 6.5.3 patch as recommended and tell us. When in doubt, you can always install to separate directories c:\program files\veritas\jav51 c:\program files\veritas\jav60 c:\program files\veritas\jav65 Note: it used to be that you couldn't choose the windows installation option to change the java admin console installation path if a version was already installed to the default (c:\program files\veritas?); you'd have to uninstall that one first. Since then, I install each major version to its own directory as above. Legato 7.x and Backup Express 2.3x and 3.x Can't help you with that. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
Anybody know where I can get it.??? The 6.5.2 Windows Java GUI will not connect to a 6.5.3 box. Any clues? TIA.. BTWHAPPY NEW YEAR! +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console
It's the 6.5.3 JAV patch. Should be an exe for Windows and a tar for UNIX. Jim VandeVegt VandeVegt @t yahoo.com, Jim.VandeVegt @t PhysiciansMutual.com Eliminate the IRS and put the fair consumption tax in place. Visit http://www.fairtax.org/ Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. --- On Wed, 12/31/08, Dennis Peacock netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: From: Dennis Peacock netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Windows Java GUI for the Admin Console To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 7:15 PM Anybody know where I can get it.??? The 6.5.2 Windows Java GUI will not connect to a 6.5.3 box. Any clues? TIA.. BTWHAPPY NEW YEAR! +-- |This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3
The first rule of the FA program is that you do not talk about the FA program. ;^ -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:48 PM To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 The Twelfth of Nover... :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:57 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 FYI / I just got a note from Symantec that First Availability of 6.5.3 will be on Nov 12th. -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3
FYI / I just got a note from Symantec that First Availability of 6.5.3 will be on Nov 12th. -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3
The Twelfth of Nover... :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:57 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 FYI / I just got a note from Symantec that First Availability of 6.5.3 will be on Nov 12th. -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3
I just finished a conference call on NBU puredisk and talked to one of the Symantec SEs, about the 11/12 release date. He told me he was on a conference call today with the product managers and was told it's slated for a December release; possibly January. He said if it was due out 11/12 he would have been notified about the date and he was not. Thank You, Dennis Peacock EBCA Acxiom Corporation 501-342-6232 (office) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:48 PM To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 The Twelfth of Nover... :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:57 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 FYI / I just got a note from Symantec that First Availability of 6.5.3 will be on Nov 12th. -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu *** The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system. Thank You. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3
This is the First Availability program. It's limited to a small subset of customers. GA will be about 30 days later I guess. -Tim On Nov 7, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Peacock Dennis - dpeaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just finished a conference call on NBU puredisk and talked to one of the Symantec SEs, about the 11/12 release date. He told me he was on a conference call today with the product managers and was told it's slated for a December release; possibly January. He said if it was due out 11/12 he would have been notified about the date and he was not. Thank You, Dennis Peacock EBCA Acxiom Corporation 501-342-6232 (office) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:48 PM To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 The Twelfth of Nover... :p -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:57 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 FYI / I just got a note from Symantec that First Availability of 6.5.3 will be on Nov 12th. -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu *** *** * The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system. Thank You. *** *** ** ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
