Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the
optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson
emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how
nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf

Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale

Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of
the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro
particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows
how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is
concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy
between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the
energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the
Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle.

https://vimeo.com/36691535


This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of
various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these
particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These
vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large
amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that
speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U

Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at
high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification.
The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an
aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification
effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a
large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply
the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to
transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest
hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission
chain.
I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle
aggregation process that enables a sort of  natural selection where the
most  effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF
amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are
good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when
there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of
their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze
nuclear effects.

There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation.
Particle piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must
be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate.

The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor
condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction.


On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
wrote:

> Axil Axil,
> Thanks for the interesting paper.  While it seems clear that small
> particles are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the
> mechanism does not appear to be understood.  If they are neutrons, as the
> authors think, why do you think they originate from the H rather than from
> the thorium salt in solution?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil 
> To: vortex-l 
> Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as
> follows:
>
> Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au
> nanoparticles in
> the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
> A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev
>
> https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
>
> "The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission
> Electron Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."
>
> The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric
> glass chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber
> and one with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber
> but without any nanoparticles inside of it.
>
> First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the
> inner chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the
> outer chamber.
>
> Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the
> inner chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in
> the outer chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V.
> Simakin and G.A. Shafeev.
>
> This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce
> the LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by
> subatomic particles that can penetrate a glass wall.
>
> Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc
> can be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open
> top of the inner chamber.
>
> 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Axil Axil,
Thanks for the interesting paper.  While it seems clear that small particles 
are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the mechanism does not 
appear to be understood.  If they are neutrons, as the authors think, why do 
you think they originate from the H rather than from the thorium salt in 
solution?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as follows:



Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in
the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev


https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf


"The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission Electron 
Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."


The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric glass 
chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber and one 
with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber but without 
any nanoparticles inside of it.


First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the inner 
chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the outer 
chamber.


Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the inner 
chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in the outer 
chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V. Simakin and G.A. 
Shafeev.


This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce the 
LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by subatomic 
particles that can penetrate a glass wall.


Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc can 
be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open top of 
the inner chamber.


Next, a high voltage spark discharge can replace the laser light that is fired 
just above the top of the water level on the inner chamber. As a probe of the 
LENR reaction, expect to see transmutation results involving thorium in the 
outer chamber.










On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield  wrote:

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?



 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 

Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield  wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports tw

[Vo]:Second Jung paper from J. Soc. Mat. Sci.

[Jed Rothwell]

Below is a translation of the English text from second Jung paper:

Damage Mechanism and Deterioration of Hydrogen Storage Ability on Pd at
Hydrogen Absorption-Desorption Multi-Cycles

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsms1963/50/9/50_9_999/_article

The rest of the paper, including the abstract and captions are in English.
The download is free, so you should download it to see what's what.

Again, this was done by translate.google.come and by me. The Google
translation program seems to be improving almost day by day. I submitted
some of the paragraphs from this paper to Google last week, and again
today, and they came out better today!

(It is possible the translation improved somewhat because I have gotten
better at using the program. The Google program as it applies to Japanese
does call for some skill. You have to prepare the text in certain ways to
avoid translation errors. I do not know about other source languages.)

Here is the text:



Damage Mechanism and Deterioration of Hydrogen Storage Ability on Pd at
Hydrogen Absorption-Desorption Multi-Cycles

Young-guan JUNG * and Yuzuru SAKAT **

† Received Aug. 18, 2000

* Student member Yokohama National University Graduate Student, Yokohama
National Univ., Hodogaya-ku, Yokoham, 240-8501, Yokohama-ku Hodogaya-ku
Yokohama-shi 240-8501

* * Full member Major Subject of Yokohama National University Faculty of
Science and Engineering Yokohama National University Joban Tai, Hodogaya-ku
Yokohama-shi 240-8501, Dept. of Materials Sci. Faculty of Eng., Yokohama
National Univ., Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama, 240-85011000

[The following abstract and keywords are in English in the original]

Damage mechanism and hydrogen storage ability variation of palladium (Pd)
were investigated on hydrogen absorption-desorption multi-cycles. In order
to study this problem, palladium plates and round bars with mechanical
working or annealing have been used. Specimens were hydrogenated cyclically
by the electrochemical method, and hydrogen absorption ratio (H/Pd) as well
as deformation of specimens were measured at each hydrogenation cycle. As
results, it was shown that damage mechanism of Pd specimens was occurred
differently with their geometries and mechanical or heat treatment. In thin
plate Pd specimens, the thickness increased in increasing hydrogenation
cycles whereas length and width decreased, and grains were greatly deformed
however damage of micro and macro structures were scarcely observed, and
also hydrogen storage ability scarcely changed. On the other hand, in round
Pd specimens, both length and diameter increased with increasing
hydrogenation cycles, and significant damage of structures were widely
observed which resulted in decrease of the ratio H/Pd to -4.2% at the final
hydrogenation stage. The damage of structures and deformation were by far
intensive in the specimens with mechanical working than with heat treatment
however the hydrogen storage ability were not so different within the two
type specimens.

Key words: Palladium, Hydrogen absorption, Electrochemical method, Hydrogen
cycles, Damage, Deterioration



[The following text was translated]

Introduction

In recent years, development of an internal combustion engine that uses
clean hydrogen energy and an eco-car using a hydrogen electrode battery has
been actively developed as a measure against environmental problems such as
air pollution caused by fossil fuel and global warming caused by CO2. Along
with this, research and development is also actively being conducted on
hydrogen storage materials for hydrogen energy systems along with this.

Now then, it is known that when hydrogen is absorbed and released into a
metal material, it causes a large expansion / shrinkage deformation. 1) As
a result, dislocations and defects occur in the material, hydrogen
precipitation occurs in the material, and plastic strain There are
accumulated, micronized is promoted micro-cracks occur. 1) ~ 3) As a
measure for preventing the material strength deterioration and hydrogen
storage performance deterioration due to pulverization and embrittlement,
alloying materials. Despite studies on structural element substitution,
structural structure alteration, amorphization, etc., materials with
superlative lifetime and absorption capacity yet to be developed. 4) ~ 9)

Degradation of the strength of the material and degradation of hydrogen
storage capacity are caused by plastic deformation of the material due to
hydrogen absorption, generation of cracks, progress of pulverization and
the like, but unresolved questions remain regarding the basic process of
deterioration. This is an obstacle to improving the durability of hydrogen
storage material. In this paper, we observed the occurrence of breakdown in
the inside bulk and on the surface of the material due to hydrogenation
cycle, large deformation and fine fragmentation of crystal grain, hydrogen
storage performance of the overall resulting material is considered the
degradation proc

[Vo]:LENR and the dark side of IF

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/pr-28-2017-lenr-dark-side-of-if.html

-peter-
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

peter

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Axil Axil]

An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as follows:

Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles
in
the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf

"The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission
Electron Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm."

The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric
glass chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber
and one with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber
but without any nanoparticles inside of it.

First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the
inner chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the
outer chamber.

Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the inner
chamber. Expect to see transmutation  results involving thorium in the
outer chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V. Simakin
and G.A. Shafeev.

This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce the
LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by
subatomic particles that can penetrate a glass wall.

Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc
can be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open
top of the inner chamber.

Next, a high voltage spark discharge can replace the laser light that is
fired just above the top of the water level on the inner chamber. As a
probe of the LENR reaction, expect to see transmutation results involving
thorium in the outer chamber.





On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield 
wrote:

> Axil Axil,
>
> Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of
> magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the
> situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.
>
> So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that
> could be altered to prove your theory?
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil 
> To: vortex-l 
> Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to
> induce meson production has proved the theory.
>
> This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to
> produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.
>
> Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that
> magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.
>
> Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental
> particle, a synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an
> anisotropic magnetic field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support
>  monopole flux lines, the magnetic field produces the same effect.
>
> The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field
> (almost a monopole formated magnetic field).
>
> This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.
>
> That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.
>
> To refresh your memory, see
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html
>
> The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides
> of the proton and neutron is yet to be determined.
>
> I am trying to understand this: See
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
>
> Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
> wrote:
>
> AXil Axil,
>
> As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just
> as likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
> My question is how can it be proved or falsified?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil 
> To: vortex-l 
> Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
>
> LENR in a nutshell
>
> LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform
> called a soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning.
> This ball of light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on
> the surface of rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on
> nanoparticles and microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty
> plasma. But critically, this soliton is not active until it is triggered
> through the electrostatic effects of a stimulating emission.
>
> When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and
> supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and
> counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This
> counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the
> light from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.
>
> But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this
> electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to
> interf

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are applied.

 Has this actually been confirmed?
 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



There is a large class of physicists working with chirped laser in the 
femto-second time frame. The pulses go through a NONLINEAR diffraction grating 
and the E-fields superimpose.
For example; a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are 
applied.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.







-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?









-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...








Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?







-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

There is a large class of physicists working with chirped laser in the 
femto-second time frame. The pulses go through a NONLINEAR diffraction grating 
and the E-fields superimpose.

For example; a stream of helium atoms will emit neutrons when pulses are 
applied.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.



-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?





-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l mailto:l...@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic 
flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission.

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle.

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Brian Ahern,
The significance of your comment is not clear to me.  I thought you disagreed 
with Axil's theory, but this sounds like you now agree.

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect
 

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?









-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...








Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?







-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin. 

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric field 
and sees meson signal”



On Sun, A

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Brian Ahern]

Chirped laser pulses provide sufficient electric and magnetic fields that 
easily cause fission fusion and all decay products known. Holmlid uses laser 
pulses.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 9:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?





-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.

This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.

Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.

Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.

The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).

This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.

That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.

To refresh your memory, see

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html

The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.

I am trying to understand this: See

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic 
flelds
www.slac.stanford.edu
Lattice QCD in strong magnetic flelds P.V.Buividovichab, M.N.Chernodubcdb x, 
E.V.Luschevskayab, M.I.Polikarpovb a JIPNR \Sosny", National Academy of 
Science, Krasin ...




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?



-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission.

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect.

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle.

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin.

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric field 
and sees meson signal”

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil 
mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A post that might hold some insights as follows:


  1.  Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 

Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect

[Adrian Ashfield]

Axil Axil,

Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of 
magnitude.  I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the 
situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms.

So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that 
could be altered to prove your theory?



 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect



IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using  a fast high electric field to induce 
meson production has proved the theory.


This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to 
produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay.



Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that 
magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron.


Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a 
synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an anisotropic magnetic 
field formatted by a pertinent  magnet to support  monopole flux lines, the 
magnetic field produces the same effect.


The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a 
monopole formated magnetic field).


This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.



That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. 


To refresh your memory, see


http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html


The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides of the 
proton and neutron is yet to be determined.


I am trying to understand this: See


http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf




Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields







On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield  wrote:

AXil Axil,

As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just as 
likely or unlikely as myriads of others.
My question is how can it be proved or falsified?

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect




LENR in a nutshell

LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform called a 
soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. This ball of 
light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on the surface of 
rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on nanoparticles and 
microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty plasma. But critically, 
this soliton is not active until it is triggered through the electrostatic 
effects of a stimulating emission. 

When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and 
supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and 
counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This 
counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the light 
from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. 

But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this 
electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to 
interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam 
projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then 
becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. 

When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move into 
its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change their 
type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons made up 
of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these subatomic 
particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light thereby increasing 
their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming subatomic energy allows 
the soliton to survive for an extended period in a self-sustaining mode while 
the electrostatic stimulant continues to maintain the organization of the 
photonic spin. 

Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday 
Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric field 
and sees meson signal”



On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:


A post that might hold some insights as follows:



Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM
Dear Andrea,

seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need heat to be 
activated?

Best regards, Giuseppe

Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM
Giuseppe:

Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on electromagnetic 
fields.

Warm Regards,

A.R.


The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in the 
plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is the 
factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in the Rossi 
patent, very high voltage electrostatic potential is that trigger. The name of 
the triggering effect is "kerr effect". The minimum vol