Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
he have great influence on the sheep & parrots who blocked LENR since 27 years. 2016-09-25 0:36 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield : > Jed, > Ethan siegel is a loud mouth. In exchanges I have had with him he was not > interested i hearing about anything that contradicted his opinion. "Too > busy to look." > I wouldn't worry too much about what he thinks. > AA > > > > On 9/23/2016 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Alain Sepeda wrote: > > ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, >> ignoring the science >> >> I'm tired >> > > You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. > We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not > have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will. > > - Jed > > > > >
Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
Jed, Ethan siegel is a loud mouth. In exchanges I have had with him he was not interested i hearing about anything that contradicted his opinion. "Too busy to look." I wouldn't worry too much about what he thinks. AA On 9/23/2016 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Alain Sepeda mailto:alain.sep...@gmail.com>> wrote: ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, ignoring the science I'm tired You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
They also have my book. Maybe, for once, someone read it. We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will. - Jed -Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l Sent: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 5:54 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again Alain Sepeda wrote: ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, ignoring the science I'm tired You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
Alain Sepeda wrote: ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, > ignoring the science > > I'm tired > You're tired, and I am apprehensive. This is what I feared might happen. We begin to see the harm Rossi and Defkalion caused. I hope this will not have an impact on the Congress but I fear that it will. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
ethan siegel bash LENR as fraud based on Rossi and Defkalion story, ignoring the science I'm tired 2016-09-23 0:04 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene : > Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this > > > > https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold- > fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/ > > > > > > > > *From:* Alain Sepeda > > An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee > on armed services with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open > curiosity... > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873 > > > > > > I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum > > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/ > > > > I seen an occasion to spread informations >
Re: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
New Scientists just gets lots wrong and keeps repeating its mistakes ad infinitum example: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106321-reality-guide-the-essential-laws-of-cosmology/ New Scientist: "Back in the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell was melding electricity and magnetism into one unified theory of electromagnetism. But however he sliced the equations, they only made sense if light travelled through space at the same constant speed, regardless of the speed of its source. This is odd. If someone fires a bullet from a moving car, to a bystander the bullet travels at the sum of its speed and the car’s speed. Yet when 20 years later US physicists Albert Michelson and Edward Morley were looking for the luminiferous ether, a medium supposed to carry light, they reached the same conclusion: however you look at it, the speed of light is a constant." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." On Thursday, 22 September 2016, 23:08, Jones Beene wrote: #yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 -- _filtered #yiv5817438683 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv5817438683 #yiv5817438683 p.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 li.yiv5817438683MsoNormal, #yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv5817438683 a:link, #yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 a:visited, #yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5817438683 span.yiv5817438683EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv5817438683 .yiv5817438683MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv5817438683 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv5817438683 div.yiv5817438683WordSection1 {}#yiv5817438683 Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/ From: Alain Sepeda An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee on armed services with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open curiosity...http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873 I launched a post for debate on lenr-forumhttps://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/ I seen an occasion to spread informations
RE: [Vo]:CBCNews Canada: Why the controversial science of cold fusion is getting hot again
Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/ From: Alain Sepeda An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee on armed services with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open curiosity... http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873 I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3827-CBCNews-Canada/ I seen an occasion to spread informations