On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <
zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:
> And the following point…
>
> Those who argue that Rossi’s inability to produce/replicate his 30%
> efficient thermoelectric technology was proof of a scam, have no clue what
> they are talking about.
>
If Rossi had not been scamming, he would have been able to produce at least
one sample or maybe a few samples of material yielding 30% efficiency. He
could not even provide a sample which worked as well as standard
technology. He has not been able to since. If it was not a scam, why
would he not have kept trying? Why would he not have *ever* made and shown
a single device that met the claims he stated?
An efficient TE device would be perfect for producing electricity from
E-cat-generated steam. If Rossi knows how to make efficient TE devices,
why does he not combine them with the E-cat and close the loop so it runs
without external electricity indefinitely until its nuclear fuel runs out?
That would be at least months and maybe years, not the silly four hours his
typical demos have lasted.
