[vox-tech] Solaris CD
Hi, I am looking for a Solaris 8 (SunOS 5.8) CD that I can borrow for a couple of days. We have a machine that failed to re-boot due to disk errors and I need to run fsck. Thanks lot in advance. Cheers! Alfredo Lopez De Leon Novozymes, Inc. 1445 Drew Ave Davis CA 95618 United States ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Solaris CD
AH! I forgot that little x86 detail, thanks, I am looking for a SPARC disc. I have seen some iso's out there but looks like some are music and some other stuff ?? go figure. Also, I have seen some Solaris 9 and I wonder if I can use one of those after all I need to boot up, run fsck and then get out of there. ?? Anyway if you know of a trick to ID the correct iso I'll appreciate if you pass it my way. Thanks again! Alfredo -Original Message- From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Tony Cratz Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Solaris CD On 05/29/2012 06:03 PM, ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) wrote: Hi, I am looking for a Solaris 8 (SunOS 5.8) CD that I can borrow for a couple of days. We have a machine that failed to re-boot due to disk errors and I need to run fsck. First you did not specified if you want Sparc or x86. I have not tried any of the sites, but if you do a web search there seems to be a number of sites which claim to have it. Also it seems there are some torrents which you might be able to get (x86 only). Tony ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Samba/Active Domain
Hi, I need some help to get Samba and Active Domain to play nicely. The new server is an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with Kubuntu to provide GUI, running Samba 3.4.7 We have several other Linux servers that work perfectly well however this is the first 10.04LTS the others are 8.04LTS. Authentication is done through Kerberos/AD and works great! There is no shared folder. The users use Samba to access their home directory from their WinXp or Win7 machines. We use NX for remote login and it is working well. The only errors that I can find is this message on the Samba log and the smbstatus (see below) The Samba log shows: From /var/log/samba/ [2012/01/10 10:11:21, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:342(reply_spnego_kerberos) Failed to verify incoming ticket with error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE! [2012/01/10 10:11:21, 1] libads/kerberos_verify.c:336(ads_secrets_verify_ticket) ads_secrets_verify_ticket: failed to fetch machine password [2012/01/10 10:11:21, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:342(reply_spnego_kerberos) Failed to verify incoming ticket with error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE! Thanks! Alfredo % Background info % The smb.conf From testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section [homes] Processing section [printers] Processing section [print$] Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] workgroup = USFN realm = USFN.NZCORP.NET server string = Samba Server - Rio security = ADS map to guest = Bad User obey pam restrictions = Yes password server = ##.###.##.### pam password change = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = No usershare allow guests = Yes panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap uid = 16777216-33554431 idmap gid = 16777216-33554431 invalid users = root [homes] comment = Home Directories path = %H read only = No smbclient -L rio.usfn.nzcorp.net -U% Domain=[USFN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.7] Sharename Type Comment - --- homes Disk Home Directories print$ Disk Printer Drivers IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba Server - Rio) Domain=[USFN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.7] Server Comment ---- RIO Samba Server - Rio WorkgroupMaster ---- USFN DCUSFN200 SMBD status service smbd status smbd start/running, process 2911 However smbstatus gives no output !? Samba version 3.4.7 PID Username Group Machine --- Service pid machine Connected at --- ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] MHT mime type
Hi, Does anybody has experience with multipart html files? *.mht or *.mhtl I have found some info that claims that one can modify the mime.types file to include a new mime type to serve the mht file correctly instead of raw text. However, the info is confusing, some suggest to use message/rfc822 mht others application/vnd.sealed.mht and also application/octet-stream Any suggestions, please. Alfredo ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Ubuntu not booting after Kernel update
Hi, Some answers: Why LILO? Because the installation scripts failed to produce a bootable system when I selected Grub. So I selected LILO and it work. The update was from kernel 2.6.24-22 to 2.6.24-23. The original installation I believe had 2.6.24-21. One of our IT guys was able to boot the machine and manually start some of the services so the new kernel is OK and I believe that the problem is the MBR or something that follows LILO. Regards, Alfredo . From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Darth Borehd Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:13 AM To: lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Ubuntu not booting after Kernel update Why LILO? I can't think of a single thing LILO can do that Grub can not do better. If you have an older kernel available in the menu, boot to that. Then check for updates again. Sometimes the headers don't download completely on older releases. If so, then install those and try to reboot with the new kernel. 2009/11/23 ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) a...@novozymes.commailto:a...@novozymes.com Hi I have an Ubuntu server 8.04 LTS with 2 TB (RAID 5) of storage space. This morning I allowed the system to download and install a bunch of updates, along them a Sun Java and a kernel update. After the update due to some concerns about a Java application I decided to re-boot the server and I got a Lilo error the infamous L 99 99 99 ... Some Google postings suggested to run lilo just to make sure that the info about the new kernel was part of the booting sequence. After booting with a rescue disk I ran /sbin/lilo and re-boot, the Lilo problem was gone but the system now hangs after the BIOS Data Checkup Successful I will a appreciate any suggestions. Thanks Alfredo Lopez ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.orgmailto:vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Ubuntu not booting after Kernel update
Hi I have an Ubuntu server 8.04 LTS with 2 TB (RAID 5) of storage space. This morning I allowed the system to download and install a bunch of updates, along them a Sun Java and a kernel update. After the update due to some concerns about a Java application I decided to re-boot the server and I got a Lilo error the infamous L 99 99 99 ... Some Google postings suggested to run lilo just to make sure that the info about the new kernel was part of the booting sequence. After booting with a rescue disk I ran /sbin/lilo and re-boot, the Lilo problem was gone but the system now hangs after the BIOS Data Checkup Successful I will a appreciate any suggestions. Thanks Alfredo Lopez ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Real VNC #$%!!
Hi, I am using Real VNC to connect to a Linux server(s) when I work from home and I need to run X-applications. However, it is a pain in the neck that I cannot do copypaste between my WinXP laptop and my Linux servers through Real VNC. A Google search shows that the problem is that RVNC uses the cut buffer instead of the copy. Is there a solution to this? Is there another VNC client that will do copy paste? At work I use Xwin-32 and it works well, but it not efficient to use Xwin-32 over a VPN on a slow DSL. Thanks for any comments. Cheers! Alfredo Lopez Novozymes, Inc. 1445 Drew Ave Davis CA 95618 United States ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Hard drive dying?
Bill, Out IT guy usually chills dying drives for 2-3 hours at 4-6 C and then he tries to extract the info. He has a big rate of success with this technique. Good Luck Man! Alfredo -Original Message- From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Bill Kendrick Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:46 PM To: t...@wildintellect.com; lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Hard drive dying? On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 07:58:54PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote: sudo smartctl -H /dev/sda Gives me: === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED Please note the following marginal Attributes: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 058 041 045Old_age Always In_the_past 42 (Lifetime Min/Max 38/49) 240 Head_Flying_Hours 0x 000 000 000Old_age Offline FAILING_NOW 179710021603702 241 Unknown_Attribute 0x 000 000 000Old_age Offline FAILING_NOW 2384165937 242 Unknown_Attribute 0x 000 000 000Old_age Offline FAILING_NOW 30165814 So I'm getting PASSED, plus FAILING_NOW...? Gives you the basic yes/no sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda Attached as an attachment... Looks like a bunch of Pre-fail and Old-age reports...? -bill! ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Help with USB Hard drive
Hi, Thank you very much for all your answers. After testing some of your suggestions I discovered that It is after all a USB drive and as root I have to umount it before logging out so the other users can mount it and use it... Too bad USB drives do not behave like real attached drives. Well. Like the Rolling Stones would say: You can't always get what you want. Have a nice one! Alfredo -Original Message- From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Nonken Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:59 PM To: lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Help with USB Hard drive Did you make sure of the permissions on the mounting point? On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:31 PM, ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) wrote: Hi, I have a brand new 1TB USB hard drive formatted by fdisk to FAT32. My system can see it mount it and umount it. However, no matter what I do I cannot change the permissions or the ownership nothing! The root can write but nobody else can. I want this drive to be totally accessible to all the users of the machine (actually a server). Is there a way to do this? ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] Help with USB Hard drive
Hi ken and Matthew, Awesome info! I'll give it a try :-) Ken: does this answer your question? Disk /dev/sdf: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdf1 1 121601 976760001b W95 FAT32 By the way I decided to use FAT32 so I can move the drive between several machines. But.., I may decide to get another one ($150.00 at Fry's final price) and do the /dev/disk/by-id/ but with an ext3 partition which will be much more efficient. Thanks!!! Alfredo -Original Message- From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Chanoch (Ken) Bloom Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:03 AM To: lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Help with USB Hard drive That's an assumption the operating system makes because most USB drives are thumb drives and the like, single-user disks that come and go. You can change that, though. Create a rule to identify the device uniquely in udev and to assign it a permenant device node (I can't tell you exactly how to do this, it will depend on being able to find something like a serial number that udev can use to identify it.), then add that device node to /etc/fstab, with appropriate mount options. Just out of curiousity, what's the block size (the size occupied by a 1 byte file) on a 1 TB fat32 drive? --Ken -- Ken (Chanoch) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory. Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology. http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/ ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Help with USB Hard drive
Hi, I have a brand new 1TB USB hard drive formatted by fdisk to FAT32. My system can see it mount it and umount it. However, no matter what I do I cannot change the permissions or the ownership nothing! The root can write but nobody else can. I want this drive to be totally accessible to all the users of the machine (actually a server). Is there a way to do this? TIA Alfredo This is some info on the drive: From /etc/fstab /dev/sdb1 /media/usb vfatpamconsole,exec,noauto,managed,rw,user 0 0 From /etc/mtab /dev/sdb1 /media/usb vfat rw 0 0 From /media ls -l drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 usb ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Re: [vox-tech] FC4 hangs at logout
Dear Jeff,
Thanks a lot I did not see this info while I was googling. This may explain why
the other servers do not have this problem, I installed those systems and I did
not installed the sound software. Heck they are servers.
Thanks I'll try disabling the Sound sys.
Seee You around Guys!!
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org
[mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Newmiller
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:51 PM
To: lugod's technical discussion forum
Subject: Re: [vox-tech] FC4 hangs at logout
ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) wrote:
Hi,
I have Fedora core 4 system that takes 3 long minutes to allow me to
logout from the gnome desktop.
I did an strace of the logout process and it always hangs at:
connect(16, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(16001),
sin_addr=inet_addr(10.16.26.53)}, 16) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
Until it times out.
The IP 10.16.26.53 belongs to the machine that I am using to connect to the
Linux server via XWin32.
All the Other Linux servers that we have never give me this problem (2
seconds to complete logout).
Does anybody has any suggestions on how to fix this weird behavior or hunt
down the problem?
No personal experience with this, but Google suggests it might have to do
with the sound manager. [1] [2]
Thanks a lot in advance.
[1] http://connectivity.hummingbird.com/support/nc/exceed/exc1003376.html?cks=y
[2] http://www.technion.ac.il/usg/x-emu/Exceed/Exceed2008/New_Exceed_2008.pdf
--
---
Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live...
DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.usBasics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---
___
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
___
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] FC4 hangs at logout
Hi,
I have Fedora core 4 system that takes 3 long minutes to allow me to logout
from the gnome desktop.
I did an strace of the logout process and it always hangs at:
connect(16, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(16001),
sin_addr=inet_addr(10.16.26.53)}, 16) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
Until it times out.
The IP 10.16.26.53 belongs to the machine that I am using to connect to the
Linux server via XWin32.
All the Other Linux servers that we have never give me this problem (2 seconds
to complete logout).
Does anybody has any suggestions on how to fix this weird behavior or hunt down
the problem?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Cheers!
Alfredo
___
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Stale NFS (was Copying/ Moving Large number of files)
Hi Guys, Thank you very much for all the enlightening disscussion. As per your suggestions I was getting ready to use rsync to copy my files from an 300 GB NFS partition to another 1 TB NSF partition and all the lights went out. ?? The new 1TB partition became unreachable and reports: -bash: cd: /export/home: Stale NFS file handle The /etc/fstab appears to have the correct entries: # NFS shares master:/export/home /export/homenfs defaults,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 /dev/hde/media/floppy1 auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 /dev/hdf/media/cdromauto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 /dev/hda/media/cdrom1 auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 But, the darn partition keeps desapearing (after a while) every time it is manually re-mounted. At this point we have no clue whay it is behaving this way, the original 300 GB NFS partition never behave this way. Does anybody has any suggestions on why the new NFS partition behaves this way or what to check? As always, thank you very much. Sincerely, Alfredo Lopez -Original Message- From: vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org [mailto:vox-tech-boun...@lists.lugod.org] On Behalf Of Troy Arnold Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 1:52 AM To: lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Copying/ Moving Large number of files On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:07:13PM -0800, Jeff Newmiller wrote: Troy Arnold wrote: mv would be fine because the file isn't unlinked from the source until it has successfully been written to the destination. I strongly disagree, having had problems with mv and large numbers of files. It isn't that data gets lost... it is simply that sorting out the mess of directories and files in two different places if there is a problem is a headache. yeah, I agree with your disagreement :) mv is only fine if everything goes well. Still, I'd use rsync. It has the advantage that it can resume if for some reason the transfer gets interrupted. rsync -av dir1 /bla/bla/bla rsync -avr ? -a is 'archive' mode. It turns on a bunch of flags, including -r (recursive) rsync is the shiznit. -t ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Copying/ Moving Large number of files
Hi,
I need to move a large number of directories whose size ranges from 1GB to 6 GB
(multiple files ~400mb each) between two NFS partitions. Which is the safest
way to do it? Will mv dir1 /bla/bla/bla/dir1 will suffice? The data is
extremely valuable and I will hate to lose it during the process, should I do
copy {cp -r dir1 /bla/bla/bla/dir1} instead and then remove the originals?
Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
Best Regards
Alfredo Lopez
___
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Looking for a course/tutor
Hi I'd like to know if any of you know where I can take a course to learn how to install and configure software for a Linux Cluster. I am a biologist and I know how to get stuff to work on stand-alone machines but clusters, I have no idea. In case you wonder, most of what I know I learned on Install fests, on Vox-Tech and reading books that some of you recommended. If you don't know of a course, but you know somebody that could give me a one-on-one tutorial plea$e contact me directly. As always, thank you very much in advance for your help, Cheers! Alfredo -- Best Regards Alfredo Lopez De Leon Novozymes, Inc. 1445 Drew Ave Davis CA 95618 United States ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
RE: [vox-tech] 32 vs. 64
Thanks Mike, It is going to be an interesting week, I have never tried to install Linux in anything this sophisticated. Cheers! Alfredo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Simons Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 6:06 PM To: lugod's technical discussion forum Subject: Re: [vox-tech] 32 vs. 64 On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:03:54PM -0700, ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) wrote: I just got a new Poweredge 1850 (Dual Xeon 3.8 GHz, 2 MB RAM, SCSI) and I am planning to install on it Fedora Core 4. The question is: Should I use the i386 version or the x86_EM64T? [...] I am wondering if I will run into trouble with my applications. Most of them if not ALL are 32-bit. You should install the x86-64 version. The 64-bit compiled code should run faster so even if all your apps are 32-bit ... at least you'll have a 64-bit kernel. I've not checked how FC4 does it, but most 64-bit linux flavors install 32-compat libraries also... some default to 64 bit in /lib and use /lib32, others default to 32 bit and provide a /lib64. Is anybody aware of any potential problems? Is there an associated cost of running 32-bit applications on 64-bit machines? On the x86 chip there I've not heard of any significant performance hit running 32 bit code when in 64 bit mode... the same code compiled in 64-bit mode often run faster because there are twice as many registers. ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] 32 vs. 64
Hi, I just got a new Poweredge 1850 (Dual Xeon 3.8 GHz, 2 MB RAM, SCSI) and I am planning to install on it Fedora Core 4. The question is: Should I use the i386 version or the x86_EM64T? The Xeons can use either OS though I don't know if both are native or if one of them is emulated. Thinking about the future, I am leaning towards the 64-bit version, but I am wondering if I will run into trouble with my applications. Most of them if not ALL are 32-bit. Is anybody aware of any potential problems? Is there an associated cost of running 32-bit applications on 64-bit machines? Thank you very much in advice for your comments. Cheers! Alfredo ___ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
[vox-tech] Konqueror
Hi, Does anybody knows the location of Koqueror's Introduction Screen page. This is the page that Konqueror displays when you run it for the first time. This page appears when you have as your Home page a ~. Konqueror somehow knows where to find it, it must be hard-coded or something similar. Thanks a lot in advance, Alfredo ___ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
RE: [vox-tech] Konqueror
Sorry to answer my own question, but I finally found it. /usr/share/doc/HTML Cheers! Alfredo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ALLO (Alfredo Lopez De Leon) Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vox-tech] Konqueror Hi, Does anybody knows the location of Koqueror's Introduction Screen page. This is the page that Konqueror displays when you run it for the first time. This page appears when you have as your Home page a ~. Konqueror somehow knows where to find it, it must be hard-coded or something similar. Thanks a lot in advance, Alfredo _ ___ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
RE: [vox-tech] Red Hat apache problem (was: [lugod lert] Help, please)
The httpd.conf file in RedHat is located in: /etc/httpd/conf Is it possible that Apache is not running? Alfredo -Original Message- From: Henry House [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:26 AM To: Janet Meizel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vox-tech] Red Hat apache problem (was: [lugod lert] Help, please) On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:56:39PM -0800, Janet Meizel wrote: Hi- I 've upgraded from Redhat 6.5 to 8.0 server at Davis High School and included Apache in the install. Everything is set up to go, but when I try to access the web page (I assume it is index.html), from another computer, the message is that of denial. I'd like to change the accessibility, but haven't been able to locate the file- even with grep. Can you tell me where it is located? (which directory, etc.) Redirected to the Vox-tech list since there does not seem to be a LERT request in your message. Would you send along the contents of the Apache configuration file please? That file will specify where the web pages are. The file will be in /etc, and is probably called /etc/apache/httpd.conf or something similar. Vox-techers: please CC this fellow in replies, since he is likely not subscribed to the list. -- Henry House The attached file is a digital signature. See http://romana.hajhouse.org/pgp for information. My OpenPGP key: http://romana.hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc. ___ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
