Re: Download verification broken

2016-04-30 Thread Robert Mayr 
2016-04-28 3:10 GMT+02:00 Dan Haskell :

> Downloaded iso of the server edition. Tried to verify following
> instructions and failed. First your key is not certified.
>
> > gpg --verify-files Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Oct 2015 01:31:05 PM PDT using RSA key ID
> 34EC9CBA
> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (23) "
> [unknown]
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: EF45 5106 80FB 0232 6B04  5AFB 3247 4CF8 34EC 9CBA
>
> Second, it appears to be the wrong key(?)
>
> > ls
> Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM  Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso
>
> > sha256sum -c Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso: OK
> sha256sum: Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: No such file or directory
> Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: FAILED open or read
> sha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formatted
> sha256sum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read
>
>
> Couldn't you just provide a md5sum instead? The gpg stuff is cool and all,
> but when it fails... give us something to work with. Clicked on support,
> but it's just a link to a BUNCH of forums. Not helpful.
>
> Dan
>
>
> --
> websites mailing list
> websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org



You have a good signature, so the ISO id ok. The rest only says the key
doesn't have a certified signature, AFAIK we will try to include some text
message in the future to give users a better resume, but won't provide
md5sum.
Regards.

-- 
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Introduction Email

2016-04-30 Thread Corey W Sheldon 
On 04/28/2016 07:38 PM, Drew Meigs wrote:
> Hi, everyone. My name is Drew and I am relatively new to Fedora, but not
> to Linux (I have been working with Debia-based systems for the better
> part of 10 years). I have a little experience with websites, but I think
> I would still be a good fit with this group. I have some working
> knowledge of HTML and a little of XML. Also, I am a fast study. I would
> very much like to get involved with the website team. I am trying to do
> some work with groups like CommOps and the Docs team, but I feel like I
> would also really like to work on the website.
>
> I look forward to working with you all.
>
> Drew
> --
> websites mailing list
> websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
Drew,


Well let me be the  first to welcome you.  Have you had a chance to read
any of the docs / SOPs?  Also  if you are  tech inclined and  use  IRC
we have a Freenode channel all to ourselves #fedora-websites.


Feel free to  ask any of us  about things that  seem odd or  otherwise 
need clarification and  once again Welcome.

-- 
--- Warm Regards ---
Corey Sheldon
P: +1 (310) 909 7672
PGP: B54B7228 (keybase) | 5A88E539 (personal) | D2264944 (fedora)
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

Disclaimer: This document, including attachments, is intended for the person(s) 
named within and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged 
information, and may occasionally include Intellectual Property / Embargoed 
Content. it is request that all emails regardless of topic or content are 
regarded in this manner. Unauthorized disclosure, copying / distribution of 
this information may be unlawful and is prohibited, including unsolicited 
Cc/Bcc. If you are not the intended recipient, please disregard and destroy 
this message and if the recipient is  known to you please inform them, and a 
return email indicating a improper recipient IS requested so that I may remove 
you from any lists, conversations such error may have created / allowed. Use of 
OpenGPG keys are highly encouraged my keys can be found @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net 
& hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Marketing] Re: [Developer-portal] Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

2016-04-30 Thread Justin W. Flory 
Hi all,

The Fedora Globalization (G11n) team would probably be the best points
of contact for this. I'm not sure on the specifics, but I believe Zanata
is the tool that would be needed.

I am including the G11n list on this reply. More info at the following
links:

* Wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N
* IRC: #fedora-g11n
* Mailing list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n.lists.fedoraproject.org/
* Zanata: http://fedora.zanata.org/

Hope this helps.

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflo...@gmail.com

On 04/28/2016 07:45 AM, Petr Hracek wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
> 
> it seems, we have first candidate for translation [1].
> Especially Spanish.
> Although I have mentioned, Fedora Developer Portal should be only in
> English, I have to be more open.
> 
> In case, folks are interested to have portal in several languages we
> have to do it. Definitely.
> 
> You mentioned tools like Zanata and Fedora Foundation.
> 
> Whom shall we contact?
> 
> What should be next steps for initiate translation Fedora Developer
> Portal to other languages.
> Like Czech;)
> 
> Shall we create a ticket somewhere?
> 
> [1] https://github.com/developer-portal/content/issues/131
> 
> On 04/22/2016 12:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste wrote:
>> Quote : "Out of the six billion people in the world, only 339 million
>> have English as a first language [3]."
>> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/translate-fedora-24-in-your-language/
>>
>> Most programming languages are english based, because it's presently
>> the easiest language to collaborate. They are still thousands of
>> website that explain and give tutorial in local languages.
>>
>> Same for Fedora, and we still translate softwares, websites and
>> documentations.
>>
>> "Software developpement" is more and more common, we slowly teach it
>> from elementary schools. We should not restrict access to information.
>> Even fedora budget is translatable, why would we like to translate
>> that kind of website as working language in Fedora is english ?
>>
>> Fedora Developer Portal is build half way between communication
>> website and Fedora documentation. Both is relevant to be translatable
>> and helps to reach more users.
>>
>> Fedora Developer Portal is no exception with any of the work of Fedora
>> Websites or Docs Project. It would rather use community tools :
>> pagure/fedorahosted/bugzilla/Zanata, and respect Fedora Foundations,
>> including Freedom by not using google analytics or promote usage of
>> github.
>>
>> If you can't make it translatable because of time, it's a thing, but
>> if you don't because you haven't thought at it or don't see the point,
>> it's a problem. The Websites and Docs projects have both experience in
>> this and may help for tools. L10N team can help to explain what works
>> well or not.
>>
>> Please don't close the door to localization.
>> You said 6 month ago you waited to have more feedback. If you go too
>> far, the cost to include it will be too high.
>> Please think about it for fedora-hubs too.
>>
>> Note : https://techbase.kde.org is translatable, same for
>> https://developer.gnome.org/languages
>>
>> Le 2016-04-22 08:50, Robert Mayr a écrit :
>>
>>> Ok, I'm fine with that. I was just bringing up a question we
>>> discussed time ago and I'm asked sometimes by L10n folks. Thanks for
>>> confirming it. Regards. Robert
>>>
>>> 2016-04-22 8:35 GMT+02:00 Petr Hracek :
>>>
 Hi Robert,

 I guess, developer portal should be only in English.
 Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.

 Regards
 Petr

 -- 
 Petr Hracek
 Software Engineer
 Developer Experience
 Red Hat, Inc
 Mob: +420777056169 [1]
 email: phra...@redhat.com
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Developer-portal mailing list
>>> developer-por...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/developer-por...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> [2]
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Petr Hracek
> Software Engineer
> Developer Experience
> Red Hat, Inc
> Mob: +420777056169
> email: phra...@redhat.com
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora Marketing mailing list
> market...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/market...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Download verification broken

2016-04-30 Thread Dan Haskell 
Downloaded iso of the server edition. Tried to verify following 
instructions and failed. First your key is not certified.


> gpg --verify-files Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM
gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Oct 2015 01:31:05 PM PDT using RSA key ID 
34EC9CBA
gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (23) 
" [unknown]

gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the 
owner.

Primary key fingerprint: EF45 5106 80FB 0232 6B04  5AFB 3247 4CF8 34EC 9CBA

Second, it appears to be the wrong key(?)

> ls
Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM  Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso

> sha256sum -c Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM
Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso: OK
sha256sum: Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formatted
sha256sum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read


Couldn't you just provide a md5sum instead? The gpg stuff is cool and 
all, but when it fails... give us something to work with. Clicked on 
support, but it's just a link to a BUNCH of forums. Not helpful.


Dan


--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Marketing] Re: [Developer-portal] Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

2016-04-30 Thread Zoltan Hoppar 
I think this developer portal will be key for us, and there is a place
for a developer hub for projects aka earlier fedora hosted. IMHO
Fedora Hosted .next should be something like a kickstart portal, just
for softwares. If we are able to our community run software startups,
host them, and even besides the description would be cool to openly,
visibly look for specified coders, designers and so on.

Z

2016-04-27 20:22 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:35:57AM +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
>> I guess, developer portal should be only in English.
>> Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
>
> If people are interested in working on it, though, having non-English intro
> pages might bring more people into Fedora.
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> 
> Fedora Project Leader
> --
> marketing mailing list
> market...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/market...@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
PGP:  06853DF7
--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora export

2016-04-30 Thread 杉村好謙 / SUGIMURA，YOSHIKANE 
To whom it may concern,

Please pardon the sudden mail.

My Name is Yoshikane Sugimura and I work at Hitachi, Ltd. in Japan.

We are developing an embedded OS based on fedora.
We are planning to export this OS.
In Japan of the low, it is necessary to clarify the encryption algorithm and 
its key length.

(Q1)Would you have such cases.
(Q2)Please tell me the encryption algorithm and its key length using in fedora.

Please advice me.

Yours faithfully,
-
Yoshikane Sugimura 
yoshikane.sugimura...@hitachi.com
--
websites mailing list
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org