Finn, thanks for your attentiveness.
Figure 'Sigma total edits' (top left cell) was copied from an earlier
calculation, unlike the other totals, which were calculated while building
this table. But unlike this table the other table did not calculate monthly
totals for months where a major language (in casu English) was not yet
processed.
See http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaZZ.htm and you get my
point.
So to be precise: 'Sigma total edits' is actually 'Sigma total edits for all
languages for which counts are available'.
Fixed report is online. Someday we will have figures for the English
Wikipedia, fingers crossed :)
Cheers, Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wiki-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finn Aarup Nielsen
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 13:12
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Regular contributor
Dear Erik,
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Erik Zachte wrote:
[...]
For instance in eo: 54% of total edits for all time were bot edits,
but most
of these will be from recent years, so the percentage will be even
higher
for recent years.
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/BotActivityMatrix.htm
Interesting!
I wonder why there is a discrepancy between the summary for the total
number. Sigma total edits are 119M but Sigma manual edits are
higher:
193M. As far as I skimmed the figures are ok for the individual
languages.
best regards
Finn
___
Finn Aarup Nielsen, DTU Informatics, Denmark
Lundbeck Foundation Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging
http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/ http://nru.dk/staff/fnielsen/
___
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
