[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2014-06-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

Tisza Gergő gti...@wikimedia.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Tisza Gergő gti...@wikimedia.org ---
Sort-of fixed in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/138212/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|Normal  |Low

--- Comment #5 from Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org ---
I think we may need to postpone this until A) The Information template gets
fixed or B) Wikidata goes live on Commons. Either way I don't think we can do
anything about it for now - dropping priority.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gti...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for reporting! Do you have any suggestions? We display either the date
from the information template or (if not present) the file upload date, so we
need some sort of qualifier to differentiate between the two.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

--- Comment #2 from Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org ---
Thanks for pointing this out, Dominic! Are you sure that the 'date' field of
the 'Information' template of the description is used inconsistently? I thought
that field was clearly intended as the creation date in the upload wizard. If
that's the case, then I think the 'Created by' label is fine. If that's not the
case, it would be possible for us to just say 'Date', but it's not ideal.

Gergo,if we are using different types of dates in the same place, I think we
should change the label to clearly indicate what users are seeing: 'Created by'
or 'Uploaded by'. Otherwise, this will lead to confusion.

When we do the structured data upgrade with Wikidata this summer, we will need
two separate fields to address this issue: 'Creation date' should never be
mixed in with 'Upload date', IMHO, it would be better to leave it blank. We may
even want to consider a third field for file edits or overwrites: 'Modification
date'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

Fabrice Florin fflo...@wikimedia.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|Unprioritized   |Normal

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

--- Comment #3 from Dmcdevit dmcde...@cox.net ---
It's not so much inconsistency as variability of meaning. The concept of
creation doesn't apply equally to all media or types of works. And there is
inherent uncertainty when you make a derivative, like a crop: is it the
creation of the derivative or the original that is put in the date? I know that
the documentation for the Information template on Commons does instruct users
to put in when the original source was created (whatever that means), but some
other relevant points are that (1) the name of the parameter and the visible
output of the field is only labeled Date, and many users likely reach their
own conclusion about what that means, and it is incongruent to use a more
specific label downstream, (2) where the creation date is unfilled or unknown,
the upload date is commonly put in that field anyway (even instructed by the
template documentation), so there is no way of telling which is meant, and (3)
not all of the machine-readable templates agree with Information about using
date for creation date. For example, {{book}} on Commons recommends
publication date (which would be different from either the writing or the
digitization in some cases).

Links to template documentation for reference: 
* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Information
* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Book

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 56797] Created on language for dates not always true

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56797

--- Comment #4 from Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 Gergo,if we are using different types of dates in the same place, I think we
 should change the label to clearly indicate what users are seeing: 'Created
 by' or 'Uploaded by'. Otherwise, this will lead to confusion.

That is what we do currently (and that's why a label like 'Date' could be
confusing).

 When we do the structured data upgrade with Wikidata this summer, we will
 need two separate fields to address this issue: 'Creation date' should 
 never be mixed in with 'Upload date', IMHO, it would be better to leave 
 it blank. We may even want to consider a third field for file edits or 
 overwrites: 'Modification date'.

Wikidata has some pretty flexible ways of handling this, like statement
qualifiers. We just need to get there somehow :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l