Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory
You rock!!! It isn't often when you are able to out do the planning dept. Crow...Man...Crow!!! --- On Thu, 7/24/08, Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory > To: "WISPA General List" > Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008, 12:00 AM > lol > > coolness > > marlon > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck McCown - 3" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:26 PM > Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory > > > > Just got back from a county commission meeting. We > appealed conditions > > placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. > They wanted us to > > provide a full acre of fall protection clearance > around the tower (leased > > land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. > They wanted the parcel > > fenced, and landscaped. And the provision that no > other development could > > ever be done there. > > > > This was for a 100 foot lattice tower in the middle of > a cow pasture. I > > argued equal protection, I showed were they have never > made us do this any > > other location. I told them I wanted the cows to > graze under the tower. > > We > > argued telecom act and the inapplicability of the > ordinance cited. I told > > them that they should require the local power company > to have a clear fall > > zone around every power pole. > > > > The commissioners struck all the conditions. The > planning guy was trying > > at > > the end to insert elements from the contract between > us and the rancher. > > I > > objected to anything from that contract being read > into the record for > > that > > proceeding. They shut him down on that too. The > planner is a new guy, > > just > > graduated from college in May as a planner or some > such thing. Our CUP > > was > > one of the first things he did. I tried to reason > with him early in the > > process but he had to strut his stuff. So his stuff > got rolled into a > > very > > tight tube and forcefully hammered into an orfice. I > think I will go out > > on > > the back porch and crow a little. > > > > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory
lol coolness marlon - Original Message - From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:26 PM Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory > Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions > placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to > provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased > land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel > fenced, and landscaped. And the provision that no other development could > ever be done there. > > This was for a 100 foot lattice tower in the middle of a cow pasture. I > argued equal protection, I showed were they have never made us do this any > other location. I told them I wanted the cows to graze under the tower. > We > argued telecom act and the inapplicability of the ordinance cited. I told > them that they should require the local power company to have a clear fall > zone around every power pole. > > The commissioners struck all the conditions. The planning guy was trying > at > the end to insert elements from the contract between us and the rancher. > I > objected to anything from that contract being read into the record for > that > proceeding. They shut him down on that too. The planner is a new guy, > just > graduated from college in May as a planner or some such thing. Our CUP > was > one of the first things he did. I tried to reason with him early in the > process but he had to strut his stuff. So his stuff got rolled into a > very > tight tube and forcefully hammered into an orfice. I think I will go out > on > the back porch and crow a little. > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory
Good job! -- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:26 PM Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory > Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions > placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to > provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased > land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel > fenced, and landscaped. And the provision that no other development could > ever be done there. > > This was for a 100 foot lattice tower in the middle of a cow pasture. I > argued equal protection, I showed were they have never made us do this any > other location. I told them I wanted the cows to graze under the tower. > We > argued telecom act and the inapplicability of the ordinance cited. I told > them that they should require the local power company to have a clear fall > zone around every power pole. > > The commissioners struck all the conditions. The planning guy was trying > at > the end to insert elements from the contract between us and the rancher. > I > objected to anything from that contract being read into the record for > that > proceeding. They shut him down on that too. The planner is a new guy, > just > graduated from college in May as a planner or some such thing. Our CUP > was > one of the first things he did. I tried to reason with him early in the > process but he had to strut his stuff. So his stuff got rolled into a > very > tight tube and forcefully hammered into an orfice. I think I will go out > on > the back porch and crow a little. > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory
Nice victory Chuck. That guy was out of control. In all the zoning hearings I have ever participated in around the US, never had they gotten as restrictive as that guy tried to be! Thank You, Brian Webster -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel fenced, and landscaped. And the provision that no other development could ever be done there. This was for a 100 foot lattice tower in the middle of a cow pasture. I argued equal protection, I showed were they have never made us do this any other location. I told them I wanted the cows to graze under the tower. We argued telecom act and the inapplicability of the ordinance cited. I told them that they should require the local power company to have a clear fall zone around every power pole. The commissioners struck all the conditions. The planning guy was trying at the end to insert elements from the contract between us and the rancher. I objected to anything from that contract being read into the record for that proceeding. They shut him down on that too. The planner is a new guy, just graduated from college in May as a planner or some such thing. Our CUP was one of the first things he did. I tried to reason with him early in the process but he had to strut his stuff. So his stuff got rolled into a very tight tube and forcefully hammered into an orfice. I think I will go out on the back porch and crow a little. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] A glorious victory
Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel fenced, and landscaped. And the provision that no other development could ever be done there. This was for a 100 foot lattice tower in the middle of a cow pasture. I argued equal protection, I showed were they have never made us do this any other location. I told them I wanted the cows to graze under the tower. We argued telecom act and the inapplicability of the ordinance cited. I told them that they should require the local power company to have a clear fall zone around every power pole. The commissioners struck all the conditions. The planning guy was trying at the end to insert elements from the contract between us and the rancher. I objected to anything from that contract being read into the record for that proceeding. They shut him down on that too. The planner is a new guy, just graduated from college in May as a planner or some such thing. Our CUP was one of the first things he did. I tried to reason with him early in the process but he had to strut his stuff. So his stuff got rolled into a very tight tube and forcefully hammered into an orfice. I think I will go out on the back porch and crow a little. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/