Re: [Yade-dev] clump discretization/integrateInertia
Zitat von Klaus Thoeni klaus.tho...@gmail.com: Hi guys, is there a reason why we have two parameters here? Wouldn't one be enough? E.i. we just use discretization and if discretization==0 than the properties are not updated. What do you thing? You are right, bool integrateInertia is not needed since it can be absorbed by discretization (e.g. no integration for = 0). Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Yade-dev] [yade-dev] clump discretization/integrateInertia
If discretization=0 don't integrate... it makes sense. Moreover, discretization=0 should be the default IMO. IntegrateInertia is a very good feature but it should be used on purpose, not by default. B On 21/02/14 01:29, Klaus Thoeni wrote: Hi guys, is there a reason why we have two parameters here? Wouldn't one be enough? E.i. we just use discretization and if discretization==0 than the properties are not updated. What do you thing? Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Yade-dev] [yade-dev] clump discretization/integrateInertia
I put your wishes to my todo list ;) christian Zitat von Bruno Chareyre bruno.chare...@hmg.inpg.fr: If discretization=0 don't integrate... it makes sense. Moreover, discretization=0 should be the default IMO. IntegrateInertia is a very good feature but it should be used on purpose, not by default. B On 21/02/14 01:29, Klaus Thoeni wrote: Hi guys, is there a reason why we have two parameters here? Wouldn't one be enough? E.i. we just use discretization and if discretization==0 than the properties are not updated. What do you thing? Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yade-dev] clump discretization/integrateInertia
Hi guys, is there a reason why we have two parameters here? Wouldn't one be enough? E.i. we just use discretization and if discretization==0 than the properties are not updated. What do you thing? Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Yade-dev] [yade-dev] clump discretization/integrateInertia
Hi guys, is there a reason why we have two parameters here? Wouldn't one be enough? E.i. we just use discretization and if discretization==0 than the properties are not updated. What do you thing? Klaus ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
