[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I'm happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD > operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be > available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature. Great work, Pawel! This is an important milestone for the FreeBSD project. Just a quick question: Does ZFS still work reliable when the write cache for ATA disks is enabled, i.e. with the line "hw.ata.wc=1" in /boot/loader.conf? I can't wait to set up a test machine with FreeBSD -current to start playing with ZFS. :) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "I invented Ctrl-Alt-Delete, but Bill Gates made it famous." -- David Bradley, original IBM PC design team ___ zfs-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:03:11AM +0200, Bruno Damour wrote: > hello, > > After csup, buildworld fails for me in libumem. > Is this due to zfs import ? > Or my config ? > > Thanks for any clue, i'm dying to try your brand new zfs on amd64 !! > > Bruno > > FreeBSD vil1.ruomad.net 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Mar 23 > 07:33:56 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VIL1 amd64 > > make buildworld: > > ===> cddl/lib/libumem (all) > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=nocona > -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/../../../compat/opensolaris/lib/libumem > -D_SOLARIS_C_SOURCE -c /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c > /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c:197: error: redefinition of 'nofail_cb' > /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c:30: error: previous definition of > 'nofail_cb' was here > /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c:199: error: redefinition of `struct > umem_cache' > /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c:210: error: redefinition of 'umem_alloc' > /usr/src/cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c:43: error: previous definition of > 'umem_alloc' was here Did you use my previous patches? There is no cddl/lib/libumem/umem.c is HEAD, it was it's old location and it was moved to compat/opensolaris/lib/libumem/. Delete your entire cddl/ directory and recsup. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpdFOvvrz3lO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Bruno Damour wrote: > Thanks, fantasticly interesting ! > > Currently ZFS is only compiled as kernel module and is only available > > for i386 architecture. Amd64 should be available very soon, the other > > archs will come later, as we implement needed atomic operations. > > > I'm waiting eagerly to amd64 version > > >Missing functionality. > > > > - There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes. > > > Is this planned ? Does that means I cannot use it as a basis for a > full-featured samba share ? It is planned, but it's not trivial. Does samba support NFSv4-style ACLs? -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpbbjVRCmVwa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
Great news, Pawel! Waiting to test it :) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
