Hello!
¿Anyone knows where I could find examples or docs about acegi and
portlets integration? ¿is it possible?. I´m going to try to integrate a JBoss
Portal Application with Acegi security framework, please if anyone knows how or
problems with the integration I will be thankful.
Because I didnt want to figure out how JBoss Portal URLs were generated, I
chose to use JbossAcegiLoginModule, which is a JAAS LoginModule that uses
Acegi Securitys AuthenticationManager. The benefit to this solution is
that the portal decides when authentication is needed. So I can use JBoss
P
I would like to request feedback on a JBoss Portal/CAS/Acegi Security
implementation. The implementation works now but I want to get feedback on
it. My implementation uses CAS 3.0.5, JBoss Portal 2.4.1-SP1, and Acegi
Security 1.0.2. Here's a walkthrough:
1. User requests portal page that requir
In the Acegi Security documentation for CAS
(http://acegisecurity.org/docbook/acegi.html#cas-server-3), the instructions
say:
"Copy Acegi-security.jar file into /localPlugins/lib."
I believe they should say:
"Copy Acegi-security.jar and Acegi-security-cas-1.0.2.jar files into
/localPlugins/lib."
There is some woefully out-of-date integration between Spring Portlet
MVC and Acegi available for Acegi 0.8.3 on the Spring Portlet MVC web
site:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/download/attachments/10/acegi-portlet.zip
I spoke with Ben Alex at the Spring Experience conference
Carlos,
Thanks for the reply, but I'm still confused, and concerned.
I tried using the exclusions, and it results in excluding all of that
artifact, including the version that I DO want. But then doesn't
exclude the related dependencies, such as *-aop, *-support, *-beans,
*-webmvc, etc. Surely,
Can the dependencies be listed as "provided" to avoid this? I would
doubt that most folks would be relying upon Acegi to be putting the
appropriate version of Spring in their classpath via maven2. I would
think they would be using a newer version of Spring than what the
dependency declares.
On
On 2/15/07, Kyle Mallory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Carlos,
>
> Thanks for the reply, but I'm still confused, and concerned.
>
> I tried using the exclusions, and it results in excluding all of that
> artifact, including the version that I DO want. But then doesn't exclude
> the related dep
