hi,
i use managed services to start my schedules.
before using that method i was using standard schedule services and restart the
service after changing dsm.opt file
what can i do to change dsm.opt and apply new changes to my schedules if i am
using Acceptor service? Should i restart
accepto
We use 3590 J's and K's. I've been asked what the lifespan of these tapes
are. I've seen where the shelf life might be 10-12 years, but have not been
able to find anything about the regular use of them. Our tapes are returned to
scratch when they become empty, so they are not private tapes. It'
You didn't mention the Maint Level of AIX 4.3.3. If you have less
than ML 10, then I would upgrade to that as one step.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17/02 05:15PM >>>
How strange.. I just went through something similar. Running on AIX
4.3.3,
TSM 4.2.1.7. What are you running?
The short
>ANR0535W Transaction failed for session 1356 for node
>SY00113 (AIX) - insufficient mount points available to
>satisfy the request.
>
>There is NOTHING else running on this TSM server. All 6 drives are online.
Nothing running can itself be an indication of things suspicious...
It may be that TSM
Hi,
I configured an TDP for Domino on OS/400 and I am unable query the server
successfully, when I issue the command domdsmc query adsmserver I get the
following error:
License file exists and contains valid license data.
ACD5221I The /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin/domdsm.log log file has
b
Hot Diggety! Matthew Glanville was rumored to have written:
> But, I have found bulk loading tapes with the door open on the 3584 is a
> problem when tapes are in the drives. I had to figure out which slots NOT
> to put tapes into because those are the slots that the tapes in the drives
> use. Whe
How strange.. I just went through something similar. Running on AIX 4.3.3,
TSM 4.2.1.7. What are you running?
The short answer was to reboot the AIX operating system, and everything
started working fine.. The long answer follows (well, not really an answer,
just my situation, and what I tried to
... Is that called a paradox or a conundrum?
I would call that a Catch-22.
At 20:02 -0600 12/16/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
>>If you're loading >10 tapes:
>>1. Leisurely stroll to the library, open it up, place all tapes directly
>>into empty slots into the library.
>>Even easier--there's no request to reply to.
>Yeah, but it requires taking the library offline while the
At 15:54 -0500 12/17/02, David Longo wrote:
I would also point out to the original issuer of this discussion that
if having more than 10 tapes is a problem, you can upgrade to a 30
slot I/O station,
We have the 30 slot station .. but it still doesn't improve the
process. The ACSLS approach is s
strange one... and ive looked at everything i can think of.
In client dsmerror.log:
12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1228E Sending of object
'/tibco/logs/hawk/log/Hawk4.log' failed
12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
12/17/02 15:01:57 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
I have question from NT administrator on system state backups ..
Can TSM backup system state ? if so what server/client versions are
supported ?
Thank You
SD
I would also point out to the original issuer of this discussion that
if having more than 10 tapes is a problem, you can upgrade to a 30
slot I/O station, just like on the 3494.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Z/OS 1.3; server 4.2.2.12 I saw mangled command text when I was retrieving
(i.e. f7 or up arrow) prior commands. I started testing a 5.1.5.4 client two
weeks ago and have not seen a mangled command since.
-Original Message-
From: William F. Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I didn't see anything but I'm going blind in my old age...
Is there any tsm client that will run on a Sequent box with DYNIX/ptx(R)
V4.4.4
Dwight
Geoff,
This is probably the base client scheduler
connecting as that node (probably for your
scheduled DP for Domino backups.)
That will also cause the platform to be changed to "WinNT"
on the filespace.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporati
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Remco Post wrote:
> So now the list is at fault when people choose to use e-mail clients that
> cannot behave. errr. Probably, people should start thinking about to who
This list adds a Reply-To: header pointing back to the list to each
message. That way,
> As far as the "platform" field... the TSM Server will update
> the platform for all filespaces under that node based upon
> the application that connected to it LAST. It looks like your
> "dev02" box must still have a BA client backing up to it
> using the same NODENAME as DP for Domino. I wouldn
Geoff,
Someone must have run a BA client backup using the same NODENAME.
DP for Domino will only create and use 2 filespaces per Domino server:
servername.DOMDBS
servername.DOMLOGS
As far as the "platform" field... the TSM Server will update the
platform for all filespaces under that node b
Thomas,
How long has your server been up since a halt of TSM.
I am on OS390 TSM Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 and I find that it does get
slower
the longer I leave it between a recycle.
So if its been a few weeks since your last, I would do that, as soon as you can.
John
Thomas Denier <[E
Tom, I have the same setup as you except the server is at 4.2.3.1.
I saw the same thing, mangled commands; I am glad someone else
saw it. I thought of opening a pmr, but didn't - it is too random and
not really a big deal.
Bill
At 02:44 PM 12/16/2002, you wrote:
>I recently installed 5.1.5.0 cl
We are running a TSM 4.2.1.9 server under OS/390. We are experiencing
serious performance problems, and I have not been able to find any
clear explanation. We currently have two late-running client backup
sessions and a backup stgpool process running. Neither client backup
uses the storage pools in
Geoff,
this is the case with q filespace. If you use q occupancy the picture is
different. As a system object ist not something like a drive there is no
capacity.
Best regards
Gerhard
---
Gerhard Rentschleremail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regional Computing Center tel. ++49/711/685 5806
U
Question:
How did everyone actually see the System Object problem in some releases
when everything I've seen always shows it at 0.0?
ARISTOTLE SYSTEM 4 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0
OBJECT
Thanks,
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Enginee
any idea how this works? or if tsm handles this?
pls let me know
--
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive
any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copyin
On 3 of 10 TDP Domino backups I can see filespaces listed within TSM that
belong to the C$ drive. See below. One of the 3 also shows the Platform as
WINNT, yet the others report as TDP Domino NT. I'm not sure how to see the
actual last time the filespace in question was backed up, since it doesn't
This has nothing to do with the end of life of the 3466. IBM always has
this type of program going; the purpose is to get more customers to buy
a new product. This is just a way for IBM to increase their revenue.
This past year they have had incentives for customers to migrate from
the 3590 B and E
If I understand you question right ...
We use Tivoli Storage Management (TSM)...
We have been using TSM for the last 7 or 8 years.
David C. Pearson
IS Production Support Analyst
System & Network Service
Snohomish County PUD # 1
<>
Phone: 425.347.4420
Pager: 425.290.0944
FAX: 425.267.6380
Hi TSMers,
I read this on the last daily notice.
Life is easier with the 3494 and the OS/2's library/tape managment program.
Is there a tape management system that helps manage Tivoli backups for
AIX??
Thanks, Roger
IBM U.S. announcements:
ItemDate Description
302-048 20020402 Modification: IBM Storage Machine Removal Program
102-165 20020611 IBM 3466 Model Conversions Enhance Flexibility
302-124 20020702 Modification: IBM Storage Machine Removal Program
302-216 20021105 Modification: IBM Storage Mac
Hi,
same for us, using about 1500 Ultrium, we got 3 completely lost tapes
(crumpled) and about 1 daily write error !
With Magstar, 1 error in last 4 years !
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support
At 20:02 -0600 12/16/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
Try this sequence instead (for <=10 tapes):
I don't see why that sequence is an improvement over the one Matthew
was complaining about. It requires the same number of actions (too
many). It is true that in either sequence, you have sixty minutes to
At 20:44 -0500 12/16/02, Richard Sims wrote:
There's a surprising amount of inconsistency as to the length of Ultrium tape,
as reported by various vendors - despite the supposed industry standard.
HP quotes 580 meters; others 609 or 610 meters (2000 feet).
Yesterday, we had the opportunity to fi
The rumour I heard was that the NSM hardware/software support was going to
be unbundled -- So after the upgrade to TSM 5.x, you are no longer forced to
maintain "NSM configuration compliance" to conform with the NSM support
scripts.
I see this as a good thing, because that means that you can use r
I hate to give a standard answer, but do you have antivirus software
installed.
Could be a bad dat file.
Mark B.
-Original Message-
From: Amini, Mehdi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE
Hi All,
I
Hi ,
are there any known problems with backup/restore a w2k cluster over san
(lanfree)
and which is the easiest way to "migrate" an existing w2k cluster from
backup over LAN
to lanfree backup?
we have two cluster nodes with 2 local disks each, and 4 managed cluster
goups. ( 6 tsm nodes)
how man
>The fact of the matter still remains that my IBM representative and an IBM
>business partner are telling me I have to move off of the 3466-C00 by April
>15, 2003. Seems the rest of the 3466 community is in the dark on this as
>much as I am. This should pan out to be a real debacle.
A *professio
The fact of the matter still remains that my IBM representative and an IBM
business partner are telling me I have to move off of the 3466-C00 by April
15, 2003. Seems the rest of the 3466 community is in the dark on this as
much as I am. This should pan out to be a real debacle.
Perhaps the IBM
Is the memory address shown in the Dr Watson report the same every time or
does it vary? If they are the same it is probably bad memory.
Marc.
"Burak Demircan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17-Dec-2002 12:25
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
i also suffer from the same problem. any help appreciated ?
regards
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I have a client NT 4 SP6 running TSM 5.1.5.4 When I login to this client
immediately I get a Dr. Watson Error on DSMCSVC.EXE
Access Violation (0Xc05) Address (0x004a5cb5)... This is the only
client out of our 80 clients that I get this message.
Any idea.
Thanks
Mehdi Amini
LAN/WAN
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:45:05 +0100
Gerhard Rentschler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> probably a change in the listserv config of this mailing list may help.
> Each mail I get from this list has the list as reply address. For replying
> to the sender you have to cut the mail address from the
Client 5.1.1
Win NT4 SP6
Server 5.1.1.4
AIX 4.3.3 ML10
We are working through the error messages we are getting from the Journal
service one at a time. Can't seem to find any information on this message at
all. Anyone have a link to anything that would give more information on
exactly what this m
Let's start from the beginning. How this came to your attention?
Especially for "all models".
You missed at least one - "IBM Announcement Letter No. ZG02-0381 dated June 11, 2002"
(I track EMEA Letters, you ought to easily find U.S one). There you can
find the following:
"Overview
To address your
--> probably a change in the listserv config ...
And with this "patch" you will solve the "me too"-problem at the cost of
introducing new huge problem - replies will be not to the list but to the
poster and discussions will be dead. Or we will have to change the address
of replies (more than 10k/y
Partial restores are only available in SQL server 2000. It is only possible
to do partial restores on full database backup objects.
When performing a partial restore, the primary file group must always be
restored, together with the other files you specify.
When doing a partial restore on a new ser
Hi,
I guess you could use different opt-files combined with different
command-lines, where preschedulecmd is defined in opt-file.
Rgds.
Geirr
-Original Message-
From: Leif Gustafsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16. december 2002 16:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: preschedulecmd
Hello,
probably a change in the listserv config of this mailing list may help. Each
mail I get from this list has the list as reply address. For replying to the
sender you have to cut the mail address from the mail and do a forward. This
is the case at least with Outlook.
It might help a little bit
Hi All
We wish to restore indiviudual filegroups from TDP for SQL from one database and
relocate it into another one.
Our environment:
Win2k TSM server
TSM 5.1.5.3 server
TDP for SQL 2.2.1.0
MSSQL 2000 service pack 2
We are able to restore SQL files/groups to the same
location via the gui but t
49 matches
Mail list logo