Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: 18 April 2008 15:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fw: TSM being abandoned?
A few more points:
- It's true that hardware compression is faster than software compression,
and off-loads the server. Har
A few more points:
- It's true that hardware compression is faster than software compression,
and off-loads the server. Hardware compression often is an extra-cost
item. This can also be true of encryption, if done in hardware. The
question is, where do you want to do your encryption? At the
Nicholas Cassimatis wrote:
> As an appliance, I call that Hardware, as in it's a device outside of the
> host getting the service, performing the service.
You can call an apple a pear, but that will not make it so.
Now, more to the point, of course an appliance doing exactly one task
(dedup incom
d by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM on 04/17/2008 04:02 PM
-
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/17/2008
02:29:00 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: Fw: TSM being abandoned?
>
> Curtis Preston
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 04/17/2008 02:34 PM
>
>
ay, April 17, 2008 10:58 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Fw: TSM being abandoned?
>
> Compression and encryption are also much faster in hardware than
software
> -
> especially when the software is running on a processor doing other
work.
> Nothing new under t
Compression and encryption are also much faster in hardware than software -
especially when the software is running on a processor doing other work.
Nothing new under the sun - it's just the same paradigm applied to a new
function.
Nick Cassimatis
- Forwarded by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IB
